Update on CVD 103-HgR single-dose, live oral cholera vaccine.

Cholera remains endemic in >50 countries, putting millions at risk, especially young children for whom killed vaccines offer limited protection. An oral, live attenuated vaccine - CVD 103-HgR (Vaxchora vaccine) - was licensed by the US FDA in 2016 for adults aged 18-64 years traveling to endemic regions, based on clinical trials in human volunteers showing the vaccine was well tolerated and conferred 90% efficacy within 10 days. The evidence base for Vaxchora vaccine has expanded with additional clinical trial data, in older adults (aged 46-64 years) and children (aged 2-17 years), demonstrating that the vaccine produces a strong vibriocidal antibody response. Over 68,000 doses have been administered in the United States, with no new safety signals. The dose volume has been reduced in children to improve acceptability, and cold chain requirements are less st ringent, at +2°C─+8°C. The vaccine has recently been licensed in the Untied States for children aged 2-17 years, in Europe for individuals aged ≥2 years, and for home administration in Europe. Next steps include a Phase 4 study in infants (6-23 months). Additional information is needed regarding duration of immunity, the need for and timing of revaccination, and efficacy data from lower-middle-income countries.

Safety and immunogenicity of PXVX0317, an aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted chikungunya virus-like particle vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) disease is an ongoing public health threat. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of PXVX0317, an aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted formulation of a CHIKV virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2 trial was conducted at three clinical trial centres in the USA. Eligible participants were healthy CHIKV-naïve adults aged 18-45 years. Participants were stratified by site and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1) to one of the eight vaccination groups using a block size of 16. Group 1 received two doses of unadjuvanted PXVX0317 28 days apart (2 × 20 µg; standard); all other groups received adjuvanted PXVX0317: groups 2-4 received two doses 28 days apart (2 × 6 µg [group 2], 2 × 10 µg [group 3], or 2 × 20 µg [group 4]; standard); group 4 also received a booster dose 18 months after the first active injection (40 µg; standard plus booster); groups 5-7 received two doses 14 days apart (2 × 6 µg [group 5], 2 × 10 µg [group 6], or 2 × 20 µg [group 7]; accelerated); and group 8 received one dose (1 × 40 µg; single). The primary endpoint was the geometric mean titre of anti-CHIKV neutralising antibody on day 57 (28 days after the last vaccination), assessed in the immunogenicity-evaluable population. Additionally, we assessed safety. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03483961. FINDINGS: This trial was conducted from April 18, 2018, to Sept 21, 2020; 468 participants were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 415 participants were randomly assigned to eight groups (n=53 in groups 1, 5, and 6; n=52 in groups 2 and 8; n=51 in groups 3 and 7; and n=50 in group 4) and 373 were evaluable for immunogenicity. On day 57, serum neutralising antibody geometric mean titres were 2057·0 (95% CI 1584·8-2670·0) in group 1, 1116·2 (852·5-1461·4; p=0·0015 vs group 1 used as a reference) in group 2, 1465·3 (1119·1-1918·4; p=0·076) in group 3, 2023·8 (1550·5-2641·7; p=0·93) in group 4, 920·1 (710·9-1190·9; p<0·0001) in group 5, 1206·9 (932·4-1562·2; p=0·0045) in group 6, 1562·8 (1204·1-2028·3; p=0·14) in group 7, and 1712·5 (1330·0-2205·0; p=0·32) in group 8. In group 4, a booster dose increased serum neutralising antibody geometric mean titres from 215·7 (95% CI 160·9-289·1) on day 547 to 10 941·1 (7378·0-16 225·1) on day 575. Durability of the immune response (evaluated in groups 1, 4, and 8) was shown up to 2 years. The most common solicited adverse event was pain at the injection site, reported in 12 (23%) of 53 participants who received the unadjuvanted vaccine (group 1) and 111 (31%) of 356 who received the adjuvanted vaccine. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: PXVX0317 was well tolerated and induced a robust and durable serum neutralising antibody immune response against CHIKV up to 2 years. A single 40 µg injection of adjuvanted PXVX0317 is being further investigated in phase 3 clinical trials (NCT05072080 and NCT05349617). FUNDING: Emergent BioSolutions.

Health Metrics Network (HMN-WHO), a Tool to Assess the Quality of the Information System in Burkina Hospitals.

An assessment of the quality of the information system was conducted in the 14 hospitals of Burkina Faso in 2017 using the HMN tool (Health Metrics Network). This evaluation was part of the process of developing a master plan for implementing a HIS for the hospitals in the country, and was aimed at analyzing the sub-components of the existing information system. The results are presented as scores, one per component, evaluated in % and converted into quartiles, ranging from the 1st quartile "Not adequate at all" to the 4th quartile "Highly adequate". The scores are as follows: Resources = Q1 (29%); indicator = Q2 (46%); data sources = Q1 (28%); information production = Q1 (21%); data management = Q2 (47%); dissemination and use = Q3 (55%). In conclusion, overall the system is not adequate (mean score 39%), particularly at the level of information production (score 21%).

Safety and tolerability of a single administration of AR-301, a human monoclonal antibody, in ICU patients with severe pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus: first-in-human trial.

PURPOSE: Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) is a critical concern in hospitals with ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) remaining the most common infection in the ICU, often due to Staphylococcus aureus, an increasingly difficult to treat pathogen. Anti-infective monoclonal antibodies (mAb) may provide new, promising treatment options. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study aimed at assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of AR-301, an S. aureus alpha toxin-neutralizing mAb, and exploring its clinical and microbiologic outcomes when used adjunctively with standard-of-care antibiotics. METHODS: Eligibility in this trial required microbiologically confirmed severe S. aureus pneumonia, including HABP, VABP or CABP, treated in the ICU and an APACHE II score ≤ 30. Standard-of-care antibiotics selected by the investigators were administered to all patients in the study following clinical and microbiologic confirmation of S. aureus pneumonia. Adjunctive treatment of AR-301 was to start < 36 h after onset of severe pneumonia. AR-301 was administered to four sequentially ascending dose cohorts. The placebo cohort received antibiotics and a placebo buffer. Clinical outcomes were adjudicated by a blinded committee. S. aureus eradication was declared based on a negative follow-up culture and presumed to be negative when no culture was obtained in the presence of clinical improvement. RESULTS: Thirteen ICUs enrolled 48 patients, with pneumonia attributable to MRSA in six subjects. The study drug displayed a favorable safety profile: Of 343 AEs reported, 8 (2.3%) were deemed related, none serious. In a post hoc subgroup analysis of VABP patients receiving AR-301, ventilation duration was shorter for AR-301-treated patients compared with the placebo group. Overall, there was a trend toward a better and faster microbiologic eradication at day 28. The PK profile of AR-301 is consistent with that of a human IgG1 mAb, with a plasma half-life of about 25 days. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive treatment of severe S. aureus HABP with anti-staphylococcal mAbs appears feasible and suggests some clinical benefits, but larger randomized studies are needed to better define its safety and efficacy.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise duration and peak oxygen consumption in older patients with heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the PEECH trial.

The Prospective Evaluation of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Congestive Heart Failure (PEECH) trial demonstrated that enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy increased exercise duration and improved functional status and quality of life without affecting peak oxygen consumption. The authors present data from a prespecified subgroup of elderly patients (65 years or older) enrolled in the PEECH trial. The 2 co-primary end points were the percentage of subjects with a >60-second increase in exercise duration and the percentage of subjects with a >1.25-mL/kg/min increase in peak volume of oxygen consumption. At 6-month follow-up, the exercise responder rate was significantly higher in EECP patients compared with controls (P=.008). Further, in contrast to the overall PEECH study, the EECP group demonstrated a significantly higher responder rate for peak oxygen consumption (P=.017). The authors conclude that an older subgroup of PEECH subjects confirms the beneficial effect of EECP in patients with chronic, stable, mild-to-moderate heart failure.

Quality Control of a Health Information System for Causes of Death Statistics in Burkina Faso Using Capture-Recapture Method.

INTRODUCTION: The information system on the causes of death (ISCD), set up in Burkina Faso in January 2014 at the University Hospital Center Souro Sanon (UHCSS) of Bobo-Dioulasso, was evaluated to assess its completeness in terms of death statistics generation. METHOD: The capture-recapture method was used to assess this quality control using the three-sources technique. RESULTS: The cross verification of the three data sources (mortuary, admission department, death certificate) gave the following estimations: number of deaths observed: 735, total estimated deaths: 852 [820-900], i.e. 86% of completeness achieved by the statistics generating system. DISCUSSION: The ISCD is functional and produces easy-to-cross-check quality data. It could be extended to the entire country for the generation of mortality statistics. Nevertheless, it needs to be improved before deploying across the country.

The effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on myocardial perfusion in patients with stable angina: a multicenter radionuclide study.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) reduces angina and extends time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with symptomatic coronary disease. One- and two-center studies and a retrospective case series reported that EECP improves myocardial perfusion in stable angina pectoris. We sought to critically evaluate and quantify the effect of EECP on myocardial perfusion. METHODS: In 6 US university hospitals, EECP was performed for 35 hours in patients with class II to IV angina who had exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Symptom-limited quantitative gated technetium Tc 99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography exercise perfusion imaging was performed at baseline and 1 month post-EECP. Sestamibi was injected at the same heart rate in both stress tests. Single photon emission computed tomography images were read at a blinded core laboratory. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, 34 of whom completed pre- and post-EECP stress testing. The mean age was 61 +/- 10 years, 81% were male, 78% had prior revascularization, and 68% had 3-vessel disease. The mean angina class decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.7 at baseline to 1.7 +/- 0.7 after EECP (P < .001). Exercise duration increased from 9.1 +/- 3.7 minutes at baseline to 10.2 +/- 3.6 minutes post-EECP (P = .03). The average percentage of tracer uptake, magnitude of reversibility, average thickening fraction, and the left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged after EECP. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm previous report that EECP reduces angina and improves exercise capacity. There were no significant changes in mean defect magnitude, amount of reversibility, thickening fraction, and ejection fraction measured using myocardial quantitative single photon emission computed tomography imaging when compared at identical pre- and post-EECP heart rates.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with heart failure: a multicenter feasibility study.

To assess the feasibility of using enhanced external counterpulsation to treat patients with heart failure, 26 patients with stable heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-III), with a left ventricular ejection fraction at or below 35%, and without fluid overload, were treated with enhanced external counterpulsation (1 hour daily, 5 days a week, to a total of 35 hours). Patients were followed for 6 months after completing the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. The primary parameter was safety as reflected by adverse events or by changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary end points included changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. There were no clinically significant problems associated with the administration of enhanced external counterpulsation. Significant improvements were seen in exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake and exercise duration), and in quality of life assessments, at 1 week and 6 months after the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. This study suggests that enhanced external counterpulsation is safe and well tolerated in patients with stable heart failure, and that a randomized, controlled study of enhanced external counterpulsation in these patients is warranted.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The PEECH (Prospective Evaluation of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Congestive Heart Failure) study assessed the benefits of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation reduced angina symptoms and extended time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease, angina, and normal left ventricular function. A small pilot study and registry analysis suggested benefits in patients with HF. METHODS: We randomized 187 subjects with mild-to-moderate symptoms of HF to either EECP and protocol-defined pharmacologic therapy (PT) or PT alone. Two co-primary end points were pre-defined: the percentage of subjects with a 60 s or more increase in exercise duration and the percentage of subjects with at least 1.25 ml/min/kg increase in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2) at 6 months. RESULTS: By the primary intent-to-treat analysis, 35% of subjects in the EECP group and 25% of control subjects increased exercise time by at least 60 s (p = 0.016) at 6 months. However, there was no between-group difference in peak VO2 changes. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved in the active treatment group at 1 week (p < 0.01), 3months (p < 0.02), and 6 months (p < 0.01). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score improved significantly 1 week (p < 0.02) and 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, single-blinded study, EECP improved exercise tolerance, quality of life, and NYHA functional classification without an accompanying increase in peak VO2.

Treating heart failure with enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP): design of the Prospective Evaluation of EECP in Heart Failure (PEECH) trial.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment can improve exercise tolerance in patients with ischemic heart disease; however, the possible benefits of EECP in patients with stable heart failure (HF) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) are unclear. An open pilot study showed significant increases in exercise tolerance in HF patients undergoing EECP. Thus a larger, controlled study of EECP in patients with stable HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes II and III) and LVD was undertaken. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PEECH trial is a controlled, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study of 187 patients with symptomatic but stable HF (NYHA classes II and III) and an LV ejection fraction < or =35% was designed to assess the efficiency of EECP in patients with stable HF. Medical therapy is optimized in all patients based on the recommendations of the Heart Failure Society of America ("Usual Care"), and then randomized between 2 treatment groups; UC or EECP (35 hours over 7 weeks). CONCLUSION: Efficacy measures include standard exercise tolerance tests on a treadmill (modified Naughton protocol), with measurements of peak oxygen uptake and exercise duration time; quality of life questionnaires; NYHA classification; and neurohormonal markers of HF.