Unincreased mortality of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis compared to the general population in the past 17 years: Analyses from the IORRA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to investigate the mortality rate of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the past 17 years. METHODS: Japanese patients with early RA enrolled in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort from 2001 to 2012 were classified into Groups A (2001-06) and B (2007-12). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 5-year survival rate were calculated. RESULTS: Groups A and B had 1609 and 1608 patients, of which 167 and 178 patients were lost during follow-up and 47 and 45 deaths were confirmed, respectively. The SMR (95% confidence intervals) for Groups A and B were 0.81 (0.59-1.08) and 0.78 (0.57-1.04), respectively, with the condition that all untraceable patients were alive. Assuming that the mortality rate of untraceable patients was twice as high as that of the general population, the SMR was 0.90 (0.68-1.19) for Group A and 0.92 (0.68-1.23) for Group B. The 5-year survival rates were 96.9% and 97.0% for Groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year mortality of patients with early RA has been comparable to that of the general Japanese population. The 5-year survival rate has been stable over the past 17 years.

Factors contributing to the improvement in J-HAQ after 3 years of treatment with abatacept in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients: Interim results of a long-term, observational, multicentre study in Japan (ORIGAMI).

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and factors affecting Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) improvement during abatacept treatment in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: The ORIGAMI study is an ongoing observational study of biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate disease activity treated with subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg, once-weekly). Patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were extracted from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry as an historical, weighted control group. The primary endpoint for this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with J-HAQ remission (score ≤0.5) at 3 years. RESULTS: Among 279 abatacept-treated and 220 csDMARD-treated patients, J-HAQ remission was achieved at 3 years in 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.7%-46.2%) and 28.9% (95% CI 9.9%-47.8%), respectively. Age, RA duration <1 year, baseline J-HAQ score, and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 6 months were associated with 3-year J-HAQ remission in the abatacept group. Overall, 24/298 patients (8.1%; safety analysis set) experienced serious adverse drug reactions with an incidence of 5.3 per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 3-year effectiveness and safety, and revealed potential factors associated with J-HAQ remission in biologic-naïve RA patients treated with abatacept in real-world clinical practice.

Associations of disease duration and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Post hoc analysis of a multicentre, real-world observational study in Japan (ORIGAMI).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the article is to investigate the associations of disease duration and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses of the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study of biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥20 years with moderate disease activity who were prescribed abatacept. Changes in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at 4, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment were analysed in patients divided according to ACPA serostatus (positive/negative), disease duration (<1/≥1 year), or both. RESULTS: SDAI scores decreased from baseline in all groups. SDAI scores tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group and disease duration <1-year group than in the ACPA-negative group and disease duration ≥1-year group, respectively. In the disease duration <1-year group, SDAI tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group than in the ACPA-negative group. Disease duration was independently associated with the change in SDAI and SDAI remission at Week 52 in multivariable regression models. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that starting abatacept within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with greater effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with RA and moderate disease activity.

Subjective symptoms contributing to the quality of life of rheumatoid arthritis patients with clinical remission from the IORRA database.

OBJECTIVES: To explore patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to quality of life (QOL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved clinical remission. METHODS: In the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis dataset, RA patients >18 years old who met the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission criteria in April 2017 were enrolled in this analysis. Pain-visual analogue scale (pain-VAS) (0-100 mm), patient's global assessment of disease activity (Pt-GA; 0-100 mm), Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, duration of morning joint stiffness, and fatigue [Checklist Individual Strength 8R (CIS)] were the tools used to evaluate PROs. To assess the contribution of each PRO to the European QOL-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) score, an analysis of variance was conducted. RESULTS: Among the 2443 patients with remission, the mean EQ-5D-5L was 0.9. The mean pain-VAS and Pt-GA were 7.2 and 7.4, respectively. Factors that significantly contributed to the EQ-5D-5L were pain-VAS (48.8%), CIS score (18.1%), and Pt-GA (15.6%). Around 82.5% of the variance in EQ-5D-5L was explained by the three PROs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that pain-VAS, CIS, and Pt-GA were significant contributors to the EQ-5D-5L score in patients with RA who achieved the simplified disease activity index remission criteria.

Association between patient-reported outcomes and impairments in work and activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: A retrospective analysis using the IORRA database.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission. METHODS: We enrolled patients with RA ≥18 years and with a simplified disease activity index ≤3.3 from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis data set collected in October 2017. The pain-visual analogue scale, patients' global assessment visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese version of the Healthcare Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) Disability Index, and duration of morning joint stiffness were selected as the PROs. To evaluate work productivity and activity, the WPAI for RA instrument (WPAI-RA) was used. To assess the contribution of each PRO to the WPAI-RA score, an analysis of variance model was constructed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 2614 patients was 62.4 years; 85.1% were female. Median values of the WPAI-RA score were 1.1% for absenteeism, 6.5% for presenteeism, 7.4% for work impairment, and 10.2% for activity impairment. Morning joint stiffness contributed the most to absenteeism (18.0%), while pain-VAS contributed the most to presenteeism (57.4%), work productivity loss (51.1%), and daily activity impairment (53.7%). J-HAQ was the second most contributing factor to presenteeism (17.4%), work productivity loss (16.3%), and daily activity impairment (26.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The pain-VAS and J-HAQ highly contributed to WPAI in patients with RA in clinical remission.

Socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We analysed data retrospectively from the prospective observational CorEvitas RA Japan Registry (March 2016-February 2020). Patients were categorised into paid workers (PWs) and home workers (HWs) and further based on drug classes. We assessed medication persistence, treatment outcomes, health care resource utilisation, and socioeconomic impact over 12 months, including direct (drugs and health care resource utilisation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs. RESULTS: Overall, 187 PWs and 114 HWs were identified. Over 12 months, medication persistence was high, treatment outcomes improved, and outpatient visits reduced in both groups. Following treatment initiation, direct costs increased, whereas indirect (loss of productivity) costs decreased in both groups. The unadjusted socioeconomic impact [Japanese yen (JPY)] increased across all drug classes in PWs (range: 29,700-151,700) and HWs (range: -28,700 to 83,000). Adjusted change in monthly socioeconomic impact was JPY 29,700-138,900 for PWs and JPY -28,000 to 92,800 for HWs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the socioeconomic burden increased across patient groups and drug classes. The decrease in indirect (loss of productivity) costs partially offset the increase in direct costs.

Contribution of the factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving low disease activity/remission with abatacept treatment: post-hoc subgroup analyses of the Japanese real-world observational "ORIGAMI" study.

OBJECTIVES: To address improvements in quality of life (QOL), we analysed the relative contributions of factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in abatacept-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the ORIGAMI study. METHODS: Patients who were evaluable for disease activity through to Week 52 in the ORIGAMI study were divided into those achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index-remission/low disease activity (remission/LDA; n=178) and patients with moderate/high disease activity (MDA/HDA; n=99). We compared the changes in EQ-5D and other outcomes through to Week 52. Focusing on the remission/LDA group, the contribution of each factor to the variance of EQ-5D at baseline and Week 52 was examined using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The remission/LDA group showed greater improvements than the MDA/HDA group in EQ-5D, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain (Pain VAS), and patient global assessment (PtGA). In the remission/LDA group, factors significantly contributing to EQ-5D were sex, C-reactive protein, and Pain VAS at baseline, and PtGA and age at Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients who achieved remission/LDA during abatacept treatment, PtGA and age at Week 52 contribute to the variance of EQ-5D, suggesting that identification of factors associated with PtGA may be important to address improvements of QOL.

Evaluation of RABBIT risk score in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting first bDMARDs: a validation study using the IORRA cohort data.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score to predict the occurrence of serious infections in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), after initiating their first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD). METHODS: We used data from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort from 2008 to 2020. Patients with RA who were started on their first bDMARDs were included. Those with missing data required to calculate the score were excluded. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the RABBIT score. RESULTS: A total of 1,081 patients were enrolled. During the one-year observational period, 23 (1.7%) patients had serious infections; the most frequent one was bacterial pneumonia (n=11, 44%). The median RABBIT score in the serious infection group was significantly higher than that in the non-serious infection group (2.3 [1.5-5.4] vs 1.6 [1.2-2.5], p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for the occurrence of serious infections was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.79), suggesting that the score had low accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our present study revealed that the RABBIT risk score did not have sufficient discriminatory ability for predicting the development of severe infections in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initiating their first bDMARD.

Trends in risks of malignancies in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Analyses from a 14-year observation of the IORRA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim is to investigate the trends in risks of overall and site-specific malignancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Among Japanese patients with RA enrolled in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort, all malignancies that occurred from 2000 to 2013 were extracted. The standardized incidence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall and site-specific malignancies were calculated during three periods: pre-biologics, 2000-04; early biologics, 2005-09; and recent biologics, 2010-13. Risk factors for overall and specific malignancies were analysed using time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among 11,299 patients with RA (68,483 person-years), 507 malignancies were confirmed. Similar risks were observed versus the general Japanese population for overall malignancies throughout the three periods, with standardized incidence ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.96 (0.80-1.14) in the pre-biologics period, 0.95 (0.82-1.09) in the early biologics period, and 0.87 (0.75-1.01) in the recent biologics period. A significantly increased risk for malignant lymphoma was observed throughout the observation period (standardized incidence ratio 4.61, 95% confidence interval 3.58-5.85). The disease activity was a significant risk factor for overall malignancies and lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the expanding use of methotrexate and biologics, there were no increases in malignancy risk in Japanese patients with RA.

Long-term evaluation of E6011, an anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, a humanized anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: In the double-blind treatment phase (24 weeks), placebo or E6011 400 mg was administered until Week 10. Thereafter, E6011 200 mg or 400 mg was administered to Week 22. Subjects who completed the evaluation at Week 24 of the treatment phase were rolled over into the extension phase. The extension phase lasted until Week 104, and all subjects received E6011 400 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks in an open-label manner until Week 102. RESULTS: A total of 47 subjects completed the double-blind treatment phase and were rolled over into the extension phase. In total, 46 (97.9%) subjects experienced any adverse events, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 57.4%. No clear efficacy trend in the American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 was well tolerated in active rheumatoid arthritis patients who had shown an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, but no clear benefit in the American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates was observed. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical benefit of E6011.

Long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, an anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of E6011, a humanized anti-fractalkine monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Active RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX were randomly assigned to the E6011 or placebo group and received the study drug subcutaneously every 2 weeks during a 24-week double-blind study period. Subjects who completed evaluations at Week 24 were rolled over into the extension phase and received open-label E6011 (200 or 400 mg) every 2 weeks until Week 102. The safety analysis was conducted up to Week 104, and the efficacy analysis was conducted up to Week 84. RESULTS: A total of 169 subjects completed the double-blind treatment phase and were rolled over into the extension phase. In total, 167 (98.8%) subjects experienced any adverse events, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 56.2%. The American College of Rheumatology 20 response rates were observed between 40 and 70% during the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS: E6011 was safe and well tolerated with no notable safety concerns up to 102 weeks in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.

Non-drug and surgical treatment algorithm and recommendations for the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to update the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prepare an algorithm for non-drug and surgical treatments. This article is a digest version of the guidelines. METHODS: The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's research group, in collaboration with the JCR, used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to update the 2014 JCR CPG for RA. The consensus was formed by CPG panel members. RESULTS: We raised 19 clinical questions regarding non-drug and surgical treatments for RA and developed recommendations. The treatments included exercise therapy; occupational therapy; joint injection of corticosteroids; and orthopaedic surgeries including cervical spine surgery, wrist and foot arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis, and replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder, elbow, finger, hip, knee, and ankle. Recommendations regarding the risks of surgery and perioperative discontinuation of medications have also been developed. Based on these recommendations, we created an original algorithm for the non-drug and surgical treatment of RA. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are expected to serve rheumatologists, health care professionals, and patients with RA as tools for shared decision-making to treat residual limb joint symptoms and functional impairment.

Drug treatment algorithm and recommendations from the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to update the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA; JCR CPG for RA) according to recent changes in the medical environment in Japan. This article is a digest version of the guidance. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to update the 2014 JCR CPG for RA. A consensus was formed by CPG panel members. RESULTS: We identified 36 important clinical questions regarding drug treatment and developed corresponding recommendations for RA. The recommendations included the following RA medications: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, anti-receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand antibodies, and Janus kinase inhibitors, as well as the tapering and discontinuation of these medications. Recommendations regarding the efficacy and safety of treatments in the elderly and patients with comorbidities were also developed. Finally, we used these recommendations to create an original algorithm for drug treatment for RA based on the Treat-to-Target approach. CONCLUSION: The 2020 JCR CPG for RA provides a useful tool for rheumatologists, health care professionals, and patients with RA, enabling shared decision-making in a variety of clinical situations.

Influence of concomitant methotrexate use on the clinical effectiveness, retention, and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Post-hoc subgroup analysis of the ORIGAMI study.

OBJECTIVES: We performed post-hoc analyses of the ORIGAMI study to investigate whether concomitant methotrexate (MTX) influences the clinical outcomes of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 325) were divided into two groups according to whether abatacept was prescribed without (MTX-) or with (MTX+) concomitant MTX. We compared the changes in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) through to 52 weeks of treatment, the abatacept retention rate, and safety. RESULTS: At Week 52, the mean SDAI (8.9 vs. 8.8), DAS28-CRP (2.6 vs. 2.6), and J-HAQ (0.92 vs. 0.91) scores were comparable in the MTX- (n = 129) and MTX+ (n = 150) groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed no significant association between MTX use and SDAI (low disease activity) or J-HAQ (minimum clinically important difference). The abatacept retention rates, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, were 73.2% and 66.7% in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 47.5% (of 139) and 52.2% (of 159) of patients in the MTX- and MTX+ groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness and safety of abatacept appeared comparable with or without concomitant MTX in this real-world clinical setting.

Selection of treatment regimens based on shared decision-making in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on remission in the FREE-J study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of various treatment de-escalation regimens in patients with RA who achieved sustained remission. METHODS: At period 1, 436 RA patients who were treated with MTX and bDMARDs and had maintained DAS28(ESR) at <2.6 were divided into five groups based on shared patient/physician decision-making; continuation, dose reduction and discontinuation of MTX or bDMARDs. At end of year 1, patients who achieved DAS28(ESR) <3.2 were allowed to enrol in period 2 for treatment using the de-escalation regimens for another year. The primary and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with DAS28(ESR) <2.6 at year 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Based on shared decision-making, 81.4% elected de-escalation of treatment and 48.4% selected de-escalation of MTX. At end of period 1, similar proportions of patients maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation, 85.2%; MTX dose reduction, 79.0%; MTX-discontinuation, 80.0%; bDMARD dose reduction, 73.9%), although the rate was significantly different between the continuation and bDMARD-discontinuation. At end of period 2, similar proportions of patients of the MTX groups maintained DAS28(ESR) <2.6 (continuation or de-escalation), but the rates were significantly lower in the bDMARD-discontinuation group. However, half of the latter group satisfactorily discontinued bDMARDs. Adverse events were numerically lower in MTX and bDMARD-de-escalation groups during period 1 and 2, compared with the continuation group. CONCLUSIONS: After achieving sustained remission by combination treatment of MTX/bDMARDs, disease control was achieved comparably by continuation, dose reduction or discontinuation of MTX and dose reduction of bDMARDs at end of year 1. Subsequent de-escalation of MTX had no impacts on disease control but decreased adverse events in year 2.

Real-world safety and efficacy of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients naïve to or switched from biologics.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study is to evaluate the real-world safety and efficacy of CT-P13, the first biosimilar of infliximab (IFX). METHODS: Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis were prospectively registered from November 2014 and followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: Of 794 patients in the analysis set, 318 patients naïve to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) showed an immediate decrease in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and increased remission rate (DAS28-CRP < 2.6). In patients who switched from IFX to CT-P13 for non-medical reasons (n = 374), the low DAS28-CRP due to previous IFX treatment decreased further with continued CT-P13 therapy. As in naïve patients, patients who switched from other bDMARDs, mainly for medical reasons (n = 102), responded similarly to CT-P13. CT-P13 in this PMS and IFX in a previous PMS had similar adverse reaction profiles, although the incidence rate in naïve patients in this current PMS was lower due to earlier initiation of CT-P13 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P13 showed excellent effectiveness as first-line therapy, no clinical difficulties in switching from IFX, and clinical improvement in patients who failed other bDMARDs. CT-P13 could be a cost-effective alternative to IFX in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Impact of concomitant chronic kidney disease on hospitalised infections and remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IORRA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) on unfavourable clinical events and remission in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We included 5103 patients with RA and CKD from the Institute of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort in 2012. CKD stages were classified into four groups: CKD with normal eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria; mild CKD, eGFR ≥45 to < 60; moderate CKD, eGFR ≥30 to < 45; and severe CKD, eGFR <30. We assessed the association between concomitant CKD and the occurrence of unfavourable clinical events or achieving remission during a 5-year observational period. RESULTS: Of the 5103 patients with RA, 686 (86.6%) had CKD. Concomitant CKD was associated with hospitalised infections [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.13, p = .02], especially in the moderate to severe CKD group (aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.12-3.13, p = .02). Of all subjects, 2407 (47.2%) had active RA at baseline and 401 (16.7%) had CKD. Concomitant CKD was also associated with the failure of achieving remission (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant CKD was a risk factor for hospitalised infections in Japanese patients with RA and failure of achieving remission in patients with active RA.

Differences in patients' population and efficacy/effectiveness of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs between randomized controlled trials and real-world settings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - using the IORRA cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in patients' population and efficacy/effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We reviewed inclusion criteria in Phase II or III RCTs of bDMARDs conducted in Japan. The Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis study participants during the period when each RCT was conducted (Cohort A) and new bDMARD users at our institute in 2016 (Cohort B) were assessed for the fulfilment of the inclusion criteria. The effectiveness of bDMARDs in our cohort and their efficacy in RCTs were compared using the inverse-variance method. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were selected. The mean proportions of patients fulfilling all inclusion criteria of each RCT in Cohorts A and B were 2.3% and 7.6%, respectively. The pooled proportion ratios (95% confidence interval) for achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70, and disease activity score 28 remission in non-eligible cases for eight RCTs versus all corresponding RCTs were 0.38 (0.30-0.51), 0.41 (0.30-0.57), 0.54 (0.35-0.82), and 1.28 (1.10-1.56), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Few rheumatoid arthritis patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the RCTs in clinical settings. There was a difference in the efficacy/effectiveness of bDMARDs between RCTs and clinical practice.

Risk of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the biologics era from 2011 to 2015 and its association with methotrexate, biologics, and corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the incidence and risk factors of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the biologics era. METHODS: We determined the rate of HZ occurrence among the RA patients that participated in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis surveys from 2011 to 2015, by assessing medical records. The standardised incidence rate per 1000 patient-years with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, and risk factors for HZ were analysed using a time-dependent Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 7815 patients (female, 84.7%) contributing to 25,863 patient-years of observation, 340 HZ events in 309 patients were confirmed. The standardised incidence rate (95% CI) per 1000 patient-years was 8.5 (6.9-10.5) in total, 6.0 (3.7-9.2) in men, and 11.0 (8.7-13.7) in women. Risk factors for HZ were age per 10 years (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, p < .05), Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) score of 0.5-1.5 (versus J-HAQ = 0; 1.51, 1.09-2.10, p < .05), methotrexate use (1.58, 1.06-2.36, p < .05), and biologic use (1.88, 1.44-2.47, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In the era when biologics were frequently used and corticosteroid use and doses were decreasing, methotrexate and biologics increased the risk for HZ.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with reference biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a part of the process of developing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology guidelines for the management of RA. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina were searched for articles to conduct a systematic review (SR). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. RESULTS: Twenty randomized controlled trials were included (biosimilars of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab). A meta-analysis revealed that the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at week 24 and serious adverse events (SAEs) for biosimilars compared with the reference bDMARDs were 1.04 (0.98-1.10) and 0.84 (0.61-1.18), respectively. The RRs of achieving ACR50 and SAEs at week 24 were respectively 0.93 (0.69-1.26) and 2.15 (0.55-8.35) in the patients who switched to biosimilars from the reference bDMARDs and 0.92 (0.76-1.12) and 1.41 (0.32-6.15) in those who continued the reference bDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Biosimilars and reference bDMARDs were equally useful for the management of RA.