Clinical outcomes after 1 versus 2-3 lines of neoadjuvant therapy in stage III inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Many stage III inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients experience a sufficient response to first-line (1L) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to allow surgery, while some require additional NAC. We evaluated the pathologic complete response (pCR), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients requiring 1 vs. 2-3 lines (L) of NAC prior to surgery. METHODS: Stage III IBC patients from 2 institutions who received 1L or 2-3L of NAC prior to surgery were identified. Hormone receptor and HER2 status, grade, and pCR were evaluated. BCFS and OS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox models were utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: 808 eligible patients (1997-2020) were identified (median age 51 years, median follow-up 69 months). 733 (91%) had 1L and 75 (9%) had 2-3L of NAC. Grade III, triple-negative and HER2-positive disease were more prevalent in 2-3L patients. 178 (24%) 1L and 14 (19%) 2-3L patients had pCR. 376 1L patients and 41 2-3L patients had recurrences. The 5-year BCFS was worse for the 2-3L group (33 vs. 46%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.99-1.91). However, in 192 patients with a pCR, BCFS was similar (76 vs. 83% in 1L vs. 2-3L, respectively). There were 308 deaths (276 among 1L and 32 among 2-3L patients). The 5-year OS in 1L vs. 2-3L was 60 vs. 53% (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Among stage III IBC patients, pCR rates were similar, irrespective of the NAC lines number, and BCFS and OS were comparable with pCR after 1L and 2-3L.

Non-sclerosing (T-cell) and sclerosing (B-cell) lymphocytic lobulitis in diagnostic breast biopsies: Clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.

Lymphocytic lobulitis (LL) is characterized by prominent lymphocytic infiltrates centered on lobules. Sclerosing lymphocytic lobulitis (SCLL) associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) or autoimmune disease (AI) was the first type to be described. Subsequently, non-sclerosing LL (NSCLL) was reported as an incidental finding in prophylactic mastectomies due to high risk germline mutations or a family history of breast cancer. The two types of LL were distinguished by stromal features and a predominant population of B-cells in the former and T-cells in the latter. In this study, 8 cases of NSCLL detected clinically or by screening were compared to 44 cases of SCLL. One case of NSCLL presented as a palpable mass, 2 as masses on screening, and 5 as MRI enhancement. In contrast, 80% of SCLL cases presented as palpable masses. Half the cases of NSCLL were associated with a BRCA1 or 2 mutation compared to 1 case of SCLL (2%). Three additional cases of NSCLL were associated with a strong family and/or personal history of breast cancer. Almost half (52%) of SCLL cases were associated with DM or AI, but only 25% of NSCLL. Immunoperoxidase studies confirmed a predominance of T-cells in NSCLL and B-cells in SCLL associated with DM or AI. It is important for pathologists to be aware of this new observation that NSCLL can be detected as a palpable mass or an imaging finding in diagnostic biopsies, as its presence can be indicative of a significant risk for breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Screening in High-risk Women During Pregnancy and Lactation.

Women who are at high risk of developing breast cancer warrant screening that is often initiated at younger ages than in average-risk women; this is usually with a combination of annual mammography and breast MRI. Compared to average-risk women, those at high risk are more frequently recommended to undergo screening during childbearing age and thus potentially during pregnancy and lactation. Understanding the appropriate use of screening breast imaging during pregnancy and lactation can be challenging due to limited data defining the evidence-based roles of the different imaging modalities, including mammography, US, and MRI. There have also been assumptions about the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities secondary to physiological changes. This scientific review discusses the current state of evidence- and expert-based guidelines and data for breast imaging screening of high-risk pregnant and/or lactating women, and the clinical and imaging presentations of breast cancer for these women.