Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57.910
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
N Engl J Med ; 390(22): 2061-2073, 2024 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767248

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma have not received a diagnosis, so their respiratory symptoms remain largely untreated. METHODS: We used a case-finding method to identify adults in the community with respiratory symptoms without diagnosed lung disease. Participants who were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma on spirometry were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether early diagnosis and treatment reduces health care utilization for respiratory illness and improves health outcomes. Participants were assigned to receive the intervention (evaluation by a pulmonologist and an asthma-COPD educator who were instructed to initiate guideline-based care) or usual care by their primary care practitioner. The primary outcome was the annualized rate of participant-initiated health care utilization for respiratory illness. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline to 1 year in disease-specific quality of life, as assessed with the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better health status); symptom burden, as assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT; scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating better health status); and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: Of 38,353 persons interviewed, 595 were found to have undiagnosed COPD or asthma and 508 underwent randomization: 253 were assigned to the intervention group and 255 to the usual-care group. The annualized rate of a primary-outcome event was lower in the intervention group than in the usual-care group (0.53 vs. 1.12 events per person-year; incidence rate ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.63; P<0.001). At 12 months, the SGRQ score was lower than the baseline score by 10.2 points in the intervention group and by 6.8 points in the usual-care group (difference, -3.5 points; 95% CI, -6.0 to -0.9), and the CAT score was lower than the baseline score by 3.8 points and 2.6 points, respectively (difference, -1.3 points; 95% CI, -2.4 to -0.1). The FEV1 increased by 119 ml in the intervention group and by 22 ml in the usual-care group (difference, 94 ml; 95% CI, 50 to 138). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial in which a strategy was used to identify adults in the community with undiagnosed asthma or COPD, those who received pulmonologist-directed treatment had less subsequent health care utilization for respiratory illness than those who received usual care. (Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research; UCAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03148210.).


Assuntos
Asma , Diagnóstico Precoce , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Espirometria , Canadá/epidemiologia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
3.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 70(4): 283-298, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583884

RESUMO

Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Sangue Oculto , Serviços Postais , Causas de Morte , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Congressos como Assunto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Sistemas de Alerta , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Nature ; 590(7844): 134-139, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348340

RESUMO

As countries in Europe gradually relaxed lockdown restrictions after the first wave, test-trace-isolate strategies became critical to maintain the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at low levels1,2. Reviewing their shortcomings can provide elements to consider in light of the second wave that is currently underway in Europe. Here we estimate the rate of detection of symptomatic cases of COVID-19 in France after lockdown through the use of virological3 and participatory syndromic4 surveillance data coupled with mathematical transmission models calibrated to regional hospitalizations2. Our findings indicate that around 90,000 symptomatic infections, corresponding to 9 out 10 cases, were not ascertained by the surveillance system in the first 7 weeks after lockdown from 11 May to 28 June 2020, although the test positivity rate did not exceed the 5% recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO)5. The median detection rate increased from 7% (95% confidence interval, 6-8%) to 38% (35-44%) over time, with large regional variations, owing to a strengthening of the system as well as a decrease in epidemic activity. According to participatory surveillance data, only 31% of individuals with COVID-19-like symptoms consulted a doctor in the study period. This suggests that large numbers of symptomatic cases of COVID-19 did not seek medical advice despite recommendations, as confirmed by serological studies6,7. Encouraging awareness and same-day healthcare-seeking behaviour of suspected cases of COVID-19 is critical to improve detection. However, the capacity of the system remained insufficient even at the low epidemic activity achieved after lockdown, and was predicted to deteriorate rapidly with increasing incidence of COVID-19 cases. Substantially more aggressive, targeted and efficient testing with easier access is required to act as a tool to control the COVID-19 pandemic. The testing strategy will be critical to enable partial lifting of the current restrictive measures in Europe and to avoid a third wave.


Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Modelos Biológicos , Distribuição por Idade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Portador Sadio/prevenção & controle , Portador Sadio/transmissão , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Distanciamento Físico , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
5.
Am J Hum Genet ; 110(11): 1950-1958, 2023 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883979

RESUMO

As large-scale genomic screening becomes increasingly prevalent, understanding the influence of actionable results on healthcare utilization is key to estimating the potential long-term clinical impact. The eMERGE network sequenced individuals for actionable genes in multiple genetic conditions and returned results to individuals, providers, and the electronic health record. Differences in recommended health services (laboratory, imaging, and procedural testing) delivered within 12 months of return were compared among individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings to matched individuals with negative findings before and after return of results. Of 16,218 adults, 477 unselected individuals were found to have a monogenic risk for arrhythmia (n = 95), breast cancer (n = 96), cardiomyopathy (n = 95), colorectal cancer (n = 105), or familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 86). Individuals with P/LP results more frequently received services after return (43.8%) compared to before return (25.6%) of results and compared to individuals with negative findings (24.9%; p < 0.0001). The annual cost of qualifying healthcare services increased from an average of $162 before return to $343 after return of results among the P/LP group (p < 0.0001); differences in the negative group were non-significant. The mean difference-in-differences was $149 (p < 0.0001), which describes the increased cost within the P/LP group corrected for cost changes in the negative group. When stratified by individual conditions, significant cost differences were observed for arrhythmia, breast cancer, and cardiomyopathy. In conclusion, less than half of individuals received billed health services after monogenic return, which modestly increased healthcare costs for payors in the year following return.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Cardiomiopatias , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Arritmias Cardíacas , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Cardiomiopatias/genética
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(2): 125-133, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252944

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Days spent obtaining health care outside the home can represent not only access to needed care but also substantial time, effort, and cost, especially for older adults and their care partners. Yet, these "health care contact days" have not been characterized. OBJECTIVE: To assess composition of, variation and patterns in, and factors associated with contact days among older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Nationally representative 2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data linked to claims. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older in traditional Medicare. MEASUREMENTS: Ambulatory contact days (days with a primary care or specialty care office visit, test, imaging, procedure, or treatment) and total contact days (ambulatory days plus institutional days in a hospital, emergency department, skilled-nursing facility, or hospice facility); multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression to identify patient factors associated with contact days. RESULTS: In weighted results, 6619 older adults (weighted: 29 694 084) had means of 17.3 ambulatory contact days (SD, 22.1) and 20.7 total contact days (SD, 27.5) in the year; 11.1% had 50 or more total contact days. Older adults spent most contact days on ambulatory care, including primary care visits (mean [SD], 3.5 [5.0]), specialty care visits (5.7 [9.6]), tests (5.3 [7.2]), imaging (2.6 [3.9]), procedures (2.5 [6.4]), and treatments (5.7 [13.3]). Half of the test and imaging days were not on the same days as office visits (48.6% and 50.1%, respectively). Factors associated with more ambulatory contact days included younger age, female sex, White race, non-Hispanic ethnicity, higher income, higher educational attainment, urban residence, more chronic conditions, and care-seeking behaviors (for example, "go to the doctor…as soon as (I)…feel bad"). LIMITATION: Study population limited to those in traditional Medicare. CONCLUSION: On average, older adults spent 3 weeks in the year getting care outside the home. These contact days were mostly ambulatory and varied widely not only by number of chronic conditions but also by sociodemographic factors, geography, and care-seeking behaviors. These results show factors beyond clinical need that may drive overuse and underuse of contact days and opportunities to optimize this person-centered measure to reduce patient burdens, for example, via care coordination. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.


Assuntos
Medicare , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Idoso , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais , Doença Crônica
7.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(3)2022 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042779

RESUMO

Political polarization impeded public support for policies to reduce the spread of COVID-19, much as polarization hinders responses to other contemporary challenges. Unlike previous theory and research that focused on the United States, the present research examined the effects of political elite cues and affective polarization on support for policies to manage the COVID-19 pandemic in seven countries (n = 12,955): Brazil, Israel, Italy, South Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Across countries, cues from political elites polarized public attitudes toward COVID-19 policies. Liberal and conservative respondents supported policies proposed by ingroup politicians and parties more than the same policies from outgroup politicians and parties. Respondents disliked, distrusted, and felt cold toward outgroup political elites, whereas they liked, trusted, and felt warm toward both ingroup political elites and nonpartisan experts. This affective polarization was correlated with policy support. These findings imply that policies from bipartisan coalitions and nonpartisan experts would be less polarizing, enjoying broader public support. Indeed, across countries, policies from bipartisan coalitions and experts were more widely supported. A follow-up experiment replicated these findings among US respondents considering international vaccine distribution policies. The polarizing effects of partisan elites and affective polarization emerged across nations that vary in cultures, ideologies, and political systems. Contrary to some propositions, the United States was not exceptionally polarized. Rather, these results suggest that polarizing processes emerged simply from categorizing people into political ingroups and outgroups. Political elites drive polarization globally, but nonpartisan experts can help resolve the conflicts that arise from it.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Política de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Ativismo Político , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(13): e2118721119, 2022 03 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316133

RESUMO

SignificanceThe challenge of securing adherence to public health policies is compounded when an emerging threat and a set of unprecedented remedies are not fully understood among the general public. The evolution of citizens' attitudes toward vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic offers psychologically and sociologically grounded insights that enrich the conventional incentives- and constraints-based approach to policy design. We thus contribute to a behavioral science of policy compliance during public health emergencies of the kind that we may increasingly face in the future. From early in the pandemic, we have tracked the same individuals, providing a lens into the conditions under which people's attitudes toward voluntary and mandated vaccinations change, providing essential information for COVID-19 policy not available from cross-section data.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Dissidências e Disputas , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Humanos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública
9.
Eur Heart J ; 45(29): 2604-2616, 2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patterns of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence post-catheter ablation for persistent AF (PsAF) are not well described. This study aimed to describe the pattern of AF recurrence seen following catheter ablation for PsAF and the implications for healthcare utilization and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the CAPLA study, an international, multicentre study that randomized patients with symptomatic PsAF to pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Patients underwent twice daily single lead ECG, implantable device monitoring or three monthly Holter monitoring. RESULTS: 154 of 333 (46.2%) patients (median age 67.3 years, 28% female) experienced AF recurrence at 12-month follow-up. Recurrence was paroxysmal in 97 (63%) patients and persistent in 57 (37%). Recurrence type did not differ between randomization groups (P = .508). Median AF burden was 27.4% in PsAF recurrence and .9% in paroxysmal AF (PAF) recurrence (P < .001). Patients with PsAF recurrence had lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (PsAF 50% vs. PAF 60%, P < .001) and larger left atrial volume (PsAF 54.2 ± 19.3 mL/m² vs. PAF 44.8 ± 11.6 mL/m², P = .008). Healthcare utilization was significantly higher in PsAF (45 patients [78.9%]) vs. PAF recurrence (45 patients [46.4%], P < .001) and lowest in those without recurrence (17 patients [9.5%], P < .001). Patients without AF recurrence had greater improvements in QoL as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire (Δ33.3 ± 25.2 points) compared to those with PAF (Δ24.0 ± 25.0 points, P = .012) or PsAF (Δ13.4 ± 22.9 points, P < .001) recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is more often paroxysmal after catheter ablation for PsAF irrespective of ablation strategy. Recurrent PsAF was associated with higher AF burden, increased healthcare utilization and antiarrhythmic drug use. The type of AF recurrence and AF burden may be considered important endpoints in clinical trials investigating ablation of PsAF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Feminino , Masculino , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(Supplement_1): S43-S52, 2024 Jul 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare seeking behavior (HSB) and community perception on cholera can influence its management. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to generate evidence on cholera associated HSB and disease perception in populations living in cholera hotspots in Ethiopia. METHODS: A total of 870 randomly selected households (HHs) in Shashemene Town (ST) and Shashemene Woreda (SW) participated in our survey in January 2022. RESULTS: Predominant HHs (91.0%; 792/870) responded "primary health center" as the nearest healthcare facility (HCF). Around 57.4% (247/430) of ST HHs traveled <30 minutes to the nearest HCF. In SW, 60.2% (265/440) of HHs travelled over 30 minutes and 25.9% (114/440) over 4 km. Two-thirds of all HHs paid

Assuntos
Cólera , Diarreia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Cólera/epidemiologia , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Breast Cancer Res ; 26(1): 73, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following a breast cancer diagnosis, it is uncertain whether women's breast density knowledge influences their willingness to undergo pre-operative imaging to detect additional cancer in their breasts. We evaluated women's breast density knowledge and their willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative testing. METHODS: We surveyed women identified in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium aged ≥ 18 years, with first breast cancer diagnosed within the prior 6-18 months, who had at least one breast density measurement within the 5 years prior to their diagnosis. We assessed women's breast density knowledge and correlates of willingness to delay treatment for 6 or more weeks for pre-operative imaging via logistic regression. RESULTS: Survey participation was 28.3% (969/3,430). Seventy-two percent (469/647) of women with dense and 11% (34/322) with non-dense breasts correctly knew their density (p < 0.001); 69% (665/969) of all women knew dense breasts make it harder to detect cancers on a mammogram; and 29% (285/969) were willing to delay treatment ≥ 6 weeks to undergo pre-operative imaging. Willingness to delay treatment did not differ by self-reported density (OR:0.99 for non-dense vs. dense; 95%CI: 0.50-1.96). Treatment with chemotherapy was associated with less willingness to delay treatment (OR:0.67; 95%CI: 0.46-0.96). Having previously delayed breast cancer treatment more than 3 months was associated with an increased willingness to delay treatment for pre-operative imaging (OR:2.18; 95%CI: 1.26-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of personal breast density was not associated with willingness to delay treatment 6 or more weeks for pre-operative imaging, but aspects of a woman's treatment experience were. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV : NCT02980848 registered December 2, 2016.


Assuntos
Densidade da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Mamografia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mamografia/psicologia , Idoso , Adulto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Inquéritos e Questionários , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia
12.
Int J Cancer ; 155(6): 1053-1067, 2024 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751040

RESUMO

With the objective to investigate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and participation in interventions designed to increase participation in cervical cancer screening among under-screened women, we randomized a random sample of 6000 women in Norway aged 35-69 years who had not attended cervical screening for ≥10 years to receive either (i) a reminder to attend regular screening (control), (ii) an offer to order a self-sampling kit (opt-in), or (iii) a self-sampling kit unsolicited (send-to-all). We analyzed how sociodemographic characteristics were associated with screening participation within and between screening arms. In the send-to-all arm, increased screening participation ranged from 17.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 10.3% to 23.8%) to 30.0% (95% CI = 21.5% to 38.6%) between sociodemographic groups. In the opt-in arm, we observed smaller, and at times, non-significant increases within the range 0.7% (95% CI = -5.8% to 7.3%) to 19.1% (95% CI = 11.6% to 26.7%). In send-to-all versus control comparisons, there was greater increase in participation for women in the workforce versus not (6.1%, 95% CI = 1.6% to 10.6%), with higher versus lower income (7.6%, 95% CI = 2.2% to 13.1%), and with university versus primary education (8.5%, 95% CI = 2.4% to 14.6%). In opt-in versus control comparisons, there was greater increase in participation for women in the workforce versus not (4.6%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 8.5%), with higher versus lower income (6.3%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 11.1%), but lower increase for Eastern European versus Norwegian background (-12.7%, 95% CI = -19.7% to -5.7%). Self-sampling increased cervical screening participation across all sociodemographic levels, but inequalities in participation should be considered when introducing self-sampling, especially with the goal to reach long-term non-attending women.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
PLoS Med ; 21(7): e1004421, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968303

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care (ANC) is essential for ensuring the well-being of pregnant women and their fetuses. This study models the association between achieving adequate ANC and various health and health-seeking indicators across wealth quintiles in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed data from 638,265 women across 47 LMICs using available Demographic and Health Surveys from 2010 to 2022. Via multilevel logistic regression analyses adjusted for a series of confounding variables and country and wealth quintile fixed effects, we estimated the projected impact of achieving adequate ANC utilization and quality on a series of health and health care indicators: facility birth, postnatal care, childhood immunizations, and childhood stunting and wasting. Achieving adequate levels of ANC utilization and quality (defined as at least 4 visits, blood pressure monitoring, and blood and urine testing) was positively associated with health-seeking behavior across the majority of countries. The strongest association was observed for facility birth, followed by postnatal care and child immunization. The strength of the associations varied across countries and wealth quintiles, with more significant ones observed in countries with lower baseline ANC utilization levels and among the lower wealth quintiles. The associations of ANC with childhood stunting and wasting were notably less statistically significant compared to other indicators. Despite rigorous adjustments for potential confounders, a limitation to the methodology is that it is possible that unobserved variables may still impact outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening ANC is associated with improved use of other health care in LMICs. ANC could serve as a critical platform for improving health outcomes for mothers and their children, emphasizing its importance beyond direct impact on maternal and neonatal mortality.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos
14.
Cancer ; 130(5): 803-815, 2024 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37880912

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors carry a high burden of morbidity, yet health care utilization by this vulnerable population remains understudied. Patterns and predictors of various domains of health care utilization in long-term BMT survivors were evaluated. METHODS: Study participants were drawn from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study (BMTSS). Patients transplanted between 1974 and 2014 at one of three transplant centers who had survived ≥2 years after BMT and were aged ≥18 years at the time of the study were included. A BMTSS survey served as the source of data for health care utilization, sociodemographics, and chronic health conditions. Domains of health care utilization in the 2 years preceding study participation included routine checkups, BMT-related visits, transplant/cancer center visits, emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and high health care utilization (≥7 physician visits during the 2 years before the study). Clinical characteristics and therapeutic exposures were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: In this cohort of 3342 BMT survivors (52% allogeneic), the prevalence of health care utilization declined over time since BMT for both allogeneic and autologous BMT survivors, such that among those who had survived ≥20 years, only 49%-53% had undergone routine checkups, 37%-38% reported BMT-related visits, and 28%-29% reported transplant/cancer center visits. The presence of severe/life-threatening conditions and chronic graft-vs-host disease increased the odds of health care utilization across all domains. Lower education, lack of insurance, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with a lower prevalence of routine checkups and/or transplant/cancer center visits. Lower income increased the odds of ER visits but reduced the odds of hospitalizations or high health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified vulnerable populations of long-term BMT survivors who would benefit from specialized risk-based anticipatory care to reduce high health care utilization, ER visits, and hospitalizations.


Assuntos
Medula Óssea , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto , Transplante de Medula Óssea , Sobreviventes , Doença Crônica , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
15.
Cancer ; 130(6): 995-1004, 2024 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment-related gonadal dysfunction leading to fertility problems is a frequently encountered late effect in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). This study evaluated reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care utilization among male CCSs compared with male siblings. METHODS: A nationwide cohort study was conducted as part of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor LATER study part 1, a questionnaire and linkage study. A questionnaire addressing reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care was completed by 1317 male CCSs and 407 male siblings. A total of 491 CCSs and 185 siblings had a previous or current desire for children and were included in this study. RESULTS: Fewer CCSs had biological children compared with siblings (65% vs. 88%; p < .001). The type of conception by men who fathered a child was comparable between CCSs and siblings (spontaneous conception of 90% of both groups; p = .86). The percentage of men who had consulted a reproductive specialist because of not siring a pregnancy was higher in CCSs compared with siblings (34% vs. 12%; p < .001). Following consultation, fewer CCSs underwent assisted reproductive techniques (ART) compared with siblings (41% vs. 77%; p = .001). After ART, fewer CCSs fathered a child compared with siblings (49% vs. 94%; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: More male survivors consult a reproductive specialist, but fewer survivors undergo ART and father a child after ART compared with siblings. This insight is important for understanding potential problems faced by survivors regarding family planning and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between oncologists and reproductive specialists.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Gravidez , Feminino , Criança , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Sobreviventes , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
16.
Cancer ; 130(17): 3011-3022, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676935

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer experience significant psychological distress and encounter barriers to accessing mental health care. Few studies have investigated racial/ethnic disparities in psychological health outcomes among AYA survivors, and none have compared outcomes within a racially minoritized population. METHODS: National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were analyzed that identified non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) survivors of AYA cancer and age- and sex-matched Black noncancer controls. Sociodemographic factors, chronic health conditions, modifiable behaviors (smoking and alcohol use), and psychological outcomes were assessed with χ2 tests. Logistic regression models, adjusted for survey weights, were used to evaluate the odds of psychological distress by cancer status after adjusting for covariates. Interactions between variables and cancer status were investigated. RESULTS: The study included 334 Black survivors of AYA cancer and 3340 Black controls. Compared to controls, survivors were more likely to report moderate/severe distress (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; p < .001), use mental health care (OR, 1.53; p = .027), report an inability to afford mental health care (OR, 3.82; p < .001), and use medication for anxiety and/or depression (OR, 2.16; p = .001). Forty-one percent of survivors reported moderate/severe distress, and only 15% used mental health care. Among survivors, ages 18-39 years (vs. 40-64 years) and current smoking (vs. never smoking) were associated with the presence of moderate/severe distress. Among survivors with distress, high poverty status was associated with reduced utilization of mental health care. CONCLUSIONS: A cancer diagnosis for a Black AYA is associated with greater psychological distress within an already vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Angústia Psicológica , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Br J Cancer ; 130(11): 1795-1802, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Modifying public awareness of oesophageal cancer symptoms might help to decrease late-stage diagnosis and, in turn, improve cancer outcomes. This study aimed to explore oesophageal cancer symptom awareness and determinants of lower awareness and anticipated time to help-seeking. METHODS: We invited 18,156 individuals aged 18 to 75 years using random sampling of the nationwide Dutch population registry. A cross-sectional web-based survey containing items adapted from the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer measure (i.e., cancer symptom awareness, anticipated time to presentation with dysphagia, health beliefs, and sociodemographic variables) was filled out by 3106 participants (response rate: 17%). Descriptive statistics were calculated and logistic regression analyses were performed to explore determinants of awareness and anticipated presentation (dichotomised as <1 month or ≥1 month). RESULTS: The number of participants that recognised dysphagia as a potential symptom of cancer was low (47%) compared with symptoms of other cancer types (change in bowel habits: 77%; change of a mole: 93%; breast lump: 93%). In multivariable analyses, non-recognition of dysphagia was associated with male gender (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.43-0.58), lower education (OR 0.44, 0.35-0.54), and non-western migration background (OR 0.43, 0.28-0.67). Anticipated delayed help-seeking for dysphagia was associated with not recognising it as possible cancer symptom (OR 1.58, 1.27-1.97), perceived high risk of oesophageal cancer (OR 2.20, 1.39-3.47), and negative beliefs about oesophageal cancer (OR 1.86, 1.20-2.87). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a disconcertingly low public awareness of oesophageal cancer symptoms. Educational interventions targeting groups with decreased awareness and addressing negative cancer beliefs may lead to faster help-seeking behaviour, although additional studies are needed to determine the effect on clinical cancer outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transtornos de Deglutição/epidemiologia , Conscientização , Fatores de Tempo , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Comportamento de Busca de Ajuda
18.
Br J Haematol ; 205(2): 463-472, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960400

RESUMO

While the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) might have increased acute episodes in people living with sickle cell disease (SCD), it may also have changed their reliance on emergency department (ED) services. We assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns on ED visits in adult SCD people followed in five French reference centres, with a special focus on 'high users' (≥10 visits in 2019). We analysed the rate of ED visits from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2021, using a self-controlled case series. Among 1530 people (17 829 ED visits), we observed a significant reduction in ED visits during and after lockdowns, but the effect vanished over time. Compared to pre-pandemic, incidence rate ratios for ED visits were 0.59 [95% CI 0.52-0.67] for the first lockdown, 0.66 [95% CI 0.58-0.75] for the second and 0.85 [95% CI 0.73-0.99] for the third. High users (4% of people but 33.7% of visits) mainly drove the reductions after the first lockdown. COVID-19 lockdowns were associated with reduced ED visits. While most people returned to their baseline utilization by April 2021, high users had a lasting decrease in ED visits. Understanding the factors driving the drop in ED utilization among high users might inform clinical practice and health policy.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , COVID-19 , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia , Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , França/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos de Coortes , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
J Clin Immunol ; 45(1): 18, 2024 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39331196

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates the frequency of hospital attendances, emergency care attendances and geographical influences on service interaction in cohorts of patients with primary and secondary antibody deficiency, to inform future service planning and delivery. METHODS: The COVID-19 in Antibody Deficiency (COV-AD) study was a United Kingdom study that enrolled 525 participants between April 2021 and September 2022. Data on health care utilisation was extracted from a screening cohort of participants at one participating site (Birmingham, UK). Hospital attendance (i.e. all outpatient and inpatient care episodes, including hospital-based IVIG treatment) and emergency care attendance patterns were analysed. Geographical differences in travel times to hospitals and associated costs were considered for all participants at all recruiting sites. RESULTS: Individuals with antibody deficiency had a median of 7 hospital attendances per year. A diagnosis of secondary antibody deficiency, and antibody deficiency severe enough to require treatment with immunoglobulin replacement were associated with an increased frequency of hospital attendance. 12.7% of the cohort attended the Emergency Department at least once in the preceding twelve months. Individuals with secondary antibody deficiency were at greater risk of requiring emergency care over the preceding one-year and five-year periods. Individuals receiving subcutaneous immunoglobulin lived further from their local immunology centre and were more likely to engage with the COV-AD research study remotely, via dried blood spots sampling. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the utilisation of emergency and secondary care usage amongst patient with immunodeficiency and may inform service adaptation and development to better accommodate patient needs and circumstances.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/epidemiologia , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Lancet ; 402 Suppl 1: S55, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer Research UK ran a mass-media campaign for 6 weeks from Sept 1, 2022, to Sept 13, 2022, targeted to people aged 50 years and older and from a lower social-grade (C2DE) in Northern Ireland. The campaign was developed to target barriers to help-seeking for the target audience. With this evaluation, we aimed to compare reported barriers and self-reported help-seeking before and after the campaign to assess changes potentially related to the campaign. METHODS: We ran cross-sectional surveys that collected data from independent participants before the campaign (wave 1; n=1262; July 18-Aug 31, 2022) and after the campaign (wave 2; n=1250; Oct 3-Nov 3, 2022; N=2512). A recruitment agency recruited participants to be representative of Northern Ireland by age, gender, and social grade (Office for National Statistics, 2011; quota sampling). After wave 2, age range was 16-94 years (mean 51 years) and gender breakdown was 46% male (n=1152), 54% female (n=1356), and <1% other (n=3). Participants gave written informed consent, and the survey was administered using Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) at waves 1 and 2, and Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) at wave 1. Ethics approval was given by Queens University Belfast. Data were analysed in SPSS. FINDINGS: 78% of the targeted audience (354/451) reported remembering the TV campaign. Of people who reported no symptoms, more reported "nothing would put them off or delay seeking medical attention" at wave 2 (447 [41%] of 1084 participants) than at wave 1 (221 [24%] of 936 participants), and this difference was significant (t(939.796)=2·243, p=0·025; 95% CI 0·083 to 1·244). Participants who reported experiencing a symptom (wave 1 n=186; wave 2 103) were less likely to report that they did not seek help from their GP or doctor in wave 2 (n=63 [61%]) than in wave 1 (n=157 [85%]); however, this difference was not significant (t(214.167)=1·133, p=0·258, 95% CI -0·051 to 0·188). INTERPRETATION: Decreases in barriers reported "nothing putting them off seeking help" and decreases in not seeking help from a GP or doctor to help seeking for actual symptoms experienced suggests this campaign might have resulted in some positive shifts in self-reported help-seeking behaviours for actual symptoms. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the limitations of this research. Although this was a large sample, additional consideration should be given to the use of independent samples (rather than repeated surveys with the same population), self-reported data, and different data collection methods. FUNDING: Community Foundation for Northern Ireland through the Department of Health Cancer Charities Fund.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Irlanda do Norte , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Meios de Comunicação de Massa , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA