Clinical Outcomes of Oral Zinc Therapy in Hepatic Encephalopathy Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Additional therapies for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) treatment are warranted. There are data evaluating the use of zinc for HE; however, clinical outcomes, specifically in the United States, are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates in patients with cirrhosis complicated by HE on lactulose and rifaximin to those on lactulose, rifaximin, and zinc. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients admitted with documented cirrhosis and home medications of lactulose and rifaximin, with or without zinc. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those receiving lactulose and rifaximin for HE (control) and those receiving lactulose, rifaximin, and zinc for HE (treatment). The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-seven patients were included (102 in control group, 55 in treatment group). Regarding 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates, there was no difference between the control and treatment groups. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study conducted in the United States evaluating zinc for HE treatment. Zinc did not impact 30-day or 1-year all-cause readmission rates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential benefit of zinc for HE, possibly in correlation with Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores.

Association of Previous Gastric Bypass Surgery and Patient Outcomes in Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis Hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with risk of alcohol use disorder. The impact of RYGB among patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) remains unknown. METHODS: A retrospective cohort from National Inpatient Sample (01/2006-09/2015) database on 421,156 admissions with alcohol-associated cirrhosis (AC) was stratified for non-primary discharge diagnosis of previous RYGB. Admissions with RYGB (cases) were matched 1:3 to without RYGB (controls) based on propensity score on demographics, calendar year, socioeconomic status (insurance and zip code income quartile), obesity, diabetes, anxiety, and alcohol use disorder. Primary outcome was concomitant discharge diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis (AH) or development of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). RESULTS: Of 10,168 admissions (mean age 49 yrs., 75% females, 79% whites), cases (N = 2542) vs. controls had higher prevalence of concomitant AH (18.8 vs. 17%, P = 0.032), hepatic encephalopathy (31 vs. 25%), infection (28 vs. 24%), and grade 3 ACLF (13 vs. 5%), P < 0.001. Conditional logistic regression models showed higher odds for AH, hepatic encephalopathy, and infection among cases. In-hospital mortality of 6.3% (43% in ACLF) was lower in cases, but similar in the sub-cohorts of AH (N = 1768) or ACLF (N = 768). Results were similar in a sensitivity analysis of matched cohort of 2016 hospitalizations (504 cases) with primary discharge diagnosis of AC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with AC, previous RYGB is associated with increased likelihood of concomitant AH, hepatic encephalopathy, and infection, but similar in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies are needed to validate, determine causality, and understand mechanisms of these findings among patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis.

Efficacy & safety of EUS-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy, laparoscopic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LA-ERCP) and enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (E-ERCP) have been utilized to achieve pancreaticobiliary access. Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) has recently emerged as an alternate and efficient approach. As data regarding EDGE continues to evolve, concerns about safety and efficacy remain, limiting wide adoptability. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of EDGE and compare it to the current standard of care. METHODS: A comprehensive search of major databases (inception to Nov 2022) identified published studies on EDGE. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates and heterogeneity (I2). Risk ratio (RR) and standardized difference in means (SMD) were utilized for head-to-head comparison analysis between EDGE vs. LA-ERCP and EDGE vs. E-ERCP. Primary outcomes assessed pooled EDGE safety (adverse events) and efficacy (technical/clinical success). Secondary outcomes assessed efficacy and safety profiles via a comparative analysis of EDGE vs. LA-ERCP and EDGE vs. E-ERCP. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (470 patients) were included. EDGE pooled technical success (TS) rate was 96% (95% CI 92-97.6, I2 = 0), and clinical success was 91% (85-95, I2 = 0). Pooled rate of all adverse events with EDGE was 17% (14-24.6, I2 = 32%). On sub-group analysis, these included failure of fistula closure 17% (10-25.5, I2 = 48%), stent migration 7% (4-12, I2 = 51%), bleeding 5% (3.2-7.9, I2 = 0), post-EDGE weight gain 4% (2-9, I2 = 0), perforation 4% (2.1-5.8, I2 = 0), and post-ERCP pancreatitis 2% (1-5, I2 = 0). EDGE TS was comparable to LA-ERCP (97% vs. 98%; RR, 1.00; CI, 0.85-1.17, p = 0.95) and E-ERCP (100% vs. 66%; RR, 1.26; CI, 0.99-1.6, p = 0.06). No statistical difference was noted in adverse events between EDGE and LA-ERCP (13% vs. 17.6%; RR, 0.61; CI, 0.28-1.35, p = 0.52) and E-ERCP (9.6% vs. 16%; RR, 0.61; CI, 0.28-1.35, p = 0.22). EDGE procedure time and hospital stay were shorter than LA-ERCP and E-ERCP (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that EDGE is safe and efficacious to the current standard of care. Further head-to-head comparative trials are needed to validate our findings.

Colonoscopy-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Abnormal Stool-Based Tests: A Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-analysis of Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs based on the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and guaiac-based fecal occult blood (gFOBT) are associated with a substantial reduction in CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate colonoscopy-related adverse events in individuals with a positive FIT or gFOBT. METHODS: A systematic and detailed search was run in January 2021, with the assistance of a medical librarian for studies reporting on colonoscopy-related adverse events as part of organized CRC screening programs. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, and the results were expressed for pooled proportions along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 771,730 colonoscopies were performed in patients undergoing CRC screening using either gFOBT or FIT across 31 studies. The overall pooled incidence of severe adverse events in the entire patient cohort was 0.42% (CI 0.20-0.64); I2 = 38.76%. In patients with abnormal gFOBT, the incidence was 0.2% (CI 0.1-0.3); I2 = 24.6%, and in patients with a positive FIT, it was 0.4% (CI 0.2-0.7); I2 = 48.89%. The overall pooled incidence of perforation, bleeding, and death was 0.13% (CI 0.09-0.21); I2 = 22.84%, 0.3% (CI 0.2-0.4); I2 = 35.58%, and 0.01% (CI 0.00-0.01); I2 = 33.21%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our analysis shows that in colonoscopies performed after abnormal stool-based testing, the overall risk of severe adverse events, perforation, bleeding, and death is minimal.

Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients 70 years or older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The rate of liver transplantation is increasing among the elderly population; however, data is limited on the post-liver transplantation outcomes in patients ≥70 years. Given the scarcity in liver allograft resources, a meta-analysis on the outcomes of liver transplantation in patients ≥70 years is warranted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through March 2022 for studies that reported on the outcomes of liver-transplantation in patients ≥70 years. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Ten studies were included that analyzed 162,725 patients. The pooled rate of 1-year, 3-years and 5-years post liver transplant survival for patients ≥70 years was 78.7% (72.6-83.7; I2=74%), 61.2% (52.3-69.5; I2=87%), and 48.9% (39.3-58.6; I2=96%), respectively. The corresponding 1-year, 3-years and 5-years survival for patients <70 years were 86.6% (82.4-89.9; I2=99%), 73.2% (63-81.3; I2=99%), and 70.1% (66.8-73.2; I2=99%); respectively. Descriptive p-values of comparison were statistically significant at 1-year and 5-years (p = 0.02 and <0.001). The pooled rate of perioperative complications in patients ≥70 years was 40.7% (26.2-57; I2=93%). The pooled rate of graft failure in patients ≥70 years was 6.7% (3.3-13.1; I2=93%) and in patients <70 years was 3.7% (1-12.4; I2=99%). The pooled rate of perioperative mortality in patients ≥70 years was 16.6% (7.6-32.5; I2=99%) and in patients <70 years was 0.8% (0-33.1; I2=88%). CONCLUSION: Patients ≥70 years undergoing liver transplantation seem to demonstrate significantly lower 1-year and 5-year survival rates as compared to patients <70 years, albeit limited by heterogeneity.

Vedolizumab Dose Escalation Improves Therapeutic Response in a Subset of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The Gemini trial failed to detect a significant difference in response rate for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) randomized to standard (every 8 week) vedolizumab dosing vs escalated (every 4 week) dosing. Subsequent real-world data imply the Gemini trial design may have obscured a benefit of escalated dosing. AIMS: We investigated outcomes after vedolizumab dose escalation for patients with UC. We also explored potential clinical predictors of dose escalation requirement. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included patients with UC who received vedolizumab between 1/2017-1/2019. We compared rates of clinical response (decrease in partial Mayo score by ≥ 2) and remission (partial Mayo < 2) for standard vs escalated dosing. RESULTS: Among the 90 patients reviewed, 52 achieved and maintained remission on standard dosing. The average time to remission with standard dosing was 33.3 ± 6.6 weeks. After an average of 56.3 ± 7.4 weeks standard dosing, 24 patients (22 "partial responders" and 2 "non-responders") were dose-escalated. Of the 22 "partial responders" dose-escalated, 10 (45%) achieved remission, 10 (45%) achieved further improvement. Neither "non-responder" demonstrated further clinical benefit. Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic exposure predicted dose escalation requirement (p = 0.008). Patients requiring dose escalation had more severe disease at baseline as measured by both full Mayo (p = 0.009) and partial Mayo scores (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We show dose escalation benefited patients with UC who exhibit a "partial response" to standard dosing. Early vedolizumab dose escalation should be considered in both patients with severe disease and those with prior anti-TNF experience.

Comparative efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as first-line palliation in malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is a challenging clinical condition commonly managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative, especially in complex cases where ERCP fails or is deemed risky. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of EUS-BD vs. ERCP in the palliation of MDBO. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched up to December 2023, including MEDLINE/PubMed, OVID and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for studies comparing EUS-BD with ERCP. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success rates, while secondary outcomes included procedural times, hospital stay duration, 30-day mortality, reintervention rates, and adverse events such as pancreatitis. Results: Seven studies involving 1245 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that EUS-BD had a technical success rate of 92%, compared to 85% for ERCP. Clinical success rates were similar for both EUS-BD and ERCP, at approximately 89%. EUS-BD was associated with a significantly lower incidence of pancreatitis (2% vs. 10% for ERCP). Conclusions: EUS-BD offers a viable and potentially superior alternative to ERCP for the primary palliation of MDBO, particularly in terms of technical success and a lower risk of pancreatitis. These findings support the adoption of EUS-BD in clinical settings equipped to perform this technique, though future research should focus on long-term outcomes and further economic analysis to solidify these recommendations.