Perioperative or adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-3): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is currently the standard of care for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The main concern regarding adjuvant chemotherapy is that only half of patients actually receive adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on the other hand, guarantees early systemic treatment and may increase chemotherapy use and thereby improve overall survival. Furthermore, it may prevent futile surgery in patients with rapidly progressive disease. However, some argue that neoadjuvant therapy delays surgery, which could lead to progression towards unresectable disease and thus offset the potential benefits. Comparison of perioperative (i.e., neoadjuvant and adjuvant) with (only) adjuvant administration of mFOLFIRINOX in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the optimal approach. METHODS: This multicenter, phase 3, RCT will include 378 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are recruited from 20 Dutch centers and three centers in Norway and Sweden. Resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as no arterial contact and ≤ 90 degrees venous contact. Patients in the intervention arm are scheduled for 8 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (2-week cycle of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 at day 1, followed by 46 h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2400 g/m2). Patients in the comparator arm start with surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. The primary outcome is overall survival by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, resection rate, quality of life, adverse events, and surgical complications. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power, 252 events are needed. The number of events is expected to be reached after the inclusion of 378 patients in 36 months, with analysis planned 18 months after the last patient has been randomized. DISCUSSION: The multicenter PREOPANC-3 trial compares perioperative mFOLFIRINOX with adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials: NCT04927780. Registered June 16, 2021.

Hybrid FDG-PET/MRI for Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Patients with Suspected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Purpose: Recently introduced hybrid 2-[18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18 F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may aid in proper diagnosis and staging of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this study is to assess the effect of 18 F-FDG PET/MRI on diagnosis and clinical decision making in the pre-operative work up of pCCA. Methods: In this single-centre pilot study patients with presumed resectable pCCA underwent state-of-the-art 18 F-FDG hybrid PET/MRI using digital silicone photomultiplier detectors integrated within a 3-Tesla bore. Data were collected on several baseline and imaging characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the added diagnostic information and the effect on clinical decision making. Secondary aim was to correlate quantitative PET signal intensity to patient- and tumour characteristics. High and low SUVmax subgroups related to the mean value were made. Significance of lesion- and patient characteristics with the high and low SUVmax subgroups, as well as TLR and TBR, was evaluated with Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney-U test. Results: In total 14 patients were included (mean age 62.4 years, 64% male). Final diagnosis was pCCA in 10 patients (71.4%), follicular lymphoma in one patient (7.1%) and benign disease in the remaining three patients. FDG-PET/MRI added valuable diagnostic information in six (43%) patients and affected clinical decision making in two of these patients (14%) by increasing confidence for malignancy which lead to the decision for surgery on short term. High SUVmax values were seen in half of cases with pCCA and half of cases with non-cancerous lesions. In addition, high SUVmax values were directly associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis when present (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Simultaneous 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI added diagnostic information in six of fourteen patients and influenced clinical decision making in two patients (14%) with presumed resectable pCCA.

Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide. DISCUSSION: The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.