Excess use of surgical supplies in minimally invasive benign gynecology surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Single-use materials and equipment are regularly opened by the surgical team during procedures but left unused, potentially resulting in superfluous costs and excess environmental waste. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the excess use of surgical supplies in minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study conducted at a university-affiliated single tertiary medical center. Designated study personnel were assigned to observe surgical procedures performed during July to September 2022. Surgical teams were observed while performing surgeries for benign indications. The teams were not informed of the purpose of the observation to avoid potential bias. Disposable materials and equipment opened during the procedure were documented. Excess supplies were defined as those opened but left unused before being discarded. Costs per item of the excess supplies were estimated on the basis of material and equipment costs provided by the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 99 surgeries were observed, including laparoscopic (32%), robotic (39%), hysteroscopic (14%), vaginal (11%), and laparotomy procedures (3%). Excess use of surgical supplies was documented in all but one procedure. The total cost across all surgeries reached $6357. The contained tissue extraction bag was the most expensive item not used (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA; $390 per unit) in 4 procedures, contributing 25.54% to the total cost. Raytec was the most common surgical waste, with a total of n=583 opened but unused (average n=5.95 per surgery). A significant difference was found in the rate of excess supplies across the surgical approaches, with robotic surgery contributing 52.19% of the total cost (P=.01). CONCLUSION: Excess use of disposable materials and equipment is common in minimally invasive benign gynecologic surgeries and contributes to superfluous costs and excess environmental waste. It is predominantly attributed to the opening of inexpensive materials that are left unused during the procedure. Increased awareness of costs and generated waste may reduce excess use of surgical supplies and should be further explored in future research.

The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0-1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is currently usually performed in the operating theatre. A considerable reduction in costs and a higher patient satisfaction are expected when procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) in an outpatient setting is applied. However, both safety and effectiveness - including the necessity for re-intervention due to incomplete resection - have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design and will be performed in the Netherlands. Women > 18 years with a maximum of 3 symptomatic type 0 or 1 submucosal fibroids with a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm are eligible to participate in the trial. After informed consent, 205 women will be randomised to either hysteroscopic myomectomy using procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol in an outpatient setting or hysteroscopic myomectomy using general anaesthesia in a clinical setting in the operating theatre. Primary outcome will be the percentage of complete resections, based on transvaginal ultrasonography 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, menstrual blood loss (Pictorial blood assessment chart), quality of life, pain, return to daily activities/work, hospitalization, (post) operative complications and re-interventions. Women will be followed up to one year after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DISCUSSION: This study may demonstrate comparable effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy under procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia in a safe and patient friendly environment, whilst achieving a significant cost reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR5357 . Registered 11th of August 2015.

Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Techniques for Endometrial Polyp Removal: The Italian Multicenter Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different techniques of hysteroscopic polypectomy. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective observational trial (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Nineteen Italian gynecologic departments (university-affiliated or public hospitals). PATIENTS: Consecutive patients suffering from endometrial polyps (EPs). INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic polypectomy, as performed through different techniques. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Included in the study were 1404 patients (with 1825 EPs). The setting was an ambulatory care unit in 40.38% of the cases (567 women), of whom 97.7% (554) did not require analgesia/anesthesia. In the remaining 59.62% of women (837 women), the procedures were performed in an operating room under mild sedation, local or general anesthesia. Minor complications occurred in 32 patients (2.27%), without significant differences between the techniques used (p = ns). Uterine perforation occurred in 14 cases, all performed in the operating room with some kind of anesthesia, only 1 with a vaginoscopic technique and the remaining during blind dilatation (odds ratio [OR], 19.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-335.79; p = .04). An incomplete removal of EPs was documented in 39 patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that a higher risk of residual EPs was associated with the use of a fiber-based 3.5-mm hysteroscope (OR, 6.78; 95% CI, 2.97-15.52; p <.001), the outpatient setting (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.14-4.14; p = .019), and EPs located at the tubal corner (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.03-2.79; p = .039). No association between incomplete EP removal and EP size or number was recorded (p = ns), as well as with the other variables evaluated. CONCLUSION: Outpatient polypectomy was associated with a minimal but significantly higher risk of residual EPs in comparison with inpatient polypectomy. Conversely, inpatient polypectomy was associated with a considerably higher risk of uterine perforation and penetration in comparison with office hysteroscopy. Because of lower intraoperative risks and higher cost-effectiveness, office hysteroscopy may be considered, whenever possible, as the gold standard technique for removing EPs.

Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: Clinical and Economic Data in Decision Making.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of hysteroscopic polypectomy using mechanical and electrosurgical systems in the hospital operating room and an office-based setting. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital and center for gynecologic care. PATIENTS: Seven hundred and fifty-four women who underwent endometrial polypectomy between January 20, 2015, and April 27, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy performed in the same-day hospital setting or office setting using one of the following: bipolar electrode, loop electrode, mechanical device, or hysteroscopic tissue removal system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The various costs associated with the 2 clinical settings at Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy were compiled, and a direct cost comparison was made using an activity-based cost-management system. The costs for using reusable loop electrode resection-16 or loop electrode resection-26 were significantly less expensive than using disposable loop electrode resection-27, the tissue removal system, or bipolar electrode resection (p = .0002). Total hospital costs for polypectomy with all systems were significantly less expensive in an office setting compared with same-day surgery in the hospital setting (p = .0001). Office-based hysteroscopic tissue removal was associated with shorter operative time compared with the other procedures (p = .0002) CONCLUSION: The total cost of hysteroscopic polypectomy is markedly higher when using disposable equipment compared with reusable equipment, both in the hospital operating room and the office setting. Same-day hospital or office-based surgery with reusable loop electrode resection is the most cost-effective approach in each settings, but requires experienced surgeons. Finally, the shorter surgical time should be taken into consideration for patients undergoing vaginal polypectomy in the office setting, owing more to patient comfort than to cost savings.

Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a late serious complication of caesarean section. The incidence of CSP has increased worldwide in recent years. Early diagnosis and prompt therapy are crucial to avoid catastrophic complications. There are various strategies for CSP treatment, but there is no consensus on the best management for CSP. Dilation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopy are common and effective treatments with their advantages and disadvantages. No in-depth study of the clinical effects of hysteroscopic management of CSP after D&C treatment failure has been conducted. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of hysteroscopic removal of residual CSP tissue (persistent CSP) as a rescue after failed D&C management. METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical research study. Forty-five patients underwent operative hysteroscopy to remove the residual gestational tissue in the caesarean scar after failed D&C treatment. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of hysteroscopic surgeries of 45 CSP cases were investigated. All data analyses were conducted with SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: Forty-three CSP cases after unsuccessful curettage treatment were successfully treated by operative hysteroscopy. The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 20.00 (10.00-500.00) mL, the hysteroscopic operating time was 20.00 (15.00-45.00) min, the decline of serum ß-hCG the day after surgery was 71.91 ± 14.05%, the total hospitalisation time was 7.87 ± 2.26 days, the medical cost was 13,682.71 ± 3553.77 China Yuan (CNY), the time of bleeding after surgery was 7.42 ± 2.48 days, and the time of serum ß-hCG resolution after surgery was 13.84 ± 9.83 days. Follow-up after discharge demonstrated that there were no severe complications for any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy therapy could treat persistent CSP effectively and safely after curettage treatment failure. Therapy should be individualised, and the risks and cost of the hysteroscopy procedure and anaesthesia must be considered and fully discussed with the patients before surgery.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Before Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in Infertile Women.

Objective: To examine the cost benefit of performing hysteroscopic polypectomy (HP) in infertile women with endometrial polyp(s) before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (COH/IUI). Study Design: Decision analytic model comparing costs and clinical outcomes. Results: HP and COH/IUI costs ranged from $537­$12,530 and $800­$7,600, respectively. Performing an HP before COH/IUI lowered fertility cost by $7,652 per clinical pregnancy. When COH/IUI costs remained constant, HP was most cost beneficial when the cost of HP was below a threshold value of $9,452. When HP costs remained constant, the threshold value at which HP was no longer cost beneficial was at COH/IUI costs below $704. The cost benefit was greatest when an office-based HP is performed. Conclusion: HP before COH/IUI is more cost beneficial than fertility treatment alone, particularly when office-based hysteroscopy is performed.

Decreasing Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: At our institution, diagnostic hysteroscopy (DH), often combined with uterine curettage, commonly has been performed in the main OR with the patient under general anaesthesia. Our objective was to create targeted interventions aimed at decreasing the number of DHs performed in the OR by 75% over one year. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative had a quasi-experimental (time-series) design. To obtain baseline numbers of DHs performed each month, we conducted a retrospective chart audit at a university teaching hospital. We implemented the following three groups of interventions: (1) staff education and case review, (2) accessible sonohysterography, and (3) an operative hysteroscopy education program. Procedures were tracked prospectively over a 12-month intervention period and an additional 12-month maintenance period. RESULTS: One hundred eleven DHs were performed at baseline. During the intervention period, 33 DHs were performed, a 70% reduction from baseline. This resulted in related savings of $126 984 and 12.5 surgical days. In the final quarter of the intervention period, there was an 81% reduction in the number of DHs with adequate preoperative evaluation compared with baseline. Twenty DHs were performed in the maintenance period, an 82% reduction from baseline. The absolute number of complications from DH remained constant during the study period. CONCLUSION: Carefully planned and targeted interventions to change the culture at our institution decreased the number of DHs performed in the main OR. These initiatives improved patient care, saved costs, and improved OR utilization. Long-term follow-up showed maintenance of the improvements in the year subsequent to the interventions.

Does probability guided hysteroscopy reduce costs in women investigated for postmenopausal bleeding?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a model to predict a failed endometrial biopsy in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and a thickened endometrium can reduce costs without compromising diagnostic accuracy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: Model based cost-minimization analysis. METHODS: A decision analytic model was designed to compare two diagnostic strategies for women with PMB: (I) attempting office endometrial biopsy and performing outpatient hysteroscopy after failed biopsy and (II) predicted probability of a failed endometrial biopsy based on patient characteristics to guide the decision for endometrial biopsy or immediate hysteroscopy. Robustness of assumptions regarding costs was evaluated in sensitivity analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs for the different strategies. RESULTS: At different cut-offs for the predicted probability of failure of an endometrial biopsy, strategy I was generally less expensive than strategy II. The costs for strategy I were always € 460; the costs for strategy II varied between € 457 and € 475. At a 65% cut-off, a possible saving of € 3 per woman could be achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing the decision to perform an endometrial biopsy or immediate hysteroscopy in women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding based on patient characteristics does not increase the efficiency of the diagnostic work-up.

Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodality local anesthetic protocol for office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Academic community-based institution. PATIENTS: Five hundred sixty-nine women undergoing 639 office-based diagnostic or operative hysteroscopic procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Multimodality local anesthetic protocol addressing vagina, cervix, paracervical region, and endometrial cavity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomes were numeric pain scores and rate of premature termination because of pain. Secondary outcomes included procedure pain and parity, delivery route, menopausal status, procedure type, and cost effect on procedure delivery. The overall mean (SD) pain score across 535 evaluable procedures was 3.7 (2.5). Patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy had a higher mean maximum pain score than did those who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy only (4.1 vs 3.2; p < .001). There was no difference among women in different age groups; however, those with both cesarean section and vaginal delivery had scores higher than the mean (4.7 [0.4]; p < .001). The estimated cost savings was almost $2 million. CONCLUSION: Using a multimodality approach to local anesthesia, a broad spectrum of diagnostic and operative procedures can be performed successfully, comfortably, and inexpensively in the context of an office procedure room, without the need for procedural sedation.

Risks and benefits of hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling as a standard procedure for assessing serendipitous findings of endometrial thickening in postmenopausal women.

A retrospective study was undertaken of 35 asymptomatic postmenopausal women undergoing hysteroscopy, dilatation and curettage (H D&C) for an incidental finding of thickened endometrium to assess the rate of significant pathological findings, cost per finding and complication rate of any procedures performed. This study found one case of endometrial adenocarcinoma (1/35; 3%) at an estimated cost per significant finding of $507,116 with an estimated 11.6 complication events per finding.

[Use of hysteroscopy at the office in gynaecological practice]. / Az office hiszteroszkópia alkalmazása a nogyógyászati gyakorlatban.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays minimally invasive techniques are a leading factors in medicine. According to this trend, hysteroscopy has been used in gynecology more and more frequently. Office hysteroscopy gives opportunity for a faster examination with less costs and strain for the patient. AIM: The aim of this work was to get familiar with the novel method. The author examined the level of pain during hysteroscopy performed for different indications with different types of instruments. In addition, the novel method invented for evaluating tubal patency was compared to the gold standard laparoscopy in 70 tubes. METHOD: Office hysteroscopy was performed in 400 cases for indications according to the traditional method. All examinations were performed in University of Debrecen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in an outpatient setting. A 2.7 mm diameter optic with diagnostic or operative sheet was used. Hysteroscopies were scheduled between the 4th and 11th cycle day. For recording pain level VAS was used in 70 cases. Comparison of hysteroscopic evaluation of tubal patency to the laparoscopic method was studies in 70 cases. RESULTS: It was found that office hysteroscopy can be performed in an outpatient setting, without anesthesia. Pain level showed no difference among subgroups (nulliparous, non-nulliparous, postmenopausal, diagnostic, operative) (mean±SD, 3.5±1.01; p=0.34). For the evaluation of tubal patency, office hysteroscopy showed 92.06% accuracy when compared to laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Office hysteroscopy has several advantages over traditional method. This procedure is fast, it has less strain for the patient. The novel method, rather than traditional hysteroscopy, should be used in the work-up of infertility as well.

[Cost effects of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic female sterilization]. / Naisten laparoskooppisen ja hysteroskooppisen sterilisaation kustannusvaikutukset.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to elucidate the costs and clinical results of sterilization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on sterilizations conducted at the Hyvinkää hospital in 2006 to 2007 by tubal ligation with clips and by microimplants. RESULTS: Total costs obtained for microimplant sterilization per patient were 1,146 Euros and for clip sterilization 1,712 Euros. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the microimplant group, and adverse effects associated with the procedure were more common in the clip sterilization group. CONCLUSIONS: Microimplant sterilization performed on an outpatient basis is more cost-effective than laparoscopic clip sterilization.

Hysteroscopy needs of indigenous communities in Northern Quebec: a retrospective cohort study.

We aimed to determine the surgical output for patients from Nunavik undergoing transfer to an urban centre for hysteroscopy, and associated costs. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients from the 14 villages of Nunavik transferred for hysteroscopic surgery from 2016 to 2021. Diagnoses, surgical intervention, and nature of the procedure were all extracted from the patient charts, and costs/length of stay obtained from logisticians and administrators servicing the Nunavik region. Over a 5-year period, 22 patients were transferred from Nunavik for hysteroscopy, of which all were elective save one. The most common diagnosis was endometrial or cervical polyp and the most common procedure was diagnostic hysteroscopy. The average cost for patient transfer and lodging to undergo hysteroscopy in Montreal ranged from $6,000 to $15,000 CDN. On average, 4-5 patient transfers occur annually for hysteroscopy, most commonly for management of endometrial polyps, at a cost of $6,000 to $15,000 CDN, suggesting the need to investigate local capacity building in Nunavik and assess cost-effectiveness.

Cost-effectiveness of hysteroscopy screening for infertile women.

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy screening prior to IVF. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness of two distinct strategies - hysteroscopy after two failed IVF cycles (Failedhyst) and routine hysteroscopy prior to IVF (Routinehyst) - was compared with the reference strategy of no hysteroscopy (Nohyst). When present, intrauterine pathology was treated during hysteroscopy. Two models were constructed and evaluated in a decision analysis. In model I, all patients had an increase in pregnancy rate after screening hysteroscopy prior to IVF; in model II, only patients with intrauterine pathology would benefit. For each strategy, the total costs and live birth rates after a total of three IVF cycles were assessed. For model I (all patients benefit from hysteroscopy), Routinehyst was always cost-effective compared with Nohyst or Failedhyst. For the Routinehyst strategy, a monetary profit would be obtained in the case where hysteroscopy would increase the live birth rate after IVF by ≥ 2.8%. In model II (only patients with pathology benefit from hysteroscopy), Routinehyst also dominated Failedhyst. However, hysteroscopy performance resulted in considerable costs. In conclusion, the application of a routine hysteroscopy prior to IVF could be cost-effective. However, randomized trials confirming the effectiveness of hysteroscopy are needed.

Operative hysteroscopy in an office-based surgical setting: review of patient safety and satisfaction in 414 cases.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and satisfaction among patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy in an office-based setting. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Physician's private office. PATIENTS: Women undergoing operative hysteroscopy in an office setting. INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred eighty-seven women underwent a total of 414 operative hysteroscopic procedures, with use of parenterally administered moderate sedation, a 9-mm operative resectoscope, and sonographic guidance. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 305 primary operative hysteroscopic procedures were performed including endomyometrial resection, myomectomy, polypectomy, removal of a uterine septum, and adhesiolysis. One hundred nine (26.3%) repeat operative procedures were performed in women in whom previous endometrial ablation and resection had failed. The average procedure required a mean (SD) of 37.6 (13.5) minutes to complete, and produced 14.1 (10.2) g of tissue. Ninety-nine percent of all procedures were completed. Only 1 patient required a hospital transfer for evaluation of a uterine perforation necessitating diagnostic laparoscopy. There were 8 (1.9%) postoperative infections, and no complications attributable to use of conscious sedation. Two hundred fifty-five women (65.6%) responded to our telephone survey. Two hundred fifty-two (98.8%) respondents were either "very satisfied" or "satisfied." Two hundred forty-nine women (97.6%) preferred the office to a hospital setting, whereas 6 (2.4%) would have preferred a hospital setting. All but 5 respondents would recommend this procedure to a friend. CONCLUSION: Major operative hysteroscopic surgery can be performed in an office-based setting with a high degree of safety and patient satisfaction.

Control and constraint for low-income women choosing outpatient sterilization.

Little is known about Hispanics and their contraceptive choices in general, with some past studies detailing nonconsensual sterilization. This article is based on interviews with a mostly Hispanic sample of 44 women being sterilized at a public clinic in southeast Texas with the Essure device, which entails a new outpatient sterilization procedure. The women cited relationship factors, wanting to better their and their children's lives, and past reproductive histories as reasons for deciding on sterilization. They specifically chose Essure as a result of an apprehension of surgery and potential side effects from tubal ligation. Their choices, however, were limited by larger structural factors of work, family, the political economy, and the health care system. We concluded that this new sterilization technique provided more contraceptive choices for these women, yet more contraceptive decision-making autonomy and more equitable social structures are still needed.

Ultrasound is the optimal choice for guidance in difficult hysteroscopy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare costs and complications associated with ultrasound-guided hysteroscopy vs laparoscopy-guided hysteroscopy vs hysteroscopy alone for the surgical repair of intrauterine septa and synechiae. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Charts of all patients undergoing reparative surgery for intrauterine synechiae or uterine septa at our academic institution between 2000 and 2008 were reviewed. A total of 159 procedures were included in the study, categorized into concurrent laparoscopic guidance (n = 69), ultrasound guidance (n = 52) or no guidance (n = 38). Data regarding billing, surgical case logs and complications were collected for these procedures. Using these data, complication rates and inflation-adjusted charges were compared between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS: A uterine perforation rate of 8.7% was observed with laparoscopic guidance vs 1.9% with ultrasound guidance (P = 0.12) and 5.3% with no guidance (P = 0.41). Analysis of billing data showed that average total costs were significantly less for ultrasound guidance than for laparoscopic guidance ($9124 vs $11 895, P < 0.001). Ultrasound guidance did not increase costs over hysteroscopy alone ($9124 vs $8242, P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: Real-time transabdominal ultrasound guidance during the resection of intrauterine synechiae or septa resulted in a trend towards reduced uterine perforation. Moreover, ultrasound guidance is less costly than laparoscopic guidance and adds no additional cost over hysteroscopy alone. Taken together, transabdominal ultrasound guidance is the optimal means of intraoperative guidance for the resection of uterine synechiae and septa.

The inSIGHT study: costs and effects of routine hysteroscopy prior to a first IVF treatment cycle. A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment a large drop is present between embryo transfer and occurrence of pregnancy. The implantation rate per embryo transferred is only 30%. Studies have shown that minor intrauterine abnormalities can be found in 11-45% of infertile women with a normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography. Two randomised controlled trials have indicated that detection and treatment of these abnormalities by office hysteroscopy after two failed IVF cycles leads to a 9-13% increase in pregnancy rate. Therefore, screening of all infertile women for intracavitary pathology prior to the start of IVF/ICSI is increasingly advocated. In absence of a scientific basis for such a policy, this study will assess the effects and costs of screening for and treatment of unsuspected intrauterine abnormalities by routine office hysteroscopy, with or without saline infusion sonography (SIS), prior to a first IVF/ICSI cycle. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicenter randomised controlled trial in asymptomatic subfertile women, indicated for a first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle, with normal findings at transvaginal sonography. Women with recurrent miscarriages, prior hysteroscopy treatment and intermenstrual blood loss will not be included. Participants will be randomised for a routine fertility work-up with additional (SIS and) hysteroscopy with on-the-spot-treatment of predefined intrauterine abnormalities versus the regular fertility work-up without additional diagnostic tests. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months of IVF/ICSI treatment after randomisation. Secondary study outcome parameters are the cumulative implantation rate; cumulative miscarriage rate; patient preference and patient tolerance of a SIS and hysteroscopy procedure. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and cox regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the costs of the additional tests as routine procedure. In total 700 patients will be included in this study. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help to clarify the significance of hysteroscopy prior to IVF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01242852.

Mobile Hysteroscopy With the Use of a Smartphone as a Cost-Effective, Diagnostic Technique.

BACKGROUND: Smartphone technology can be adapted to promote cable-free, wireless, and cost-effective diagnostic mobile office hysteroscopy. INSTRUMENT: We developed a new cable-free setup by coupling a rigid 30°, 2-mm-diameter hysteroscope to a smartphone using a commercially available adapter and using a portable and rechargeable light-emitting diode cold light source. The new setup cost is considerably lower compared with that of a typical endoscopic tower. EXPERIENCE: We performed both standard hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy using the new portable setup in 40 patients for a variety of benign gynecologic indications. The operating time was compared between the two methods, as was the pain perceived by the patients. Videos from the two setups were blindly reviewed and scored by experts regarding image resolution, brightness, color, and overall image quality. The new technique was acceptable for diagnosis in 97.5% of the videos. CONCLUSION: We report a promising initial experience using a smartphone to provide a convenient, cable-free, low-cost, office hysteroscopy system.

Hysteroscopic and aspiration biopsies in the histologic evaluation of the endometrium, a comparative study.

This study aimed to compare the quality of histological endometrial samples collected through Pipelle aspiration and hysteroscopic biopsies to assess the agreement between these 2 biopsies in the histological diagnosis of malignancy and to compare the costs of both biopsies.This was a cross-sectional study. Forty-five women were biopsied, first using Pipelle and immediately after using hysteroscopy. The material collected was sent for analysis, and hysteroscopy was considered the gold standard. The results were divided into the following 3 categories: normal (atrophic, proliferative, and secretory endometrium); polyps; and malignancies. We report the agreement between Pipelle and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy and compare their costs.The study showed that while analyzing endometrial malignancies, Pipelle sampling had 100% sensitivity and specificity. In the detection of polyps, Pipelle sampling showed 26.1% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity, 75% positive predictive value, 48.5% negative predictive value, and 53.7% accuracy. Agreement with hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy was 100%. The Pipelle device costs 27 times less than hysteroscopic biopsy for health insurance companies. This cost is 13.7 times lower in the Brazilian Unified Health System.Endometrial biopsies using the Pipelle have a high accuracy for endometrial cancer and a low accuracy for polyps. We detected 100% agreement between the reports of Pipelle and hysteroscopy with regard to malignancy. Pipelle is the most cost-effective method of endometrial biopsy.