RESUMO
The ankyrin repeat (AR) domain of IκBα consists of a cooperative folding unit of roughly four ARs (AR1-AR4) and of two weakly folded repeats (AR5 and AR6). The kinetic folding mechanism of the cooperative subdomain, IκBα(67-206), was analyzed using rapid mixing techniques. Despite its apparent architectural simplicity, IκBα(67-206) displays complex folding kinetics, with two sequential on-pathway high-energy intermediates. The effect of mutations to or away from the consensus sequences of ARs on folding behavior was analyzed, particularly the GXTPLHLA motif, which have not been examined in detail previously. Mutations toward the consensus generally resulted in an increase in folding stability, whereas mutations away from the consensus resulted in decreased overall stability. We determined the free energy change upon mutation for three sequential transition state ensembles along the folding route for 16 mutants. We show that folding initiates with the formation of the interface of the outer helices of AR3 and AR4, and then proceeds to consolidate structure in these repeats. Subsequently, AR1 and AR2 fold in a concerted way in a single kinetic step. We show that this mechanism is robust to the presence of AR5 and AR6 as they do not strongly affect the folding kinetics. Overall, the protein appears to fold on a rather smooth energy landscape, where the folding mechanism conforms a one-dimensional approximation. However, we note that the AR does not necessarily act as a single folding element.
Assuntos
Repetição de Anquirina , Anquirinas/química , Proteínas I-kappa B/química , Dobramento de Proteína , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Sequência Consenso , Humanos , Proteínas I-kappa B/genética , Proteínas I-kappa B/metabolismo , Cinética , Modelos Moleculares , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Mutação/genética , Homologia de Sequência de AminoácidosRESUMO
The factor inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1) hydroxylates many ankyrin repeat-containing proteins including IκBα. It is widely speculated that hydroxylation of IκBα has functional consequences, but the effects of hydroxylation have not been demonstrated. We prepared hydroxylated IκBα and compared it to the unhydroxylated protein. Urea denaturation and amide H/D exchange experiments showed no change in the "foldedness" upon hydroxylation. Surface plasmon resonance measurements of binding to NFκB showed no difference in the NFκB binding kinetics or thermodynamics. Ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation experiments showed no difference in the half-life of the protein. Thus, it appears that hydroxylation of IκBα by FIH-1 is inconsequential, at least for the functions we could assay in vitro.