Complete Laparoscopic Type C2 Radical Surgery for Cervical Stump Cancer: No-Look and No-Touch Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Due to previous surgical history and subsequent adhesions between pelvic organs, surgery for cervical stump cancer (CSC) is technically more challenging than surgery for cervical cancer with an intact uterus.1 We aimed to illustrate the related anatomy, surgical steps and techniques of complete laparoscopic type C2 radical surgery (CLRS) for early-stage CSC. METHODS: CLRS for six patients with CSC was performed from January 2021 to January 2022. We demonstrated the detailed skills of parametrial management during CLRS for CSC in case 5 by means of a video. A 58-year-old woman diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIA1 CSC received CLRS through five operative ports (Fig. 1). RESULTS: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and gross appearance of the specimen are shown in Fig. 2. The median age and body mass index (BMI) of the six patients were 53 years and 23.8, respectively. The median blood loss was 275 mL; the median time of operation was 218 min; the median length of hospitalization was 15 days; and the median time to recover urinary function was 12 days. One patient underwent postoperative radiation for pathologically proven adenocarcinoma with deep stromal invasion,2 while the other five did not. After a median follow-up of 24 months, no patients experienced complications, recurrence, or death (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: This study details the skills of CLRS for CSC, especially space development and the 'no-look, no-touch' tumor-free principle. It is helpful for clinicians to perform safe and standardized surgery on patients with early-stage CSC. Fig. 1 Trocar placement of complete laparoscopic type C2 radical surgery for early-stage CSC. CSC cervical stump cancer, S superior, I inferior, R right, L left, U umbilicus Fig. 2 MRI scans and gross appearance of the specimen for case 5 with CSC at FIGO 2018 stage IIA1. The tumor lesion on the cervical stump is indicated by yellow arrows. a Axial T2-weighted image; b DKI image; c ADC map; d sagittal T2-weighted image; e sagittal T1-weighted image; f gross appearance of the surgical specimen. MRI magnetic resonance imaging, CSC cervical stump cancer, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, DKI diffusional kurtosis imaging, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and outcomes of patients with cervical stump cancer Patient no. Age at diagnosis (years) BMI Reasons for subtotal hysterectomy FIGO 2018 stage Histology Operation Operation time (mins) Blood loss (mL) Urinary catheter (days) Hospital stay (days) Complications Depth of invasion LVSI LNs dissected TNM stage Tumor size (mm) Postoperative radiotherapy Follow-up (months) Recurrence Death 1 50 25.9 Uterine myoma IIA1 ASC CLRS+PLND 221 360 10 12 No Middle one-third N 13 T2a1N0M0 16 No 30 No No 2 55 17.3 Uterine myoma IB1 AC CLRS+PLND 191 270 20 12 No Deep one-third N 24 T1b1N0M0 10 Yes 20 No No 3 50 24.8 Uterine myoma IB1 SC CLRS+PLND 295 310 13 15 No Superficial one-third N 21 T1b1N0M0 15 No 25 No No 4 63 30.1 Uterine myoma IB1 SC CLRS+PLND 213 180 6 16 No Superficial one-third N 25 T1b1N0M0 15 No 19 No No 5 58 20.2 Postpartum hemorrhage IIA1 SC CLRS+PLND 220 100 11 14 No Middle one-third N 21 T2a1N0M0 15 No 24 No No 6 46 22.7 Uterine myoma IB1 SC CLRS+PLND 215 120 14 17 No Superficial one-third N 26 T1b1N0M0 12 No 23 No No BMI body mass index, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ASC cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, AC cervical adenocarcinoma, SC cervical squamous carcinoma, CLRS+PLND complete laparoscopic radical surgery and pelvic node dissections, LVSI lymphovascular space invasion, N negative, LNs lymph nodes, TNM tumor node metastasis.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma Undergoing Various Postoperative Adjuvant Therapies.

Purpose: To investigate prognostic factors affecting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and to analyze the survival outcomes of patients with undifferentiated and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UDEC) who underwent various postoperative adjuvant therapies. Methods: The independent risk factors affecting CSS were studied using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and CSS in the presence of various postoperative treatments was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method based on the cohort with pathologically confirmed UDEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Meanwhile, the study included 18 cases with UDEC in our center and explored their molecular characteristics and prognosis. Results: Between 2000 and 2019, a total of 443 patients were included from the SEER database. The median CSS duration was 14 months, with corresponding 3- and 5-year CSS rates of 45.9% and 44.0%, respectively. Factors such as pTNM stage, surgical resection of primary lesion, and chemoradiation independently influenced CSS. Postoperative chemotherapy alone improved CSS in patients with initial tumor spread beyond the uterus (pT3 and pT4), or lymph node (LN) invasion, or distant metastases. Additionally, postoperative radiotherapy enhanced CSS in patients who had undergone postoperative chemotherapy, those with primary tumors progressing to stage pT3, and those with LN involvement but without distant metastases. Of the 18 patients diagnosed at our center, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months, one experienced relapse and two succumbed to UDEC, who exhibited aberrant p53 expression in immunohistochemical staining. Conclusion: Postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy are beneficial for UDEC patients with tumors extending beyond the uterus or involving lymph nodes.

Pharmacogenomics, Race, and Treatment Outcome in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Importance: Disparities in outcomes exist between Black and White patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with Black patients experiencing poorer prognosis compared with their White counterparts. Objective: To assess whether varying intensity of induction therapy to treat pediatric AML is associated with reduced disparities in treatment outcome by race. Design, Setting, and Participants: A comparative effectiveness analysis was conducted of 86 Black and 359 White patients with newly diagnosed AML who were enrolled in the AML02 trial from 2002 to 2008 or the AML08 trial from 2008 to 2017. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2023 through January 2024. Interventions: Patients in AML02 were randomly assigned to receive standard low-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy or augmented high-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy, whereas patients in AML08 received high-dose cytarabine-based therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cytarabine pharmacogenomic 10-single-nucleotide variant (ACS10) scores were evaluated for association with outcome according to race and treatment arm. Results: This analysis included 86 Black patients (mean [SD] age, 8.8 [6.5] years; 54 boys [62.8%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 52 600 [74 000] cells/µL) and 359 White patients (mean [SD] age, 9.1 [6.2] years; 189 boys [52.6%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 54 500 [91 800] cells/µL); 70 individuals with other or unknown racial and ethnic backgrounds were not included. Among all patients without core binding factor AML who received standard induction therapy, Black patients had significantly worse outcomes compared with White patients (5-year event-free survival rate, 25% [95% CI, 9%-67%] compared with 56% [95% CI, 46%-70%]; P = .03). By contrast, among all patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in outcome according to race (5-year event-free survival rate, Black patients, 50% [95% CI, 38%-67%]; White patients, 48% [95% CI, 42%-55%]; P = .78). Among patients who received standard induction therapy, those with low ACS10 scores had a significantly worse 5-year event-free survival rate compared with those with high scores (42.4% [95% CI, 25.6%-59.3%] and 70.0% [95% CI, 56.6%-83.1%]; P = .004); however, among patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in 5-year event-free survival rates according to ACS10 score (low score, 60.6% [95% CI, 50.9%-70.2%] and high score, 54.8% [95% CI, 47.1%-62.5%]; P = .43). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of pediatric patients with AML treated in 2 consecutive clinical trials, Black patients had worse outcomes compared with White patients after treatment with standard induction therapy, but this disparity was eliminated by treatment with augmented induction therapy. When accounting for ACS10 scores, no outcome disparities were seen between Black and White patients. Our results suggest that using pharmacogenomics parameters to tailor induction regimens for both Black and White patients may narrow the racial disparity gap in patients with AML.

Pharmacogenomic Score Effectively Personalizes Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE: Cytarabine (also known as ara-C) has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for over five decades. Recent pharmacogenomics-based 10-SNP ara-C score (ACS10) showed low ACS10 (£0) to be associated with poor outcome in AML patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated ACS10 score in the context of three different induction 1 regimens in pediatric AML patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ACS10 score groups (low,£0 or high,>0) were evaluated for association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by three randomized treatment arms in patients treated on the AML02 (NCT00136084) and AML08 (NCT00703820) clinical trials: AML02 low-dose cytarabine (LDAC arm, n=91), AML02+AML08 high-dose cytarabine (HDAC arm, n=194) and AML08 clofarabine+ cytarabine (Clo/Ara-C arm, n=105) induction 1 regimens. RESULTS: Within the low-ACS10 score (£0) group, significantly improved EFS and OS was observed among patients treated with Clo/Ara-C as compared to LDAC (EFS, HR=0.45, 95% CI, 0.23-0.88, p=0.020; OS, HR=0.44, 95% CI, 0.19-0.99, p=0.048). In contrast, within the high-ACS10 score group (score >0) augmentation with Clo/Ara-C was not favorable as compared to LDAC (Clo/Ara-C vs. LDAC, EFS, HR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.05-3.63, p=0.035; OS HR=2.17, 95%CI: 1.05-4.49; p=0.037). Personalization models predicted 9% improvement in outcome in ACS10 score-based tailored induction (Clo/Ara-C for low and LDAC for high-ACS10 groups) as compared to non-personalized approaches (p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that tailoring induction regimens using ACS10 scores can significantly improve outcome in patients with AML. Given the SNPs are germline, preemptive genotyping can accelerate matching the most effective remission induction regimen.

Integrated drug resistance and leukemic stemness gene-expression scores predict outcomes in large cohort of over 3500 AML patients from 10 trials.

In this study, we leveraged machine-learning tools by evaluating expression of genes of pharmacological relevance to standard-AML chemotherapy (ara-C/daunorubicin/etoposide) in a discovery-cohort of pediatric AML patients (N = 163; NCT00136084 ) and defined a 5-gene-drug resistance score (ADE-RS5) that was predictive of outcome (high MRD1 positivity p = 0.013; lower EFS p < 0.0001 and OS p < 0.0001). ADE-RS5 was integrated with a previously defined leukemic-stemness signature (pLSC6) to classify patients into four groups. ADE-RS5, pLSC6 and integrated-score was evaluated for association with outcome in one of the largest assembly of ~3600 AML patients from 10 independent cohorts (1861 pediatric and 1773 adult AML). Patients with high ADE-RS5 had poor outcome in validation cohorts and the previously reported pLSC6 maintained strong significant association in all validation cohorts. For pLSC6/ADE-RS5-integrated-score analysis, using Group-1 (low-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) as reference, Group-4 (high-scores for ADE-RS5 and pLSC6) showed worst outcome (EFS: p < 0.0001 and OS: p < 0.0001). Groups-2/3 (one high and one low-score) showed intermediate outcome (p < 0.001). Integrated score groups remained an independent predictor of outcome in multivariable-analysis after adjusting for established prognostic factors (EFS: Group 2 vs. 1, HR = 4.68, p < 0.001, Group 3 vs. 1, HR = 3.22, p = 0.01, and Group 4 vs. 1, HR = 7.26, p < 0.001). These results highlight the significant prognostic value of transcriptomics-based scores capturing disease aggressiveness through pLSC6 and drug resistance via ADE-RS5. The pLSC6 stemness score is a significant predictor of outcome and associates with high-risk group features, the ADE-RS5 drug resistance score adds further value, reflecting the clinical utility of simultaneous testing of both for optimizing treatment strategies.