Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Res ; 132(4): 483-497, 2023 02 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795846

RESUMO

Heart disease is a significant burden on global health care systems and is a leading cause of death each year. To improve our understanding of heart disease, high quality disease models are needed. These will facilitate the discovery and development of new treatments for heart disease. Traditionally, researchers have relied on 2D monolayer systems or animal models of heart disease to elucidate pathophysiology and drug responses. Heart-on-a-chip (HOC) technology is an emerging field where cardiomyocytes among other cell types in the heart can be used to generate functional, beating cardiac microtissues that recapitulate many features of the human heart. HOC models are showing great promise as disease modeling platforms and are poised to serve as important tools in the drug development pipeline. By leveraging advances in human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte biology and microfabrication technology, diseased HOCs are highly tuneable and can be generated via different approaches such as: using cells with defined genetic backgrounds (patient-derived cells), adding small molecules, modifying the cells' environment, altering cell ratio/composition of microtissues, among others. HOCs have been used to faithfully model aspects of arrhythmia, fibrosis, infection, cardiomyopathies, and ischemia, to name a few. In this review, we highlight recent advances in disease modeling using HOC systems, describing instances where these models outperformed other models in terms of reproducing disease phenotypes and/or led to drug development.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Cardiopatias , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes Induzidas , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes , Animais , Humanos , Cardiopatias/terapia , Cardiopatias/metabolismo , Miócitos Cardíacos/metabolismo , Cardiomiopatias/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Pluripotentes/metabolismo , Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip
2.
J Biol Chem ; 299(11): 105263, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37734551

RESUMO

Over 35 years ago the cell biology community was introduced to connexins as the subunit employed to assemble semicrystalline clusters of intercellular channels that had been well described morphologically as gap junctions. The decade that followed would see knowledge of the unexpectedly large 21-member human connexin family grow to reflect unique and overlapping expression patterns in all organ systems. While connexin biology initially focused on their role in constructing highly regulated intercellular channels, this was destined to change as discoveries revealed that connexin hemichannels at the cell surface had novel roles in many cell types, especially when considering connexin pathologies. Acceptance of connexins as having bifunctional channel properties was initially met with some resistance, which has given way in recent years to the premise that connexins have multifunctional properties. Depending on the connexin isoform and cell of origin, connexins have wide-ranging half-lives that vary from a couple of hours to the life expectancy of the cell. Diversity in connexin channel characteristics and molecular properties were further revealed by X-ray crystallography and single-particle cryo-EM. New avenues have seen connexins or connexin fragments playing roles in cell adhesion, tunneling nanotubes, extracellular vesicles, mitochondrial membranes, transcription regulation, and in other emerging cellular functions. These discoveries were largely linked to Cx43, which is prominent in most human organs. Here, we will review the evolution of knowledge on connexin expression in human adults and more recent evidence linking connexins to a highly diverse array of cellular functions.


Assuntos
Conexinas , Junções Comunicantes , Humanos , Biologia , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Conexina 26/metabolismo , Conexinas/metabolismo , Junções Comunicantes/metabolismo , Animais
3.
Radiographics ; 44(11): e240009, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39388372

RESUMO

Coronary artery vasculitis (CAV) and coronary artery encasement are rarely diagnosed conditions that are important diagnostic considerations, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome without traditional cardiovascular risk factors or systemic illness. Vasculitis refers to inflammation of the blood vessel walls, which can be primary or secondary. This process should be distinguished from neoplastic involvement of the coronary arteries, termed coronary artery encasement. Prospective diagnosis of these diseases is challenging, often requiring multidisciplinary workup with careful attention to clinical presentation and multiorgan findings. While CAV and coronary artery encasement can be indistinguishable at coronary CT angiography, certain imaging features help order the differential diagnosis. CAV should be considered when there is smooth wall thickening that is circumferential and/or continuous. A diagnosis of coronary artery encasement is favored when there is irregular or nodular wall thickening that is eccentric to the vessel lumen. Epicardial fat stranding may also appear more extensive compared with CAV. Potential mimics of CAV include atherosclerosis, acute plaque rupture, coronary artery aneurysm, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Detection and diagnosis of CAV may help avoid complications related to accelerated atherosclerosis and infarction. Radiologists should be familiar with the range of pathologic conditions that can affect the coronary arteries beyond atherosclerosis as they may be the first to raise such diagnostic possibilities, guiding next steps in patient workup and management. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Imagem Multimodal , Vasculite , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Vasculite/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Coronária/métodos
4.
J Interprof Care ; 38(4): 695-704, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734870

RESUMO

Bias in advanced heart failure therapy allocation results in inequitable outcomes for minoritized populations. The purpose of this study was to examine how bias is introduced during group decision-making with an interprofessional team using Breathett's Model of Heart Failure Decision-Making. This was a secondary qualitative descriptive analysis from a study focused on bias in advanced heart failure therapy allocation. Team meetings were recorded and transcribed from four heart failure centers. Breathett's Model was applied both deductively and inductively to transcripts (n = 12). Bias was identified during discussions about patient characteristics, clinical fragility, and prior clinical decision-making. Some patients were labeled as "good citizens" or as adherent/non-adherent while others benefited from strong advocacy from interprofessional team members. Social determinants of health also impacted therapy allocation. Interprofessional collaboration with advanced heart failure therapy allocation may be enhanced with the inclusion of patient advocates and limit of clinical decision-making using subjective data.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Relações Interprofissionais , Comportamento Cooperativo , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Masculino , Feminino , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Tomada de Decisões , Processos Grupais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Am J Transplant ; 23(6): 805-814, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931436

RESUMO

Advanced heart failure (AHF) therapy allocation is vulnerable to bias related to subjective assessments and poor group dynamics. Our objective was to determine whether an implementation strategy for AHF team members could feasibly contribute to organizational and culture change supporting equity in AHF allocation. Using a pretest-posttest design, the strategy included an 8-week multicomponent training on bias reduction, standardized numerical social assessments, and enhanced group dynamics at an AHF center. Evaluations of organizational and cultural changes included pretest-posttest AHF team member surveys, transcripts of AHF meetings to assess group dynamics using a standardized scoring system, and posttest interviews guided by a framework for implementing a complex strategy. Results were analyzed with qualitative descriptive methods and Brunner-Munzel tests for relative effect (RE, RE >0.5 signals posttest improvement). The majority of survey metrics revealed potential benefit with RE >0.5. REs were >0.5 for 5 of 6 group dynamics metrics. Themes for implementation included (1) promoting equitable distribution of scarce resources, (2) requiring a change in team members' time investment to correct bias and change the meeting structure, (3) slowing and then accelerating the allocation process, and (4) adaptable beyond AHF and reinforceable with semi-annual trainings. An implementation strategy for AHF equity demonstrated the feasibility for organizational and culture changes.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Neurooncol ; 145(1): 107-114, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31468270

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Children with recurrent medulloblastoma have a poor prognosis. Re-irradiation is an option for some patients, but has not been well-studied in the era of molecular characterization for pediatric medulloblastoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 14 children age 18 years and younger at initial diagnosis with recurrent medulloblastoma, who received two or more courses of radiation therapy (RT). Molecular subgrouping was performed using nanoString and was available for nine patients. The primary study endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: Re-irradiation (RT2) was directed at the supratentorial brain in six patients, infratentorial brain in one patient, and spine in seven patients. In addition, six patients received stem cell transplant as part of salvage therapy. Median OS for all patients was 12.4 months. One patient with recurrent Wnt-activated medulloblastoma remains alive with 154 months' survival; median survival was not reached for four patients with Group 4 disease, while three with Shh-activated disease had median survival of 2.2 months. A single patient with Group 3 disease died 4.3 months after RT2. Patients treated with RT2 to the spine for diffuse disease had poorer OS (p = 0.02), as compared to focal RT2 for intracranial recurrence. Distant failure, outside RT2 volumes, was the predominant pattern of recurrence after RT2. CONCLUSIONS: Re-irradiation for recurrent pediatric medulloblastoma can offer some patients disease control, particularly those with focally recurrent disease in the brain. Prospective studies are needed to confirm subgroups of patients who may benefit most from RT2.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Cerebelares/radioterapia , Meduloblastoma/radioterapia , Reirradiação/métodos , Terapia de Salvação , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Cerebelares/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Meduloblastoma/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
7.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 66(9): e27881, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31207154

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are very few studies about the role of repeat irradiation (RT2) for children with recurrent supratentorial high-grade glioma (HGG). It was the aim of this study to assess the effectiveness and safety of RT2 in this population. PROCEDURE: This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 children age 18 years and under with recurrent supratentorial HGG who had received at least one course of RT. In-field reirradiation volumes included focal or whole brain RT, with doses ranging from 30 to 54 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the first day of RT2. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent RT2. The median survival of these patients was 6.5 months. Patients with ≥12 months elapsed time between RT1 and RT2 experienced longer OS than patients who had < 12 months (P = 0.009). There was no difference in OS between patients with or without germline mutations (e.g., Lynch, Li-Fraumeni, or constitutional mismatch-repair deficiency, P = 0.20). Ten patients received RT2 that overlapped with RT1 volumes for locally recurrent disease. Of this group, 80% experienced clinical benefit from in-field RT2, defined as clinical/radiologic response or stable disease. Ninety-three percent completed the prescribed course of RT2, with one patient developing grade 3 radiation necrosis four months after RT2. When compared with 26 patients who were not offered reirradiation, those selected for RT2 had improved median survival from the time of first disease progression (9.4 vs 3.8 months, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation for children with recurrent supratentorial HGG is a safe, effective treatment that provides short-term disease control.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/radioterapia , Glioma/mortalidade , Glioma/radioterapia , Reirradiação , Adolescente , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/genética , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioma/genética , Glioma/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Can J Public Health ; 2024 Jul 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39017909

RESUMO

SETTING: Task sharing can fill health workforce gaps, improve access to care, and enhance health equity by redistributing health services to providers with less training. We report learnings from a demonstration project designed to assess whether lay student vaccinators can support community immunizations. INTERVENTION: Between July 2022 and February 2023, 27 undergraduate and graduate students were recruited from the University of Toronto Emergency First Responders organization and operated 11 immunization clinics under professional supervision. Medical directives, supported with online and in-person training, enabled lay providers to administer and document vaccinations when supervised by nurses, physicians, or pharmacists. Participants were invited to complete a voluntary online survey to comment on their experience. OUTCOMES: Lay providers administered 293 influenza and COVID-19 vaccines without adverse events. A total of 141 participants (122 patients, 17 lay vaccinators, 1 nurse, and 1 physician) responded to our survey. More than 80% of patients strongly agreed to feeling safe and comfortable with lay providers administering vaccines under supervision, had no concerns with lay vaccinators, and would attend another lay vaccinator clinic. Content and thematic analysis of open-text responses revealed predominantly positive experiences, with themes about excellent vaccinators, organized and efficient clinics, and the importance of training, communication, and access to regulated professionals. The responding providers expressed comfort working in collaborative immunization teams. IMPLICATIONS: Lay student providers can deliver vaccines safely under a medical directive while potentially improving patient experiences. Rather than redeploying scarce professionals, task sharing strategies could position trained lay vaccinators to support immunizations, improve access, and foster community engagement.


RéSUMé: LIEU: Le partage de tâches peut combler les pénuries de personnels de santé et améliorer l'accès aux soins et l'équité en santé en redistribuant les services de santé vers des prestataires ayant moins de formation. Nous rendons compte des enseignements d'un projet de démonstration visant à déterminer si des vaccinateurs étudiants profanes pourraient appuyer l'immunisation communautaire. INTERVENTION: Entre juillet 2022 et février 2023, 27 étudiantes et étudiants de premier cycle et de cycles supérieurs ont été recrutés auprès de l'organisation des secouristes opérationnels de l'Université de Toronto pour gérer 11 cliniques de vaccination sous la supervision de personnel spécialisé. Des directives médicales, appuyées par une formation en ligne et en présentiel, ont permis à ces prestataires profanes d'administrer des vaccins et de les consigner en dossier sous la supervision d'infirmières, de médecins ou de pharmaciens. Les personnes participantes ont été invitées à répondre à un sondage en ligne sur leur expérience. RéSULTATS: Les prestataires profanes ont administré 293 vaccins contre la grippe et la COVID-19 sans manifestations postvaccinales indésirables. En tout, 141 personnes (122 patients, 17 vaccinateurs profanes, 1 infirmière et 1 médecin) ont répondu au sondage. Plus de 80 % des patients ont dit se sentir tout à fait en sécurité et à l'aise de recevoir des vaccins administrés par des prestataires profanes sous supervision, n'avoir aucune inquiétude vis-à-vis des vaccinateurs profanes et être disposés à se présenter à une autre clinique gérée par des vaccinateurs profanes. L'analyse du contenu et des thèmes des réponses aux questions ouvertes a révélé des expériences majoritairement positives, et des thèmes axés sur l'excellence des vaccinateurs, l'organisation et l'efficacité des cliniques, ainsi que l'importance de la formation, des communications et de l'accès à des professionnels réglementés. Les prestataires ayant répondu au sondage se sont dit à l'aise de travailler au sein d'équipes de vaccination collaboratives. CONSéQUENCES: Des prestataires étudiants profanes peuvent administrer des vaccins en toute sécurité en suivant une directive médicale, et cela peut potentiellement améliorer l'expérience des patients. Plutôt que de redéployer des ressources professionnelles limitées, les stratégies de partage de tâches pourraient placer des vaccinateurs profanes formés pour appuyer l'immunisation, améliorer l'accès et favoriser l'engagement communautaire.

9.
ESC Heart Fail ; 2024 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39420596

RESUMO

AIMS: Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease (VHD). It is unknown whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities. Among an adequately insured population, we evaluated the relationship between clinician segregation in a hospital and receipt of care by a cardiologist according to patient race. We also evaluated the association between clinician segregation, race and care by a cardiologist on 30-day readmission and 1-year survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM, US commercial and Medicare beneficiaries) from 2010 to 2018, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of VHD. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium and high segregation groups (SG), according to clinician segregation index (SI). SI can range from 0-1 (0: the ratio of Black to White patients is the same for all clinicians; 1: each clinician treats only Black or only White patients). Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed effect models. Among 8649 patients [median age 75 (67-82), 45.4% female, 16.1% Black, 83.9% White], odds of care from a cardiologist did not vary across race for all SGs [Low SG adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.08), P = 0.14; Medium SG aOR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25), P = 0.43; High SG aOR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.69), P = 0.76]. Among those that received care from a cardiologist, there was no difference in the 30-day readmission between Black and White patients across SGs [Low SG aOR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), P = 0.70; Medium SG aOR: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.92-1.61), P = 0.17; High SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57-1.17), P = 0.27]. Among patients that did not receive care from a cardiologist, Black patients in low SG had higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients [aOR: 2.74 (95%CI:1.38-5.43), P < 0.01]. Odds of 1-year survival were similar across race for all SG irrespective of receipt of care from a cardiologist [seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.86-1.48), P = 0.38; Medium SG aOR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59-1.17), P = 0.29; High SG aOR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.66-1.52), P = 0.98; not seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.34), P = 0.19; Medium SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.28-2.37), P = 0.70; High SG aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.23-1.74), P = 0.37]. CONCLUSIONS: Among an insured population, race was not associated with care by a cardiologist for VHD or survival. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had higher odds of 30-day readmission in low clinician SG.

10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(5): e027701, 2023 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36846988

RESUMO

Background US regulatory framework for advanced heart failure therapies (AHFT), ventricular assist devices, and heart transplants, delegate eligibility decisions to multidisciplinary groups at the center level. The subjective nature of decision-making is at risk for racial, ethnic, and gender bias. We sought to determine how group dynamics impact allocation decision-making by patient gender, racial, and ethnic group. Methods and Results We performed a mixed-methods study among 4 AHFT centers. For ≈ 1 month, AHFT meetings were audio recorded. Meeting transcripts were evaluated for group function scores using de Groot Critically Reflective Diagnoses protocol (metrics: challenging groupthink, critical opinion sharing, openness to mistakes, asking/giving feedback, and experimentation; scoring: 1 to 4 [high to low quality]). The relationship between summed group function scores and AHFT allocation was assessed via hierarchical logistic regression with patients nested within meetings nested within centers, and interaction effects of group function score with gender and race, adjusting for patient age and comorbidities. Among 87 patients (24% women, 66% White race) evaluated for AHFT, 57% of women, 38% of men, 44% of White race, and 40% of patients of color were allocated to AHFT. The interaction between group function score and allocation by patient gender was statistically significant (P=0.035); as group function scores improved, the probability of AHFT allocation increased for women and decreased for men, a pattern that was similar irrespective of racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions Women evaluated for AHFT were more likely to receive AHFT when group decision-making processes were of higher quality. Further investigation is needed to promote routine high-quality group decision-making and reduce known disparities in AHFT allocation.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Etnicidade , Dinâmica de Grupo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Sexismo
11.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1014773, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37228737

RESUMO

Many clinical processes include multidisciplinary group decision-making, yet few methods exist to evaluate the presence of implicit bias during this collective process. Implicit bias negatively impacts the equitable delivery of evidence-based interventions and ultimately patient outcomes. Since implicit bias can be difficult to assess, novel approaches are required to detect and analyze this elusive phenomenon. In this paper, we describe how the de Groot Critically Reflective Diagnoses Protocol (DCRDP) can be used as a data analysis tool to evaluate group dynamics as an essential foundation for exploring how interactions can bias collective clinical decision-making. The DCRDP includes 6 distinct criteria: challenging groupthink, critical opinion sharing, research utilization, openness to mistakes, asking and giving feedback, and experimentation. Based on the strength and frequency of codes in the form of exemplar quotes, each criterion was given a numerical score of 1-4 with 1 representing teams that are interactive, reflective, higher functioning, and more equitable. When applied as a coding scheme to transcripts of recorded decision-making meetings, the DCRDP was revealed as a practical tool for examining group decision-making bias. It can be adapted to a variety of clinical, educational, and other professional settings as an impetus for recognizing the presence of team-based bias, engaging in reflexivity, informing the design and testing of implementation strategies, and monitoring long-term outcomes to promote more equitable decision-making processes in healthcare.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Tomada de Decisões
12.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) ; 3(1): 944-956, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479377

RESUMO

Objectives: Older adults face racism, sexism, and ageism. As the U.S. population ages, it is important to understand how the current population views older adults. Methods: Participants recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk provided perceptions of older Black and White models' photographs. Using mixed-effect models, we assessed interactions between race and gender of participants and models. Results: Among Participants of Color and White participants (n = 712, 70% non-Hispanic White, 70% women, mean 37.81 years), Black models were perceived as more attractive, less threatening, and sadder than White models, but differences were greater for White participants (race-by-race interaction: attractive p = 0.003, threatening p = 0.009, sad p = 0.016). Each gender perceived their respective gender as more attractive (gender-by-gender interaction p < 0.0001). Male and female participants perceived male models as happier than female models, but differences were greater for male participants (p = 0.026). Irrespective of participant age group, women were perceived as more threatening (p = 0.012). Other perceptions were not significant. Discussion: Participants had few biases toward older Black and White models, while gender biases favored men.

13.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(34): 3813-3821, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570616

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hearing loss (HL) is a serious secondary effect of treatment for CNS and head-and-neck tumors in children. The goal of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for HL in patients with multiple ototoxic exposures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 340 ears from 171 patients with CNS or head-and-neck tumors treated with radiation, with or without chemotherapy, who had longitudinal audiologic evaluation. International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Boston grades were assigned to 2,420 hearing assessments. Multivariable weighted ordinal logistic regression was fitted to evaluate the effect of clinicopathologic features on HL. RESULTS: Mean cochlea dose (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per Gy, P < .001), time since radiotherapy (RT; OR 1.21 per year, P < .001), cisplatin dose (OR 1.48 per 100 mg/m2, P < .001), and carboplatin dose (OR 1.41 per 1,000 mg/m2, P = .002) were associated with increasing International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Boston grade of HL. There was no synergistic effect of RT and cisplatin (interaction term, P = .53) or RT and carboplatin (interaction term, P = .85). Cumulative incidence of high-frequency HL (> 4 kHz) was 50% or greater at 5 years after RT if mean cochlea dose was > 30 Gy, while incidence of HL across all frequencies continued to increase beyond 5 years after RT. CONCLUSION: Children treated with radiation and chemotherapy experience a high incidence of HL over time, with associations found between more severe HL and cisplatin or carboplatin dose as well as mean cochlea dose. Mean cochlea dose of ≤ 30 Gy is proposed as a goal to reduce the risk of HL; a lower threshold (20-25 Gy) may be considered in patients receiving platinum chemotherapy to reduce cumulative HL burden.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Perda Auditiva/induzido quimicamente , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Fatores de Risco
14.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 10(3): e159-e165, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841675

RESUMO

PURPOSE: At our institution, a multifaceted approach is used to reduce general anesthetic (GA) use for children receiving photon radiation therapy (RT) as standard-of-care treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated as part of the pediatric radiation therapy program from 2010 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. GA use was defined as need for intravenous propofol or inhaled gaseous anesthetic for at least 1 simulation or RT session. Methods to reduce GA use included presence of a dedicated pediatric nurse for procedural preparation, audiovisual distraction (television during RT), and 2-way audio communication with caregivers. RESULTS: There were 779 unique patients who received RT over 14 163 fractions of radiation. GA utilization was 90% in those under age 3, 28% in those age 3 to 6, 1% in those age 7 to 11, and <1% in those ≥12 years of age. Four years of age is a cutoff age at which the majority of patients switch from needing GA (56.6% for those aged 3) to not needing GA (29.8% for those aged 4). Younger age, use of total body irradiation, and craniospinal irradiation were independently associated with requiring GA. CONCLUSIONS: Using methods designed to reduce GA use, most children aged 4 years or older were able receive RT awake. Our GA rates compare favorably to other literature reports; thus, pediatric RT centers should consider adopting specific interventions to reduce GA use.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(7): e2011044, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692370

RESUMO

Importance: Racial bias is associated with the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies, heart transplants, and ventricular assist devices. It is unknown whether gender and racial biases are associated with the allocation of advanced therapies among women. Objective: To determine whether the intersection of patient gender and race is associated with the decision-making of clinicians during the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, 46 US clinicians attending a conference for an international heart transplant organization in April 2019 were interviewed on the allocation of advanced heart failure therapies. Participants were randomized to examine clinical vignettes that varied 1:1 by patient race (African American to white) and 20:3 by gender (women to men) to purposefully target vignettes of women patients to compare with a prior study of vignettes of men patients. Participants were interviewed about their decision-making process using the think-aloud technique and provided supplemental surveys. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory methodology, and surveys were analyzed with Wilcoxon tests. Exposure: Randomization to clinical vignettes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thematic differences in allocation of advanced therapies by patient race and gender. Results: Among 46 participants (24 [52%] women, 20 [43%] racial minority), participants were randomized to the vignette of a white woman (20 participants [43%]), an African American woman (20 participants [43%]), a white man (3 participants [7%]), and an African American man (3 participants [7%]). Allocation differences centered on 5 themes. First, clinicians critiqued the appearance of the women more harshly than the men as part of their overall impressions. Second, the African American man was perceived as experiencing more severe illness than individuals from other racial and gender groups. Third, there was more concern regarding appropriateness of prior care of the African American woman compared with the white woman. Fourth, there were greater concerns about adequacy of social support for the women than for the men. Children were perceived as liabilities for women, particularly the African American woman. Family dynamics and finances were perceived to be greater concerns for the African American woman than for individuals in the other vignettes; spouses were deemed inadequate support for women. Last, participants recommended ventricular assist devices over transplantation for all racial and gender groups. Surveys revealed no statistically significant differences in allocation recommendations for African American and white women patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This national study of health care professionals randomized to clinical vignettes that varied only by gender and race found evidence of gender and race bias in the decision-making process for offering advanced therapies for heart failure, particularly for African American women patients, who were judged more harshly by appearance and adequacy of social support. There was no associated between patient gender and race and final recommendations for allocation of advanced therapies. However, it is possible that bias may contribute to delayed allocation and ultimately inequity in the allocation of advanced therapies in a clinical setting.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos/normas , Sexismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Transplante de Coração/normas , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Alocação de Recursos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sexismo/etnologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
17.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 17(1): 85, 2019 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of pediatric participants in studies is difficult due to the vulnerability of this population and the scarcity of certain conditions. Co-enrolling in multiple studies is a strategy that may help overcome this problem. Although anecdotal evidence suggests that co-enrollment may increase patient and caregiver burden, few studies have been conducted from the patient perspective. The objective of this quality improvement project was to elicit patient and caregiver opinions on co-enrolling in multiple research studies. METHODS: Patients and caregivers attending the rheumatology clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview or focus group session. Participants were asked to respond to ten prompts, organized into five categories: experience in clinical research, multiple studies, study selection, study timing and other comments. Sessions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using NVivo 10 to identify common themes. RESULTS: Overall, eighteen caregivers and two patients were included in the study. Participants felt that the level of study involvement, rather than the number of studies, was the biggest factor affecting their decision to participate. Another factor commonly identified was the competing demands of participants' work and family life. Participants indicated that they generally preferred to be informed about all study opportunities and liked to receive this information prior to their appointments. Once informed, they preferred to be approached by the research team while they were waiting for their appointment. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers are open to the concept of co-enrolling in multiple research studies. There are multiple factors which influence decisions to co-enroll in studies including the demands of the study and personal limitations. These findings will help guide the design and practices of future research.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões , Nível de Saúde , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Reumatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 85(2): 236-41, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22542460

RESUMO

P3a and P3b event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited with an auditory three-stimulus (target, distracter, and standard) discrimination task in which subjects responded only to the target. Distracter stimuli consisted of white noise or novel sounds with stimulus characteristics perceptually matched. Target/standard discrimination difficulty was manipulated by varying target/standard pitch differences to produce relatively easy, medium, and hard tasks. Error rate and response time increased with increases in task difficulty. P3a was larger for the white noise compared to novel sounds, maximum over the central/parietal recording sites, and did not differ in size across difficulty levels. P3b was unaffected by distracter type, decreased as task difficulty increased, and maximum over the parietal recording sites. The findings indicate that P3a from white noise is robust and should be useful for applied studies as it removes stimulus novelty variability. Theoretical perspectives are discussed.


Assuntos
Mapeamento Encefálico , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados P300/fisiologia , Ruído , Atenção/fisiologia , Eletrodos , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA