Recurrence Prediction by Circulating Tumor DNA in the Patient with Colorectal Liver Metastases After Hepatectomy: A Prospective Biomarker Study.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rate after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains high. This study aimed to investigate postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) based on ultra-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) to predict patient recurrence and survival. METHODS: Using the high-throughput NGS method tagged with a dual-indexed unique molecular identifier, named the CRLM-specific 25-gene panel (J25), this study sequenced ctDNA in peripheral blood samples collected from 134 CRLM patients who underwent hepatectomy after postoperative day 6. RESULTS: Of 134 samples, 42 (31.3%) were shown to be ctDNA-positive, and 37 resulted in recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that disease-free survival (DFS) in the ctDNA-positive subgroup was significantly shorter than in the ctDNA-negative subgroup (hazard ratio [HR], 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-4.6; p < 0.05). When the 42 ctDNA-positive samples were further divided by the median of the mean allele frequency (AF, 0.1034%), the subgroup with higher AFs showed a significantly shorter DFS than the subgroup with lower AFs (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.85; p < 0.05). The ctDNA-positive patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy longer than 2 months showed a significantly longer DFS than those who received treatment for 2 months or less (HR, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.189-0.751; p < 0.05). Uni- and multivariable Cox regression indicated two factors independently correlated with prognosis: ctDNA positivity and no preoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that ctDNA status 6 days postoperatively could sensitively and accurately predict recurrence for patients with CRLM using the J25 panel.

Tumor attachment to Major intrahepatic vascular for Colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastases attached major intrahepatic vessels has been considered to be a risk factor for survival outcome after liver resection. The present study aimed to clarify the outcomes of R1 surgery (margin < 1 mm) in CRLM patients, distinguishing parenchymal margin R1 and attached to major intrahepatic vessels R1. METHODS: In present study, 283 CRLM patients who were evaluated to be attached to major intrahepatic vessels initially and underwent liver resection following preoperative chemotherapy. They were assigned to two following groups: R0 (n = 167), R1 parenchymal (n = 58) and R1 vascular (n = 58). The survival outcomes and local recurrence rates were analyzed in each group. RESULTS: Overall, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates after liver resection were 53.0% and 38.2% (median overall survival 37 months). Five-year overall survival was higher in patients with R0 than parenchymal R1 (44.9%% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.009), whereas there was no significant difference from patients with vascular R1 (34.3%, p = 0.752). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative chemotherapy > 4 cycles, clinical risk score 3-5, RAS mutation, parenchymal R1 and CA199 > 100 IU/ml were identified as independent predictive factors of overall survival (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for local recurrence among three groups. CONCLUSION: Parenchymal R1 resection was independent risk factor for CRLM. Vascular R1 surgery achieved survival outcomes equivalent to R0 resection. Non-anatomic liver resection for CRLM attached to intrahepatic vessels might be pursued to increase patient resectability by preoperative chemotherapy.

Prediction of Therapeutic Effect to Treatment in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and RECIST Criteria: A Pilot Study in Comparison between Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy and Standard Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are widely used for evaluating the therapeutic effect of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients, but showed undesirable accuracy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of functional MRI compared with RECIST criteria in predicting the therapeutic effect in CRLM patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab. METHODS: Overall, 137 patients with CRLM who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatic resection between January 2013 and November 2018 were included and were divided into the bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pre- and post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were generated on the whole-volume (ADCmean), periphery (ADCperi), and isocenter (ADCcentral) of the tumor at the maximum slice. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were used as prognostic indicators. RESULTS: Post-treatment ADCmean was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.008) in the bevacizumab group, while RECIST-defined response was found to be only significantly associated with RFS in the non-bevacizumab group (p = 0.042). When categorizing the bevacizumab group by the post-treatment ADCmean cut-off value of 1.15 ×10-3 mm2/s, patients in the ADC response group showed significantly better OS than the non-response group (3-year OS: 91.5% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between RECIST-defined response and non-response in either OS (3-year OS: 60.2% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.104) or RFS (3-year RFS: 26.2% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.129) in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSIONS: DWI-related parameters such as post-treatment ADCmean could accurately reflect the therapeutic effectiveness and predicting survival in patients treated with bevacizumab, which is superior to the RECIST criteria.

Circulating Lipid- and Inflammation-Based Risk (CLIR) Score: A Promising New Model for Predicting Outcomes in Complete Colorectal Liver Metastases Resection.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a determining factor affecting the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aims at developing a novel prognostic stratification tool for CRLM resection. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 666 CRC patients who underwent complete CRLM resection from two Chinese medical institutions between 2001 and 2016 were classified into the training (341 patients) and validation (325 patients) cohorts. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Associations between clinicopathological variables, circulating lipid and inflammation biomarkers, and OS were explored. The five most significant prognostic factors were incorporated into the Circulating Lipid- and Inflammation-based Risk (CLIR) score. The predictive ability of the CLIR score and Fong's Clinical Risk Score (CRS) was compared by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Five independent predictors associated with worse OS were identified in the training cohort: number of CRLMs >4, maximum diameter of CRLM >4.4 cm, primary lymph node-positive, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level >250.5 U/L, and serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio >2.9. These predictors were included in the CLIR score and each factor was assigned one point. Median OS for the low (score 0-1)-, intermediate (score 2-3)-, and high (score 4-5)-risk groups was 134.0 months, 39.9 months, and 18.7 months in the pooled cohort. The CLIR score outperformed the Fong score with superior discriminatory capacities for OS and RFS, both in the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The CLIR score demonstrated a promising ability to predict the long-term survival of CRC patients after complete hepatic resection.

Prognostic value of the combination of primary tumor location and RAS mutational status on patients with colorectal liver metastasis undergoing hepatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prognostic influences of RAS mutational status and primary tumor site on cases with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) who underwent hepatectomy. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of 762 patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy between January 2000 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The left-sided tumors (LST) included tumors located in the splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum; while right-sided tumors (RST) included those located in the cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon. RAS mutational status was determined using Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing, including KRAS (Codons 12, 13, and 61) and NRAS (Codons 12, 13, and 61), which were defined as wild-type (RASwt) and mutant-type (RASmut), respectively. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier plotter and compared by the log rank test. The clinicopathological data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the LST group was longer than that in the RST group (OS: 47.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.000, respectively), and the OS in the RASwt group was longer compared with that in the RASmut group (OS: 53.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.000). Besides, overall survival of the patients after hepatectomy was alternative, which was stratified by primary tumor site, with the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.1%, 62.1%, and 47.1% for patients with LST, and 91.1%, 42.8%, and 31.0% for patients with RST, respectively. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly different stratified by RAS mutational status, with the 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of 96.9%, 67.9%, and 53.6% for patients with RASwt tumors, and 85.7%, 41.5%, and 24.0% for patients with RASmut tumors, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 51.9%, 30.0%, and 26.7% for patients with RASwt tumors, and 35.8%, 18.2%, and 14.9% for patients with RASmut tumors, respectively. The results of multivariate analysis showed that RAS mutational status and primary tumor site were both independent influencing factors of OS. CONCLUSION: RAS mutational status and primary tumor site affect OS independently in CRLM patients undergoing hepatectomy. The worse prognosis of RST cannot be simply attributed to the imbalance of RAS mutational status in different primary tumor sites.

Perioperative second-line chemotherapy is beneficial for resectable liver metastases that occur during or early after adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with liver metastases during or early after adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is significantly worse. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of perioperative second-line chemotherapy in prolonging survival in those patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent liver resection, with resectable liver metastases that occurred within 12 months after the last cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC, from January 2006 to December 2019, were included. The long-term outcome of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between different groups was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included, of whom 112 underwent direct hepatectomy and 88 received upfront second-line chemotherapy. OS and PFS were significantly better in patients receiving upfront second-line chemotherapy than direct surgery (PFS, P = 0.016; OS, P = 0.013). Further analysis showed that perioperative second-line chemotherapy could provide a greater survival benefit, which was also confirmed by propensity score matching (OS: P = 0.03; PFS: P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis determined that perioperative second-line chemotherapy was an independent factor influencing OS (OR [95% CI]: 0.468 [0.294-0.744], P = 0.001) and PFS (OR [95% CI]: 0.517 [0.353-0.758], P = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Perioperative second-line chemotherapy could improve the survival of patients who underwent hepatectomy, with resectable liver metastases that occurred during or early after adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC.

Prognostic factors in colorectal liver metastases patients with various tumor numbers treated by liver resection: a single-center, retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple liver metastases is considered a risk factor for overall survival of colorectal liver metastases patients (CRLM) after curative resection. However, whether the prognostic factors were constant in patients with various liver metastases (LM) numbers has not been adequately investigated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the changing of prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) in CRLM patients with various LM after curative resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between January 2000 and November 2020 were retrospectively studied. They were divided into three subgroups according to LM numbers by X-tile analysis. Multivariable analysis identified prognostic factors in each subgroup. Nomograms were built using different prognostic factors in three subgroups, respectively. Performance of the nomograms was assessed according to the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. The abilities of different scoring systems predicting OS were compared by calculating the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1095 patients were included. Multivariable analysis showed tumor number increasing was an independent risk factor. Patients were subsequently divided into 3 subgroups according to the number of LM by X-tile analysis, namely solitary (n = 375), 2-4 (n = 424), and ≥ 5 (n = 296). The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 64.1% and 54.0% in solitary LM group, 58.1% and 41.7% in 2-4 LM group, and 50.9% and 32.0% in ≥ 5 LM group, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, RAS mutation was the only constant independent risk factor in all subgroups. The nomograms were built to predict survival based on independent factors in three subgroups. The C-index for OS prediction was 0.707 (95% CI 0.686-0.728) in the solitary LM group, 0.695 (95% CI 0.675-0.715) in the 2-4 LM group, and 0.687 (95% CI 0.664-0.710) in the ≥ 5 LM group. The time-dependent AUC values of nomograms developed using different risk factors after stratifying patients by tumor number were higher than the traditional scoring systems without patient stratification. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic factors varied among CRLM patients with different LM numbers. RAS mutation was the only constant risk factor. Building prediction models based on different prognostic factors improve patient stratification.

Long disease-free interval diminishes the prognostic value of primary tumor stage for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: It is assumed that the impact of primary tumor stage (PTS) on prognosis gradually weakens with increasing disease-free interval (DFI) from colorectal cancer resection to liver metastases. METHODS: Data from 733 patients undergoing hepatectomy in the Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery Department I of Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Early and late metastases were defined as DFI ≤ and >12 months, respectively. RESULTS: In early metastases group, patients with T4 stage had a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with T1-3 stage (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with N1-2 stage disease also demonstrated a worse RFS and OS than those with N0 stage (P = 0.006 and P = 0.007, respectively). In late metastases group, patients with T4 and T1-3 stages as well as patients with N1-2 and N0 stages, had comparable RFS (P = 0.395 and P = 0.996, respectively) and OS (P = 0.387 and P = 0.684, respectively). T and N stages were independent prognostic predictors only in patients with early metastases. CONCLUSION: The impact of PTS on prognosis is diminished with increasing DFI and limited only to patients with early metastases.

Deep learning-assisted magnetic resonance imaging prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Accurate evaluation of tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy is crucial for assigning appropriate patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to surgery or conservative therapy. However, there is no well-recognized method for predicting pathological response before surgery. Our study constructed and validated a deep learning algorithm using prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict pathological response in CRLM. CRLM patients from center one who had ≤5 lesions and were scheduled to receive preoperative chemotherapy followed by liver resection between January 2013 and November 2016, were included prospectively and chronologically divided into a training cohort (80% of patients) and a testing cohort (20% of patients). Patients from center two were included January 2017 and December 2018 as an external validation cohort. MRI-based models were constructed to discriminate according to pathology tumor regression grade (TRG) between the response (TRG1/2) and nonresponse (TRG3/4/5) groups at the lesion level. From center one, 155 patients (328 lesions) were included; chronologically, 101 (264 lesions) in the training cohort and 54 (64 lesions) in the testing cohort. The model achieved better accuracy (0.875 vs 0.578) and AUC (0.849 vs 0.615) than RECIST for discriminating response; it also distinguished the survival outcomes after hepatectomy better than the RECIST criteria. Evaluations of the external validation cohort (25 patients, 61 lesions) also showed good ability with an AUC of 0.833. In conclusion, the MRI-based deep learning model provided accurate prediction of pathological tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with CRLM and may inform individualized treatment.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Preoperatively Estimate Post-hepatectomy Liver Dysfunction Risk and Long-term Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a nomogram to estimate the risk of SPLD (International Study Group of Liver Surgery definition grade B or C) and long-term survival in patients with HCC before hepatectomy. BACKGROUND: SPLD is the leading cause of post-hepatectomy mortality. The decision to refer an HCC patient for hepatectomy is mainly based on the survival benefit and SPLD risk. Prediction of SPLD risk before hepatectomy is of great significance. METHODS: A total of 2071 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC were recruited and randomly divided into the development cohort (n = 1036) and internal validation cohort (n = 1035). Five hundred ninety patients from another center were enrolled as the external validation cohort. A nomogram was developed based on independent preoperative predictors of SPLD determined in multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The SPLD incidences in the development, internal, and external validation cohorts were 10.1%, 9.5%, and 8.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified total bilirubin, albumin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, prothrombin time, clinically significant portal hypertension, and major resection as independent predictors for SPLD. Incorporating these variables, the nomogram showed good concordance statistics of 0.883, 0.851, and 0.856, respectively in predicting SPLD in the 3 cohorts. Its predictive performance in SPLD, 90-day mortality, and overall survival (OS) outperformed Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease, albumin-bilirubin, and European Association for the Study of the Liver recommended algorithm. With a nomogram score of 137, patients were stratified into low and high risk of SPLD. High-risk patients also had decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram showed good performance in predicting both SPLD and OS. It could help surgeons select suitable HCC patients for hepatectomy.

Characterization of genomic alterations in Chinese colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The exploration of genomic alterations in Chinese colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is limited, and corresponding genetic biomarkers for patient's perioperative management are still lacking. This study aims to understand genome diversification and complexity that developed in CRLM. METHODS: A custom-designed IDT capture panel including 620 genes was performed in the Chinese CRLM cohort, which included 396 tumor samples from metastatic liver lesions together with 133 available paired primary tumors. RESULTS: In this Chinese CRLM cohort, the top-ranked recurrent mutated genes were TP53 (324/396, 82%), APC (302/396, 76%), KRAS (166/396, 42%), SMAD4 (54/396, 14%), FLG (52/396, 13%) and FBXW7 (43/396, 11%). A comparison of CRLM samples derived from left- and right-sided primary lesions confirmed that the difference in survival for patients with different primary tumor sites could be driven by variations in the transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and RAS signaling pathways. Certain genes had a higher variant rate in samples with metachronous CRLM than in samples with simultaneous metastasis. Overall, the metastasis and primary tumor samples displayed highly consistent genomic alterations, but there were some differences between individually paired metastases and primary tumors, which were mainly caused by copy number variations. CONCLUSION: We provide a comprehensive depiction of the genomic alterations in Chinese patients with CRLM, providing a fundamental basis for further personalized therapy applications.

A Prognostic Scoring System to Predict Survival Outcome of Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases in this Modern Era.

BACKGROUND: An individualized treatment decision is based on the accurate evaluation of clinical risk factors and prognosis for resectable colorectal liver metastases. The current study aimed to develop an effective nomogram to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and to design a treatment schedule preoperatively. METHODS: The study enrolled a primary cohort of 532 patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatic resection at two institutions and a validation cohort of 237 patients at two additional institutions with resectable CRLM between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. A nomogram was created based on the independent predictors in the multivariable analysis of progression-free survival in the primary cohort. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the concordance index (C-index) and the calibration curve. The score was compared with the current standard Fong score and validated with an external cohort. RESULTS: The independent risk factors for CRLM patients identified in the multivariable analysis were tumor larger than 5 cm, more than one tumor, RAS mutation, primary lymph node metastasis, and primary tumor located on the right side. All five factors were considered in the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.696. With external validation, the C-index of the nomogram for the prediction of the PFS was 0.682, which demonstrated that this model has a good level of discriminative ability. For high-risk patients (score > 16), neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved PFS and overall survival (OS) after hepatic resection. CONCLUSION: The current nomogram demonstrated an accurate performance in predicting PFS for resectable CRLM patients with liver-limited disease. Based on the current nomogram, high-risk patients (nomogram score > 16) might benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound Improved Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has improved in recent years, therefore the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging, preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography), intraoperative ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of CRLM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible trials published before 30 March 2020 were identified from the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, and descriptive and quantitative data were extracted. Study quality was evaluated for the identified studies and a random-effects model was used to determine the integrated diagnosis estimation. Meta-regression was implemented to explore the possible contributors to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Overall, 13 studies were included for analysis, comprising 682 patients with a total of 2303 liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.97), 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), and 79 (95% CI 32-196), respectively. The overall weighted area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97). In univariate meta-regression analysis, disappearing liver metastasis, contrast agent, and Kupffer phase were the potent sources of heterogeneity; however, in multivariate meta-regression, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for screening CRLM.

The prognostic impact of resection margin status varies according to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical margin status remains a controversial factor in predicting the outcome of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection. Our study aims to evaluate the effects of surgical margins on oncologic outcomes with regard to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score. METHODS: R1 resection was defined as having a less than 1 mm margin width. Patients who underwent surgery for CRLM from January 2005 to December 2018 were recruited. The patients were divided into two risk subgroups, namely, the low or medium risk (GAME 0-3) and high-risk (GAME score 4 or more) groups. The effects of margin status on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) were examined. RESULTS: In total, 661 patients were recruited, among which 159 (24.1%) had R1 resection. Before hepatectomy, 514 patients showed a low or medium risk (R1 resection: n = 124), while 147 patients demonstrated a high risk (R1 resection: n = 35). In the whole cohort, multivariable analysis did show that R1 resection was associated with worse RFS and OS. While further research only found that in the low or medium risk group, R1 resection was related to poor OS and RFS. Meanwhile, in the high risk group, no significant difference was found in the median OS and RFS among patients with R0 or R1 resection. CONCLUSION: The prognostic role of margin status varied according to the GAME score. Margin clearance only improved survival rates in patients with low or medium GAME score. In contrast, R1 resection demonstrated similar oncologic outcomes with R0 resection in patients with high GAME score.

Preoperative CA19-9: a competitive predictor of recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: The role of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients is still unclear. The present study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative CA19-9 in those patients. METHODS: A total of 691 CRLM patients were included in this study. X-tile analyses were performed to determine the optimal cut-off values of CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Prognostic predictors were identified by multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values of CA19-9 and CEA for 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 35.24 U/ml and 20.4 ng/ml, respectively. Patients with high-level CA19-9 had significantly worse RFS and overall survival (OS) than those with low-level CA19-9 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). In addition, patients with high-level CA19-9 had poor RFS and OS (P = 0.028 and P = 0.011, respectively) at low-level CEA. Multivariate analyses confirmed that preoperative CA19-9 was an independent predictor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.295; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.043-1.607; P = 0.019) but not for OS (HR 1.213; 95% CI 0.902-1.631; P = 0.201). CONCLUSION: CA19-9 is a promising predictor of recurrence for CRLM patients undergoing hepatectomy, and an effective supplement for patients with low-level CEA.

Recurrent colorectal liver metastasis patients could benefit from repeat hepatic resection.

BACKGROUND: Local treatment remains the best option for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The current study aimed to investigate predictive factors of survival outcomes and select candidates for local treatment for CRLM at first recurrence. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from CRLM patients who underwent hepatic resection and developed first recurrence between 2000 and 2019 at our institution.A nomogram predicting overall survival was established based on a multivariable Cox model of clinicopathologic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the concordance index and calibration curve. RESULTS: Among 867 patients who underwent curative hepatic resection, 549 patients developed recurrence. Three hundred patients were evaluated and had resectable and liver-limited disease. Among them, repeat liver resection and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation were performed in 88 and 85 patients, respectively. The other 127 patients received only systemic chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis identified primary lymph node positivity, tumor size > 3 cm, early recurrence, RAS gene mutation and no local treatment as independent risk factors for survival outcomes. Integrating these five variables, the nomogram presented a good concordance index of 0.707. Compared with patients who received only systemic chemotherapy, radical local treatment did not significantly improve survival outcomes (median OS: 21 vs. 15 months, p = 0.126) in the high-risk group (total score ≥ 13). CONCLUSION: Radical local treatment improved the survival of recurrent CRLM patients. The proposed model facilitates personalized assessments of prognosis for patients who develop first recurrence in the liver.

En bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for right-sided colon cancer invading duodenum.

BACKGROUND: En bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy (RHCPD) is the optimum treatment to achieve the adequate margin of resection (R0) for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer with duodenal invasion. Information regarding the indications and outcomes of this procedure is limited. METHOD: In this retrospective study, 2269 patients with right colon cancer underwent radical right colectomy between October 2010 and May 2019, in which 19 patients underwent RHCPD for LARCC were identified. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), operative mortality, postsurgical complications, gene mutational analysis, and prognostic factors were evaluated. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meir method. RESULTS: Of these 19 patients who underwent LARCC, the OS was 88%, 66%, and 58% at 1, 3, and 5 years. The DFS was 72%, 56%, and 56% at 1, 3, and 5 years. The median operative time was 320 min (range: 222-410 min), and the median operative blood loss was 268 mL (range: 100-600 mL). The OS was significantly better among patients with well-differentiated tumor, N0 stage, and high microsatellite instability (MSI) and in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The major postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (42%), with pancreatic fistula (PF) being the most common. On the basis of the univariate analysis, poorly differentiated tumor, regional lymph node dissemination, MSI status, and no perioperative chemotherapy were the significant predictors of poor survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that RHCPD is feasible and can achieve complete tumor clearance with favorable outcome, particularly in patients with lymph node-negative status.

Liver resection for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on the role of hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients compared to matched younger patients. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2018, 724 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases. Based on a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) model, 64 elderly patients (≥ 70 years of age) were matched to 128 younger patients (< 70 years of age) to obtain two balanced groups with regard to demographic, therapeutic, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: There were 73 elderly and 651 younger patients in the unmatched cohort. Compared with the younger group (YG), the elderly group (EG) had significantly higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists score III and comorbidities and lower proportion of more than 3 liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.05). After PSM for these factors, rat sarcoma virus proto-oncogene/B-Raf proto-oncogene (RAS/BRAF) mutation status and primary tumor sidedness, the EG had significantly less median intraoperative blood loss than the YG (175 ml vs. 200 ml, p = 0.046), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.020), and a higher readmission rate (4.7% vs.0%, p = 0.036). The EG also had longer disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to the YG, but these findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Old age was not an independent factor for DFS, OS, and CSS by Cox multivariate regression analysis (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy is safe for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients, and these patients may subsequently benefit from prolonged DFS, OS, and CSS.

Comparison of sequential, delayed and simultaneous resection strategies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the perioperative safety and long-term survival of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases undergoing sequential resection (SeR), delayed resection (DeR) and simultaneous resection (SiR). METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2016, data from patients undergoing surgery at Peking University Cancer Hospital for synchronous colorectal liver metastases were retrospectively collected. The above three different surgical strategies were compared. RESULTS: A total of 233 cases were included, with 49 in the SeR group, 98 in the DeR group and 86 in the SiR group. The incidence of severe complications was 26.7% in the SiR group, higher than that in the DeR group (11.2%, P = 0.007) and the SeR group (16.3%, P = 0.166). The overall survival at 1 and 3 years in the SeR group (93.9 and 50.1%) was lower than that in the DeR group (94.9 and 64.8%, P = 0.019), but not significantly different from that in the SiR group (93.0 and 55.2%, P = 0.378). Recurrence-free survival at 1 and 3 years in the SeR group (22.4 and 18.4%) was lower than that in the DeR group (43.9 and 24.2%, P = 0.033) but not significantly different from that in the SiR group (31.4 and 19.6%, P = 0.275). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that T4, lymph node-positive primary tumour, liver metastases > 30 mm and SiR (compared with DeR) were correlated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous resection has a relatively higher incidence of severe complications, and with a staged resection strategy, the prognosis of delayed resection was better than that of sequential resection.

The individualized selection of Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy has markedly decreased but remains an important challenge for the complexity of operation and technical skills involved. The present study aimed to clarify the impact of individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and management to postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS: Data from 529 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were retrospectively analysed from the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking Cancer Hospital. The pancreaticoenteric anastomosis was determined based on the pancreatic texture and diameter of the main pancreatic duct. The amylase value of the drainage fluid was dynamically monitored postoperatively on days 3, 5 and 7. A low speed intermittent irrigation was performed in selected patients. Intraoperative and postoperative results were collected and compared between the pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) group and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) group. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2019, 529 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in 364 patients; pancreaticojejunostomy was performed in 150 patients respectively. The clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) was 9.8% and mortality was zero. The soft pancreas, diameter of main pancreatic duct≤3 mm, BMI ≥ 25, operation time > 330 min and pancreaticogastrostomy was correlated with postoperative pancreatic fistula significantly. The CR-POPF of PJ was significantly higher than that of PG in soft pancreas patients; the operation time of PJ was shorter than that of PG significantly in hard pancreas patients. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time of PG was less than that of PJ significantly in normal pancreatic duct patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis should be determined based on the pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter. The appropriate anastomosis and postoperative management could prevent mortality.