Left atrial compression by a large hiatal hernia: A rare cause of cardiac dysfunction.

Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) is most often revealed by gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there are atypical presentations some of which are life-threatening. We report the case of a 57-year-old woman brought to the emergency department with isolated shortness of breath for 24 h. Initial explorations revealed unexplained hyperlactatemia (6.4 mmol/L) without clinical or biological evidence of hypovolemia, distributive, obstructive or cardiogenic shock. Two hours after admission, we observed a decreased of blood pressure and an increase of lactate level to 7.9 mmol/L. A bedside echocardiography revealed an extra-cardiac left atrial compression and thoracoabdominal computed tomography showed a large sliding HH compressing the left atrium. After an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy permitting the aspiration of gastric contents, a repair surgery was performed without complications and patient was discharge three days later. Emergency physicians should be aware that HH can be a rare cause of cardiac symptoms by heart compression and certainly use echocardiography for unexplained hemodynamic failure.

Computed tomographic comparison of esophageal hiatal size in brachycephalic and non-brachycephalic breed dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an anatomical difference in esophageal hiatus (EH) size exists between brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 87). METHODS: Clinical records and images of dogs that underwent computed tomography between June 2015 and September 2018 were reviewed. For the first part of the study, EH and aortic (Ao) cross-sectional surface areas were measured in brachycephalic (group 1) and nonbrachycephalic dogs of similar body size (<15 kg) without respiratory or gastroesophageal (GE) signs (group 2) by using multiplanar reconstruction. Esophageal hiatus:aortic ratio was calculated. In the second part of the study, absolute EH measurements were also compared in weight-matched (WM) dogs (8-10 kg) from groups 1 and 2. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) of EH:Ao values for group 1 (8.1 ± 2.8) were higher (P < .0001) than those for group 2 (3.7 ± 1.1). In addition, EH measurements of 20 WM dogs in group 1 were higher than those of 20 dogs in group 2 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Esophageal hiatus cross-sectional surface area (directly and indirectly measured) in brachycephalic dogs was considerably larger than that in nonbrachycephalic dogs of generally similar body size. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results of this study provide evidence to support the existence of a specific anatomical factor that could likely correlate to functional GE alterations (eg, regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux, and sliding hiatal hernia) commonly seen in brachycephalic dogs.

Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center.

INTRODUCTION: Published data regarding robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair are mainly limited to small cohorts. This study aimed to provide information on the morbidity and mortality of robot-assisted complex hiatal hernia repair and redo anti-reflux surgery in a high-volume center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients that underwent robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair, redo hiatal hernia repair, and anti-reflux surgery between 2011 and 2017 at the Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands were evaluated. Primary endpoints were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb. RESULTS: Primary surgery 211 primary surgeries were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 67 (IQR 58-73) years. 84.4% of patients had a type III or IV hernia (10.9% Type I; 1.4% Type II; 45.5% Type III; 38.9% Type IV, 1.4% no herniation). In 3.3% of procedures, conversion was required. 17.1% of patients experienced complications. The incidence of major complications was 5.2%. Ten patients (4.7%) were readmitted within 30 days. Symptomatic early recurrence occurred in two patients (0.9%). The 30-day mortality was 0.9%. Redo surgery 151 redo procedures were performed by two surgeons. The median age was 60 (IQR 51-68) years. In 2.0%, the procedure was converted. The overall incidence of complications was 10.6%, while the incidence of major complications was 2.6%. Three patients (2.0%) were readmitted within 30 days. One patient (0.7%) experienced symptomatic early recurrence. No patients died in the 30-day postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information on robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of primary or recurrent hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery for both patient and surgeon. Serious morbidity of 5.2% in primary surgery and 2.6% in redo surgery, in this large series with a high surgeon caseload, has to be outweighed by the gain in quality of life or relief of serious medical implications of hiatal hernia when counseling for surgical intervention.

The other explanation for dyspnea: giant paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair routinely improves pulmonary function.

Paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEHs) are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms; less widely appreciated is their potentially important influence on respiratory function. We hypothesize that surgical repair of PEH will significantly improve not only gastrointestinal symptoms, but also preoperative dyspnea and spirometry scores. A prospective Institutional Review Board-approved database was used to review all patients undergoing PEH repair from 2000 to 2016. Patients with pre- and postoperative pulmonary function tests assessed by spirometry were included. Postoperative changes in spirometry measurements were compared to PEH size as reflected by the percentage of intrathoracic stomach observed on preoperative contrast studies. Patients were stratified according to improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Patients with >12% ('significant') improvement in FEV1 after surgery were compared to the remaining patient population. In total, 299 patients met the inclusion criteria. Symptomatic improvement in respiratory function was noted in all patients after PEH repair. Age, gender, BMI, presenting symptoms, Charlson comorbidity index as well as preoperative comorbidities did not significantly impact the functional outcome. Spirometry results improved in 80% of the patients, 21% of whom showed an improvement of >20% compared to the preoperative level. 'Significant' improvement in respiratory function was seen in 122 of 299 (41%) patients. Patients presenting with moderate and severe preoperative pulmonary obstruction demonstrated 'significant' improvement in FEV1 in 48% and 40% of cases, respectively. Large PEHs, characterized by a percentage of intrathoracic stomach >75%, was strongly associated with 'significant' improvement in FEV1 (P = 0.001). PEHs can impact subjective and objective respiratory status and surgical repair can result in a significant improvement in dyspnea and pulmonary function score that is independent of preoperative pulmonary disease. Gastric herniation of more than 75% was associated with higher possibility for improvement of pulmonary function tests. Patients with persistent and unexplained dyspnea and coexistent PEH should be assessed by an experienced surgeon for consideration of elective repair.

[Anatomical features and biomechanical properties of the diaphragm in pathogenesis of hiatal hernia]. / Anatomicheskie osobennosti i biomekhanicheskie svoistva diafragmy v patogeneze razvitiia gryzh pishchevodnogo otverstiia diafragmy.

OBJECTIVE: To study changes of diaphragm and esophageal-diaphragmatic junction depending on age and constitutional features. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied changes of diaphragm and esophageal-diaphragmatic junction depending on age and constitutional features by using of 40 cadaveric specimens (people aged 19-75 years). RESULTS: Esophageal-aortic ligament is observed rarer with age. This ligament is poorly developed in brachiomorphic body type while diaphragmatic-cardiac ligament is generally absent as a rule. This is a predisposing factor for weakening this area. It was revealed that reduced strength and elasticity (especially esophageal-aortic and esophageal-diaphragmatic ligaments) is one of the key factors in the development of hiatal hernia. It is especially relevant for brachiomorphic body type, the 2nd mature and elderly age. The 2nd mature period is associated with reduced diameter and kinking of great arteries, that leads to 1.5-2 times decrease of arterial capacity of the diaphragm. Therefore, hiatal hernia repair using own tissues may be insufficient and accompanied by recurrence in persons with brachiomorphic body type in the 2nd mature period. CONCLUSION: Analysis of biomechanical data and anatomical features of the diaphragm may be useful to predict recurrent hiatal hernia.

Identifying clinically relevant sliding hiatal hernias: a population-based endoscopy study.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical relevance of small to moderate sliding hiatal hernias is controversial. The aims of the present study were to (1) investigate which symptoms are associated with sliding hiatal hernias and (2) define the length of a sliding hiatal hernia at which gastrointestinal symptoms occur. METHODS: A study population representative of the general Swedish population answered a questionnaire regarding gastrointestinal symptoms and was investigated with an upper endoscopy. The length of any sliding hiatal hernia was measured. RESULTS: Only reflux-related symptoms were associated with length of the hiatal hernia (acid regurgitation OR 1.46, CI 1.19-1.79, heartburn OR 1.27, CI 1.05-1.54), and the association did not become significant until an axial hiatal hernia length of 2 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Only reflux symptoms could be attributed to sliding hiatal hernias. Hiatal hernias less than 2 cm should be considered clinically insignificant.

Delayed Gastric Emptying Following Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernias Impairs Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following hiatus hernia surgery may affect a substantial number of patients with adverse clinical consequences. Here, we aim to evaluate the impact of DGE following laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernias on patients' quality of life, gastrointestinal symptomatology, and daily function. METHODS: Analysis of data collected from a multicenter prospective randomised trial of patients who underwent laparoscopic mesh versus sutured repair of very large hiatus hernias (>50% of stomach in chest). DGE was defined as gastric food retention visualised at endoscopy after 6 h of fasting at 6 months post-surgery. Quality of life (QOL), gastrointestinal symptomatology, and daily function were assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, Visick scoring and structured surveys administered prior to surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen of 102 (18.6%) patients had DGE 6 months after surgery. QOL questionnaires were completed in at least 80% of patients across all time points. Compared with controls, the DGE group demonstrated significantly lower SF-36 physical component scores, delayed improvement in health transition, more adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, higher Visick scores and a slower rate of return to normal daily activities. These differences were still present 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DGE following large hiatus hernia repair is associated with a negative impact on quality of life at follow-up to 12 months after surgery.

Swallow-induced esophageal shortening in patients without hiatal hernia is associated with gastroesophageal reflux.

Longitudinal esophageal body shortening with swallow-induced peristalsis has been reported in healthy individuals. Esophageal shortening is immediately followed by esophageal re-elongation, and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) returns to the baseline position. High-resolution manometry (HRM) allows for objective assessment of extent of shortening and duration of shortening. In patients without hiatal hernia at rest, swallow-induced esophageal shortening can lead to transient hiatal hernia (tHH) which at times may persist after the completion of swallow. This manometric finding has not been investigated in the literature, but a question arises whether this swallow-induced transient herniation can effect on the likelihood of gastroesophageal reflux. This study aims to assess the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and the subtypes of swallow-induced esophageal shortening, i.e. tHH and non-tHH, in patients without hiatal hernia at rest. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent HRM evaluation and 24-hour pH study between January to December 2015. Patients with type-I esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology (i.e. no hiatal hernia) according to the Chicago classification v3.0 were included. The patterns of the esophageal shortening with swallows were divided into two subtypes, i.e. tHH and non-tHH. tHH was defined as an EGJ double high-pressure zones (≥1 cm) at the second inspiration after the termination of swallow-induced esophageal body contraction. The number of episodes of tHH was counted per 10 swallows and tHH size was measured for each patient. In total, 41 patients with EGJ morphology Type-I met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 47.2 years, 35 patients (85.4%) were women, and the mean body mass index was 33.9 kg/m2. The mean number of tHH episodes was 3 out of 10 swallows; mean maximal tHH size was 1.3 cm. Patients who had tHH in ≥3 out of 10 swallows (n = 16; 39.0%) were more likely to have abnormal DeMeester scores than patients with <3 swallows (56% vs. 28%; P = 0.070). Patients with maximal tHH ≥2 cm in at least 1 swallow (n = 17; 41.5%) were more likely to experience pathological reflux than patients with maximal tHH <2 cm (59% vs. 25%; P = 0.029). In conclusion, we showed that, in a subset of patients with Type-I EGJ morphology, swallowing induced transient EGJ double high-pressure zones (≥1 cm) after peristalsis. We have named this new manometric finding the swallow-induced tHH. A high prevalence of pathological reflux disease was observed in patients with maximal tHH ≥2 cm. The degree of swallow-induced tHH could be an early indicator of lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in patients without manometric hiatal hernia.

Loss-of-function mutations in WDR73 are responsible for microcephaly and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: Galloway-Mowat syndrome.

Galloway-Mowat syndrome is a rare autosomal-recessive condition characterized by nephrotic syndrome associated with microcephaly and neurological impairment. Through a combination of autozygosity mapping and whole-exome sequencing, we identified WDR73 as a gene in which mutations cause Galloway-Mowat syndrome in two unrelated families. WDR73 encodes a WD40-repeat-containing protein of unknown function. Here, we show that WDR73 was present in the brain and kidney and was located diffusely in the cytoplasm during interphase but relocalized to spindle poles and astral microtubules during mitosis. Fibroblasts from one affected child and WDR73-depleted podocytes displayed abnormal nuclear morphology, low cell viability, and alterations of the microtubule network. These data suggest that WDR73 plays a crucial role in the maintenance of cell architecture and cell survival. Altogether, WDR73 mutations cause Galloway-Mowat syndrome in a particular subset of individuals presenting with late-onset nephrotic syndrome, postnatal microcephaly, severe intellectual disability, and homogenous brain MRI features. WDR73 is another example of a gene involved in a disease affecting both the kidney glomerulus and the CNS.

Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease pathophysiology is multifactorial and linked to a misbalance between the aggressiveness of the refluxate into the esophagus or adjacent organs and the failure of protective mechanisms associate or not to a defective valvular mechanism at the level of the esophagogastric junction incapable of dealing with a transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient. Antireflux mechanisms include the lower esophageal sphincter and abdominal esophagus, the diaphragm, the angle of His, the Gubaroff valve, and the phrenoesophageal membrane. Protective mechanisms include esophageal motility, saliva production, and epithelial protection. Disruption of this balance occurs most commonly due to the presence of a hiatal hernia, esophageal dysmotility, a rise in abdominal pressure (obesity), and decrease in thoracic pressure (chronic lung diseases).

Omission of preoperative esophageal manometry does not alter operative approach or postoperative dysphagia following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Routine esophageal manometry for surgical planning before laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been advocated in an effort to reduce the likelihood of postoperative dysphagia. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether omitting routine preoperative esophageal manometry is associated with a change in the type of fundoplication performed and with an increase in the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with and without preoperative esophageal manometry undergoing PEH repair was performed between January 2011 and July 2014 at an academic medical center. Demographic and outcome data were collected in a prospective database. The primary outcome measures were the type of fundoplication performed and postoperative disease-specific quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) dysphagia score. Secondary outcome measures were total GERD-HRQL score, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and requirement for endoscopic dilation. One hundred twenty-five patients underwent laparoscopic PEH repair. Forty-seven (37%) patients had preoperative manometry and 79 (63%) did not. Patients who did not have manometry were older (67.9 ± 14.3 vs. 61.7 ± 13.5, P = 0.02), but the groups did not differ in terms of BMI, gender, PPI use, baseline GERD-HRQL dysphagia score, or baseline total GERD-HRQL score. Sixty-nine (87%) patients without manometry and 43 (93%) patients with manometry underwent a complete fundoplication (P = 0.55). At a median follow-up of 16 (4-44) months, the median GERD-HRQL dysphagia scores (0(0-1) vs. 0(0-1); P = 0.66) and total GERD-HRQL scores (3(1-8) vs. 4(0-8); P = 0.72) were equivalent between the groups. Equivalent proportion of patients without and with preoperative manometry used PPI (9% vs. 21%; P = 0.06) and required endoscopic dilation (6% vs. 6%; P = 0.99) in the postoperative period. Omission of routine preoperative manometry prior to laparoscopic PEH repair is not associated with a change in the type of fundoplication performed, an increased incidence of postoperative dysphagia, or an increased requirement for postoperative endoscopic dilation.

Temporal patterns of hiatus hernia recurrence and hiatal failure: quality of life and recurrence after revision surgery.

Antireflux and paraesophageal hernia repair surgery is increasingly performed and there is an increased requirement for revision hiatus hernia surgery. There are no reports on the changes in types of failures and/or the variations in location of crural defects over time following primary surgery and limited reports on the outcomes of revision surgery. The aim of this study is to report the changes in types of hernia recurrence and location of crural defects following primary surgery, to test our hypothesis of the temporal events leading to hiatal recurrence and aid prevention. Quality of life scores following revision surgery are also reported, in one of the largest and longest follow-up series in revision hiatus surgery. Review of a single-surgeon database of all revision hiatal surgery between 1992 and 2015. The type of recurrence and the location of crural defect were noted intraoperatively. Recurrence was diagnosed on gastroscopy and/or contrast study. Quality of life outcomes were measured using Visick, dysphagia, atypical reflux symptoms, satisfaction scores, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Two-hundred eighty four patients (126 male, 158 female), median age 60.8(48.2-69.1), underwent revision hiatal surgery. Median follow-up following primary surgery was 122.8(75.3-180.3) and 91.6(40.5-152.5) months after revision surgery. The most common type of hernia recurrence in the early period after primary surgery was 'telescope'(42.9%), but overall, fundoplication apparatus transhiatal migration was consistently the predominant type of recurrence at 1-3 years (54.3%), 3-5 years (42.5%), 5-10 years (45.1%), and >10 years (44.1%). The location of crural defects changed over duration following primary surgery as anteroposterior defects was most common in the early period (45.5% in <1 year) but decreased over time (30.3% at 1-3 years) while anterior defects increased in the long term with 35.9%, 40%, and 42.2% at 3-5 years, 5-10 years, and >10 years, respectively. Revision surgery intraoperative morbidity was 19.7%, mainly gastric (9.5%) and esophageal (2.1%) perforation. There was a 75% follow-up rate and recurrence following revision surgery was 15.4%(44/284) in unscreened population and 21%(44/212) in screened population. There was no difference in recurrence rate based on size of hiatus hernia at primary surgery, or at revision surgery. There were significant improvements in the Visick score (3.3 vs. 2.4), the modified Dakkak score (23.2 vs. 15.4), the atypical reflux symptom score (23.7 vs. 15.4), and satisfaction scores (0.9 vs. 2.2), but no difference in the various domains (symptom, physical, social, and medical) of the GIQLI scores following revision surgery. Revision hiatal surgery has higher intraoperative morbidity but may achieve adequate long-term satisfaction and quality of life. The most common type of early recurrence following primary surgery is telescoping, and overall is wrap herniation. Anterior crural defects may be strong contributor to late hiatus hernia recurrence. Symptom-specific components of GIQLI, but not the overall GIQLI score, may be required to detect improvements in QOL.

Mesh hiatal reinforcement in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for neurologically impaired children is safe and feasible.

Fundoplication is a standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in neurologically impaired children. However, it has a high recurrence rate due to wrap herniation and disruption resulting from the failure or enlargement of the esophageal hiatus suture site. In adult patients with GERD, reinforcement of the sutured esophageal hiatus with a mesh significantly reduces the recurrence rate after surgery for esophageal hiatus hernia. In children, there are no big series of fundoplication with mesh reinforcement. Therefore, we confirmed the safety and feasibility of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh hiatal reinforcement with fundoplication as an additional procedure for neurologically impaired children. Neurologically impaired children (age, ≥5 years) who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication and gastrostomy at our institution between 2011 and 2013 were included in this study. The operative time, bleeding amount, complications, and recurrence were retrospectively evaluated. Thirteen patients were included in this study. The mean age at operation was 147.2 ± 37.8 months, and mean body weight was 18.5 ± 7.9 kg. The complication rate of epilepsy and scoliosis was 100% and 84.6%, respectively. The operative time was 265.1 ± 38.1 minutes, and mean blood loss was 26.5 ± 34.7 mL. There were no peri- or postoperative complications. None of the patients showed recurrent symptoms such as repeated vomiting and aspiration pneumonia during the mean follow-up period of 2.5 ± 0.6 years. The mesh hiatal reinforcement with fundoplication for neurologically impaired children is safe and feasible.

[Evaluating an effectiveness of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease combined with hiatal hernia]. / Otsenka éffektivnosti khirurgicheskogo lecheniia gastroézofageal'noi refliuksnoi bolezni v sochetanii s gryzhei pishchevodnogo otverstiia diafragmy.

AIM: To assess an effectiveness of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) combined with hiatal hernia (HH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial included 96 patients with GERD and HH who were divided into 2 groups. The principal difference between groups was the use of surgery in the main group and therapeutic treatment in the comparison group. RESULTS: The effectiveness of surgical treatment is superior to therapeutic treatment of GERD by more than 2.5 times. CONCLUSION: HH combined with GERD is an indication for surgical treatment. Fundoplication cuff should not lead to angular and rotational esophageal deformation. Nissen procedure in Donahue modification (Short Floppy Nissen) simulates optimally the geometry of esophago-gastric junction and His angle.

[Creative surgery for hiatal hernia]. / Kreativnaia khirurgiia gryzhi pishchevodnogo otverstiia diafragmy.

AIM: To present an experience of surgical treatment of hiatal hernia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An experience of more than thousand laparoscopic fundoplications in various modifications has been accumulated in the Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University for the period 2001-2016. RESULTS: An original device for intraoperative measurement of hiatal orifice is described. Hiatal orifice repair was indicated in case of its dimension over 3.5 cm. 310 patients underwent hiatal orifice repair including diaphragmocrurorrhaphy in 189 cases, hiatal orifice replacement by using of mesh implant in 121 cases. Simultaneous interventions were performed in 211 cases due to hiatal hernia combined with other abdominal diseases. CONCLUSION: Thus, selection of hiatal hernia patients for antireflux surgery should be clearly indicated according to clinical and instrumental data in the context of health care system reforming and widespread use of minimally invasive technologies. Laparoscopic operations for hiatal hernia are preferable and contribute to decrease of morbidity and improvement of outcomes.

Esophagogastric Junction Morphology and Distal Esophageal Acid Exposure.

BACKGROUND: The Chicago classification has recently added a morphological subclassification for the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Our aim was to assess the distal esophageal acid exposure in patients with this new Chicago EGJ-type IIIa and IIIb classification. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospectively collected high-resolution manometry (HRM) database, we identified patients who underwent 24-h pH study between October 2011 and June 2015 and were diagnosed with EGJ-type III based on HRM. Chicago EGJ-type III is defined as the inter-peak nadir pressure ≤gastric pressure and a lower esophageal sphincter (LES)-crural diaphragm (CD) separation >2 cm [IIIa-pressure inversion point (PIP) remains at CD level and IIIb-PIP remains at LES level]. We classified the patients into reflux group [DeMeester score >14.72 or Fraction time pH (<4) > 4.2 %] and non-reflux group based on 24-h pH study. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified that satisfied the study criteria, of which 37 patients (74 %) were EGJ-type IIIa. In those with EGJ-type IIIb, abdominal LES length (AL) in reflux group was significantly shorter than the non-reflux group (0.8 vs. 1.8, p < 0.05). EGJ-type IIIa patients showed significantly higher value for DeMeester score and Fraction time pH and more often had a positive pH study than EGJ-type IIIb patients (DeMeester score: 26.7 vs. 11.7, p < 0.05; Fraction time pH: 7.9 vs. 2.6, p < 0.05; positive pH study: 81.1 vs. 30.8 %, p < 0.001). Reflux was more common in LES-CD ≥ 3 cm than that in LES-CD < 3 cm (85 vs. 56.7 %, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A subset of patients with >2-cm LES-CD separation (type IIIb) maintain a physiological intra-abdominal location of the EGJ and are less likely to have reflux. A LES-CD ≥ 3 cm seems to discern a hiatus hernia of clinical significance.

Esophagogastric junction distensibility in hiatus hernia.

Hiatus hernia is known to be an important risk factor for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease. We aimed to use the endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) to evaluate the functional properties of the esophagogastric junction. EndoFLIP assessments were made in 30 patients with hiatus hernia and Barrett's esophagus, and in 14 healthy controls. The EndoFLIP was placed straddling the esophagogastric junction and the bag distended stepwise to 50 mL. Cross-sectional areas of the bag and intra-bag pressures were recorded continuously. Measurements were made in the separate sphincter components and hiatus hernia cavity. EndoFLIP measured functional aspects such as sphincter distensibility and pressure of all esophagogastric junction components and visualized all hiatus hernia present at endoscopy. The lower esophageal sphincter in hiatus hernia patients had a lower pressure (e.g. 47.7 ± 13.0 vs. 61.4 ± 19.2 mm Hg at 50-mL distension volume) and was more distensible (all P < 0.001) than the common esophagogastric junction in controls. In hiatus hernia patients, the crural diaphragm had a lower pressure (e.g. 29.6 ± 10.1 vs. 47.7 ± 13.0 mm Hg at 50-mL distension volume) and was more distensible (all P < 0.001) than the lower esophageal sphincter. There was a significant association between symptom scores in patients and EndoFLIP assessment. Conclusively, EndoFLIP was a useful tool. To evaluate the presence of a hiatus hernia and to measure the functional properties of the esophagogastric junction. Furthermore, EndoFLIP distinguished the separate esophagogastric junction components in hiatus hernia patients, and may help us understand the biomechanics of the esophagogastric junction and the mechanisms behind hiatal herniation.