Surgical Rib Fixation is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) along with supportive care has been the adopted approach for traumatic rib fractures; however, surgical approaches have emerged recently to treat this common pathology. Despite this, there are no guidelines for surgical rib fixation in patients with traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study was performed at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital aiming to compare the outcomes and complications between patients with traumatic rib fractures who undergo surgical fixation and their counterparts with NOM. The study period comprised from January 2016 through July 2020. Outcomes were evaluated with negative binomial and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified for the surgical rib fixation group, who were matched to 150 patients who received NOM. The majority of patients were male (91.5%), with a median (interquartile range) age of 53 (29) years. Concomitant chest injuries were significantly more prevalent in the operative group, such as flail segment (P < 0.001), number of fractures (P < 0.001), and displaced rib fractures (P < 0.001). Although hospital length of stay was 25% (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.54) longer in the surgical group, this intervention was associated with an 85% (95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.70) lower mortality rate when compared to conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Rib fixation may offer some benefits in selected patients with traumatic rib fractures, such as those with bilateral rib fractures, multiple displaced rib fractures, flail segment, and concomitant thoracic injuries. This study may serve as a guide for treatment strategy and patient selection regarding the surgical management of traumatic rib fractures.

The Earlier the Better: Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Associated With Improved Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer respiratory complications. This study sought to evaluate the association between SSRF timing and patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients aged ≥45 y who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcome was incidence of ventilator-assisted pneumonia (VAP). Secondary outcomes included acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), unplanned endotracheal intubation, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after all major complications, and FTR after severe respiratory complications. Logistic regression models of outcomes on timing to SSRF were fit while controlling for age, gender, body mass index, injury severity score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking. RESULTS: Among 4667 patients who received SSRF, average time to SSRF was 4.6 ± 3.2 d. Each additional day to SSRF was associated with increased odds of VAP (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.11) and intubation (OR 1.10, CI 1.08-1.13). A longer time to SSRF was associated with increased odds of ARDS (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15), while no significant association was observed for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.99, CI 0.93-1.04). A longer time to SSRF was associated with decreased odds of FTR after a major complication (OR 0.90, CI 0.83-0.97) and respiratory complications (OR 0.87, CI 0.78-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: For each day that SSRF is delayed, increased odds of VAP, intubation, and ARDS were observed. Prompt intervention is crucial for preventing these complications and improving our ability to rescue patients.

Benefits of Rib Fixation Utilizing Low-Cost Materials: A Randomized Pilot Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) using standard rib plating systems has become a norm in developed countries. However, the procedure has not garnered much interest in low-middle-income countries, primarily because of the cost. METHODS: This was a single-center pilot randomized trial. Patients with severe rib fractures were randomized into two groups: SSRF and nonoperative management. SSRF arm patients underwent surgical fixation in addition to the tenets of nonoperative management. Low-cost materials like stainless steel wires and braided polyester sutures were used for fracture fixation. The primary outcome was to assess the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were randomized, 11 in each arm. Per-protocol analysis showed that the SSRF arm had significantly reduced duration of hospital stay (22.6 ± 19.1 d versus 7.9 ± 5.7 d, P value 0.031), serial pain scores at 48 h and 5 d (median score 5, IQR (3-6) versus median score 7, IQR (6.5-8), P value 0.004 at 48 h and median score 2 IQR (2-3) versus median score 7 IQR (4.5-7) P value 0.0005 at 5 d), significantly reduced need for injectable opioids (9.9 ± 3.8 mg versus 4.4 ± 3.4 mg, P value 0.003) and significantly more ventilator-free days (19.9 ± 8.7 d versus 26.4 ± 3.2 d, P value 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in the total duration of ICU stay (median number of days 2, IQR 1-4.5 versus median number of days 7, IQR 1-14, P value 0.958), need for tracheostomy (36.4% versus 0%, P value 0.155), and pulmonary and pleural complications. CONCLUSIONS: SSRF with low-cost materials may provide benefits similar to standard rib plating systems and can be used safely in resource-poor settings.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Versus Multimodal Pain Management for Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs) are frequently utilized when treating patients with multiple rib fractures. While previous work has demonstrated the efficacy of ESPB as an adequate method of pain control, there has been no work comparing a continuous ESPB to "best practice" multimodal pain control. We hypothesize that a continuous ESPB catheter combined with a multimodal pain regimen may be associated with a decrease in opioid requirements when compared to a multimodal pain regimen alone. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study at a level 1 trauma center from September 2016 through September 2021. Inclusion criteria included patients 18 y or older with at least three unilateral rib fractures who were not mechanically ventilated during admission. The primary outcome was the total morphine equivalents utilized throughout the index admission. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in this study, 71 in each cohort. Patients included had a mean age of 52.5 y, and 18% were female. Demographic data including injury severity score, total number of rib fractures, and length of stay were similar. While there was a trend toward a decrease in morphine equivalents in the patient cohort undergoing ESPB catheter placement, this was not found to be statistically significant (284.3 ± 244.8 versus 412.6 ± 622.2, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: While ESPB catheters are frequently utilized for analgesia in the setting of multiple rib fractures, there was no decrease in total opioid usage when compared with patients who were managed with a multimodal pain regimen alone. Further assessment comparing ESPB catheters to best practice multimodal pain control regimens through a prospective, multicenter trial is required to further validate these findings.

Geriatric Trauma Intensive Care Unit Admission Guideline is Associated With Reduction in Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admissions.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric trauma patients experience disproportionate adverse outcomes compared to younger patients with similar injuries and represent an important target for quality improvement. Our institution created a Geriatric Trauma Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission Guideline to identify high-risk patients and elevate their initial level of care. The goal of implementation was reducing unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs), a recognized surrogate marker for adverse outcomes. METHODS: The Geriatric Trauma ICU Admission Guideline was implemented on July 1, 2020, at a large academic level-1 trauma center. Using trauma registry data, we retrospectively analyzed geriatric patients who met the criteria for ICU admission 2 y preimplementation and postimplementation. The main outcome was UIAs in the target geriatric population. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilator days, mortality, and 30-d readmissions. Characteristics between groups were compared with t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test. Risk-adjusted logistic and negative binomial regressions were used for the categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 1075 patients were identified with 476 in the preimplementation and 599 in the postimplementation group. The groups were similar across most demographic and physiologic characteristics, with the exception of a higher incidence of hypertension in the preimplementation group (77.7% versus 71.6%, P = 0.02) and COVID in the postimplementation group (3.8% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001). While mechanism of injury was similar, there was a higher incidence of traumatic brain injury in the preimplementation group (35.1% versus 26.2%, P = 0.002). In the postimplementation group, there was a higher incidence ≥3 rib fractures (68% versus 61.3%, P = 0.02) and an expected increase in initial ICU level of care (69.5% versus 37.1%, P < 0.001). The odds of a UIA after guideline implementation were reduced by half (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.92). There was not a significant difference in the secondary outcomes of mortality, 30-d readmission, hospital-free days, ICU-free days, or ventilator-free days. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Geriatric Trauma ICU Admission Guideline was associated with a reduction in UIAs by half in the target population. There was not a significant change in hospital-free days, ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, mortality, 30-d readmission, or venous thromboembolism. Further research is needed to better refine admission guidelines, examine the association of preventative admission on delirium, and determination of criteria that would allow safe, earlier downgrade.

Inpatient Outcomes of Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation With Surgical Rib Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Rib fractures are associated with significant pain and morbidity. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (INCA) offers targeted, prolonged pain relief for these patients. Over the last decade, more patients have undergone surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) after injury. However, data on INCA use in SSRF patients are limited. This study aimed to identify the relationship of INCA in blunt trauma patients (BTPs) undergoing SSRF, hypothesizing INCA coupled with SSRF would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) was queried for BTPs ≥18 y old who underwent SSRF. Patients who received INCA ((+)INCA) were compared to patients who did not ((-)INCA). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) LOS and in-hospital complications. A subgroup analysis of only flail chest patients was performed. RESULTS: From 15,784 BTPs, 750 (4.8%) received INCA. Hospital LOS was similar between groups (12 versus 12 d, P = 0.10); however, the (+)INCA patients had decreased ICU LOS (6 versus 7 d, P < 0.001). The (+)INCA cohort also had decreased hospital complications (20.4% versus 24.4%, P = 0.01), including pulmonary embolism (0.7% versus 1.8%, P = 0.02) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (2.1% versus 3.8%, P = 0.02). On subgroup analysis of flail chest patients, decreased ICU LOS in the (+)INCA patients remained a significant outcome (7 versus 8 d, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 5% of SSRF patients received INCA. While overall LOS was similar, the (+)INCA cohort had decreased ICU LOS and in-hospital complications. Future studies are needed to corroborate these findings and evaluate any long-term complications associated with INCA before widespread adoption.

Age-Neutral Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Breaking the Ageism Barrier.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer complications. This study evaluates whether the decision to undergo SSRF is associated with age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status and assesses associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients ≥45 y old with rib fractures who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2016 to 2020. Race, ethnicity, and insurance statuses were collected. Age in years was dichotomized into two groups: 45-64 and 65+. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned endotracheal intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after major complications, and FTR after respiratory complications. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes, controlling for gender, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty-nine patients aged 45-64 and 1828 patients aged 65+ underwent SSRF. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was noted between these groups. Analysis showed that the association of SSRF with ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, FTR after a major complication, or FTR after a respiratory complication did not vary by age (P > 0.05). Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.77; P < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; P < 0.001), and Medicaid (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.95; P = 0.005) patients were less likely to receive SSRF. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes were measured between adults aged 45-64 and ≥65 who underwent SSRF. Older age should not preclude patients from receiving SSRF. Further work is needed to improve underutilization in Black, Hispanic and Medicaid patients.

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors for postoperative wound infection following open reduction and internal fixation of Rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound infections (PWIs) significantly impact patient outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of rib fractures. Identifying and understanding risk factors associated with these infections are crucial for improving surgical outcomes and patient care. METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted from January 2020 to October 2023 at our institution, aimed to analyze the risk factors for PWIs in patients undergoing ORIF for rib fractures. A total of 150 patients were included, with 50 in the infected group and 100 in the non-infected control group, matched for demographic and clinical characteristics. Data on variables such as intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay duration, body mass index (BMI), operation time, presence of anemia, drainage time, diabetes mellitus status, smoking habits, and age were collected. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate logistic regression using SPSS software (Version 27.0), with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed no significant association between intraoperative blood loss or hospital stay duration and PWIs. However, operation time ≥ 5 h, anemia, drainage time ≥ 7 days, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and age ≥ 60 years were significantly associated with higher PWI rates. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed these factors as independent predictors of PWIs, with operation time and diabetes mellitus showing particularly strong associations. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged operation time, anemia, extended drainage, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and advanced age significantly increase the risk of PWIs following ORIF for rib fractures. Early identification and targeted management of these risk factors are essential to reduce the incidence of infections and improve postoperative outcomes.

Fractures and other chest wall abnormalities after thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain following a thoracotomy for esophageal cancer is frequently reported but poorly understood. This study aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of thoracotomy-related thoracic fractures on postoperative imaging and (2) compare complications, long-term pain, and quality of life in patients with versus without these fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a thoracotomy between 2010 and 2020 with pre- and postoperative CTs (<1 and/or >6 months). Disease-free patients were invited for questionnaires on pain and quality of life. RESULTS: Of a total of 366 patients, thoracotomy-related rib fractures were seen in 144 (39%) and thoracic transverse process fractures in 4 (2%) patients. Patients with thoracic fractures more often developed complications (89% vs. 74%, p = 0.002), especially pneumonia (51% vs. 39%, p = 0.032). Questionnaires were completed by 77 after a median of 41 (P25 -P75 28-91) months. Long-term pain was frequently (63%) reported but was not associated with thoracic fractures (p = 0.637), and neither were quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic fractures are prevalent in patients following a thoracotomy for esophageal cancer. These thoracic fractures were associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, especially pneumonia, but an association with long-term pain or reduced quality of life was not confirmed.

Potential strength and weakness of artificial intelligence integration in emergency radiology: a review of diagnostic utilizations and applications in patient care optimization.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its recent increasing healthcare integration has created both new opportunities and challenges in the practice of radiology and medical imaging. Recent advancements in AI technology have allowed for more workplace efficiency, higher diagnostic accuracy, and overall improvements in patient care. Limitations of AI such as data imbalances, the unclear nature of AI algorithms, and the challenges in detecting certain diseases make it difficult for its widespread adoption. This review article presents cases involving the use of AI models to diagnose intracranial hemorrhage, spinal fractures, and rib fractures, while discussing how certain factors like, type, location, size, presence of artifacts, calcification, and post-surgical changes, affect AI model performance and accuracy. While the use of artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the practice of emergency radiology, it is important to address its limitations to maximize its advantages while ensuring the safety of patients overall.

Comparative study of wound outcomes and surgical strategies: Internal fixation versus external stabilization in rib fracture patients with traumatic chest wounds.

The clinical management of traumatic chest incisions accompanied by rib fractures presents the formidable challenge. The study was carried out to compare the outcomes of auscultatory triangle internal fixation (ATIF) and external fixation (EF) in such injuries. From June 2019 to June 2022, 105 patients with multiple rib fractures participated in the cohort study in which they were divided into two groups: 53 patients underwent ATIF and 52 patients underwent EF. The incidence of surgical site infection, wound healing time, incidence of wound dehiscence, number of dressing changes, pain as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), duration of hospitalization, period of return to work, pulmonary complications and functionality of the upper limbs as assessed by the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were among the parameters evaluated. In comparison with EF, ATIF demonstrated the decreased incidence of wound dehiscence (1.9% vs. 9.6%) (p < 0.05), surgical site infection (3.8 vs. 11.5) and wound healing time (12.3 ± 2.1 vs. 18.5 ± 3.7 days) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, during their ATIF treatment, patients required fewer changes of dressing (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 5.7 ± 1.2) and demonstrated enhanced pain management, reduced hospital stays and expedited return to work (p < 0.05). ATIF group demonstrated enhancements in both upper limb functionality and post-operative pulmonary function (p < 0.05). The utilization of ATIF as opposed to EF for the treatment of traumatic chest wounds accompanied by rib fractures yields superior outcomes in terms of wound healing, infection reduction and restoration of pulmonary and upper limb functionality.

Assessment of automatic rib fracture detection on chest CT using a deep learning algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate deep neural networks for automatic rib fracture detection on thoracic CT scans and to compare its performance with that of attending-level radiologists using a large amount of datasets from multiple medical institutions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, an internal dataset of 12,208 emergency room (ER) trauma patients and an external dataset of 1613 ER trauma patients taking chest CT scans were recruited. Two cascaded deep neural networks based on an extended U-Net architecture were developed to segment ribs and detect rib fractures respectively. Model performance was evaluated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) on both the internal and external dataset, and compared with attending-level radiologist readings using t test. RESULTS: On the internal dataset, the AUC of the model for detecting fractures at per-rib level was 0.970 (95% CI: 0.968, 0.972) with sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI: 92.0%, 94.4%) at a specificity of 98.4% (95% CI: 98.3%, 98.5%). On the external dataset, the model obtained an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.941, 0.945) with sensitivity of 86.2% (95% CI: 85.0%, 87.3%) at a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 98.9%), compared to the sensitivity of 70.5% (95% CI: 69.3%, 71.8%) (p < .0001) and specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.7%, 98.9%) (p = 0.175) by attending radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed DL model is a feasible approach to identify rib fractures on chest CT scans, at the very least, reaching a level on par with attending-level radiologists. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning-based algorithms automatically detected rib fractures with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity on chest CT scans. • The performance of deep learning-based algorithms reached comparable diagnostic measures with attending level radiologists for rib fracture detection on chest CT scans. • The deep learning models, similar to human readers, were susceptible to the inconspicuity and ambiguity of target lesions. More training data was required for subtle lesions to achieve comparable detection performance.

Multiple rib and vertebral fractures associated with Bordetella pertussis infection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pertussis is a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, characterized by paroxysms of severe coughing, and predominantly affects children. We report the first case of multiple fractures in the ribs, lumbar spine, and sacrum associated with severe coughing caused by Bordetella pertussis infection in an adult. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old female presented with acute-onset chest wall pain for 3 weeks. Imaging results revealed multiple fractures in the ribs and vertebrae, as well as bilateral pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, right pneumothorax, and enlargement of the left parapharyngeal and subclavian lymph nodes. The patient's bone density scan, autoimmune antibodies, bone marrow biopsy, and sacral bone biopsy all came back normal. Imaging test results found no evidence of solid tumors or active TB infection. The patient later recalled having violent coughing prior to the onset of chest pain and several family members having similar symptoms. Her blood sample was sent to the CDC, revealing Bordetella pertussis toxin (PT) IgG titer of 110.68 IU/mL. The patient was diagnosed with pertussis and multiple stress fractures from violent coughing. Symptomatic treatments were administered, and the patient's symptoms improved. The patient was followed up 8 weeks later, she reported no more coughing or chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pertussis is not just a pediatric disease, but diagnosis in adults is challenging as patients may present with a myriad of confusing symptoms, such as multiple stress fractures due to violent coughing. Medical and epidemiological histories are key to reaching the correct diagnosis, which is essential for appropriate treatments to avoid further complications. Adult immunization should be suggested both for the protection of the adult population and to prevent transmission to children.

Comprehensive Review of Current Pain Management in Rib Fractures With Practical Guidelines for Clinicians.

Rib fractures are present in 15% of all traumas and 60% of patients with chest traumas. Rib fractures are not life-threatening in isolation, but they can be quite painful which leads to splinting and compromise of respiratory function. Splinting limits the ability of a patient to take a deep breath, which leads to atelectasis, atelectasis to poor secretion removal, and poor secretion removal leads to pneumonia. Pneumonia is the common pathway to respiratory failure in patients with rib fractures. It is noted that in the elderly, each rib fracture increases developing pneumonia by 27% and the risk of dying by 19%. From a public health perspective, rib fractures have long-term implications with only 59% of patients returning to work at 6 months. In this review we will examine the state of art as it currently exists with regard to the management of pain associated with rib fractures. Included in this overview will be a brief review of the anatomy of the thorax and some important physiologic concepts, the latest trends in pharmacologic and noninvasive means of managing rib pain, a special section on epidural anesthesia, some other alternative invasive methods of pain control, and a review of the recent literature on rib plating. Finally, a practical, easy to follow guideline, to manage the patient with pain from rib fractures will be presented.

Analgesic Techniques for Rib Fractures-A Comprehensive Review Article.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rib fractures are a common traumatic injury that has been traditionally treated with systemic opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Due to the adverse effects of opioid analgesics, regional anesthesia techniques have become an increasingly promising alternative. This review article aims to explore the efficacy, safety, and constraints of medical management and regional anesthesia techniques in alleviating pain related to rib fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, opioid analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and paravertebral block (PVB) have been favored options in the pain management of rib fractures. TEA has positive analgesic effects, and many studies vouch for its efficacy; however, it is contraindicated for many patients. PVB is a viable alternative to those with contraindications to TEA and exhibits promising outcomes compared to other regional anesthesia techniques; however, a failure rate of up to 10% and adverse complications challenge its administration in trauma settings. Serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) and erector spinae blocks (ESPB) serve as practical alternatives to TEA or PVB with lower incidences of adverse effects while exhibiting similar levels of analgesia. ESPB can be performed by trained emergency physicians, making it a feasible procedure to perform that is low-risk and efficient in pain management. Compared to the other techniques, intercostal nerve block (ICNB) had less analgesic impact and required concurrent intravenous medication to achieve comparable outcomes to the other blocks. The regional anesthesia techniques showed great success in improving pain scores and expediting recovery in many patients. However, choosing the optimal technique may not be so clear and will depend on the patient's case and the team's preferences. The peripheral nerve blocks have impressive potential in the future and may very well surpass neuraxial techniques; however, further research is needed to prove their efficacy and weaknesses.

Evaluating AI rib fracture detections using follow-up CT scans.

PURPOSE: This study compares the results of Artificial Intelligence (AI) diagnosis of rib fractures using initial CT and follow-up CT as the final diagnostic criteria, and studies AI-assisted diagnosis in improving the detection rate of rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 113 patients who underwent initial and follow-up CT scans due to trauma. The initial and follow-up CT were used as diagnostic criteria, respectively. All images were transmitted to the AI software (V2.1.0, Huiying Medical Technology Co., Beijing, China) for rib fracture detection. The radiologist group (Group 1), AI group (Group 2), and Radiologist with AI group (Group 3) reviewed CT images at an interval of one month, recorded and compared the differences in the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing rib fractures. RESULTS: 589 and 712 rib fractures were diagnosed by the initial and follow-up CT, respectively. The initial CT diagnosis failed to detect 127 rib fractures, resulting in a missed rate of 17.84%. In addition, four normal ribs were mistakenly identified as being fractured. The follow-up CT was regarded as the diagnostic standard for rib fractures. The sensitivity and specificity were 82.16% and 99.80% for Group 1, 79.35% and 84.90% for Group 2, and 91.57% and 99.70% for Group 3. The sensitivity of Group 3 was higher than that of Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.05). The specificity was lower for Group 2 compared with Group 1 and Group 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: AI-assisted diagnosis improved the detection rate of rib fractures, the follow-up CT should be used for the diagnosis standard of rib fractures, and AI misdiagnoses can be greatly reduced when a radiologist reviews the diagnosis.

Application of preoperative 3D printing in the internal fixation of posterior rib fractures with embracing device: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of preoperative 3D printing on the fixation of posterior rib fractures utilizing a memory alloy embracing device of rib under thoracoscopy. METHODS: The enrolled patients were divided into the 3D printing (11 patients) and the non-3D printing (18 patients) groups, based on whether a 3D model of ribs was prepared prior to surgery. Analysis was conducted comparing the average fixation time per fracture, postoperative fixation loss, and poor reduction of fractured end between the two groups. RESULTS: The average fixation time of each fracture was 27.2 ± 7.7 min in the 3D printing group and 29.3 ± 8.2 min in the non-3D printing group, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of poor fracture fixation in the 3D printing group was statistically lower than that in the non-3D printing group (12.9% vs. 44.7%, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis revealed that the off-plate rate in the 3D printing group and the non-3D group was (3.2% vs. 12.8%, P > 0.05), and the dislocation rate of the fractured end was (9.7% vs. 31.9%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of 3D printing technology to prepare the rib model before surgery is proves beneficial in reducing the occurrence of poor fixation of fractures and achieving precise and individualized treatment.

A Patch-Based Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Rib Fractures on Frontal Radiographs in Young Children.

Chest radiography is the modality of choice for the identification of rib fractures in young children and there is value for the development of computer-aided rib fracture detection in this age group. However, the automated identification of rib fractures on chest radiographs can be challenging due to the need for high spatial resolution in deep learning frameworks. A patch-based deep learning algorithm was developed to automatically detect rib fractures on frontal chest radiographs in children under 2 years old. A total of 845 chest radiographs of children 0-2 years old (median: 4 months old) were manually segmented for rib fractures by radiologists and served as the ground-truth labels. Image analysis utilized a patch-based sliding-window technique, to meet the high-resolution requirements for fracture detection. Standard transfer learning techniques used ResNet-50 and ResNet-18 architectures. Area-under-curve for precision-recall (AUC-PR) and receiver-operating-characteristic (AUC-ROC), along with patch and whole-image classification metrics, were reported. On the test patches, the ResNet-50 model showed AUC-PR and AUC-ROC of 0.25 and 0.77, respectively, and the ResNet-18 showed an AUC-PR of 0.32 and AUC-ROC of 0.76. On the whole-radiograph level, the ResNet-50 had an AUC-ROC of 0.74 with 88% sensitivity and 43% specificity in identifying rib fractures, and the ResNet-18 had an AUC-ROC of 0.75 with 75% sensitivity and 60% specificity in identifying rib fractures. This work demonstrates the utility of patch-based analysis for detection of rib fractures in children under 2 years old. Future work with large cohorts of multi-institutional data will improve the generalizability of these findings to patients with suspicion of child abuse.

Rib fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in this subgroup of patients. This systematic review compares conservative treatment to surgical fixation in elderly patients (older than 60 years) with multiple rib fractures. The primary outcome is mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care length of stay (HLOS and ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) and pneumonia rates. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for comparative studies reporting on conservative versus operative treatment for rib fractures in patients older than 60 years. Both observational studies and randomised clinical trials were considered. RESULTS: Five observational studies (n = 2583) were included. Mortality was lower in operatively treated patients compared to conservative treatment (4% vs. 8%). Pneumonia rate and DMV were similar (5/6% and 5.8/6.5 days) for either treatment modality. Overall ILOS and HLOS of stay were longer in operatively treated patients (6.5 ILOS and 12.7 HLOS vs. 2.7 ILOS and 6.5 ILOS). There were only minimal reports on perioperative complications. Notably, the median number of rib fractures (8.4 vs. 5) and the percentage of flail chest were higher in operatively treated patients (47% vs. 39%). CONCLUSION: It remains unknown to what extent conservative and operative treatment contribute individually to reducing morbidity and mortality in the elderly with multiple rib fractures. To date, the quality of evidence is rather low, thus well-performed comparative observational studies or randomised controlled trials considering all confounders are needed to determine whether operative treatment can improve a patient's outcome.

Improving diagnostic performance of rib fractures for the night shift in radiology department using a computer-aided diagnosis system based on deep learning: A clinical retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on deep learning (DL) of rib fractures for night shifts in radiology department. METHODS: Chest computed tomography (CT) images and structured reports were retrospectively selected from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for 2,332 blunt chest trauma patients. In all CT imaging examinations, two on-duty radiologists (radiologists I and II) completed reports using three different reading patterns namely, P1 = independent reading during the day shift; P2 = independent reading during the night shift; and P3 = reading with the aid of a CAD system as the concurrent reader during the night shift. The locations and types of rib fractures were documented for each reading. In this study, the reference standard for rib fractures was established by an expert group. Sensitivity and false positives per scan (FPS) were counted and compared among P1, P2, and P3. RESULTS: The reference standard verified 6,443 rib fractures in the 2,332 patients. The sensitivity of both radiologists decreased significantly in P2 compared to that in P1 (both p <  0.017). The sensitivities of both radiologists showed no statistical difference between P3 and P1 (both p >  0.017). Radiologist I's FPS increased significantly in P2 compared to P1 (p <  0.017). The FPS of radiologist I showed no statistically significant difference between P3 and P1 (p >  0.017). The FPS of Radiologist II showed no statistical difference among all three reading patterns (p >  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DL-based CAD systems can be integrated into the workflow of radiology departments during the night shift to improve the diagnostic performance of CT rib fractures.