Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs rifampin-soaked Dacron for the treatment of infected aortic and iliac grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic and iliac graft infections remain complex clinical problems with high mortality and morbidity. Cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAAs) and rifampin-soaked Dacron (RSD) are options for in situ reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of CAA vs RSD in this setting. METHODS: Data from patients with aortic and iliac graft infections undergoing in situ reconstruction with either CAA or RSD from January 2002 through August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Our primary outcomes were freedom from graft-related reintervention and freedom from reinfection. Secondary outcomes included comparing trends in the use of CAA and RSD at our institution, overall survival, perioperative mortality, and major morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (80 RSD, 69 CAA) with a mean age of 68.9 and 69.1 years, respectively, were included. Endovascular stent grafts were infected in 60 patients (41 CAA group and 19 RSD group; P ≤ .01). Graft-enteric fistulas were more common in the RSD group (48.8% RSD vs 29.0% CAA; P ≤ .01). Management included complete resection of the infected graft (85.5% CAA vs 57.5% RSD; P ≤ .01) and aortic reconstructions were covered in omentum in 57 (87.7%) and 63 (84.0%) patients in the CAA and RSD group, respectively (P = .55). Thirty-day/in-hospital mortality was similar between the groups (7.5% RSD vs 7.2% CAA; P = 1.00). One early graft-related death occurred on postoperative day 4 due to CAA rupture and hemorrhagic shock. Median follow-up was 20.5 and 21.5 months in the CAA and RSD groups, respectively. Overall post-discharge survival at 5 years was similar, at 59.2% in the RSD group and 59.0% in the CAA group (P = .80). Freedom from graft-related reintervention at 1 and 5 years was 81.3% and 66.2% (CAA) vs 95.6% and 92.5% (RSD; P = .02). Indications for reintervention in the CAA group included stenosis (n = 5), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), reinfection (n = 2), occlusion (n = 2), rupture (n = 1), and graft-limb kinking (n = 1). In the RSD group, indications included reinfection (n = 3), occlusion (n = 1), endoleak (n = 1), omental coverage (n = 1), and rupture (n = 1). Freedom from reinfection at 1 and 5 years was 98.3% and 94.9% (CAA) vs 92.5% and 87.2% (RSD; P = .11). Two (2.9%) and three patients (3.8%) in the CAA and RSD group, respectively, required graft explantation due to reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Aorto-iliac graft infections can be managed safely with either CAA or RSD in selected patients for in situ reconstruction. However, reintervention was more common with CAA use. Freedom from reinfection rates in the RSD group was lower, but this was not statistically significant. Conduit choice is associated with long-term surveillance needs and reinterventions.

Dialister pneumosintes and aortic graft infection - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Dialister pneumosintes is an anaerobic, Gram negative bacillus, found in the human oral cavity and associated with periodontitis. It has also been isolated from gastric mucosa and stool samples. Recent case reports implicate D. pneumosintes in local infection such as dental root canals, sinusitis, Lemierres syndrome and brain abscesses, as well as distal infections of the liver and lung through haematogenous spread. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a novel case of aortic graft infection and aortoenteric fistula (AEF) in a 75 year old Caucasian male, associated with D. pneumosintes bacteraemia. Microbiological evaluation of septic emboli in the lower limbs revealed other gastrointestinal flora. This suggests either AEF leading to graft infection and subsequent distal emboli and bacteraemia, or a dental origin of infection which seeded to the graft, resulting in AEF and systemic infection. To our knowledge this is the first report of D. pneumosintes associated aortic graft infection. The patient underwent surgical explantation, oversew of the aorta and placement of extra-anatomical bypass graft in conjunction with antimicrobial therapy, making a good recovery with discharge home after a 35-day hospital admission. CONCLUSION: We report a case of Dialister pneumosintes bacteraemia associated with aortic graft infection. To our knowledge, vascular graft-associated infection with D. pneumosintes has not been reported before.

Primary aortoenteric fistula after intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Primary aortoenteric fistulas (PAEFs) are a rare entity with high morbidity, and their relationship with Bacillus Instillation of Calmette-Guérin is anecdotal. METHODS/RESULTS: We present a 68-year-old male with a primary aortoenteric fistula after instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for a non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Diagnosis was made by CT angiography, subsequently confirmed by intraoperative findings and results of anatomopathological studies of aortic wall samples. We performed an in-situ reconstruction with a silver prosthesis impregnated in rifampicin with satisfactory evolution at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Primary aortoenteric fistula is an extremely rare complication, and although its relationship with intravesical BCG therapy is anecdotal, it should be considered in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding who have previously undergone this treatment. Its diagnosis requires clinical suspicion, and its treatment should be carried out without delay. Long-term targeted anti-biotherapeutic treatment is a fundamental pillar for its management. Reconstruction with an antibiotic-impregnated silver prosthesis is a valid option in cases of controlled infection.

Improved perioperative mortality after secondary aortoenteric fistula repair and lessons learned from a 20-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Secondary aortoenteric fistulas (SAEFs) are rare but represent one of the most challenging and devastating problems for vascular surgeons. Several issues surrounding SAEF treatment remain unresolved, including optimal surgical reconstruction and conduit choice. We performed an audit of our experience with SAEFs and highlight aspects of care that have affected outcomes over time with the intent to identify factors associated with best outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single center, retrospective review of all consecutive SAEF repairs (1999-2019), defined as presence of a false communication between an enteric structure and pre-existing aortic graft. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications and overall survival. Time-dependent outcome comparison was performed. Cox proportional hazards modeling and life-table analysis estimated risk and freedom from endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (63% male; n = 36) presented with SAEF (median age, 69 years; interquartile range [IQR], 61-74 years). Median follow-up time was 10 months (interquartile range, 3-21 months. The most common presenting symptoms were gastrointestinal bleeding (60%; n = 34) and abdominal pain (56%; n= 3 2). For the overall cohort, 30% (n = 17) underwent extra-anatomic bypass with aortic ligation, 30% (n = 17) rifampin-soaked Dacron graft, 26% (n = 15) femoral vein (eg, neoaortoiliac system), and 14% (n = 8) cryopreserved aortic allograft. The enteric communication involved the duodenum in 85% (n = 48), and a double-layer hand-sewn primary repair was most commonly employed (61%; n = 35). Thirty-day mortality was 35% (n = 20) with no significant difference between 90 days (39%; n = 22) and 180 days (42%; n = 24). Morbidity was 70% (n = 40), with gastrointestinal (30%; n = 17; leak [9%]), pulmonary (25%; n = 14), and renal (21%) complications being most common. Incidence of reoperation for any vascular and/or gastrointestinal-related complication was 56% (n = 32). One-year and 3-year survival was 54% ± 6% and 48% ± 8%, respectively. Over time, 30- and 90-day mortality improved (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.5; P = .002) despite no change in patient factors, operative strategy, conduit choice, or morbidity rate. Prehospital history of gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.9; P = .06); however, reconstruction strategy (in-situ vs extra-anatomic bypass), postoperative gastrointestinal and/or vascular complication, omental flap use, and preoperative endovascular aneurysm repair history were not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we observed improved short-term mortality despite no significant change in patient presentation or postoperative complications. This highlights increasing institutional experience in selecting the optimal surgical strategy and improved ability to rescue patients experiencing adverse postoperative events. An individualized approach to reconstruction and conduit choice can lead to best outcomes after SAEF management when patients are treated at a high-volume aortic surgery center.

Fifteen-year, single-center experience with in situ reconstruction for infected native aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival and freedom from reinfection for patients with infected native aortic aneurysms (INAAs) treated with in situ revascularization (ISR), using either open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and to identify the predictors of outcome. METHODS: Patients with INAAs who had undergone ISR from January 2005 to December 2020 were included in the present retrospective single-center study. The diagnosis of INAAs required a combination of two or more of the following criteria: (1) clinical presentation, (2) laboratory results, (3) imaging findings, and (4) intraoperative findings. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, estimated survival, patency, and freedom from reinfection using the Kaplan-Meier method. The predictive factors for adverse outcomes were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Fisher exact test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (53 men [81.5%]; median age, 69.0 years; interquartile range, 61.5-75.0 years) were included, 31 (47.7%) were immunocompromised, 60 were symptomatic (92.3%), and 32 (49.2%) had presented with rupture, including 3 aortocaval fistulas (4.6%) and 12 aortoenteric fistulas (18.5%). The most common location was infrarenal (n = 39; 60.0%). Of the 65 patients, 55 (84.6%) had undergone primary OSR with ISR, 3 (4.6%) had required EVAR as a bridge to OSR, and 8 (12.3%) had undergone EVAR as definitive treatment. The approach was a midline laparotomy for 44 patients (67.7%), mostly followed by reconstruction and aortic-aortic bypass (n = 28; 40.6%) and the use of a silver and triclosan Dacron graft (n = 30; 43.5%). Causative organisms were identified in 55 patients (84.6%). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 6.2% (n = 4) and 10.8% (n = 7). The median follow-up was 33.5 months (interquartile range, 13.6-62.3 months). The estimated 1- and 5-year survival rates were 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.6%-87.7%) and 67.4% (95% CI, 51.2%-79.3%). The corresponding freedom from reinfection rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 81.1%-97.1%) and 79.4% (95% CI, 59.1%-90.3%). On multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality increased with uncontrolled sepsis (P < .0001), rapidly expanding aneurysms (P = .008), and fusiform aneurysms (P = .03). The incidence of reinfection increased with longer operating times (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of ISR and OSR combined with targeted antimicrobial therapy functioned reasonably well in the treatment of INAAs, although larger, prospective, multicenter studies with appropriately powered comparative cohorts are necessary to confirm our findings and to determine the best vascular substitute and precise role of EVAR as a bridge to OSR or definitive treatment.

A Case of Successful Endovascular Aortic Repair of Primary Aortoenteric Fistula Without Aortic Explantation.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to report a case of a primary aortoenteric fistula successfully treated with endovascular repair without aortic explant. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old man presented with a 24-hour history of hematemesis and malena. A computed tomography (CT) abdomen and pelvis demonstrated a 6 cm infrarenal aortic aneurysm with periaortic stranding and contrast enhancement within the lumen of the third part of the duodenum. The patient underwent emergency Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). The patient was discharged on day 8 of his admission on oral antibiotics. He returned 7 weeks postindex procedure and underwent a laparotomy with omental patch repair of the aortic defect. Intraoperative cultures grew candida albicans, and the patient was discharged on lifelong oral Fluconazole and Amoxycillin-Clavulanic Acid. At 18 months postoperatively, the patient was clinically stable with improved appearances on CT aortogram. CONCLUSION: We discuss the use of EVAR without aortic explant as a possible treatment option in the management of patient with primary aortoenteric fistulae. This may potentially avoid the significant morbidity and mortality associated with aortic explant in suitable candidates without perioperative signs of sepsis.

Out of sight for the endoscopist? Gastrointestinal bleeding after aortic repair.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Secondary Aortoenteric Fistulas (sAEF) are difficult to diagnose and usually result in fatal gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding following aortic repair. Outcomes are largely dependent on a timely diagnosis, but AEFs remain challenging to identify endoscopically and are usually diagnosed on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of our study was optimize diagnosis of AEF by identifying patients developing GI bleeding after aortic repair, investigate their clinical course and identify factors specific to different bleeding sources. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study capturing all patients developing upper or lower GI bleeding after aortic surgery between January 2009 and March 2020 was performed. Electronic health records were screened for diagnostic codes of the relevant procedures. Bleeding was classified into three groups: AEF with demonstrable fistula, ischemic - macroscopic ulceration plus histological confirmation or imaging and "other" due to other recognized conventional cause, such as peptic ulcer disease. RESULTS: 47 GI bleeding episodes in 39 patients were identified. Of these, 10 episodes (21%) were caused by AEF, 16 (34%) by ischemic ulceration and 21 (45%) due to other causes. Patients with AEF exhibited more frequent hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors and had higher mortality, while ischemic ulcerations were associated with more recent operation or hypotensive episode. CONCLUSIONS: GI bleeding complications are uncommon following aortic surgery. AEF and ischemic ulceration are however frequent bleeding causes in this cohort. In patients presenting with fulminant bleeding, primary CT-scanning should be considered.

Polymicrobial Infections Among Patients with Vascular Q Fever, France, 2004-2020.

We report 5 cases of vascular Q fever complicated by polymicrobial superinfection in patients who had no risk factors for acute Q fever. Q fever was diagnosed by serologic and molecular assays for Coxiella burnetii. We confirmed additional infections using conventional graft cultures.

In situ bypass and extra-anatomic bypass procedures result in similar survival in patients with secondary aortoenteric fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal revascularization modality in secondary aortoenteric fistula (SAEF) remains unclear in the literature. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the revascularization approach associated with the lowest morbidity and mortality using real-world data in patients with SAEF. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of SAEF from 2002 to 2014 was performed using a standardized database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and operative and postoperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 182 patients at 34 institutions from 11 countries presented with SAEF (median age, 72 years; 79% male). The initial aortic procedures that resulted in SAEF were 138 surgical grafts (76%) and 42 endografts (23%), with 2 unknown; 102 of the SAEFs (56%) underwent complete excision of infected aortic graft material, followed by in situ (in-line) bypass (ISB), including antibiotic-soaked prosthetic graft (53), autogenous femoral vein (neoaortoiliac surgery; 17), cryopreserved allograft (28), and untreated prosthetic grafts (4). There were 80 patients (44%) who underwent extra-anatomic bypass (EAB) with infected graft excision. Overall median Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 319 days (interquartile range, 20-2410 days). Stratified by EAB vs ISB, there was no significant difference in Kaplan-Meier estimated survival (P = .82). In comparing EAB vs ISB, EAB patients were older (74 vs 70 years; P = .01), had less operative hemorrhage (1200 mL vs 2000 mL; P = .04), were more likely to initiate dialysis within 30 days postoperatively (15% vs 5%; P = .02), and were less likely to experience aorta-related hemorrhage within 30 days postoperatively (3% aortic stump dehiscence vs 11% anastomotic rupture; P = .03). There were otherwise no significant differences in presentation, comorbidities, and intraoperative or postoperative variables. Multivariable Cox regression showed that the duration of antibiotic use (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98; P = .01) and rifampin use at time of discharge (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.86; P = .03) independently decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ISB does not offer a survival advantage compared with EAB and does not decrease the risk of postoperative aorta-related hemorrhage. After repair, <50% of SAEF patients survive 10 months. Each week of antibiotic use decreases mortality by 8%. Further study with risk modeling is imperative for this population.

Case series of aortoenteric fistulas: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding and is often misdiagnosed in clinical practice. Herein, a case series of AEFs are presented and the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and management strategies are summarized. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive hospitalized patients with a final diagnosis of AEF at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2020. The clinical data including diagnostic and management procedures as well as outcomes were collected and summarized. RESULTS: A total of nine patients were included in this study, five with primary AEF and four with secondary AEF. Eight of the patients were male, and the median age was 63 years. The fistulas were located in both the small intestine and the colon. All patients presented with gastrointestinal bleeding and pain, followed by weight loss, anorexia, and fever. A typical abdominal triad was found in only two cases. Seven patients experienced complications with preoperative abdominal infections and sepsis, and multiple organ failure occurred in four of these patients. All patients were assessed by computed tomography and five underwent abdominal and/or iliac aorta angiography. Two of these patients showed contrast agent leakage from the abdominal aorta into the intestine. Two cases were diagnosed with AEF by endoscopy before the operation. Eight patients received surgery and six patients survived. CONCLUSIONS: AEF is a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding that is associated with high mortality. Gastrointestinal bleeding and pain are the most common presentations. Timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary management are crucial to achieve a positive outcome.

Primary Aortoduodenal Fistula: A Case Report and Current Literature Review.

Primary aortoduodenal fistula is a rare, life-threatening pathology that is difficult to diagnose and manage. We present the case of a 64-year-old male with a primary aortoduodenal fistula. Our patient initially underwent an endovascular aneurysm repair at an outside institution before being transferred to our tertiary care center, where he ultimately had definitive management with an extra-anatomic bypass, aortic ligation, duodenal resection with primary anastomosis, and gastrojejunostomy tube placement. His surgical cultures grew Candida albicans, and he was discharged with a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics with subsequent antibiotic suppression for 1 year. He died 14 months postoperatively from tongue squamous cell carcinoma. We also review the current literature regarding epidemiology, pathology, diagnostics, management, and case reports from 2015 to present. Overall, timely diagnosis and treatment is imperative for reducing mortality from primary aortoduodenal fistula, and although formal consensus is lacking regarding most clinical aspects, an increasing number of case reports has helped describe options for management.

[Aortoesophageal fistula-A rare differential diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding]. / Die aortoösophageale Fistel ­ Eine seltene Differenzialdiagnose der oberen Gastrointestinalblutung.

Approximately 1% of all patients are admitted to an emergency room for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Differential diagnostics reveal an aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) as the cause of the bleeding in very few cases. Despite increasing means of diagnostics and treatment, mortality is high in patients with AEF even under maximum medical care. These are often fulminant situations with fatal outcome for the patient. We report a case that supports this observation described from previous cases and give a closer look at this rare emergency situation. A 54-year-old patient was taken to a maximum care hospital with the clinical diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after receiving emergency medical treatment. The source of bleeding was quickly identified as an AEF following lobectomy for bronchial cancer. Despite maximum interventional intensive treatment, the patient died a few hours after hospital admission in hemorrhagic shock due to fulminant hemorrhage from the fistula.

A rare case of sudden death due to aortogastric fistula after endovascular aortic repair of the descending aorta.

Aortogastric fistulas are a rare type of aortoenteric fistula (AEF). Aortoenteric fistulas have been reported as a complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) after the placement of prosthetic materials. Considering the anatomic relationship of the descending thoracic aorta and the stomach, the formation of an aortic fistula involving the stomach is an extremely rare case. We report the case of a 77-year-old woman who was admitted to the hospital due to severe mid-thoracic chest pain and was diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Her medical history included an aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta, which was treated using the Thoracic Endovascular Repair (TEVAR) method several months prior. The patient died a few hours later amid hemorrhagic shock. The autopsy confirmed the upper gastrointestinal bleeding and revealed a fistula between the descending thoracic aorta and stomach, which were in anatomic contact because of a sliding hiatus hernia.

Intraoperative endoprosthesis customization for repair of an aortoenteric fistula in an emergency context: a case report.

Aortoenteric fistula is a severe clinical condition and its management remains a major technical challenge for surgeons. In these cases, the conventional surgical approach is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular surgery is an excellent option in these cases, but considering that the aorta has been treated previously, anatomy may not be compatible with commercially available endovascular devices and so physician-modified endografts may be needed in urgent cases. The case reported involves a secondary aortoenteric fistula, treated on an emergency basis with endovascular techniques, using a physician-modified endograft.

Fatal secondary aortoduodenal fistula diagnosed with postmortem computed tomography angiography.

Secondary aortoduodenal fistula (AEF), although less rare than its primary form, is an uncommon and frequently lethal cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We report a case of fatal GI hemorrhage in a woman with a remote history of endovascular graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Postmortem examination included computed tomography (PMCT) and CT angiography (PMCTA), which revealed air in the aorta, loss of the fat plane between the aorta and duodenum, and direct extravasation of contrast from the aorta into the duodenum. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of secondary AEF diagnosed by PMCT and confirmed with PMCTA. We propose a set of imaging criteria by which PMCTA can be used to supplant traditional anatomical dissection in the medicolegal investigation of deaths due to AEF.

Secondary aortoenteric fistula successfully treated with staged endovascular repair and duodenal resection without graft removal.

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are rare life-threatening complications that occur after abdominal aortic graft implant to treat aortic aneurysm or occlusive disease. Conventional treatments such as extra-anatomic bypass grafting with aortic ligation and subsequent graft removal with bowel repair are associated with a 25% to 90% operative mortality rate. In the emergency setting, patients unsuitable for major arterial surgery may benefit from a staged, less invasive approach. We present a case of SAEF treated with endoluminal deployment of a stent graft followed by duodenojejunal resection and anastomosis without further aortic reconstruction and graft removal.

Aortic Bulge: A Possible Predictive Sign of Impending Aortoenteric Fistula.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to introduce the aortic bulge sign, a finding observed retrospectively on computed tomography prior to the acute presentation of aortoenteric fistula, and to determine its interobserver reliability. METHODS: Following research ethics board approval, all cases of aortoenteric fistula at our institution occurring from 2011-2015 were identified retrospectively. All previous computed tomography images of patients who eventually developed aortoenteric fistula were reviewed by a single observer for the presence of a potentially predictive finding of fistulization, the aortic bulge sign. These previous images were then combined with age and sex matched controls into a case bank. Eight radiology residents and staff were instructed in observing the aortic bulge sign. These observers then reviewed the case bank in a blinded analysis to determine the interobserver reliability of this finding. RESULTS: Fourteen cases of aortoenteric were identified. The average patient age was 70.71 years with a male-to-female ratio of 11:3. Eleven patients had previous computed tomography images available for review. With blinded analysis by multiple observers, the aortic bulge sign was identified with greater than 80% agreement in six of 11 cases (66.67%). Fleiss' kappa was calculated at k = 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.50-0.69), corresponding to moderate-to-substantial interobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic bulge sign has been retrospectively identified as a promising computed tomography finding of eventual aortoenteric fistula prior to acute presentation. Further study is required to determine the diagnostic value of this sign.

Aortoenteric fistula - A fatal cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Can it be missed? - A case report.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, is the life threating presentation of many diseases in emergency room. Aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is one of the rare causes of GI bleeding that can be fatal if not diagnosed and treated promptly. We present a case of a86 years old hypertensive male with the history of fresh bleeding per rectum, dizziness, fatigability and palpitation for last 12 hours who came to the emergency room in January 2015 He was stabilized and resuscitated. On lab investigation and abdominal CT scan he was diagnosed as aortic aneurysm with AEF. The related pathology, diagnosis and management of the disorder has been discussed in this case report.

The red connection: a review of aortic and arterial fistulae with an emphasis on CT findings.

Fistulae between the aorta and adjacent structures are a rare, emergent, and potentially life-threatening process. Most commonly, aortic fistulae arise secondarily as a complication of prior aortic surgery with fistulization to adjacent structures. Rarely, a primary fistula may arise from the aorta in the setting of a pre-existing aneurysm or from a mass, inflammation, or infection. Although the incidence of aortic fistulae remains low, the frequency continues to increase as aortic surgical interventions and post-surgical follow-up with imaging become more common. Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice in evaluating the patient with suspected aortic fistula because of its accessibility and short scan time. In addition, CT allows for more clear depiction of para-aortic or intra-aortic gas than ultrasound or magnetic resonance (MR). This gas may be the first clue of a fistula. Given the high mortality associated with aortic fistulae, familiarity with the imaging findings of the spectrum of aortic fistulae is essential knowledge in the emergency setting. This review will discuss the imaging appearance of aortic and arterial fistulae to the bronchi, esophagus, gastrointestinal tract, ureters, and veins on CT.

Editor's Choice - Treatment of Aortic Prosthesis Infections by Graft Removal and In Situ Replacement with Autologous Femoral Veins and Fascial Strengthening.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic prosthetic graft infection (AGI) is a major challenge in vascular surgery. Eradicating the infection requires prosthetic material removal, debridement, and lower limb revascularization. For the past 15 years, we have used femoral veins for aorto-iliac reconstruction and tensor fascia lata to strengthen the upper anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this single institution retrospective study is to present results regarding in situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with autologous femoral veins (FVs). METHODS: From October 2000 to March 2013, patients treated for AGI with graft removal and autologous FV reconstruction at Helsinki University Hospital were included. Primary outcome measures were 30 day mortality, long-term treatment related mortality, and re-infection rate. Secondary outcome measures were long-term all cause mortality and event free survival (graft rupture, re-intervention, major amputation). RESULTS: During a 13 year period 55 patients (42 male, 13 female) were operated on using a venous neo-aorto-iliac system for AGI. The mean follow up was 32 months (1-157 months). The 30 day mortality rate was 9% (5) and overall treatment related mortality 18% (10). All cause mortality during follow up was 22 (40%) and overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 90.7% at 30 days, 81.5% at 1 year, and 59.3% at 5 years. Graft rupture occurred in three (5%) cases, two of which were caused by graft re-infection (4%). Four patients required major amputation, one of them on arrival and three (5%) during the post-operative period. Nine (16%) patients needed interventions for the vein graft, and two graft limbs occluded during follow up. CONCLUSION: In situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection with autologous FV presents acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality, and remains the treatment of choice for AGI at Helsinki University Hospital.