A New Definition for Alar Flare Based on "Alar Flare Angle".

BACKGROUND: An accurate diagnosis and an appropriate treatment are important parts of successful rhinoplasty. We proposed a new definition for alar flares to guide our clinical work. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with alar flares from July 2017 to July 2021, and the follow-up time ranged from 12 to 27 months, mean of 16 months. We defined the alar flare angle by the formation of two lines: the line that connects the alar to the alar root point and line that connects the alar to the pronasale. The alar flare angle, interalar distance and nasal base width were measured, and alar wedge excision or alar base excision and tip elevation were performed. Scars, complications and satisfaction scales were evaluated after surgery. Through an analysis of the database, we found that the ideal alar flare angle was between 130 degrees and 140 degrees. If it was less than 130 degrees, it represented alar flares, and patients asked for alar surgery. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included. All patients underwent tip elevation, 12 patients underwent external alar wedge excision, and 5 patients underwent external alar wedge excision and alar base excision. External alar wedge excision can be used to completely correct alar flares, and in our study, the alar flare angles were more than 130 degrees after surgery. One patient complained of an acceptable scar, and there was no infection or alar deformity. All patients were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a new definition in which an alar flare angle less than 130 degrees can be diagnosed as an alar flare. This new definition is valuable for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of alar flares. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Classification of alar abnormalities and the relevant treatments. / é¼»ç¿¼ç•¸å½¢åˆ†åž‹åŠç›¸å ³çš„æ²»ç–—.

At present, nasal abnormalities is often classified from different perspectives, such as the alar-columella relationship, nasal base width, and the condition of alar hyperplasia. However, due to the impact of race and region, different people may be applied to different classification methods, resulting in different clinical diagnosis and treatments. So far, there is no unified standard for alar deformity classification to guide clinical treatment. In alar-columella relationship, the retracted ala and the hanging columella, hanging ala and retracted columella are easily confused. According to the classification of nasal base width, it is easy to confuse the alar flare with wide alar base. Therefore, the accurate preoperative evaluation of the nasal ala and the selection of appropriate clinical treatments for different abnormalities are beneficial for surgeons to achieve perfect rhinoplasty results.

Psychological evaluation of Asian female patients with rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring plastic surgery exhibit more abnormal psychological trends (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder [BDD], depression, and anxiety) than those requiring other surgeries. However, there are only a few domestic studies on the psychological aspects of the population requiring plastic surgery. Therefore, we analyzed the psychological characteristics and psychological impact of rhinoplasty in female patients. METHODS: In this study, patients were classified into 2 groups: 151 males and 60 females. The self-rating scale of body image (SSBI), self-rating anxiety scale, self-rating depression scale, and postoperative satisfaction questionnaire were used to examine the patients before and after surgery. The results were analyzed using t-test, analysis of variance, chi-square test, paired rank sum test, and Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: The total prevalence of BDD in female patients who underwent rhinoplasty was 7.3%. The prevalence of anxiety disorders was 31.8% and that of depression was 45.0%. Female patients with BDD were more likely to exhibit depression (55.5%) and anxiety (36.4%). The SSBI score was related to marital status (p = 0.001) and history of rhinoplasty (p = 0.000). Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between preoperative BDD score and postoperative satisfaction (r = -0.392, p = 0.002) as well as between the previous history of rhinoplasty and postoperative satisfaction (r = -0.603, p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Pathological psychologies such as anxiety, depression, and BDD are common in patients scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty, and BDD is more likely to be associated with depression. Rhinoplasty has little psychological impact on patients, i.e., it neither causes improvement nor deterioration. Female patients who have undergone rhinoplasty should be considered to a have high risk of BDD. Although the outcomes of surgery are generally quite positive, patients diagnosed with BDD are more likely to be dissatisfied.

The effectiveness of cell-derived exosome therapy for diabetic wound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes among the elderly population is significant and rising annually. One of the most severe and frequent complications of diabetes mellitus is the diabetic wound, which has long-term negative effects on patients' finances, mental health, and functional abilities. Exosomes, a cell-free therapy, have emerged as a promising novel treatment for diabetic wounds, but their mechanism is still not entirely understood. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of exosomes in the management of diabetic wounds. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science for pertinent studies that described the therapeutic benefits of exosomes on diabetic wound models that were released before October 17, 2022. The outcome indicators consisted of wound healing rate, neovascular density, re-epithelialization rate, collagen deposition, scar width, and inflammatory factors. RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct all statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies with 323 animals were identified in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that exosome therapy was shown to be superior to control therapy in terms of wound healing rate (SMD = 5.42; 95 %CI = 4.40-6.44; P < 0.00001), neovascular density (SMD = 5.48; 95 %CI = 4.31-6.64; P < 0.00001), re-epithelialization rate (SMD = 5.06; 95 %CI = 3.75-6.37; P < 0.00001), collagen deposition (SMD = 4.78; 95 %CI = 3.58-5.98; P < 0.00001), scar width (SMD = -8.10; 95 %CI = -10.31 to -5.89; P < 0.00001). Additionally, the expression of inflammatory factors was significantly downregulated in the exosome treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: According to this meta-analysis of the current trials, exosome therapy can enhance the quality of diabetic wounds, especially when used in conjunction with novel dressings. To demonstrate the most efficient exosomes and therapeutic parameters for the treatment of diabetic wounds, future studies should conduct sizable, randomized, double-blind trials with high-quality, long-term follow-ups.

A novel classification of alar retraction based on nostril exposure in Asian rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Alar retraction is considered a challenge in rhinoplasty. The classification of alar retraction remains poorly defined, especially in Asia. Patients with alar retraction are associated with excessive exposure to the nostrils in Asia. This study aimed to introduce a classification method of alar retraction based on nostril exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients who had undergone rhinoplasty with alar retraction based on nostril exposure between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The corrections of alar retraction were categorized into three groups according to a classification method of alar retraction based on nostril exposure: mild alar retraction, moderate alar retraction, and severe alar retraction. The visual analog scale (VAS) and rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) were used to evaluate the satisfaction rate. RESULTS: Within a median period of 13.3 months, 45 patients (51.14%) with mild alar retraction were corrected by alar contour graft. 23 patients (26.14%) with moderate alar retraction were treated with the alar contour graft(n=10), the lateral crural strut graft (n = 6), and the alar projection graft (n = 7). 20 patients (22.73%) with severe alar retraction were corrected by lateral crural strut graft combined with composite graft (n = 6), lateral crural strut graft (n = 10), and composite graft (n = 4). The severe alar retraction group had a higher satisfaction rate in ROE(P<0.05) and VAS (P<0.05) than moderate alar retraction and mild alar retraction at a follow-up of 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of alar retraction based on nostril exposure is more practical for rhinoplasty in Asia.