Risk Factors of Open Surgery Conversion in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to Achieve Nephron Sparing.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for the conversion from laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) to open surgery to achieve partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Data from patients who underwent LPN between June 2020 and September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in whom the PN procedure could be completed laparoscopically were recorded as the 'Fully Laparoscopic' (FL) group (n = 97), and those converted to open surgery from laparoscopy were recorded as the 'Conversion to Open' (CTO) group (n = 10). The demographic and pathologic variables were compared between groups. Regression analyses were used to define predictor factors, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to define the cut-off value of the surgical bleeding volume. RESULTS: Conversion to open surgery was found in 10/107 patients (9.3%). There was no statistical difference between groups in demographic and pathologic variables. Intraoperative blood loss volume, upper pole localized tumor, and posterior localized tumor were found to be statistically higher in the CTO group (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.043, respectively). Furthermore, these factors were only found to be statistically significant predictors of conversion to open surgery in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses. 235 cc was found to be the cut-off value of intraoperative blood loss volume for predicting conversion to open surgery (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using these predictive factors in clinical practice, treatment planning will lead to the possibility of starting the treatment directly with open surgery instead of minimally invasive options, and it may also provide a chance of being prepared for the possibility of conversion to open surgery peroperatively.

A Novel Classification System of Renal Hilar Tumors for Surgical Guidance: Technique, Outcome, and Safety.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to develop an innovative classification and guidance system for renal hilar tumors and to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for managing such tumors. METHODS: A total of 179 patients undergoing RAPN for renal hilar tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A novel classification system with surgical techniques was introduced and the perioperative features, tumor characteristics, and the efficacy and safety of RAPN were compared within subgroups. RESULTS: We classified the tumors according to our novel system as follows: 131 Type I, 35 Type II, and 13 Type III. However, Type III had higher median R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and ROADS scores compared with the others (all p < 0.001), indicating increased operative complexity and higher estimated blood loss [180.00 (115.00-215.00) ml]. Operative outcomes revealed significant disparities between Type III and the others, with longer operative times [165.00 (145.00-200.50) min], warm ischemia times [24.00 (21.50-30.50) min], tumor resection times [13.00 (12.00-15.50) min], and incision closure times [22.00 (20.00-23.50) min] (all p < 0.005). Postoperative outcomes also showed significant differences, with longer durations of drain removal (77.08 ± 18.16 h) and hospitalization for Type III [5.00 (5.00-6.00) d] (all p < 0.05). Additionally, Type I had a larger tumor diameter than the others (p = 0.009) and pT stage differed significantly between the subtypes (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The novel renal hilar tumor classification system is capable of differentiating the surgical difficulty of RAPN and further offers personalized surgical steps tailored to each specific classification. It provides a meaningful tool for clinical practice.

The impact of body mass index on robotic surgery outcomes in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare surgical outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery across different BMI categories. METHODS: A retrospective study including all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery at a tertiary cancer center between December 2007 and December 2022. The study analyzed outcome measures, including blood loss, surgical times, length of hospitalization, perioperative complications, and conversion rates with the Kruskal-Wallis test for BMI group differences and the Chi-squared test for associations between categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 1329 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the study. Patients were stratified by BMI: <30.0 (n = 576; 43.3%), 30.0-39.9 (n = 449; 33.8%), and ≥ 40.0 (n = 304; 22.9%). There were no significant differences in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay (p = 0.105) and hospital stay (p = 0.497) between the groups. The rate of post-op complications was similar across the groups, ranging from 8.0% to 9.5% (p = 0.761). The rate of conversion to laparotomy was also similar across the groups, ranging from 0.7% to 1.0% (p = 0.885). Women with a BMI ≥40.0 had a non-clinically relevant but greater median estimated blood loss (30 mL vs. 20 mL; p < 0.001) and longer median operating room (OR) time (288 min vs. 270 min; p < 0.001). Within the OR time, the median set-up time was longer for those with a higher BMI (58 min vs. 50 min; p < 0.001). However, skin-to-skin time (209 min vs. 203 min; p = 0.202) and post-op time (14 min vs. 13 min; p = 0.094) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: BMI does not affect the peri-operative outcome of patients undergoing robotic staging procedures for endometrial cancer.

Characteristics associated with blood transfusion among women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors that affect females. A laparoscopic myomectomy is the standard surgical treatment for most women who wish to retain their uterus. The most common complication of a myomectomy is excessive bleeding. However, risk factors for hemorrhage during a laparoscopic myomectomy are not well studied and no risk stratification tool specific for identifying the need for a blood transfusion during a laparoscopic myomectomy currently exists in the literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion during laparoscopic myomectomies and to develop a risk stratification tool to determine the risk for requiring a blood transfusion. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. Women who underwent a laparoscopic (conventional or robotic) myomectomy were included. Women who received 1 or more blood transfusions within 72 hours after the start time of a laparoscopic myomectomy were compared with those who did not require a blood transfusion. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors independently associated with the risk for transfusion. Two risk stratification tools to determine the need for a blood transfusion were developed based on the multivariable results, namely (1) based on preoperative factors and (2) based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. RESULTS: During the study period, 11,498 women underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy. Of these, 331(2.9%) required a transfusion. In a multivariable regression analysis of the preoperative factors, Black or African American and Asian races, Hispanic ethnicity, bleeding disorders, American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or IV classification, and a preoperative hematocrit value ≤35.0% were independently associated with the risk for transfusion. Identified intraoperative factors included specimen weight >250 g or ≥5 intramural myomas and an operation time of ≥197 minutes. A risk stratification tool was developed in which points are assigned based on the identified risk factors. The mean probability of transfusion can be calculated based on the sum of the points. CONCLUSION: We identified preoperative and intraoperative independent risk factors for a blood transfusion among women who underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy. A risk stratification tool to determine the risk for requiring a blood transfusion was developed based on the identified risk factors. Further studies are needed to validate this tool.

Navigating Progress: 8-Year Single-Center Experience With Minimally Invasive Proctectomy and IPAA.

BACKGROUND: IPAA has become the criterion standard for treating ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected cases of Crohn's colitis. Robotic surgery promises improved postoperative outcomes and decreased length of stay. However, few studies have evaluated the benefits of robotic IPAA compared to laparoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term 30-day postoperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study from a single, high-volume center. SETTINGS: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (tertiary referral center for IBD). PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing minimally invasive proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy between January 2015 and April 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day complications, hospital length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion rate, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen patients were included in the study; 107 underwent robotic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy, whereas 110 had laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy. Operating time was significantly longer in the robotic group (263 ± 38 vs 228 ± 75 minutes, p < 0.0001). The robotic group also had lower estimated blood loss (81.5 ± 77.7 vs 126.8 ± 111.0 mL, p = 0.0006) as well as fewer conversions (0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.003). Patients in the robotic group received more intraoperative fluids (3099 ± 1140 vs 2472 ± 996 mL, p = 0.0001). However, there was no difference in length of stay, 30-day morbidity, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, rate of diverting loop ileostomy closure at 3 months, and surgical IPAA complication rate after ileostomy closure. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, single-center study, potential bias because of the novelty of the robotic approach, and lack of long-term and quality-of-life outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic proctectomy with IPAA and diverting loop ileostomy may offer advantages in terms of estimated blood loss and conversion rate while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. See Video Abstract . NAVEGANDO EL PROGRESO EXPERIENCIA DE OCHO AOS EN UN SOLO CENTRO CON PROCTECTOMA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y ANASTOMOSIS ANALBOLSA ILEAL: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis anal-bolsa ileal (IPAA) se ha convertido en el estándar de oro para el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa, la poliposis adenomatosa familiar y casos seleccionados de colitis de Crohn. La cirugía robótica promete mejores resultados posoperatorios y una menor duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han evaluado los beneficios de la IPAA robótica en comparación con la laparoscopia.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados postoperatorios a corto plazo a 30 días de la proctectomía robótica versus laparoscópica con IPAA e ileostomía en asa de derivación.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo de un único centro de gran volumen.AJUSTES:Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (centro terciario de referencia para EII).PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes adultos sometidos a proctectomía mínimamente invasiva con IPAA y DLI entre Enero de 2015 y Abril de 2023.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Complicaciones a los 30 días, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, pérdida de sangre estimada, tasa de conversión, reingreso a los 30 días y reoperación a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron en el estudio 217 pacientes; 107 se sometieron a proctectomía robótica con IPAA y DLI, mientras que 110 se sometieron a proctectomía laparoscópica con IPAA y DLI. El tiempo operatorio fue significativamente mayor en el grupo robótico (263 ± 38 minutos versus 228 ± 75 minutos, p < 0,0001); la pérdida de sangre estimada (EBL) fue menor en el grupo robótico (81,5 ± 77,7 ml versus 126,8 ± 111,0 ml, p = 0,0006), así como el número de conversiones (0% versus 8,2%, p = 0,003). Los pacientes del grupo robótico recibieron más líquidos intraoperatorios (3099 ± 1140 ml versus 2472 ± 996 ml, p = 0,0001). Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, la morbilidad a los 30 días, el reingreso a los 30 días, la reoperación a los 30 días, la tasa de cierre del DLI a los tres meses y la tasa de complicaciones quirúrgicas de la IPAA después del cierre de la ileostomía.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, estudio unicéntrico, posible sesgo debido a la novedad del enfoque robótico, falta de resultados a largo plazo y de calidad de vida.CONCLUSIONES:La proctectomía robótica con IPAA y DLI puede ofrecer ventajas en términos de EBL y tasa de conversión, manteniendo al mismo tiempo los beneficios de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Se necesita más investigación para evaluar los resultados a largo plazo. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Preoperative Identification and Outcomes of Vascular Variants on Surgery for Chronic Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeries for chronic pancreatitis are tailored based on disease process and either include parenchymal-preserving surgeries or total pancreatectomy with or without islet cell autotransplantation. It is critical to account for vascular variants as injuries to these are associated with short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of contemporary data on the true incidence of aberrant arterial anatomy, and it is likely to be underreported by nonhepatobiliary radiologists. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing pancreatic resections for chronic pancreatitis at the single center. The presence of vascular variants was compared between standard reporting and preoperative imaging review by a hepatobiliary radiologist and surgeon. Primary outcomes were operative time and blood loss. RESULTS: Of the 72 pancreatic resections for chronic pancreatitis, 50 (69%) satisfied inclusion criteria. Three of fifty (6%) had vascular anomalies reported on standard reporting while 11 (22%) had vascular anomalies identified on preoperative imaging review and confirmed at surgery. Hence, only 27% of patients with variant vascular anatomy were reported on standard imaging. There was no significant difference in operative times or blood loss between those with and without known vascular anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection is a complex undertaking as long-standing inflammation distorts anatomic planes and increases opportunity for inadvertent vascular injury especially if there are aberrant vessels. In this study, we found that anatomic vascular variants are oftentimes not reported. Dedicated surgical planning with review of cross-sectional imaging identified all cases of anatomic variants resulting in no difference in operative time or incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage.

Clinical Safety and Performance of GATT-Patch for Hemostasis in Minimal to Moderate Bleeding During Open Liver Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hemorrhage affect outcomes after liver resection. GATT-Patch is a new flexible, pliable hemostatic sealant patch comprising fibrous gelatin carrier impregnated with N-hydroxy-succinimide polyoxazoline. We evaluated safety and performance of the GATT-Patch for hemostasis at the liver resection plane. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective open liver surgery were recruited in three centers. GATT-Patch was used for minimal to moderate bleeding at the liver resection plane. The primary endpoint was hemostasis of the first-treated bleeding site at 3 min versus a prespecified performance goal of 65.4%. RESULTS: Two trial stages were performed: I (n = 8) for initial safety and II (n = 39) as the primary outcome cohort. GATT-Patch was applied in 47 patients on 63 bleeding sites. Median age was 60.0 (range 25-80) years and 70% were male. Most (66%) surgeries were for colorectal cancer metastases. The primary endpoint was met in 38 out of 39 patients (97.4%; 95% confidence interval: 84.6%-99.9%) versus 65.4% (P < 0.001). Of all the 63 bleeding sites, hemostasis was 82.7% at 30, 93.7% at 60, and 96.8% at 180 s. No reoperations for rebleeding or device-related issues occurred. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to a performance goal derived from state-of-the-art hemostatic agents, GATT-Patch for the treatment of minimal to moderate bleeding during liver surgery successfully and quickly achieved hemostasis with acceptable safety outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04819945).

Safe to save blood in ovarian cancer surgery - time to change transfusion habits.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) undergoing surgery are often subjected to red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Both anemia and RBC transfusion are associated with increased morbidity. The aim was to evaluate patient recovery after the implementation of patient blood management (PBM) strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 354 patients with AOC undergoing surgery at Skane University Hospital Lund, Sweden, between January 2016 and December 2021. The gradual implementation of PBM strategies included restrictive RBC transfusion, tranexamic acid as standard medication before laparotomies and intravenous iron administered to patients with iron deficiency. Severe complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3a. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the differences between three consecutive periods. RESULTS: After the implementation of new strategies, 52% of the patients had at least one transfusion compared to 83% at baseline (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of severe complications (CD ≥ 3a) between the groups, adjusted odds ratio 0.55 (95% CI 0.26-1.17). The mean difference in hemoglobin before chemotherapy was -1.32 g/L (95% CI -3.04 to -0.22) when adjusted for blood loss and days from surgery to chemotherapy. The length of stay (LOS) decreased from 8.5 days to 7.5 days (p 0.002). INTERPRETATION: The number of patients transfused were reduced by 31%. Despite a slight increase in anemia rate, severe complications (CD ≥ 3a) remained stable. The LOS was reduced, and chemotherapy was given without delay, indicating that PBM is feasible and without causing major severe effects on short-term recovery.

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3-10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to those of cold endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) have been reported. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of CEMR and CSP. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of CEMR and CSP in removing 3-10 mm polyps. The outcomes assessed included complete resection rate, intraoperative bleeding rate, delayed bleeding rate, perforation, and polyp removal time. The results are reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 1,911 polyps were included in the analysis. The complete resection rate of CEMR was comparable to that of CSP (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.04, p = 0.32). Comparable results were also demonstrated for intraoperative bleeding rate (polyp-based analysis: RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.33-4.43, p = 0.77), delayed bleeding rate (polyp-based analysis: RR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.44-4.15, p = 0.61), and polyp removal time (mean difference: 28.31 s, 95% CI: -21.40-78.02, p = 0.26). No studies reported cases of perforation. CONCLUSION: CEMR has comparable efficacy and safety to CSP in removing 3-10 mm polyps. Further randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to compare and validate efficacy.

Robotic liver parenchymal transection using the SynchroSeal.

BACKGROUND: There is much heterogeneity in the instrumentation used for parenchymal transection in minimally invasive liver surgery. Instruments specifically designed for robotic parenchymal transection of the liver are lacking. We aim to gain insight into the safety and effectiveness of the SynchroSeal (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), a novel bipolar electrosurgical device, in the context of liver surgery. METHODS: The present study is a post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from patients undergoing robotic liver resection (RLR) using the SynchroSeal in two high-volume centres. The results of the SynchroSeal were compared with that of the previous generation bipolar-sealer; Vessel Sealer Extend (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) using propensity score matching, after excluding the first 25 Vessel Sealer procedures per center. RESULTS: During the study period (February 2020-March 2023), 155 RLRs meeting the eligibility criteria were performed with the SynchroSeal (after implementation in June 2021) and 145 RLRs with the Vessel Sealer. Excellent outcomes were achieved when performing parenchymal transection with the SynchroSeal; low conversion rate (n = 1, 0.6%), small amounts of intraoperative blood loss (median 40 mL [IQR 10-100]), short hospital stays (median 3 days [IQR 2-4]), and adequate overall morbidity (19.4%) as well as severe morbidity (11.0%). In a matched comparison (n = 94 vs n = 94), the SynchroSeal was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (48 mL [IQR 10-143] vs 95 mL [IQR 30-200], p = 0.032) compared to the Vessel Sealer. Other perioperative outcomes were similar between the devices. CONCLUSION: The SynchroSeal is a safe and effective device for robotic liver parenchymal transection.

The modified Surgical Apgar Score predictive value for postoperative complications after robotic surgery for rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The Surgical Apgar Score quantifies three intraoperative parameters: lowest heart rate, lowest mean arterial pressure, and estimated blood loss (EBL). This scoring system predicts postoperative complications based on these measured factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of modified Surgical Apgar Score (mSAS) in predicting postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer treated with robotic surgery in order to improve the survival and quality of life of rectal cancer patients. METHODS: The study included patients with rectal cancer who underwent robotic surgery in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2015 to December 2023. In minimally invasive surgery, we developed a modified Surgical Apgar Score (mSAS) tailored for robotic rectal cancer surgery, incorporating an adjusted threshold for EBL. This threshold was derived from quartile analysis of a cohort of 524 patients, with a median EBL of 100 mL (IQR 80-130 mL). We analyzed the association of postoperative complications with low mSAS. RESULTS: This study included 524 patients, of which 91 (17.4%) experienced complications and 22 (4.2%) suffered severe complications. mSAS of 6 provided maximal Youden index and were determined as the cut-off values. The area under the ROC curve for predicting complications using the mSAS was 0.740. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that an older age, lower tumor localization, longer operation time, radiotherapy alone, combined chemoradiotherapy, and lower mSAS as independent risk factors for complications. The AUC of the prediction nomogram was 0.834 (95% CI 0.774-0.867). The calibration curve demonstrated excellent concordance with the nomogram, indicating the prediction curve ft the diagonal well. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that mSAS might be a valuable predictive indicator for postoperative complications following robotic rectal cancer surgery, with potentially higher clinical utility.

Real-time detection of active bleeding in laparoscopic colectomy using artificial intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Most intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) result from surgeons' errors, and bleeding is the majority of iAEs. Recognizing active bleeding timely is important to ensure safe surgery, and artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential for detecting active bleeding and providing real-time surgical support. This study aimed to develop a real-time AI model to detect active intraoperative bleeding. METHODS: We extracted 27 surgical videos from a nationwide multi-institutional surgical video database in Japan and divided them at the patient level into three sets: training (n = 21), validation (n = 3), and testing (n = 3). We subsequently extracted the bleeding scenes and labeled distinctively active bleeding and blood pooling frame by frame. We used pre-trained YOLOv7_6w and developed a model to learn both active bleeding and blood pooling. The Average Precision at an Intersection over Union threshold of 0.5 (AP.50) for active bleeding and frames per second (FPS) were quantified. In addition, we conducted two 5-point Likert scales (5 = Excellent, 4 = Good, 3 = Fair, 2 = Poor, and 1 = Fail) questionnaires about sensitivity (the sensitivity score) and number of overdetection areas (the overdetection score) to investigate the surgeons' assessment. RESULTS: We annotated 34,117 images of 254 bleeding events. The AP.50 for active bleeding in the developed model was 0.574 and the FPS was 48.5. Twenty surgeons answered two questionnaires, indicating a sensitivity score of 4.92 and an overdetection score of 4.62 for the model. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an AI model to detect active bleeding, achieving real-time processing speed. Our AI model can be used to provide real-time surgical support.

Full robotic versus open ALPPS: a bi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In primarily unresectable liver tumors, ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) may offer curative two-stage hepatectomy trough a fast and extensive hypertrophy. However, concerns have been raised about the invasiveness of the procedure. Full robotic ALPPS has the potential to reduce the postoperative morbidity trough a less invasive access. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of open and full robotic ALPPS. METHODS: The bicentric study included open ALPPS cases from the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and robotic ALPPS cases from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy from 01/2015 to 07/2022. Main outcomes were intraoperative parameters and overall complications. RESULTS: Open and full robotic ALPPS were performed in 36 and 7 cases. Robotic ALPPS was associated with less blood loss after both stages (418 ± 237 ml vs. 319 ± 197 ml; P = 0.04 and 631 ± 354 ml vs. 258 ± 53 ml; P = 0.01) as well as a higher rate of interstage discharge (86% vs. 37%; P = 0.02). OT was longer with robotic ALPPS after both stages (371 ± 70 min vs. 449 ± 81 min; P = 0.01 and 282 ± 87 min vs. 373 ± 90 min; P = 0.02). After ALPPS stage 2, there was no difference for overall complications (86% vs. 86%; P = 1.00) and major complications (43% vs. 39%; P = 0.86). The total length of hospital stay was similar (23 ± 17 days vs. 26 ± 13; P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Robotic ALPPS was safely implemented and showed potential for improved perioperative outcomes compared to open ALPPS in an experienced robotic center. The robotic approach might bring the perioperative risk profile of ALPPS closer to interventional techniques of portal vein embolization/liver venous deprivation.

Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is the last resort for achieving a complete cure for pelvic cancer; however, it is burdensome for patients. Minimally invasive surgeries, including robot-assisted surgery, have been widely used to treat malignant tumors and have also recently been used in PE. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted PE (RPE) by comparing the outcomes of open PE (OPE) with those of conventional laparoscopic PE (LPE) for treating pelvic tumors. METHODS: Following the ethics committee approval, a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration between January 2012 and October 2022 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were collected. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize group selection bias. RESULTS: In total, 261 patients met the study criteria, of whom 61 underwent RPE, 90 underwent OPE, and 110 underwent LPE. After propensity score matching, 50 pairs were created for RPE and OPE and 59 for RPE and LPE. RPE was associated with significantly less blood loss (RPE vs. OPE: 408 mL vs. 2385 ml, p < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (RPE vs. OPE: 32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001), and lower rate of complications over Clavien-Dindo grade II (RPE vs. OPE: 48% vs. 74%, p = 0.013; RPE vs. LPE: 48% vs. 76%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study suggests that RPE reduces blood loss and transfusion compared with OPE and has a lower rate of complications compared with OPE and LPE in patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic tumors.

Technical aspects and learning curve of complex laparoscopic hepatectomy: how we do it.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver surgery has advanced significantly, offering benefits, such as reduced intraoperative complications and quicker recovery. However, complex laparoscopic hepatectomy (CLH) is technically demanding, requiring skilled surgeons. This study aims to share technical aspects, insightful tips, and outcomes of CLH at our center, focusing on the safety and learning curve. METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing liver resection at our center from July 2017 to December 2023, focusing on those who underwent CLH. Of 135 laparoscopic liver resections, 63 (46.7%) were CLH. The learning curve of CLH was also assessed through linear and piecewise regression analyses considering the operation time and intraoperative blood loss. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred only in 4.8% of patients, with a 90-day mortality rate of 3.2%. The mean operation time and blood loss significantly decreased after the first 20 operations, marking the learning curve's optimal cut-off. Significant improvements in R0 resection (p = 0.024) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.035) were noted beyond the learning curve threshold. CONCLUSION: CLH is a safe and effective approach, with a relatively short learning curve of 20 operations. Future large-scale studies should further investigate the impact of surgical experience on CLH outcomes to establish guidelines for training programs.

Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the preservation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions but has a high morbidity rate, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness between minimally invasive central pancreatectomy (MICP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP) basing on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: An extensive literature search to compare MICP and OCP was conducted from October 2003 to October 2023 on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed-effect models or random effects were selected based on heterogeneity, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with a total of 510 patients were included. There was no significant difference in POPF between MICP and OCP (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.64, 1.43]; P = 0.82), whereas intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 125.13; 95% CI [- 194.77, -55.49]; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.86; 95% CI [- 5.00, - 0.72]; P = 0.009) were in favor of MICP compared to OCP, and there was a strong trend toward a lower intraoperative transfusion rate in MICP than in OCP (MD = 0.34; 95% CI [0.11, 1.00]; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MICP was as safe and effective as OCP and had less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Clinical impact and role of major vessels involvement in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

BACKGROUND: Severe bleeding remains a significant concern in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma. It is rarely reported that how the degree of major vessels involvement impacts on severe bleeding. The present study primarily aimed to analyze the impacts of the number of involved major vessels (NIMV) during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma and evaluate the risk factors associated with increased bleeding. METHODS: A database search was carried out for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for liver hemangiomas at our department from January 2018 to December 2023. The collected data included demographics, characteristics of the hemangiomas, laboratory data, operation method, surgical and postoperative variables. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study. 42 patients were categorized into the group with NIMV < 2, while 30 patients were divided into the group with NIMV ≥ 2. The group with NIMV ≥ 2 demonstrated a significant correlation with special segments, involved multiple segments and diameter of the hemangiomas (P < 0.01). And the perioperative variables including the extent of resection, operative time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver times, postoperative stay, drainage tube duration, and postoperative liver function (ALT, AST) also showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Notably, NIMV ≥ 2 was identified as the most important independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 ml in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma (P = 0.011). For NIMV ≥ 2, the independent risk factor was special segments in multivariate analysis (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The involvement of multiple major vessels (NIMV ≥ 2) was significantly associated with special segments, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss, operation difficulty, and delayed postoperative recovery. Moreover, it was identified as the single independent risk factor with a considerable risk for increased blood loss during laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic esophageal cancer surgery using robotic approaches for the thoracic and abdominal parts has recently been reported as total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). We herein present the first report of a new technique for esophageal cancer: total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method. METHODS: We reviewed 20 patients who underwent total RAMIE with 3FLND by a simultaneous two-team approach at the National Cancer Center East Hospital from March 2023 to September 2023. Short-term surgical outcomes and the safety and efficacy of this technique were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean operative time for abdominal surgery with this new docking technique was 135 ± 19.6 min. The total operative time was 488 ± 42.9 min, and the time from the end of abdominal manipulation to the end of surgery was 80.1 ± 15.6 min. The intraoperative blood loss was 116.7 ± 64.4 mL. The incidence of anastomotic leakage, postoperative vocal cord paralysis, and postoperative pneumonia was 10%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (range 11-63 days). No in-hospital deaths occurred, and R0 resection was possible in all cases. The average number of lymph nodes dissected was 87.7. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that total RAMIE with a simultaneous two-team approach using the new docking method can be safely introduced. The simultaneous cervical and abdominal manipulation with the new docking method allowed total RAMIE without prolonging the operating time, suggesting that it may be a valuable approach for esophageal cancer surgery.

Laparoscopic liver resection or enucleation for giant hepatic hemangioma: how to choose?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic treatment has been increasingly adopted for giant hepatic hemangioma (HH), but the role of liver resection or enucleation remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to compare the laparoscopic resection (LR) with laparoscopic enucleation (LE) for HH, and to provide evidence on how to choose the most suitable approach for HH. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of HH patients underwent laparoscopic treatment between March 2015 and August 2022 was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared based on the surgical approaches, and risk factors for increased blood loss was calculated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients in LR group and 287 patients in LE group were enrolled in this study. The median blood loss (300 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001) was higher in LE group than that in LR group. Independent risk factors for blood loss higher than 400 mL were tumor size ≥ 10 cm, tumor adjacent to major vessels, tumor occupying right liver or caudate lobe, and the portal phase enhancement ratio (PER) ≥ 38.9%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that LR was associated with less blood loss (155 vs. 400 mL, P < 0.001) than LE procedure in patients with high PER value. Both LR and LE approaches exhibited similar perioperative outcomes in patients with low PER value. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic treatment for HH could be feasibly and safely performed by both LE and LR. For patients with PER higher than 38.9%, the LR approach is recommended.

Open versus robot-assisted retroperitoneal tumors resection involving inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, and renal hilum: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for retroperitoneal tumors that do not involve any specific organ. The use of robots for removing both benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors is considered safe and feasible. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether robotic retroperitoneal tumor resection (RMBRs) is superior to open retroperitoneal malignant resection (OMBRs). This study compares the short-term outcomes of robotic excision of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors with open excision of the same-sized tumors. METHODS: The study compared demographics and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic resection (n = 54) vs open resection (n = 54) of retroperitoneal tumors between March 2018 and December 2022. A 1:1 matching analysis was conducted to ensure a fair comparison. RESULTS: The study found that RBMRs resulted in reduced operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBM), and postoperative hospital stay (PSH) when compared to OBMRs. Additionally, RBMRs reduced EBL, PHS, and OT for patients with malignant tumor involvement in major vessels. No significant differences were found in tumor size, blood transfusion rate, and morbidity rate between the RBMRs and OBMRs groups. CONCLUSION: When comparing RMBRs to OMBRs, it was observed that RMBR was associated with lower (EBL), shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS), and reduced operative time (OT) in a specific group of patients with both benign and malignant tumors.