Meta-analysis of corneal endothelial changes after phacoemulsification in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is still controversy about the differential changes in corneal endothelium function and morphology after phacoemulsification between Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and non-Diabetes Mellitus (non-DM) patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of phacoemulsification on the corneal endothelium in DM and non-DM patients. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 1, 2011 and December 25, 2021. The weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used to estimate the outcomes of statistical analyses performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 1744 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. No significant difference was observed in the central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficients of variation (CV), or hexagonal cell percentage (HCP) between the DM and non-DM groups (CCT: P = 0.91; ECD: P = 0.07; CV: P = 0.06; HCP: P = 0.09) preoperatively. The CCT was significantly thicker in the DM group at 1 month (P = 0.003) and 3 months (P = 0.0009) postoperatively, and there was no significant difference at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.26) than non-DM group. The CV was significantly higher and HCP was significantly lower in the DM group at 1 month (CV:P < 0.0001, HCP: P = 0.002), with no significant difference at 3 months (CV: P = 0.09, HCP: P = 0.36) and 6 months (CV: P = 0.32, HCP: P = 0.36) postoperatively than non-DM group. DM patients had lower ECD than non-DM patients at all postoperative time points (1 month, 3 months: P < 0.00001, 6 months: P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The influence of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial damage is greater in diabetic patients. Moreover, the recovery of corneal endothelial function and morphology is delayed in these patients. Clinicians should be more attentive to the corneal health of DM patients when considering phacoemulsification.

Mendelian randomization analysis of causal relationship between cheese intake and diabetic retinopathy.

AIM: To assess whether there is a possible causal link between the intake of cheese and the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) utilizing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: The research data were obtained from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Genetic loci closely related to cheese intake were extracted as instrumental variables (IVs), and DR was the outcome variable. The data were extracted from individuals of European ethnicity. The data of cheese intake consisted of 451 486 samples with 9 851 867 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), while the DR data consisted of 206 234 samples with 16 380 446 SNPs. Sixty-one genetic loci closely related to cheese intake were selected as IVs. MR analysis was performed by inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method and MR-Egger regression respectively. The causal relationship between cheese intake and DR was evaluated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Egger-intercept test was used to test horizontal pleiotropy and sensitivity analysis was performed by leave-one-out test. RESULTS: The P value of the IVW method was less than 0.05, indicating a significant negative correlation between cheese intake and DR. MR-Egger regression showed that the intercept was 0.01 with a standard error of 0.022, and a P-value of 0.634, indicating no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy affecting the IVs related to the exposure factors. Besides, heterogeneity tests confirmed the absence of heterogeneity, and the "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were stable. CONCLUSION: Cheese intake is causally negatively correlated with the occurrence of DR, and cheese intake could reduce the risk of DR.