Dilemma of Thrombolysis in a patient with high-risk Pulmonary Embolism with severe Thrombocytopenia: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Managing a high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) in a critically ill patient with severe thrombocytopenia can present a challenging dilemma. There is a high risk of fatal bleeding due to anticoagulation in high-risk PE with thrombocytopenia; therefore, risks and benefits are balanced while dealing with such a critical scenario. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a female patient with thrombocytopenia who was admitted for management of lymphoma. Her hospital course was complicated by high-risk PE, leading to acute respiratory failure and hypotension, necessitating urgent transfer to the medical intensive care unit. She was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation. Multiple cardiac arrests occurred due to compromised cardiac output from a severely dilated right ventricle on bedside transthoracic echocardiography. As a last resort to save her life in this critical state and severe thrombocytopenia, she was given a half bolus dose of the recommended drug, i.e., 50mg IV of Alteplase. Subsequently, she stabilized and was extubated without any further complications. DISCUSSION: High-risk PE needs prompt management with anticoagulation to avoid fatal outcomes. However, on the other hand, anticoagulation carries a high risk of bleeding, especially in patients with thrombocytopenia. These challenges prompt a modern perspective in situations where clear guidelines are absent. CONCLUSION: We aim to discuss our contemporary clinical practice in managing such a complex case and highlight the need for further studies.

The Role of IVC Filters in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a prevalent cardiovascular condition, ranking third globally after myocardial infarction and stroke. The risk of VTE rises with age, posing a growing concern in aging populations. Acute PE, with its high morbidity and mortality, emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and intervention. This review explores prognostic factors for acute PE, categorizing it into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk based on hemodynamic stability and right ventricular strain. Timely classification is crucial for triage and treatment decisions. In the contemporary landscape, low-risk PE patients are often treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACS) and rapidly discharged for outpatient follow-up. Intermediate- and high-risk patients may require advanced therapies, such as systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and IVC filter placement. The latter, particularly IVC filters, has witnessed increased usage, with evolving types like retrievable and convertible filters. However, concerns arise regarding complications and the need for timely retrieval. This review delves into the role of IVC filters in acute PE management, addressing their indications, types, complications, and retrieval considerations. The ongoing debate surrounding IVC filter use, especially in patients with less conventional indications, reflects the need for further research and data. Despite complications, recent studies suggest that clinically significant issues are rare, sparking discussions on the appropriate and safe utilization of IVC filters in select PE cases. The review concludes by highlighting current trends, gaps in knowledge, and potential avenues for advancing the role of IVC filters in future acute PE management.

Clinical Outcome Using Different Catheter Interventional Treatment Modalities in High-Risk Pulmonary Artery Embolism.

BACKGROUND: For patients with high-risk pulmonary artery embolism (PE), catheter-directed therapies pose a viable alternative treatment option to systemic thrombolysis or anticoagulation. Right now, there are multiple devices available which have been proven to be safe and effective in lower-risk settings. There is, however, little data comparing their efficacies in high-risk PE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study on patients with high-risk PE undergoing catheter interventional treatment. Patients receiving large-bore catheter thrombectomy were compared to patients receiving alternative treatment forms. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients included, 9 received large-bore thrombectomy, and 11 received alternative interventional treatments. While the baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, periprocedural and in-hospital mortality tended to be significantly lower with large-bore thrombectomy when compared to other treatment forms (0 vs. 55% and 33 vs. 82%, p = 0.07 and 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this small, retrospective study, large-bore thrombectomy was associated with lower mortality as compared to alternative treatment forms. Future prospective research is needed to corroborate these findings.

Temporal trends in the utilization of advanced therapies among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: insights from a national database.

There is a paucity of data regarding the contemporary temporal trends in the adoption of advanced pulmonary embolism (PE) therapies in the United States as well as the parallel trends in outcomes of patients with acute PE. Therefore, we queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (years 2016-2020) to report the temporal trends in utilization of advanced PE therapies. Our final analysis included 920 770 hospitalizations with acute PE. We demonstrated an increase in the proportion of patients diagnosed with high-risk PE during the study years. Overall, there was an increase in the use of advanced PE therapies, which was mainly due to the increase in the utilization of systemic thrombolytics, and catheter-directed therapies. Also, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation showed an incremental increase over the study years. The use of inferior vena cava filter has declined, while the use of surgical embolectomy did not change during the study years. The use of advanced therapies has increased among urban teaching, but not among urban non-teaching hospitals. During the study years, there was no change in unadjusted or adjusted in-hospital mortality rates among patients with acute PE, while the 90-day unplanned readmission rate has declined.

Clinical profile, management and outcome of pulmonary embolism in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a significant mortality and morbidity. We aim to study clinical profile, management and outcome of PE at Shahid Gangalal National heart Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal. METHODS: It was a retrprospective, single centre study, conducted from January 2015 to December 2016. Haemodynamics was used for risk Simplified, PESI score, predisposing factors, symptoms, clinical features at the time of admission, ECG features, echocardiogram, treatment received and the outcome were reviewed. RESULTS: During the study period 23 cases of PE were admitted. Nine were males and 14 were females. Eleven patients were diagnosed as provoked PE. High risk PE was diagnosed in four patients, Non-high risk in 19 patients. The most common clinical presentation was shortness of breath. The most common finding in ECG is sinus tachycardia followed by ST-T changes in V1-V3. Eight patient had SPO2 less than 90%. Most of the patients had a normal chest radiograph. Echocardiography revealed dilated RA and RV in 20 patients.All high risk PE patients were thrombolyzed with streptokinase. All patients who were diagnosed as Non-high risk PE were treated with LMWH. All the patients were treated with oral anticoagulants. Mean hospital stay was 9.7 ± 4.9 days. Two patients died during hospital stay. S-PESI score was 1.4 ± 0.9 respectively. Mean warfarin dose at the time of discharge was 5.9 ± 1.6 mg. CONCLUSION: PE is an under diagnosed clinical problem world over. Suspicion is the most important part to come to the diagnosis of PE.

Systemic Thrombolysis for Pulmonary Embolism: Who and How.

Anticoagulation has been shown to improve mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Initiation of anticoagulation should be considered when PE is strongly suspected and the bleeding risk is perceived to be low, even if acute PE has not yet been proven. Low-risk patients with acute PE are simply continued on anticoagulation. Severely ill patients with high-risk (massive) PE require aggressive therapy, and if the bleeding risk is acceptable, systemic thrombolysis should be considered. However, despite clear evidence that parenteral thrombolytic therapy leads to more rapid clot resolution than anticoagulation alone, the risk of major bleeding including intracranial bleeding is significantly higher when systemic thrombolytic therapy is administered. It has been demonstrated that right ventricular dysfunction, as well as abnormal biomarkers (troponin and brain natriuretic peptide) are associated with increased mortality in acute PE. In spite of this, intermediate-risk (submassive) PE comprises a fairly broad clinical spectrum. For several decades, clinicians and clinical trialists have worked toward a more aggressive, yet safe solution for patients with intermediate-risk PE. Standard-dose thrombolysis, low-dose systemic thrombolysis, and catheter-based therapy which includes a number of devices and techniques, with or without low-dose thrombolytic therapy, have offered potential solutions and this area has continued to evolve. On the basis of heterogeneity within the category of intermediate-risk as well as within the high-risk group of patients, we will focus on the use of systemic thrombolysis in carefully selected high- and intermediate-risk patients. In certain circumstances when the need for aggressive therapy is urgent and the bleeding risk is acceptable, this is an appropriate approach, and often the best one.

Advanced Cardiopulmonary Support for Pulmonary Embolism.

Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) requires an understanding of the pathophysiology of PE, options for rapid clot reduction, critical care interventions, and advanced cardiopulmonary support. PE can lead to rapid respiratory and hemodynamic collapse via a complex sequence of events leading to acute right ventricular failure. Importantly, reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance must be accomplished either by systemic thrombolytics, catheter directed thrombolytics, endovascular clot extraction, or surgical embolectomy. There are important advances in these techniques all of which have a niche role in the cardiopulmonary stabilization of critically ill patient with PE. Critical care support surrounding the above interventions is necessary. Maintenance of systemic perfusion and cardiac output may require careful titration of vasopressors, inotropes, and preload. Extreme caution should be taken with approach to intubation and positive pressure ventilation. A hemodynamically neutral induction with preparations for circulatory collapse should be the goal. Once intubated, the effect of positive pressure on pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular hemodynamics is necessary. Veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation plays an increasingly important role in the stabilization of the hemodynamically collapsed patient who either has a contraindication to systemic lytics, failed systemic lytics, or requires a bridge to surgical or catheter embolectomy. Veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation has also been used alone to stabilize the circulation until hemodynamics normalize on anticoagulation and has also been used in tenuous patient as a safety net for endovascular procedures.