Prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subanalysis from Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial). METHODS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV). RESULTS: In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B. CONCLUSION: We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required.

Timing of Presentation and Outcomes of Women with Stage IV Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer (PABC).

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and concurrent, or early development of, stage IV disease is uncommon. Given this rarity, and complexities surrounding pregnancy, data are limited regarding PABC treatment and outcomes. We evaluated oncologic, obstetric, and fetal outcomes of women with stage IV PABC in relation to presentation timing and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our retrospective review of an institutional database identified women with stage IV PABC from 1998 to 2018. PABC was defined as diagnosis during pregnancy or ≤ 1 year postpartum. Clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome variables were compared between women diagnosed during pregnancy versus postpartum. RESULTS: We identified 77 women (median age 35 years; interquartile range [IQR] 32-37 years): 51 (66%) in the postpartum group and 26 (34%) in the pregnant group, including 9 with therapeutic or spontaneous abortion. Among 17 women who continued pregnancy, no obstetric or fetal complications were noted. Clinicopathologic and treatment variables did not differ between groups. Of 43 women dead from disease, 15 had triple negative (TN) tumors. Median overall survival (OS) of TN tumors was 14 months (range 5-39 months); OS was associated with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive tumors (p < 0.01). At 31 months (range 0-137 months) median follow-up, the 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 21-46%), and did not differ among pregnant and postpartum groups (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Women with stage IV TN PABC had high mortality rates despite multimodality therapy. Timing of presentation did not affect management decisions or OS, even for women who completed pregnancy. Further research to understand PABC biology, focusing on TN tumors, is warranted.

Primary Tumor Surgery for Patients with De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer can Decrease Local Symptoms and Improve Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: It was unknown whether surgery for primary tumor would affect the occurrence of local symptoms caused by tumor progression in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC). Our work attempted to probe the effect of local resection on controlling local symptoms and improving the quality of life in de novo stage IV BC patients. METHODS: Our study included patients presenting with de novo stage IV BC at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2008 to December 2014. In this study, we defined a new term called "local progress/recurrence of symptoms" (LPRS) to refer to the local problems caused by tumor progression/recurrence. All the patients were grouped into surgery and non-surgery groups. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed by Chi square and Fisher's test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were designed to evaluate independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: This study contained 177 patients. The follow-up deadline was April 1, 2019. The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 1-135 months). In included patients, 77 (43.5%) underwent surgery for primary tumors. Primary tumor surgery could reduce the occurrence of LPRS (relative risk/risk ratio (RR = 0.440; 95% CI 0.227-0.852; p = 0.015)) and patients without LPRS had longer OS (45 months vs 29 months, p < 0.001). In addition, patients who had only one symptom had better OS than those who had two or three symptoms (p = 0.0175). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer can be improved by reducing the incidence of local symptoms through primary tumor surgery.

Primary tumor resection in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.

Breast and axillary surgery in Stage IV disease is outside current national guidelines but has been a topic of ongoing debate. A single institution retrospective study identified women with de novo stage IV BC from 2011-2016 to evaluate the rate and goals of primary site surgery. Only 10.2% (n = 27/265patients) had primary site surgery. The goal of surgery was most often treatment intent (n = 23, 85.1%) not palliation (n = 4, 14.8%). There was no 30-day mortality and low (n = 1, 3.7%) 30-day morbidity. Multi-disciplinary patient care pathways based on modern evidence may help identify patients potentially suitable for primary site surgery.

A prognostic scoring model for survival after locoregional therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of locoregional treatment (LRT) remains controversial in de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC). We sought to analyze the role of LRT and prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in de novo stage IV BC patients treated with LRT utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The objective of the current study is to create and internally validate a prognostic scoring model to predict the long-term OS for de novo stage IV BC patients treated with LRT. METHODS: We included de novo stage IV BC patients reported to NCDB between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided into LRT and no-LRT subsets. We randomized LRT subset to training and validation cohorts. In the training cohort, a seventeen-point prognostic scoring system was developed based on the hazard ratios calculated using Cox-proportional method. We stratified both training and validation cohorts into two "groups" [group 1 (0-7 points) and group 2 (7-17 points)]. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare OS between the two groups. Our prognostic score was validated internally by comparing the OS between the respective groups in both the training and validation cohorts. RESULTS: Among 67,978 patients, LRT subset (21,200) had better median OS as compared to that of no-LRT (45 vs. 24 months; p < 0.0001). The group 1 and group 2 in the training cohort showed a significant difference in the 3-year OS (p < 0.0001) (68 vs. 26%). On internal validation, comparable OS was seen between the respective groups in each cohort (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Our prognostic scoring system will help oncologists to predict the prognosis in de novo stage IV BC patients treated with LRT. Although firm treatment-related conclusions cannot be made due to the retrospective nature of the study, LRT appears to be associated with a better OS in specific subgroups.

Readdressing the Role of Surgery of the Primary Tumor in de Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer.

The impressive advances in breast cancer treatment observed in recent years also apply to the metastatic setting, where a subset of patients with favorable metastatic disease enjoy long-term survival with systemic therapy. In patients with distant disease, the primary tumor in the breast has not classically been though to merit specific locoregional therapy. However, about 6% of Stage IV patients in the USA and up to 20% in limited resource environments present with synchronous distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis. For this group, who have an intact primary tumor, retrospective studies suggest that local therapy for the primary site may be beneficial. However, these retrospective analyses are biased in that women receiving local therapy to the primary site were younger and had biologically favorable tumors and lower volume metastatic disease. Two completed randomized clinical trials have shown conflicting results, and others are ongoing. In this chapter, we discuss the results of these studies through the present day and summarize their conclusions and their implications for clinical management.

Significance of primary lesion resection in Stage IV breast cancer.

Systemic treatment with drugs is administered to prolong survival and palliate symptoms in Stage IV breast cancer patients who have distant metastases at diagnosis. Surgical procedures for the primary tumor are not actively recommended in guidelines due to lack of evidence indicating prognostic benefit. Recently, several retrospective studies have shown primary tumor resection to prolong overall survival in patients with Stage IV breast cancer. Prospective randomized trials began enrolling patients to examine this possibility and two have already reported results. However, the results of these two trials were discordant. The first trial, conducted in India, reported negative effects of primary tumor resection after primary systemic therapy. A Turkish trial then obtained a positive effect of surgery as primary treatment. Several questions regarding the effects, timing, methods and eligibility for primary surgery have yet to be answered. Robust evidence, which is anticipated from other ongoing trials examining surgery for metastatic breast cancer, is eagerly awaited.

Ten-year survival in women with primary stage IV breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate breast cancer-specific survival at 10 years in patients who present with primary stage IV breast cancer, and to determine whether survival varies with age of diagnosis. METHODS: We retrieved the records of 25,323 women diagnosed with primary stage IV breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18 registries database from 1990 to 2012. For each case, we extracted information on age at diagnosis, tumour size, nodal status, oestrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, ethnicity, cause of death and date of death. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death due to stage IV breast cancer, according to age group. RESULTS: Among 25,323 women with stage IV breast cancer, 2542 (10.0 %) were diagnosed at age 40 or below, 5562 (22.0 %) were diagnosed between ages 41 and 50 and 17,219 (68.0 %) were diagnosed between ages 51 and 70. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, 16,387 (64.7 %) women died of breast cancer (median survival 2.3 years). The ten-year actuarial breast cancer-specific survival rate was 15.7 % for women ages 40 and below, 14.9 % for women ages 41-50 and 11.7 % for women ages 51 to 70 (p < 0.0001). In an adjusted analysis, the risk of death from breast cancer at 10 years was significantly lower for women ages 40 and below (HR 0.78; 95 % CI 0.74-0.82; p < 0.0001) and for women ages 41-50 (HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.79-0.85; p < 0.0001), compared to women ages 51-70. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 13 % of women with primary stage IV breast cancer survive 10 years after diagnosis. Women diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer before age 50 have better survival at 10 years compared to older women.

Impact of Surgery on Survival in Stage IV Breast Cancer.

We aimed to assess retrospectively the survival outcome in patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent surgery. In a retrospective, nonrandomized study of stage IV breast cancer patients diagnosed in a single institution between 2000 and 2012, we assessed patient's survival in the context of baseline characteristics. A total 678 patients with metastatic breast cancer were included; 412 (60.77%) underwent surgery for the primary tumor (Surgery group), and 266 (39%) did not underwent surgery for the primary tumor (Nonsurgery group), with a median follow-up of 41 months. Patients in the Surgery group had longer survival (41 versus 27 months, p < 0.0029). The 5-year survival rate for Surgery group was 34% compared with 14% for the Nonsurgery group. A multivariate analysis revealed surgery (p = 0.0003), large tumor size (p = 0.0195), ER-positive (p < 0.0001), and metastasis at presentation (p = 0.0032) were prognostic variables. Loco-regional surgery does confer a survival advantage in stage IV breast cancer, however, selection bias cannot be excluded, a well-designed and powerful randomized, controlled trial would be valuable to answer whether surgery can improve survival.

Has racial difference in cause-specific death improved in older patients with late-stage breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Research on temporal mortality trends for stage IV breast cancer is limited, especially among older patients by race. We evaluated factors associated with overall, breast cancer-specific and other-cause mortalities using contemporary population data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified older women (≥ 66 years) with stage IV breast cancer diagnosed in 2002-2009. Overall mortality was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, compared by log-rank tests, and modeled by Cox models. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate breast cancer-specific and other-cause mortalities. RESULTS: The median overall survival time for non-Hispanic blacks improved from 8.6 months in 2002-2003 to 9.9 months in 2007-2009, whereas that for non-Hispanic whites improved from 12.1 to 14.8 months. In the multivariate model, the risk of breast cancer-specific death for patients diagnosed in 2007-2009 was significantly lower (P = 0.02), whereas the risk of other-cause mortality changed little (P = 0.88) compared with those risks for patients diagnosed in 2002-2003. Non-Hispanic blacks had the higher risk of both mortality types compared with non-Hispanic whites; a diagnosis time-race interaction term was not statistically significant for either cause of death. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer-specific mortality among older women modestly improved from 2002 to 2009 across all races, but not other-cause mortality. Racial disparity in mortality persisted, but did not widen in this period. Efforts should be devoted to improving other-cause mortality for all women, with special attention toward decreasing breast cancer mortality for non-Hispanic black women.

Relationship between fear of progression and symptom burden, disease factors and social/family factors in patients with stage-IV breast cancer in Shandong, China.

OBJECTIVE: To assess fear of progression (FoP)'s relationship with symptom burden and disease and social/family factors, as well as, determine the status of FoP in women with stage-IV breast cancer in Shandong, China. METHODS: Two hundred and sixteen women were recruited from the department of breast cancer internal medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute. Data for this observational study were collected between October 2020 and January 2021 using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) and a participant information scale. SPSS 23.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After excluding invalid responses, the data of 200 participants were analysed. The average total FoP-Q-SF score was 29.39 ± 9.39 (95% confidence interval, 21.81-27.64). The FoP level among the participants was relatively low. For disease and social/family factors, FoP statistically significantly differed by satisfaction with family emotional support and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score. The ECOG score was positively correlated with FoP. Furthermore, symptom burden was positively correlated with FoP. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage-IV breast cancer, satisfaction with family emotional support, ECOG score and symptom burden play key roles in FoP. Interventions, including providing appropriate emotional support from family, improving physical fitness and relieving symptom burden, must be considered in future studies, which may improve patients' overall physical and mental status and provide a supportive therapeutic environment.

Impact of Clinical Examination and Gamma Knife Surgery in Stage IV Breast Cancer With Brain Metastasis.

Metastatic breast cancer often presents with significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. This case report highlights the crucial role of thorough clinical examination and history-taking in diagnosing and managing a patient with metastatic breast cancer, mainly focusing on the successful integration of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). We present a case of a 68-year-old postmenopausal woman with metastatic breast cancer, initially presenting with a primary tumour in the left breast and later developing a solitary brain metastasis (BM) in the left temporal lobe. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and left mastectomy, the patient experienced involuntary movements in the right arm, leading to the discovery of the brain lesion. Critical to this diagnosis was a detailed clinical examination emphasising the importance of vigilant monitoring in cancer management. The patient underwent GKRS, offering a focused and less invasive treatment approach with favourable outcomes. This case underscores the value of clinical vigilance in managing complex breast cancer cases. The integration of GKRS as a targeted treatment modality for BM represents a pivotal aspect of modern oncological care, especially for patients with multiple treatment modalities. This report emphasizes the importance of clinical examination in the early detection of complications such as BM in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of GKRS in managing such metastases, reinforcing its role as a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary treatment approach for advanced breast cancer.

Prognostic value and mode selection of locoregional treatment in Stage-IV breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the actual prognostic significance of different locoregional treatment (LRT) (surgery and radiotherapy) modalities for stage-IV  breast cancer (BC) patients and construct a competing risk nomogram to make precise predictions of the breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) risk among LRT recipients. METHODS: A total of 9279 eligible stage-IV BC patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. Initially, we evaluated the impact of LRT on survival both before and after the propensity score matching (PSM). Then, we used the Cox hazard proportional model and competing risk model to identify the independent prognostic factors for LRT recipients. Based on the screened variables, a comprehensive nomogram was established. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that LRT significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (P < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) possessed the optimal survival (P < 0.001). Regardless of the surgical modalities, primary tumor resection combined with radiotherapy could ameliorate the prognosis (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with T2-T4 stage, PORT had a survival benefit compared with those undergoing surgery combined with preoperative radiotherapy (PRRT) and surgery only. Based on the screened independent prognostic factors, we established a comprehensive nomogram to forecast BCSD in 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, which showed robust predictive ability. CONCLUSION: PORT was associated with a lower BCSD in stage-IV BC patients. The practical nomogram could provide a precise prediction of BCSD for LRT recipients, which was meaningful for patients' individualized management.

Case report: An exceptional responder of low-dose continuous 5-FU in a patient with de-novo stage IV triple-negative breast cancer with liver and bone marrow failure.

Continuous low-dose 5-FU was popularized as a therapy for pretreated metastatic breast cancer for the past few decades, spurred by the advent of the electronic infusion pump. Capecitabine, otherwise known by its trade name Xeloda, is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is administered orally in many chemotherapy regimens, and plays a role in metastatic breast cancer treatment refractory to traditional anthracyclines and taxane therapy. In this case presentation, we describe a unique case of refractory de-novo stage IV triple-negative breast cancer presented with right breast primary invasive ductal carcinoma, extensive lymphadenopathy, with biopsy proven bone marrow infiltration, diffuse hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, significant hyperbilirubinemia, and bone marrow failure treated with continuous 5-FU infusion and subsequently oral capecitabine after initial treatment failure with nab-paclitaxel and sacituzimab govitecan. With this case presentation, the authors aim to showcase the versatility of 5-FU and its prodrug in treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with severe bone marrow and liver involvement while highlighting key physiologic and pharmacologic mechanisms.

HR+/HER2- de novo metastatic breast cancer: a true peculiar entity?

De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) accounts for ~6-10% of all breast cancers and for ~30% of MBC with increasing incidence over time. Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) tumours are the most frequent subtype with a similar incidence to that observed amongst recurrent MBC (rMBC). Higher frequency of PI3KCA and ARID2 mutations and a lower frequency of ESR1 mutations and of genes involved in DNA damage, as compared with rMBC, have been reported in HR+/HER2- dnMBC; however, these are not correlating with prognosis, whilst tumour mutational burden is inversely correlated with outcome. Bone represents the most frequent metastatic site, being the single site in up to 60% of patients with dnMBC. HR+/HER2- dnMBC has been generally reported to have better outcomes than rMBC, with a median overall survival ranging from 26 months to nearly 5 years in patients with favourable features such as age <40 years and bone-only disease, but not when compared with patients with late recurring disease (≥2-5 years). Analyses of the de novo cohorts within randomized clinical trials and large real-world series report a better outcome after treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine agents as compared to rMBC. Despite the limitations of retrospective studies and controversial results of the randomized trials, locoregional treatment of the primary tumour after response to systemic therapy appears to confer a survival benefit, particularly in patients with favourable prognostic factors. Altogether genomic, biological and clinical findings highlight HR+/HER2- dnMBC as a peculiar entity as compared with rMBC and deserve a dedicated treatment algorithm. This article is part of the Tackling clinical complexity in breast cancer Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/tackling-clinical-complexity-in-breast-cancer/.

Operative Management in Stage IV Breast Cancer.

Traditionally, surgical therapy for primary breast lesions in stage IV breast cancer has been reserved for palliation. Several retrospective studies have suggested a possible survival benefit with surgical resection of the primary tumor in patients with distant metastases. However, evidence from prospective, randomized controlled trials suggest that locoregional control provides no clear survival advantage for patients with stage IV breast cancer. Future areas of inquiry include identification of subsets of patients who may derive a survival benefit from locoregional control.

The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in de novo stage IV breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The presence of a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with increased mortality in several malignancies. And the majority of studies on breast cancer (BC) analyzed patients with early-stage. Fewer studies focused on metastatic BC (MBC). De novo stage IV BC with no prior treatment is more suitable for analyzing prognostic factors. Herein, we examined the prognostic value of baseline NLR in de novo stage IV BC patients. Methods: We retrospectively screened the medical records of female patients who were diagnosed with de novo stage IV BC at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 2011 and December 2020. All patients were followed up by telephone every 6 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of NLR for progression-free survival (PFS). Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Correlations of PFS and overall survival (OS) with NLR and other clinicopathological factors were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. Results: A total of 128 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 were enrolled. 70 (54.7%) cases were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, 79 (61.7%) patients had visceral metastasis and 67 (52.3%) patients had more than 2 metastatic sites. The cutoff values of NLR were 2.9, optimized by ROC curve analysis. Totals of 77 and 51 patients were assigned to the NLR-low (≤2.9) and NLR-high (>2.9) groups, respectively. Compared with NLR-high patients, the NLR-low patients had significantly longer median PFS (14.8 vs. 7.2 months; hazard ratio =1.791; P=0.003). The OS showed no significant difference (64.1 vs. 56.0 months, P=0.980). The patients with NLR-low had a higher level of peripheral CD3+ T cells (P=0.028) and a lower level of peripheral CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells (P=0.041). Patient samples with NLR-low also demonstrated higher levels of TILs than those with NLR-high (P=0.025). Conclusions: The baseline NLR-high is associated with adverse PFS in patients with de novo stage IV BC. The NLR-high status may indicate immune suppression status, which can help identify patients with unfavorable prognosis and assist with physicians' treatment decision.

Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy after Primary Tumor Resection in De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 19-02).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing planned primary tumor resection (PTR) and to identify the subgroup of patients who would most benefit from PORT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 426 patients with dnMBC administered PTR alone or with PORT. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 53.7 months (range, 3.1 to 194.4). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 73.2% and 32.0%, respectively. For OS, clinical T3/4 category, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), postoperative chemotherapy alone were significantly poor prognostic factors, and administration of PORT failed to show its significance. Regarding PFS, PORT was a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.82; p < 0.001), in addition to T1/2 category, ≤ 5 metastases, and non-TNBC. According to the multivariate analyses of OS in the PORT group, we divided the patients into three groups (group 1, T1/2 and non-TNBC [n=193]; group 2, T3/4 and non-TNBC [n=171]; and group 3, TNBC [n=49]), and evaluated the effect of PORT. Although PORT had no significance for OS in all subgroups, it was a significant factor for good prognosis regarding PFS in groups 1 and 2, not in group 3. CONCLUSION: PORT was associated with a significantly better PFS in patients with dnMBC who underwent PTR. Patients with clinical T1/2 category and non-TNBC benefited most from PORT, while those with TNBC showed little benefit.

Metastatic breast cancer: Who benefits from surgery?

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify characteristics of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who may benefit most from primary tumor resection. METHODS: Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize non-surgical patients with de novo MBC in the NCDB (2010-2015) into 3 groups (I/II/III) based on 3-year overall survival (OS). After bootstrapping (BS), group-level profiles were applied, and the association of surgery with OS was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: All patients benefitted from surgery (median OS, surgery vs no surgery): 72.7 vs 42.9 months, 47.3 vs 30.4 months, 23.8 vs 14.4 months (all p < 0.001) in BS-groups I, II, and III, respectively. After adjustment, surgery remained associated with improved OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.50-0.55). The effect of surgery on OS differed quantitatively across groups. CONCLUSION: Prognostic groups may inform the degree of benefit from surgery, with the greatest benefit seen in those with the most favorable survival.