Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 241(2): 154-161, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies describe the distribution of glaucoma and its risk factors in the general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Epidemiological findings from population-based studies were extrapolated for the situation in Germany, in order to estimate current and future prevalence of glaucoma by using official population statistics for Germany. RESULTS: The prevalence of glaucoma in the adult population above 40 years of age is currently 2.1%, resulting in 980 thousand subjects with glaucoma, plus at least one more million subjects with ocular hypertension (OHT). Two thirds of all glaucoma cases are above 70 years of age. By 2060, the prevalence of glaucoma will increase to 2.8%, due to the aging of the population. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a decrease in the population size, glaucoma will become more prevalent in the future.


Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Hipertensão Ocular , Adulto , Humanos , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Glaucoma/epidemiologia , Glaucoma/complicações , Hipertensão Ocular/epidemiologia , Hipertensão Ocular/etiologia , Prevalência , Envelhecimento , Pressão Intraocular
2.
Aging Ment Health ; 25(5): 946-953, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054296

RESUMO

Objectives: Little is known about the specific association of vision loss and psychosocial outcome measures in contrast to other health limitations. The aim of this study was to identify whether vision problems are associated with psychosocial outcomes among middle-aged and older adults and to compare it with the association between other chronic health conditions and psychosocial factors.Method: Cross-sectional data came from wave 5 (2014) of the German Ageing Survey which is a representative sample of non-institutionalized individuals ≥ 40 years in Germany. Psychosocial outcomes (life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, depressive symptoms, optimism, general self-esteem, and social isolation) were assessed using well-established and widely used scales. Self-rated trouble reading the newspaper due to vision problems and self-rated difficulties recognizing known people on the street due to vision problems were used as independent variables of interest.Results: Regressions showed that both 'vision problems: reading the newspaper' and 'vision problems: difficulties recognizing people' are consistently associated with worse psychosocial outcomes (decreased life satisfaction, decreased positive affect, increased negative affect, increased depressive symptoms, decreased optimism, decreased self-esteem and increased social isolation). In contrast, none of the physical illnesses was consistently associated with all psychosocial outcome measures.Conclusion: Adjusting for various potential confounders and in contrast to various chronic diseases, our findings emphasize an association between vision problems and worse psychosocial outcomes in middle-aged and older adults. Future longitudinal studies are needed to validate our findings.


Assuntos
Otimismo , Autoimagem , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 17(1): 98, 2019 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170975

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Most definitions of visual impairment focus on the status of the better-seeing eye only, but this approach might underestimate the influence of the worse-seeing eye on the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL). METHODS: We assessed distance-corrected visual acuity in both eyes and VRQoL using the "National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire" (NEI VFQ-25) in the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study. We calculated the Rasch-based visual functioning scale (VFS) and socioemotional scale (SES). We categorized the visual acuity of the better-seeing eye (BE) and worse-seeing eye (WE) as follows: (1) no visual impairment (VI) (< 0.32 logMAR)), (2) mild VI (0.32-0.5 logMAR), and (3) moderate to severe VI (> 0.5 logMAR). Next, the subjects were categorized as follows: both eyes with no VI (no/no), the better-seeing eye with no VI and the worse-seeing eye with mild VI (no/mild), no VI/severe VI (no/severe), both eyes with mild VI (mild/mild), light VI/severe VI (mild/severe), and both eyes with severe VI (severe/severe). We calculated the median scores for VFS and SES. We used linear regression to estimate the combined influence of BE/WE on VFS and SES. RESULTS: We included 11,941 participants (49.9% female, age range: 35-74 years) with information on VRQoL and visual acuity. The median VFS/SES scores were 90/100 (no/no VI group), 84/97 (no/mild group), 81/94 (no/severe group), 70/90 (mild/mild group), 67/74 (mild/severe group), and 63/76 (severe/severe group). These differences were supported by the regression analysis results. CONCLUSION: Relying on the function of the better-seeing eye considerably underestimates the impact of visual impairment on VRQoL.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Transtornos da Visão/psicologia , Acuidade Visual , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão
4.
Ophthalmology ; 125(8): 1149-1159, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29548645

RESUMO

TOPIC: To estimate the prevalence of nonrefractive visual impairment and blindness in European persons 55 years of age and older. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Few visual impairment and blindness prevalence estimates are available for the European population. In addition, many of the data collected in European population-based studies currently are unpublished and have not been included in previous estimates. METHODS: Fourteen European population-based studies participating in the European Eye Epidemiology Consortium (n = 70 723) were included. Each study provided nonrefractive visual impairment and blindness prevalence estimates stratified by age (10-year strata) and gender. Nonrefractive visual impairment and blindness were defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/60 and 20/400 in the better eye, respectively. Using random effects meta-analysis, prevalence rates were estimated according to age, gender, geographical area, and period (1991-2006 and 2007-2012). Because no data were available for Central and Eastern Europe, population projections for numbers of affected people were estimated using Eurostat population estimates for European high-income countries in 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: The age-standardized prevalence of nonrefractive visual impairment in people 55 years of age or older decreased from 2.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-3.10) from 1991 through 2006 to 0.92% (95% CI, 0.42-1.42) from 2007 through 2012. It strongly increased with age in both periods (up to 15.69% and 4.39% in participants 85 years of age or older from 1991 through 2006 and from 2007 through 2012, respectively). Age-standardized prevalence of visual impairment tended to be higher in women than men from 1991 through 2006 (2.67% vs. 1.88%), but not from 2007 through 2012 (0.87% vs. 0.88%). No differences were observed between northern, western, and southern regions of Europe. The projected numbers of affected older inhabitants in European high-income countries decreased from 2.5 million affected individuals in 2000 to 1.2 million in 2010. Of those, 584 000 were blind in 2000, in comparison with 170 000 who were blind in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increase in the European older population, our study indicated that the number of visually impaired people has decreased in European high-income countries in the last 20 years. This may be the result of major improvements in eye care and prevention, the decreasing prevalence of eye diseases, or both.


Assuntos
Baixa Visão/epidemiologia , Acuidade Visual , Pessoas com Deficiência Visual/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência
5.
Ophthalmology ; 122(7): 1489-97, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25983215

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate whether myopia is becoming more common across Europe and explore whether increasing education levels, an important environmental risk factor for myopia, might explain any temporal trend. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of population-based, cross-sectional studies from the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium. PARTICIPANTS: The E(3) Consortium is a collaborative network of epidemiological studies of common eye diseases in adults across Europe. Refractive data were available for 61 946 participants from 15 population-based studies performed between 1990 and 2013; participants had a range of median ages from 44 to 78 years. METHODS: Noncycloplegic refraction, year of birth, and highest educational level achieved were obtained for all participants. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤-0.75 diopters. A random-effects meta-analysis of age-specific myopia prevalence was performed, with sequential analyses stratified by year of birth and highest level of educational attainment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variation in age-specific myopia prevalence for differing years of birth and educational level. RESULTS: There was a significant cohort effect for increasing myopia prevalence across more recent birth decades; age-standardized myopia prevalence increased from 17.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6-18.1) to 23.5% (95% CI, 23.2-23.7) in those born between 1910 and 1939 compared with 1940 and 1979 (P = 0.03). Education was significantly associated with myopia; for those completing primary, secondary, and higher education, the age-standardized prevalences were 25.4% (CI, 25.0-25.8), 29.1% (CI, 28.8-29.5), and 36.6% (CI, 36.1-37.2), respectively. Although more recent birth cohorts were more educated, this did not fully explain the cohort effect. Compared with the reference risk of participants born in the 1920s with only primary education, higher education or being born in the 1960s doubled the myopia prevalence ratio-2.43 (CI, 1.26-4.17) and 2.62 (CI, 1.31-5.00), respectively-whereas individuals born in the 1960s and completing higher education had approximately 4 times the reference risk: a prevalence ratio of 3.76 (CI, 2.21-6.57). CONCLUSIONS: Myopia is becoming more common in Europe; although education levels have increased and are associated with myopia, higher education seems to be an additive rather than explanatory factor. Increasing levels of myopia carry significant clinical and economic implications, with more people at risk of the sight-threatening complications associated with high myopia.


Assuntos
Escolaridade , União Europeia/estatística & dados numéricos , Miopia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo
6.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 30(4): 305-15, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25784363

RESUMO

To estimate the prevalence of refractive error in adults across Europe. Refractive data (mean spherical equivalent) collected between 1990 and 2013 from fifteen population-based cohort and cross-sectional studies of the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium were combined in a random effects meta-analysis stratified by 5-year age intervals and gender. Participants were excluded if they were identified as having had cataract surgery, retinal detachment, refractive surgery or other factors that might influence refraction. Estimates of refractive error prevalence were obtained including the following classifications: myopia ≤-0.75 diopters (D), high myopia ≤-6D, hyperopia ≥1D and astigmatism ≥1D. Meta-analysis of refractive error was performed for 61,946 individuals from fifteen studies with median age ranging from 44 to 81 and minimal ethnic variation (98 % European ancestry). The age-standardised prevalences (using the 2010 European Standard Population, limited to those ≥25 and <90 years old) were: myopia 30.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 30.4-30.9], high myopia 2.7 % (95 % CI 2.69-2.73), hyperopia 25.2 % (95 % CI 25.0-25.4) and astigmatism 23.9 % (95 % CI 23.7-24.1). Age-specific estimates revealed a high prevalence of myopia in younger participants [47.2 % (CI 41.8-52.5) in 25-29 years-olds]. Refractive error affects just over a half of European adults. The greatest burden of refractive error is due to myopia, with high prevalence rates in young adults. Using the 2010 European population estimates, we estimate there are 227.2 million people with myopia across Europe.


Assuntos
Erros de Refração/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca
7.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 252(9): 1403-11, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566902

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the sex- and age-specific prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and its correlation with urban or rural residence in a large and relatively young European cohort. METHODS: We evaluated fundus photographs from participants in the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), a population-based, prospective, observational, single-centre study in the Rhineland-Palatine region in midwestern Germany. The participants were 35-74 years of age at enrolment. The fundus images were classified as described in the Rotterdam Study and were graded independently by two experienced ophthalmologists (CK and UBK) based on the presence of hard and soft drusen, retinal pigmentary abnormalities, and signs of atrophic or neovascular age-related macular generation (AMD). RESULTS: Photographs from 4,340 participants were available for grading. Small, hard drusen (<63 µm, stages 0b and 0c) were present in 37.4% of participants (95% confidence interval [CI], stage 0b, 31.6% [30.3-33.7]; stage 0c, 5.8% [5.1-6.5]). Early AMD (soft drusen, pigmentary abnormalities, stages 1-3) was present in 3.8% of individuals in the youngest age group (35-44 years) (95% CI, stage 1a, 0.4% [0.3-0.5%]; stage 1b, 3.2% [2.9-3.5%]; stage 2a, 0.1% [0.1-0.2%]; stage 2b, 0% [0-0.0%]; stage 3, 0.1% [0.1-0.2%]), whereas late AMD (stages 4a and 4b) did not appear in the youngest age group. In all age groups, signs of early AMD were detected in 11.9% of individuals (stage 1a, 2.1% [1.7-2.6]; stage 1b, 8.0% [7.2-8.8]; stage 2a, 1.0% [0.7-1.3]; stage 2b, 0.5% [0.3-0.7]; stage 3, 0.3% [0.2-0.6]). Late AMD (geographic atrophy or neovascular AMD) was found in 0.2% of individuals (stage 4a, 0.1 % [0.0-0.2]; stage 4b, 0.1% [0.0-0.2]). AMD increased significantly with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10). Sex, iris colour, and residence (rural vs. urban) were not associated with different rates of AMD. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the prevalence of AMD increased dramatically with age; however, although AMD is usually thought to occur after age 50, signs of early AMD were found in 3.8% of individuals in the youngest age group (younger than 45 years). This population-based sample is the first to provide substantial epidemiologic data from a large German cohort, including data on macular degeneration in younger age groups and incidence data after recall.


Assuntos
Degeneração Macular/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Degeneração Macular/classificação , Degeneração Macular/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fotografação , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Sexo , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Ophthalmic Res ; 51(2): 73-81, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24296831

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify and describe the most relevant obstacles to carrying out ophthalmic research in Germany. METHODS: Two research methods were used to assess current problems in ophthalmic research. First, 55 expert interviews were conducted with major stakeholders in ophthalmic research, and key problems were identified. An online questionnaire was then sent to 3,080 German ophthalmologists, of whom 927 responded by evaluating the current research situation within ophthalmology in Germany. We devised a score to rank areas of concern by multiplying the responders' rate, ranging between -3 ('I disagree completely') and +3 ('I fully agree'), with the percentage of response frequencies. The maximum possible score was 300. RESULTS: The lack of opportunities to combine clinical work and research (score: 231.8) as well as unattractive career perspectives (175.7) were identified as the most relevant problems. Further barriers were difficulties in acquiring research funds (155.7), organizational problems at the local level (143.7) and a lack of support for women (24.1; among women: 122.3). Potential improvement was expected in particular from exemption from clinical work for scientific purposes; this was found to be more appealing than more prestigious awards for research achievements. A widely held position was that research projects should focus more closely on common eye diseases, and that vision research needs a more prominent profile among politicians and in the public arena. CONCLUSION: Our findings may help to initiate improvements in both research performance and outcomes.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Financiamento Governamental , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Satisfação no Emprego , Oftalmologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Bibliometria , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Alemanha , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Oftalmologia/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 251(8): 2019-28, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23624617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main objectives of this analysis were to assess the treatment costs and to identify major cost drivers and factors predicting direct costs in German patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: This non-interventional cross-sectional study was conducted in two university hospitals and 13 ophthalmology practices in Germany regions (Bavaria, Rhineland-Palatinate, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hamburg and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) between May 2009 and January 2010 to assess resource utilisation in patients with OHT (ICD-10: 40.0) or POAG (ICD-10: 40.1) at early, moderate or advanced stages, according to the European Glaucoma Society classification Guidelines. Treatment patterns and direct costs were evaluated retrospectively for 5 years. Resource utilisation data (medication, hospitalisation, outpatient surgery, visits to ophthalmologists) were abstracted from the charts, and unit costs were applied to estimate direct costs per year (in Euros, 2009), calculated from the perspective of the statutory health insurance in Germany (Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung). Factors predicting costs were assessed in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four patients (17.5% OHT, 27.9% early, 22.7% moderate, and 31.8% advanced POAG), on average 67 years old (SD 11) were included in the study. Average total annual direct costs per patient for OHT were 226 (SD 117), for early POAG 423 (SD 647), moderate 493 (SD 385) and advanced POAG 809 (SD 877). Glaucoma-related medications and hospitalisation represented the two major components of direct costs, increasing with the progression of glaucoma. In addition to treatment switches (p = 0.0001), factors predictive of an increase in total direct costs included the number of hospital interventions (p < 0.0001), disease-state changes since the start of treatment (p = 0.05), and current disease state (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct costs of treatment are higher in glaucoma compared to OHT and further increase in more severe glaucoma states. Additional treatment changes are major contributing factors to the increased treatment costs of glaucoma. If intraocular pressure can be controlled over the long term, progression to moderate and advanced states avoided, and patients remain on initial treatments, treatment costs could decline due to reduced and less expensive healthcare resource utilisation.


Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/economia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Oftalmologia/economia , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Anti-Hipertensivos/economia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Progressão da Doença , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Cirurgia Filtrante/economia , Cirurgia Filtrante/métodos , Alemanha , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/classificação , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/diagnóstico , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Ocular/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Ocular/economia , Hipertensão Ocular/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tonometria Ocular , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Ophthalmologica ; 229(4): 227-34, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23614930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of severity of disease on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and early, moderate, or advanced primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: This multicenter study was conducted at 2 university hospitals and 13 ophthalmology practices in Germany. QoL data were assessed by the Health Utility Index (HUI3) and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25). RESULTS: 154 patients (17.5% OHT, 27.9% early, 22.7% moderate, and 31.8% advanced POAG) were included. The HUI3 scores for OHT, early, moderate, and advanced POAG were 0.87 ± 0.09, 0.85 ± 0.15, 0.75 ± 0.23, and 0.58 ± 0.32, respectively. Compared to a normal population matched by age and gender, for moderate and severe POAG a difference of -0.06 ± 0.24 and -0.19 ± 0.28, respectively, was observed. NEI-VFQ-25 scores illustrate different dimensions of the impact on QoL; reduced peripheral vision or difficulties to drive a car were more crucial to glaucoma patients than social factors. CONCLUSIONS: The key difference for QoL impairment in glaucoma lies between OHT/early POAG versus moderate/severe POAG, hence every possible effort needs to be made to prevent disease progression over this threshold.


Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/psicologia , Nível de Saúde , Hipertensão Ocular/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Acuidade Visual , Campos Visuais , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Ocular/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA