Targeted decrease of portal hepatic pressure gradient improves ascites control after TIPS.

BACKGROUND: Ascites is a definitive sign of decompensated liver cirrhosis driven by portal hypertension. Although transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion (TIPS) is indicated for therapy of recurrent and refractory ascites, there is no evidence-based recommendation for a specific target of portal hepatic pressure gradient (PPG) decrease. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective trial, we investigated the decrease of PPG in 341 patients undergoing TIPS insertion for therapy of refractory or recurrent ascites until 2015. During each procedure, portal and inferior vena cava pressures were invasively measured and correlated with patients' outcome and ascites progression over time, according to the prespecified Noninvasive Evaluation Program for TIPS and Follow-Up Network protocol (NCT03628807). RESULTS: Patients without ascites at 6 weeks after TIPS had significantly greater PPG reduction immediately after TIPS, compared to the patients with refractory ascites (median reduction 65% vs. 55% of pre-TIPS PPG; p = 0.001). Survival was significantly better if ascites was controlled, compared to patients with need for paracentesis 6 weeks after TIPS (median survival: 185 vs. 41 weeks; HR 2.0 [1.3-2.9]; p < 0.001). Therefore, higher PPG reduction by TIPS ( p = 0.005) and lower PPG after TIPS ( p = 0.02) correlated with resolution of severe ascites 6 weeks after TIPS. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that higher Child-Pugh score before TIPS (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.7]; p = 0.03) and lower serum sodium levels (OR 0.9 [0.9-1.0]; p = 0.004) were independently associated with ascites persistence 6 weeks after TIPS, whereas PPG reduction (OR 0.98 [0.97-1.00]; p = 0.02) was associated with resolution of ascites 6 weeks after TIPS. CONCLUSION: Extent of PPG reduction and/or lowering of target PPG immediately after TIPS placement is associated with improved ascites control in the short term and with survival in the long term. A structured follow-up visit for patients should assess persistence of ascites at 6 weeks after TIPS.

Mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in older adult patients with cirrhosis: A validated prediction model.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves survival in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites and portal hypertensive bleeding. However, the indication for TIPS in older adult patients (greater than or equal to 70 years) is debated, and a specific prediction model developed in this particular setting is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a multivariable model for an accurate prediction of mortality in older adults. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 411 consecutive patients observed at four referral centers with de novo TIPS implantation for refractory ascites or secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (derivation cohort) and an external cohort of 415 patients with similar indications for TIPS (validation cohort). Older adult patients in the two cohorts were 99 and 76, respectively. A cause-specific Cox competing risks model was used to predict liver-related mortality, with orthotopic liver transplant and death for extrahepatic causes as competing events. Age, alcoholic etiology, creatinine levels, and international normalized ratio in the overall cohort, and creatinine and sodium levels in older adults were independent risk factors for liver-related death by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After TIPS implantation, mortality is increased by aging, but TIPS placement should not be precluded in patients older than 70 years. In older adults, creatinine and sodium levels are useful predictors for decision making. Further efforts to update the prediction model with larger sample size are warranted.

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: Recent evolution and open questions.

In selected patients with cirrhosis and ascites, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement improves control of ascites and may reduce mortality. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the use of TIPS for the treatment of ascites in patients with cirrhosis, from pathophysiology of ascites formation to hemodynamic consequences, patient selection, and technical issues of TIPS insertion. The combination of these factors is important to guide clinical decision-making and identify the best strategy for each individual patient. There is still a need to identify the best timing for TIPS placement in the natural history of ascites (recurrent vs. refractory) as well as which type and level of renal dysfunction is acceptable when TIPS is proposed for the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to define the optimal stent diameter according to patient characteristics and individual risk of shunt-related side effects, particularly hepatic encephalopathy and insufficient cardiac response to hemodynamic consequences of TIPS insertion.

Variability in surgical approaches to hernias in patients with ascites.

BACKGROUND: Hernias in patients with ascites are common, however we know very little about the surgical repair of hernias within this population. The study of these repairs has largely remained limited to single center and case studies, lacking a population-based study on the topic. STUDY DESIGN: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative and its corresponding Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR) which captures specific patient, hernia, and operative characteristics at a population level within the state was used to conduct a retrospective review of patients with ascites undergoing ventral or inguinal hernia repair between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2022. The primary outcome observed was incidence and surgical approach for both ventral and inguinal hernia cohorts. Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse clinical outcomes as listed here: (ED visits, readmission, reoperation and complications) and surgical priority (urgent/emergent vs elective). RESULTS: In a cohort of 176 patients with ascites, surgical repair of hernias in patients with ascites is a rare event (1.4% in ventral hernia cohort, 0.2% in inguinal hernia cohort). The post-operative 30-day adverse clinical outcomes in both cohorts were greatly increased compared to those without ascites (ventral: 32% inguinal: 30%). Readmission was the most common complication in both inguinal (n = 14, 15.9%) and ventral hernia (n = 17, 19.3%) groups. Although open repair was most common for both cohorts (ventral: 86%, open: 77%), minimally invasive (MIS) approaches were utilized. Ventral hernias presented most commonly urgently/emergently (60%), and in contrast many inguinal hernias presented electively (72%). CONCLUSION: A population-level, ventral and incisional hernia database capturing operative details for 176 patients with ascites. There was variation in the surgical approaches performed for this rare event and opportunities for optimization in patient selection and timing of repair.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome is a condition that occurs in people with chronic liver disease (such as alcoholic hepatitis, advanced cirrhosis, or fulminant liver failure) and portal hypertension. The prognosis is dismal, often with a survival of weeks to months. Hepatorenal syndrome is characterised by the development of intense splanchnic vasodilation favouring ascites and hypotension leading to renal vasoconstriction and acute renal failure. Therefore, treatment attempts focus on improving arterial pressure through the use of vasopressors, paracentesis, and increasing renal perfusion pressure. Several authors have reported that the placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) may be a therapeutic option because it decreases portal pressure and improves arterial and renal pressures. However, the evidence is not clearly documented and TIPS may cause adverse events. Accordingly, it is necessary to evaluate the evidence of the benefits and harms of TIPS to assess its value in people with hepatorenal syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in adults with hepatorenal syndrome compared with sham, no intervention, conventional treatment, or other treatments. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 2 June 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised clinical trials with a parallel-group design, which compared the TIPS placement with sham, no intervention, conventional therapy, or other therapies, in adults aged 18 years or older, regardless of sex or ethnicity, diagnosed with chronic liver disease and hepatorenal syndrome. We excluded trials of adults with kidney failure due to causes not related to hepatorenal syndrome, and we also excluded data from quasi-randomised, cross-over, and observational study designs as we did not design a separate search for such studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. morbidity due to any cause, and 3. serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 1. health-related quality of life, 2. non-serious adverse events, 3. participants who did not receive a liver transplant, 4. participants without improvement in kidney function, and 5. length of hospitalisation. We performed fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analyses using risk ratio (RR) or Peto odds ratio (Peto OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for the continuous outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included two randomised clinical trials comparing TIPS placement (64 participants) versus conventional treatment (paracentesis plus albumin 8 g/L of removed ascites) (66 participants). The co-interventions used in the trials were dietary treatment (sodium less than 60 mmoL/day), spironolactone (300 mg/day to 400 mg/day), and furosemide (120 mg/day). Follow-up was up to 24 months. Both were multicentre trials from Spain and the USA, and Germany, conducted between 1993 and 2002. Most participants were men (aged 18 to 75 years). We are uncertain about the effect of TIPS placement compared with conventional treatment, during the first 24 months of follow-up, on all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.38; 2 trials, 130 participants; I2 = 58%; very low-certainty evidence) and on the development of any serious adverse event (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.10 to 24.59; 2 trials, 130 participants; I2 = 78%; very low-certainty evidence). The use of TIPS may or may not result in a decrease in overall morbidity such as bacterial peritonitis, encephalopathy, or refractory ascites, during the first 24 months of follow-up, compared with the conventional treatment (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.18; 2 trials, 130 participants; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of TIPS placement versus conventional treatment on the number of people who did not receive a liver transplant (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14; 2 trials, 130 participants; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) or on the length of hospitalisation (MD -20.0 days, 95% CI -39.92 to -0.08; 1 trial, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Kidney function may improve in participants with TIPS placement (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.02; 1 trial, 70 participants; low-certainty evidence). No trials reported health-related quality of life, non-serious adverse events, or number of participants with improvement in liver function associated with the TIPS placement. Funding No trials reported sources of commercial funding or conflicts of interest between researchers. Ongoing studies We found one ongoing trial comparing TIPS with conventional therapy (terlipressin plus albumin) and listed one study as awaiting classification as no full-text article could be found. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: TIPS placement was compared with conventional treatment, with a follow-up of 24 months, in adults with hepatorenal syndrome type 2. Based on two trials with insufficient sample size and trial limitations, we assessed the overall certainty of evidence as low or very low. We are unsure if TIPS may decrease all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, the number of people who did not receive a liver transplant, and the days of hospitalisation because of the very low-certainty evidence. We are unsure if TIPS, compared with conventional treatment, has better effects on overall morbidity (bacterial peritonitis, encephalopathy, or refractory ascites). TIPS may improve kidney function, but the certainty of evidence is low. The trials included no data on health-related quality of life, non-serious adverse events, and liver function associated with the TIPS placement. We identified one ongoing trial and one study awaiting classification which may contribute to the review when information becomes available.

Indications and outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion in two regional Australian hepatology centres.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important therapy for complications of portal hypertension but remains underutilised in regional settings. AIMS: The aim of this study is to explore the demographics, indications, outcomes and complications in patients undergoing TIPS in two regional hepatology centres. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients undergoing TIPS at two regional centres between January 2017 and March 2023. The primary outcome measures were efficacy and complications of TIPS. Patient demographics (such as age, baseline liver severity scores and aetiology of liver disease) and indications for TIPS are detailed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent TIPS. Median age was 56 years (interquartile range (IQR): 46-65). The most common indications for TIPS were refractory ascites (n = 17) and failure of secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (n = 13). Cumulative survival at 3 months and 1 year was 93% and 77% respectively. There was no significant difference in outcomes based on TIPS indication. The median number of paracenteses in patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites 1 year pre- and post-TIPS were 10 (IQR: 4.5-16) and 2 (IQR: 0-4) respectively (P < 0.001). There were no procedure-related deaths. Inpatient management of liver disease complications had a mean cost of $32 874.67 (SEM: 7779) in 1 year pre-TIPS compared with $12 304.70 (SEM: 3531.1) in 1 year post-TIPS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS is a safe and effective treatment to reduce complications of portal hypertension and can be performed successfully in the regional setting.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To compare minimally invasive (MILR) and open liver resections (OLRs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS). BACKGROUND: Liver resections for HCC on MS are associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. No data on the minimally invasive approach in this setting exist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter study involving 24 institutions was conducted. Propensity scores were calculated, and inverse probability weighting was used to weight comparisons. Short-term and long-term outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 996 patients were included: 580 in OLR and 416 in MILR. After weighing, groups were well matched. Blood loss was similar between groups (OLR 275.9±3.1 vs MILR 226±4.0, P =0.146). There were no significant differences in 90-day morbidity (38.9% vs 31.9% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.08) and mortality (2.4% vs 2.2% OLRs and MILRs, P =0.84). MILRs were associated with lower rates of major complications (9.3% vs 15.3%, P =0.015), posthepatectomy liver failure (0.6% vs 4.3%, P =0.008), and bile leaks (2.2% vs 6.4%, P =0.003); ascites was significantly lower at postoperative day 1 (2.7% vs 8.1%, P =0.002) and day 3 (3.1% vs 11.4%, P <0.001); hospital stay was significantly shorter (5.8±1.9 vs 7.5±1.7, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: MILR for HCC on MS is associated with equivalent perioperative and oncological outcomes to OLRs. Fewer major complications, posthepatectomy liver failures, ascites, and bile leaks can be obtained, with a shorter hospital stay. The combination of lower short-term severe morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes favor MILR for MS when feasible.

Endovascular Lymphatic Decompression via Thoracic Duct Stent Placement for Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical and clinical success of endovascular lymphatic decompression via thoracic duct (TD) stent placement in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients (6 men and 3 women; median age, 66 [interquartile range {IQR}, 65-68] years; range, 62-78 years) who underwent TD stent placement for refractory ascites with contraindications for liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation were included in this retrospective study. TD stent placement was performed under local anesthesia using retrograde access from the venous system. Self-expanding stents from 5 to 8 mm in diameter were used and extended into the subclavian vein by approximately 1 cm. Technical (correct positioning of the stent) and clinical success (no more requirement of paracentesis) were evaluated. In addition, the safety of the procedure and TD pressure evolution were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%, and 3 (33%) patients reported clinical success. Five (56%) patients reported 7 minor adverse events (Grade I), among which 2 TD perforations were induced by stent angioplasty, with no clinical manifestation or treatment required. The median TD pressure decreased from 19 mm Hg (IQR, 11-24 mm Hg) at the beginning of the procedure to 6 mm Hg (IQR, 5-11 mm Hg) after TD stent placement. The median survival time after the procedure was 7.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular lymphatic decompression via TD stent placement is feasible and safe and was effective on ascites in some patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Thrombectomy (TIPS-Thrombectomy) for Symptomatic Acute Noncirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis.

PURPOSE: To report the safety and effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and mechanical thrombectomy (TIPS-thrombectomy) for symptomatic acute noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (NC-PVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with acute NC-PVT who underwent TIPS-thrombectomy between 2014 and 2021 at a single academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two patients were included (men, 56%; median age, 51 years [range, 39-62 years]). The causes for PVT included idiopathic (n = 12), prothrombotic disorders (n = 11), postsurgical sequelae (n = 6), pancreatitis (n = 2), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1). The indications for TIPS-thrombectomy included refractory abdominal pain (n = 14), intestinal venous ischemia (n = 9), ascites (n = 4), high-risk varices (n = 3), and variceal bleeding (n = 2). Variables studied included patient, disease, and procedure characteristics. Patients were monitored over the course of 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Successful recanalization of occluded portal venous vessels occurred in all 32 patients (100%). Compared with pretreatment patency, recanalization with TIPS-thrombectomy resulted in an increase in patent veins (main portal vein [28% vs 97%, P < .001], superior mesenteric vein [13% vs 94%, P < .001], and splenic vein [66% vs 91%, P < .001]). Three procedure-related adverse events occurred (Society of Interventional Radiology grade 2 moderate). Hepatic encephalopathy developed in 1 (3%) of 32 patients after TIPS placement. At 1-year follow-up, return of symptoms occurred in 3 (9%) of 32 patients: (a) ascites (n = 1), (b) variceal bleeding (n = 1), and (c) intestinal venous ischemia (n = 1). The intention-to-treat 1-year portal vein and TIPS primary and secondary patency rates were 78% (25/32) and 100% (32/32), respectively. Seven patients required additional procedures, and the 1-year mortality rate was 3% (1/32). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS-thrombectomy is a safe and effective method for treating patients with symptomatic acute NC-PVT.

TIPS: indications, Contraindications, and Evaluation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current and emerging indications, contraindications, and evaluation for TIPS. In the last three decades of use, there have been substantial changes and progress in this field, including the use of controlled-expansion, covered stents, which has broadened the clinical uses of TIPS. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings have rapidly expanded the indications for TIPS, including emerging uses in hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and before abdominal surgery. The widespread use of controlled-expansion, covered stents has decreased rates of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy, opening TIPS to a larger patient population. Overall, with newer stent technology and more research in this area, the clinical utility and potential of TIPS has rapidly expanded. Going forward, a renewed focus on randomized-control trials and long-term outcomes will be a crucial element to selecting appropriate TIPS recipients and recommending emerging indications for this procedure.

Fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation with artificial ascites or pleural effusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas: the feasibility rate and mid-term outcome.

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility rate and the mid-term outcomes of fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with artificial ascites or pleural effusion of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) based on tumor locations.Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 456 patients with single HCCs ≤4 cm were referred for RFA from April 2019 to April 2020. The tumor locations were classified into a conventional location (CL) and difficult location (DL, close to the diaphragm/heart/major vessels/bile ducts/gastrointestinal tract/kidneys). This study assessed the feasibility rate of CT/MRI-US fusion system-guided RFA with artificial ascites or pleural effusion and the therapeutic outcomes including technical success, technique efficacy, and local tumor progression (LTP) according to tumor location. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: 235 of 456 (51.5%) patients had HCCs in DL. Ablation was feasible in 431 of 456 (94.5%) patients. The feasibility rate was significantly lower in DL group than in CL group (89.8% [211/235] vs. 99.5% [220/221], p < 0.001). The technical success and technique efficacy rates were 100% [211/211] vs. 99.5% [219/220] and 98.6% [208/211] vs. 100% [220/220] in DL and CL groups, respectively (p > 0.05). The estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP rates in DL group were 1.0%, 2.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, and were not significantly different from the 2.3%, 3.9%, and 3.9% observed in CL group (p = 0.456).Conclusion: Fusion imaging-guided RFA with artificial ascites or pleural effusion could decrease technically infeasible cases and provide comparable LTP rates for HCCs in DL to HCCs in CL.

Feasibility and outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in infants.

BACKGROUND: Experience with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the pediatric population, especially in infants, is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of TIPS placement in infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective non-comparative observational cohort study analyzed all pediatric patients < 12 months of age treated with TIPS while waiting for liver transplant between October 2018 and April 2021. The sample consisted of 10 infants with chronic liver disease. All had refractory ascites and decreased portal vein size. Their mean age ± standard deviation was 5 ± 1 months and their mean weight was 5.4 ± 1.0 kg. We calculated the pediatric end-stage liver disease score and portosystemic gradients before and after TIPS placement. We used ultrasound to check for complications and to assess the presence of ascites. We used paired-sample t-test for the mean comparison of paired variables. RESULTS: Ten TIPS procedures were performed that were technically and hemodynamically successful except for one, in which an extrahepatic portal puncture required surgical repair. Ascites resolved in three infants and was reduced in six. The portal vein size remained stable after TIPS placement. Four infants had early stent thrombosis and two had late stent thrombosis treated with angioplasty or covered stents. CONCLUSION: TIPS placement in infants is a feasible, safe and effective procedure.

Early short-term abdominal paracentesis drainage in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis with pelvic ascites.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the effect of early short-term abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP/SAP) with pelvic ascites. METHODS: A total of 135 MSAP/SAP patients with early pelvic ascites were divided into the Short-term APD group (57 patients) and the Non-APD group (78 patients). The effects, complications, and prognosis of short-term APD patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics in the two groups were similar. The target days of intra-abdominal hypertension relief, half-dose enteral nutrition, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay (in days) and total hospitalization (also in days) were all lower in the Short-term APD group than in the Non-APD group (P = 0.002, 0.009, 0.004, 0.006 and 0.019), while the white blood cell count and serum C-reaction protein level decreased significantly more quickly (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), and the prevalence of intra-abdominal infection was also significantly lower (P = 0.014) in the former than the latter. No complications occurred in early APD patients, and the microbial cultures of pelvic ascites were all negative. In addition, patients with early APD presented fewer cases of residual wall-off necrosis or fluid collection (P = 0.008) at discharge and had a lower incidence of rehospitalization and percutaneous catheter drainage and/or necrosectomy (P = 0.017 and 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: For MSAP/SAP patients with pelvic ascites, the early short-term APD is feasible and safe to perform, and it can decrease clinical symptoms, reduce intra-abdominal infection and shorten the hospital stay. It may also reduce the incidence of rehospitalization and surgical intervention.

Novel Innovations in Ascites Management.

Ascites in patients with end-stage liver disease and resultant portal hypertension worsens prognosis and accelerates mortality of up to 40% within one year and 50% within two years. In case of refractory ascites, median survival often does not exceed six months due to the development of complications including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hyponatremia and renal failure. Additionally, ascites hinders quality of life (QOL) and its management poses a challenge. Sodium restriction and diuresis are the first line treatment which may be limited by renal failure and/ or hypotension. Diuretic-resistant ascites may necessitate periodic large volume paracentesis which is invasive and provides only temporary relief. Alternatively, refractory ascites can be curtailed with creation of a trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in very selective patients due to the shunt's propensity to exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy and heart failure. The alfapump system, a novel innovation, is an investigational therapy for ascites management. It is a remotely-rechargeable, battery-operated, subcutaneously implantable device that is designed to continuously divert intraperitoneal ascites into the bladder without external components. This invention is aimed to significantly improve the QOL for patients with ascites.

[Role of peritoneovenous shunt therapy in end-of-life care of refractory malignant ascites cases].

The short- and long-term outcomes of 34 patients with refractory malignant ascites who underwent peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) therapy were retrospectively reviewed. The primary disease was gastrointestinal cancer in 31 patients and gynecologic cancer in 3 patients. Regarding performance status, 21 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS) 2 and 13 patients were PS 3;thus, many were in a poor general condition. After treatment, abdominal distention disappeared in 79.4% of patients, and appetite improved in 60.9%. The median postoperative survival time was 38 days (range, 1-294 days), and 18 patients (52.9%) were discharged. Disseminated intravascular coagulation with clinical symptoms was observed in 3 patients (8.8%), and heart failure was observed in 7 patients (20.6%). PVS therapy was useful in improving the subjective symptoms of patients with refractory malignant ascites and in enabling them to receive care at home. However, serious postoperative complications are a concern, and appropriate preoperative evaluation is necessary.

Implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): indication and patient selection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes indications and contraindications for implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Further, patient selection strategies are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: TIPS implantation is a highly effective treatment for portal hypertension. Main indications are ascites and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. There is growing evidence that early TIPS implantation after variceal bleeding is associated with an improved survival (preemptive TIPS).Preliminary data also suggest that an analogous concept of early TIPS implantation may be beneficial for patients with ascites. Further, well-selected patients with acute or chronic nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis can be effectively treated with TIPS implantation. In contrast, there is generally no recommendation for TIPS implantation in patients with hepatic veno-occlusive disease, noncirrhotic portal hypertension or prior before surgery to avoid complications of portal hypertension. Apart from evidence-based patient selection, the newly developed FIPS score can be an objective component in decision-making. SUMMARY: Consideration of well-established indications and contraindications for TIPS implantation as well as concise patient selection criteria are essential for an optimal outcome after TIPS implantation.

Challenges in the management of cerebrospinal fluid ascites: a case report.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ascites is an uncommon sequela of ventriculo-peritoneal (V-P) shunt. We report a case of CSF ascites in a 7-year-old girl with craniopharyngioma and the challenges and limitations we faced in her management. Ascites completely resolved after a ventriculo-atrial (V-A) shunt surgery. Abdominal paracentesis, diuretics, and ventriculo-pleural shunt were not effective in the management of the CSF ascites.

The Use of Rifaximin in the Prevention of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt : A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of rifaximin in the secondary prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is well documented, but its effectiveness in preventing a first episode in patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rifaximin prevents overt HE after TIPS compared with placebo. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02016196). PARTICIPANTS: 197 patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS for intractable ascites or prevention of variceal rebleeding. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive rifaximin (600 mg twice daily) or placebo, beginning 14 days before TIPS and continuing for 168 days after the procedure. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy end point was incidence of overt HE within 168 days after the TIPS procedure. RESULTS: An episode of overt HE occurred in 34% (95% CI, 25% to 44%) of patients in the rifaximin group (n = 93) and 53% (CI, 43% to 63%) in the placebo group (n = 93) during the postprocedure period (odds ratio, 0.48 [CI, 0.27 to 0.87]). Neither the incidence of adverse events nor transplant-free survival was significantly different between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: The study's conclusion applies mainly to patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, who made up the study population. The potential benefit of rifaximin 6 months after TIPS and beyond remains to be investigated. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS, rifaximin was well tolerated and reduced the risk for overt HE. Rifaximin should therefore be considered for prophylaxis of post-TIPS HE. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: French Public Health Ministry.

Refractory ascites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common surgical option for gallstone disease with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. Ascites is a relatively uncommon complication after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and is more frequently observed in patients with preoperative abnormal liver function. However, patients without underlying liver disease develop refractory ascites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare. We report a case of massive ascites caused by lymphatic injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old woman complained of abdominal discomfort and distension at the twelfth day after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder stones. Subsequently, the patient developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and a decreased output of urine. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) identified abdominal effusion. The patient received abdominocentesis and the volume of slightly turbid yellow ascites averaged 1500-2000 ml per day. The results of laboratory analysis of ascitic fluid showed the following: serum-ascites albumin-gradient (SAAG), 11-12 g/L; albumin, 11-14 g/L; triglycerides, 0.91 mmol/L. After the diuretic therapy, repeated large-volume paracentesis with albumin supplementation, administration of antibiotics and renal vasodilating medications, the patient's symptoms did not relieve. Lymphoscintigraphy found a small amount of radioactive filling in the abdominal cavity. The patient finally received surgery with detection and ligation of the lymphatic leak. The ascites disappeared and the patient recovered well. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with atypical characteristics of chylous ascites, lymphoscintigraphy could help to localize and qualify the diagnosis. Surgical treatment could be considered when conservative treatment fails.

Lymphatic-venous anastomosis for the treatment of refractory lymphatic ascites following radiation therapy: A case report.

Radical treatments for intra-abdominal malignancies disturb physiological lymphatic drainage and predispose the patients to lymphatic complications such as lymphatic ascites. Despite its infrequent occurrence, lymphatic ascites is a morbid complication, and a definitive treatment protocol for refractory cases has not been established. Surgical treatments are opted depending on the etiology, symptoms, and facility equipment. Lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA) bypasses the proximal lymphatic blockages and provides an alternative route for lymphatic fluid recirculation into the venous system, thereby improving the lymphatic congestion. Herein, we report the utility of LVA surgery in the treatment of refractory serous lymphatic ascites that developed after radiation therapy for cervical cancer in a 77-year-old woman. The patient had massive ascites and suffered from abdominal distention and anorexia for 1 year. The ascites was unresponsive to conservative treatment. Under local anesthesia, eight incisions were made in the lower extremities just above the lymphatic channels that were identified by indocyanine green lymphography, and a total of 14 LVAs were created. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the ascites improved significantly. The patient remained free from the recurrence of ascites during 3.5 years of postoperative follow-up. LVA surgery was effective for the improvement and long-term control of lymphatic ascites. This procedure may be a viable option for the management of lymphatic ascites.