Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 265
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 67(6): 773-781, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411981

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequities have implications for access to health care and may be associated with disparities in treatment and survival. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of socioeconomic inequities on time to treatment and survival of anal squamous-cell carcinoma. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study using a nationwide data set. SETTINGS: The patients were selected from the National Cancer Database and enrolled from 2004 to 2016. PATIENTS: We identified patients with stage I to III squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus who were treated with chemoradiation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Socioeconomic factors, including race, insurance status, median household income, and percentage of the population with no high school degrees, were included. The association of these factors with treatment delay and overall survival was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 24,143 patients who underwent treatment for grade I to III squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus were identified. The median age was 60 years, and 70% of patients were women. The median time to initiation of treatment was 33 days. Patients from zip codes with lower median income, patients with a higher percentage of no high school degree, and patients with other government insurance followed by Medicaid insurance had treatment initiated after 60 days from diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the late-treatment group had worse overall survival compared to the early treatment group (98 vs 125 months; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: No detailed information is available about the chemoradiotherapy regimen, completion of treatment, recurrence, disease-free survival, and individual-level socioeconomic condition and risk factors. CONCLUSION: Patients from communities with lower median income, level of education, and enrolled in public insurance had longer time to treatment. Lower socioeconomic status was also associated with poorer overall survival. These results warrant further analysis and measures to improve access to care to address this disparity. See Video Abstract . DESIGUALDADES SOCIOECONMICAS EN CASOS DE CNCER ANAL EFECTOS EN EL RETRASO DEL TRATAMIENTO Y LA SOBREVIDA: ANTECEDENTES:Las desigualdades socio-económicas tienen implicaciones en el acceso a la atención médica y pueden estar asociadas con disparidades en el tratamiento y la sobrevida.OBJETIVO:Indagar el impacto de las desigualdades socio-económicas sobre el tiempo de retraso en el tratamiento y la sobrevida en casos de carcinoma a células escamosas del ano (CCEA).DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo utilizando un conjunto de datos a nivel nacional.AJUSTES:Todos aquellos pacientes inscritos entre 2004 a 2016 y que fueron seleccionados de la Base Nacional de Datos sobre el Cáncer.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes con CCEA en estadíos I-III y que fueron tratados con radio-quimioterápia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron factores socio-económicos tales como la raza, el tipo de seguro de salud, el ingreso familiar medio y el porcentaje de personas sin bachillerato de secundaria (SBS). Se investigó la asociación entre estos factores con el retraso en iniciar el tratamiento y la sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron un total de 24.143 pacientes que recibieron tratamiento para CCEA estadíos I-III. La mediana de edad fue de 60 años donde 70% eran de sexo femenino. La mediana del tiempo transcurrido desde el diagnóstico hasta el inicio del tratamiento fue de 33 días. Los pacientes residentes en zonas de código postal con ingresos medios más bajos, con un mayor porcentaje de individuos SBS y los pacientes con otro tipo de seguro gubernamental de salud, seguidos del seguro tipo Medicaid iniciaron el tratamiento solamente después de 60 días al diagnóstico inicial de CCEA. El análisis de Kaplan-Meier de la sobrevida mostró que el grupo de tratamiento tardío tuvo una peor supervivencia general comparada con el grupo de tratamiento precoz o temprano (98 frente a 125 meses; p <0,001).LIMITACIONES:No se dispone de información detallada sobre el tipo de radio-quimioterapia utilizada, ni sobre la finalización del tratamiento o la recurrencia, tampoco acerca de la sobrevida libre de enfermedad ni sobre las condiciones socio-económicas o aquellos factores de riesgo a nivel individual.CONCLUSIÓN:Los pacientes de comunidades con ingresos medios más bajos, con un nivel de educación limitado e inscritos en un seguro público tardaron mucho más tiempo en recibir el tratamiento prescrito. El nivel socio-económico más bajo también se asoció con una sobrevida global más baja. Los presentes resultados justifican mayor análisis y medidas mas importantes para mejorar el acceso a la atención en salud y poder afrontar esta disparidad. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Quimiorradioterapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em Saúde , Atraso no Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Ânus/terapia , Neoplasias do Ânus/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Atraso no Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Cancer Sci ; 112(10): 4281-4291, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288283

RESUMO

To address the major issue of regional disparity in the treatment for elderly cancer patients in an aging society, we compared the treatment strategies used for elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and their survival outcomes in metropolitan areas and other regions. Using the national database of hospital-based cancer registries in 2008-2011, patients aged 75 years or older who had been diagnosed with thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated in metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Osaka, Aichi, Saitama, and Chiba prefectures) with populations of 6 million or more and those treated in other areas (the other 41 prefectures). Compared were patient backgrounds, treatment strategies, and survival curves at each cancer stage. In total, 1236 (24%) patients from metropolitan areas and 3830 (76%) patients from nonmetropolitan areas were enrolled. Patients in metropolitan areas were treated at more advanced stages. There was also a difference in treatment strategy. The 3-year survival rate among cStage I patients was better in metropolitan areas (71.6% vs. 63.7%), and this finding mainly reflected the survival difference between patients treated with radiotherapy alone. For cStage II-IV patients, there were no differences. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis including interaction terms between treatment areas, cStage, and the first-line treatments revealed that treatments in the metropolitan areas were significantly associated with better survival among patients treated with radiotherapy alone for cStage I cancer. Treatment strategies for elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and its survival outcomes differed between metropolitan areas and other regions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/mortalidade , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidades/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Densidade Demográfica , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1166-1176, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184929

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Measurement of testosterone levels during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is broadly recommended, but how therapy should be altered in response to testosterone values during ADT remains controversial. Our objective was therefore to evaluate the relation between testosterone and concomitant prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels during ADT on clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from the continuous androgen deprivation arm of the PR.7 trial of intermittent ADT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following radiotherapy were included. Statistical analyses evaluated the prognostic importance of testosterone levels during ADT relative to concomitant PSA levels. We similarly evaluated whether the number of testosterone breakthroughs >1.7 nmol/l predicted the time to castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), cancer specific survival (CSS) or overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, the prognostic importance of testosterone on outcomes was eclipsed by the prognostic value of concomitant PSA values. The occurrence of testosterone values >0.7 nmol/l in the first year of therapy was associated with subsequent rises >1.7 nmol/l, but the number of testosterone breakthroughs per patient had no relationship to the risk of CRPC, CSS or OS. A time-dependent adjusted analysis indicated as expected that PSA values were prognostic, but there was no association of relative cumulative testosterone exposure with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale trial with long followup, breakthrough testosterone was unrelated to time to CRPC, CSS or OS. Castrate testosterone values during ADT for recurrent prostate cancer provides prognostic information that must be considered alongside the time since ADT initiation and concomitant PSA values.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Calicreínas/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Testosterona/sangue , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 642, 2021 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab has shown long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trials, but robust real-world evidence is lacking. We present long-term outcomes from the IMAGE study (NCT01511913) in patients receiving ipilimumab and/or non-ipilimumab (any approved treatment other than ipilimumab) systemic therapies. METHODS: IMAGE was a multinational, prospective, observational study assessing adult patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab or non-ipilimumab systemic therapies between June 2012 and March 2015 with ≥3 years of follow-up. Adjusted OS curves based on multivariate Cox regression models included covariate effects. Safety and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1356 patients, 1094 (81%) received ipilimumab and 262 (19%) received non-ipilimumab index therapy (systemic therapy [chemotherapy, anti-programmed death 1 antibodies, or BRAF ± MEK inhibitors], radiotherapy, and radiosurgery). In the overall population, median age was 64 years, 60% were male, 78% were from Europe, and 78% had received previous treatment for advanced melanoma. In the ipilimumab-treated cohort, 780 (71%) patients did not receive subsequent therapy (IPI-noOther) and 314 (29%) received subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (IPI-Other) on study. In the non-ipilimumab-treated cohort, 205 (78%) patients remained on or received other subsequent non-ipilimumab therapy (Other-Other) and 57 (22%) received subsequent ipilimumab therapy (Other-IPI) on study. Among 1151 patients who received ipilimumab at any time during the study (IPI-noOther, IPI-Other, and Other-IPI), 296 (26%) reported CTCAE grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, most occurring in year 1. Ipilimumab-treated and non-ipilimumab-treated patients who switched therapy (IPI-Other and Other-IPI) had longer OS than those who did not switch (IPI-noOther and Other-Other). Patients with prior therapy who did not switch therapy (IPI-noOther and Other-Other) showed similar OS. In treatment-naive patients, those in the IPI-noOther group tended to have longer OS than those in the Other-Other group. Patient-reported outcomes were similar between treatment cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: With long-term follow-up (≥ 3 years), safety and OS in this real-world population of patients treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg were consistent with those reported in clinical trials. Patient-reported quality of life was maintained over the study period. OS analysis across both pretreated and treatment-naive patients suggested a beneficial role of ipilimumab early in treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01511913. Registered January 19, 2012 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01511913.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Ipilimumab/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Radiocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 585, 2021 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34022830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) is a non-negligible and sometimes life-threatening complication among patients with thoracic radiation. We initially aimed to ascertain the predictive value of acute radiation-induced esophagitis (SARE, grade ≥ 2) to symptomatic RP (SRP, grade ≥ 2) among thoracic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Based on that, we established a novel nomogram model to provide individualized risk assessment for SRP. METHODS: Thoracic cancer patients who were treated with thoracic radiation from Jan 2018 to Jan 2019 in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were enrolled prospectively. All patients were followed up during and after radiotherapy (RT) to observe the development of esophagitis as well as pneumonitis. Variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, and a nomogram model was established to predict SRP by "R" version 3.6.0. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were enrolled (64 esophageal cancer, 57 lung cancer and 2 mediastinal cancer) in this study prospectively. RP grades of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 occurred in 29, 57, 31, 0, 3 and 3 patients, respectively. SRP appeared in 37 patients (30.1%). In univariate analysis, SARE was shown to be a significant predictive factor for SRP (P < 0.001), with the sensitivity 91.9% and the negative predictive value 93.5%. The incidence of SRP in different grades of ARE were as follows: Grade 0-1: 6.5%; Grade 2: 36.9%; Grade 3: 80.0%; Grade 4: 100%. Besides that, the dosimetric factors considering total lung mean dose, total lung V5, V20, ipsilateral lung mean dose, ipsilateral lung V5, and mean esophagus dose were correlated with SRP (all P < 0.05) by univariate analysis. The incidence of SRP was significantly higher in patients whose symptoms of RP appeared early. SARE, mean esophagus dose and ipsilateral mean lung dose were still significant in multivariate analysis, and they were included to build a predictive nomogram model for SRP. CONCLUSIONS: As an early index that can reflect the tissue's radiosensitivity visually, SARE can be used as a predictor for SRP in patients receiving thoracic radiation. And the nomogram containing SARE may be fully applied in future's clinical work.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Esofagite/epidemiologia , Nomogramas , Pneumonite por Radiação/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Torácicas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Esofagite/diagnóstico , Esofagite/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Pneumonite por Radiação/diagnóstico , Pneumonite por Radiação/etiologia , Tolerância a Radiação , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo
6.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 81, 2021 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33468109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with poor survival and prognosis. Randomized trials have demonstrated that chemotherapy improves survival in patients with GBM. This study aims to examine the clinical characteristics that are potentially associated with the efficacy of chemotherapy and the risk factors of GBM. METHODS: A total of 25,698 patients diagnosed with GBM were identified between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). The clinical and demographic variables between groups were examined by Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test. GBM-specific survival (GBMSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were also performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify statistically significant prognostic factors. RESULTS: Patients who received chemotherapy had better overall survival (median OS 13 vs. Three months, HR = 1.9224, 95%CI 1.8571-1.9900, p < 0.0001) and better GBMSS (median GBMSS of 12 vs. Three months, HR = 1.9379, 95%CI 1.8632-2.0156, p < 0.0001), compared to patients who did not. Further subgroup analysis revealed that among patients who underwent chemotherapy, those who were younger, with a supratentorial tumor, received surgery, or radiotherapy had both improved OS and GBMSS. Age, race, tumor location, tumor size, and treatments were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariable analyses for patients with glioblastoma. CONCLUSION: Patients with GBM who were younger (< 65 years), underwent surgery, or radiotherapy can benefit more from chemotherapeutic regimens. Age, race, tumor size, tumor location, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were factors associated with the prognosis of patients with GBM.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 639, 2021 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines recommend CCRT+AC and IC + CCRT as level 2A evidence for treatment of the locoregionally advanced NPC (II-IVa), IC + CCRT+AC could also be an alternative but it is seldom used because of the low completion rates. This article aimed to compare the effectiveness of the three radiotherapy regimens using a large-scale retrospective study. METHODS: This retrospective single center analysis enrolled 1812 diagnosed NPC patients at Nanfang Hospital from January 2005 to December 2015 and only 729 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Patients without distant metastasis, age of 18-70 years, Karnofsky scores of at least 70,stage III-IVb, and adequate adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Were enrolled. Adverse events and other categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test or Fishier exact test. Time-to-event data were described with the Kaplan-Meier curves, time-to-event intervals compared with the log-rank test. We did multivariable analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent signifi cance of diff erent factors. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the ß regression coeffi cient, p value, and hazard ratio and its 95% CI for each of the selected risk predictors. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 47 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no significant differences among three groups in 3-year failure-free survival (FFS, P = 0.225), 3-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.992), 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS, P = 0.549), and 3-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS, P = 0.174). Stratified survival analysis based on the risk scoring model revealed no differences in FFS, OS, LFFS, and DFFS between IC + CCRT and CCRT+AC groups for low-risk patients, however, the 3-year OS (88.3% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.049) and 3-year DFFS (84.0% vs.66.8%, P = 0.032) were respectively significantly better in IC + CCRT group compared with CCRT+AC group for high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CCRT+AC, IC + CCRT lowers distant metastasis rate and improves OS among patients with locally advanced NPC in high risk group.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
8.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 552, 2021 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33992087

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the safety and efficacy of concurrent capecitabine and stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with BCBM underwent 31 stereotactic sessions to 90 lesions from 2005 to 2019 with receipt of capecitabine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of stereotactic radiation. Imaging was independently reviewed by a neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: Median follow-up from stereotactic radiation was 9.2 months. Receptor types of patients treated included triple negative (n = 7), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (n = 7), HR+/HER2+ (n = 6), and HR-/HER2+ (n = 3). Fourteen patients had stage IV disease prior to BCBM diagnosis. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was 3 (1 to 12). The median dose of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 21 Gy (range: 15-24 Gy) treated in a single fraction and for lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) 25 Gy (24-30 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions (range: 3-5). Of the 31 stereotactic sessions, 71% occurred within 1 month of capecitabine. No increased toxicity was noted in our series with no cases of radionecrosis. The 1-year OS, LC, and DIC were 46, 88, and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our single institution experience, we demonstrate stereotactic radiation and capecitabine to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with adequate LC. Further study is needed to determine the potential synergy between stereotactic radiation and capecitabine in the management of BCBM.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/patologia , Encéfalo/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose/diagnóstico , Necrose/etiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radiocirurgia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(2): 407-412, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119366

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of postreatment plasmatic levels of the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) as a survival independent prognostic factor in patients with LACC. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter study including LACC patients (FIGO 2009 stages IB2, IIA2-IVA) managed at the Gynecology Oncological Units corresponding to eight reference hospitals in Spain between 2000 and 2016. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values of postreatment SCC-Ag levels in prediction of survival. Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. Cox models were used to analyze different factors in terms of their prognosis predictive value. RESULTS: The study included 447 patients with a median follow-up time of 53 months (IQR 26-101) and median pre- and postreatment SCC-Ag levels of 3.4 ng/ml (IQR 1.2-11) and 0.8 ng/ml (IQR 0.5-1.2), respectively. The cut-off level of pretreatment SCC-Ag was 11.75 ng/ml (sensibility 37.5%; specificity 80.5%) and that of postreatment SCC-Ag was 1.24 ng/ml (sensibility 34.6%; specificity 83.1%). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, factors that were independent predictors of OS were: FIGO stage (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.18-3.8; p = 0.011), paraaortic lymph node involvement (HR 3.56; 95%CI 2.04-6.2; p < 0.0001), postreatment SCC-Ag level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml (HR 1.95; 95%CI 1.11-3.44; p = 0.02) and incomplete response to treatment (HR 4.5; 95%CI 2.5-8.11; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Postreatment plasmatic SCC-Ag level ≥ 1.2 ng/ml was an independent risk factor for the survival of patients with LACC. Further factors influencing survival included: paraaortic lymph node involvement, advanced disease and poor response to concomitant chemoradiotherapy.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Neoplasias/sangue , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Serpinas/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
10.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(2): 277-283, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34059350

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The recently published ASTRO cervical cancer guidelines recommend the use of modern radiotherapy. Imaging is now incorporated in the updated FIGO 2018 staging with a new stage IIIC. This study aims to evaluate the oncologic outcomes and predictors of survival using FIGO 2018 staging in a cohort of patients treated in an era of high-precision image-guided radiotherapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 216 adult cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Eligible patients had non-metastatic cervical cancer treated at a single academic institution. All patients had pre-treatment MRI and CT/PET. Treatment protocol consisted of external beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D image-guided brachytherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Multivariate cox proportional-hazards model was performed to identify potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 50 and median BMI was 26.4 kg/m2. Median follow-up time was 44.3 months. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival and loco-regional disease-free survival rates were 76.8%, 68.5% and 82.6%, respectively. FIGO 2018 showed better OS discrimination compared to FIGO 2009 classification. OS was increasingly worse with positive pelvic and para-aortic nodes (p < 0.001). In a multivariate prediction model, performance status (p = 0.044) and FIGO 2018 classification (stage III p = 0.016; stage IVA p = 0.010) were predictors of mortality; FIGO 2018 classification (stage III p = 0.003; stage IVA p = 0.001) was a predictor of any recurrence; MRI tumor diameter (p ≤ 0.001) and nodal metastases (p = 0.024) were predictors of loco-regional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of state-of-the-art imaging in cervical cancer staging and in radiotherapy planning leads to good loco-regional control rates, however distant recurrence remains an important issue. FIGO 2018 staging better reflects patient prognosis, highlighting the need for new treatment strategies for stage IIIC cervical cancer.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Útero/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Prognóstico , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Future Oncol ; 17(13): 1625-1635, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726500

RESUMO

Aim: PD-L1 is an important immune intervention target for lung cancer treatment; however, its clinical significance and biological function in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of lung cancer need to be explored in depth. Materials & methods: In this study, the CanPatrol method was used to detect three types of CTCs and PD-L1 in 271 lung cancer patients from December 2015 to October 2019. Results: Smoking index, pathological diagnosis and clinical stage are independent influencing factors of PD-L1 expression. The methods that affect the count of CTCs are first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy; however, there is no difference in the expression of PD-L1 with different treatments. Conclusions: The detection of CTCs and PD-L1 in peripheral blood is helpful for the diagnosis of lung cancer patients.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/diagnóstico , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/sangue , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/terapia , Idoso , Antígeno B7-H1/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/sangue , Fumar/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Future Oncol ; 17(20): 2647-2657, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34008415

RESUMO

Aim: To explore the clinical utility of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for predicting the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients & methods: After calculating the SII in 180 patients with ESCC, the relationship between SII values and the pre-/post-radiotherapy SII ratio and overall survival was determined. Results: The median overall survival was 649 days for the entire group and 909 and 466 days for the high and low pre-/post-radiotherapy SII ratio groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.045), lymphatic metastasis (p = 0.032), mid-radiotherapy SII (p < 0.001) and pre-/post-radiotherapy SII ratio (p = 0.003) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The pre-/post-radiotherapy SII ratio and mid-radiotherapy SII are potentially effective markers for predicting ESCC prognosis.


Lay abstract The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is calculated from the counts of peripheral blood platelets (P), neutrophils (N) and lymphocytes (L) per liter according to the formula SII = P × N/L. The SII is associated with poor survival in certain cancer types. However, some reports have examined the prognostic value of the SII in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who were undergoing radiotherapy or radical chemoradiotherapy. As such, the current study sought to investigate the clinical prognostic value of the SII during radiotherapy and the ratio of the SII before and after radiotherapy in patients with ESCC who were undergoing chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. The study found that the pre-/post-radiotherapy SII ratio and mid-radiotherapy SII are potentially effective markers for predicting ESCC prognosis.


Assuntos
Plaquetas/imunologia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/mortalidade , Linfócitos/imunologia , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/imunologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/sangue , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/imunologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Contagem de Plaquetas , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Future Oncol ; 17(33): 4571-4582, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34519220

RESUMO

Aims: To determine how consistently Chinese glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients were treated according to the Stupp regimen. Patients and methods: The proportion of treatments conforming to the Stupp regimen and reasons for nonconformity were evaluated in 202 newly diagnosed GBM patients. Results: Only 15.8% of GBM patients received treatments compliant with the Stupp regimen. The main deviations were temozolomide dosages >75 mg/m2 (58/120; 48.3%) and treatment durations <42 days (84/120; 70.0%) in the concomitant phase and temozolomide dosages <150 mg/m2 (89/101; 88.1%) in the maintenance phase. Median overall survival (27.09 vs 18.21 months) and progression-free survival (14.27 vs 12.10 months) were longer in patients who received Stupp regimen-compliant treatments. Conclusion: Increased conformity to the Stupp regimen is needed for GBM patients in China.


Lay abstract In 2005 the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26981 study led to US FDA approval for the use of temozolomide in combination with radiotherapy to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The Stupp regimen consists of fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days/week for 6 weeks (a total of 60 Gy), plus concomitant daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day, 7 days/week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy), followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150­200 mg/m2/day for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). In 2012 the Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of glioma of the CNS recommended the Stupp regimen as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed GBM. In the present study, compliance of GBM treatments with the Stupp regimen in 28 Chinese centers from 2012­2016 was evaluated. Only 15.8% of GBM patients received treatments compliant with the Stupp regimen. The main deviations related to temozolomide dosages and treatment durations in the concomitant and maintenance phases. Median overall survival (27.09 vs 18.21 months) and progression-free survival (14.27 vs 12.10 months) were longer in patients who received Stupp regimen-compliant treatments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Glioblastoma/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Temozolomida/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/normas , China/epidemiologia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Adulto Jovem
14.
Future Oncol ; 17(21): 2713-2724, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960209

RESUMO

The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer remains controversial. The authors examined the National Cancer Database and identified patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with no brain metastasis. Patients were excluded if they died 30 days from diagnosis, did not receive polychemotherapy, had other palliative radiation or had missing information. A propensity score-matched analysis was also performed. A total of 21,019 patients were identified. The majority of patients did not receive radiation (69%), whereas 10% received PCI and 21% received TRT. The addition of PCI and TRT improved median survival and survival at 1 and 2 years (p ≤ 0.05). The propensity score-matched analysis confirmed the same overall survival benefit with both PCI and TRT. This registry-based analysis of >1500 accredited cancer programs shows that PCI and TRT are not commonly utilized for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients who are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. The addition of PCI and TRT significantly improves overall survival in this otherwise poor prognostic group. Further research is needed to confirm the role of PCI and TRT, especially in the era of improved systemic therapy.


Lay abstract The role of radiation therapy in patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer remains controversial. The authors examined the National Cancer Database and identified patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer without brain metastasis. Patients were excluded if they died 30 days from diagnosis, did not receive multiagent chemotherapy, had other palliative radiation or had missing information regarding treatment. A total of 21,019 patients were identified. The majority of patients did not receive radiation (69%), whereas 10% received radiation to the brain and 21% received radiation to their lungs. The addition of brain and lung radiation therapy improved median survival and survival at 1 and 2 years. The addition of prophylactic cranial irradiation and thoracic radiation therapy improves survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Future research is needed to evaluate the role of radiation in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/prevenção & controle , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Irradiação Craniana/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/secundário , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(2): 877-887, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524284

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An incidence of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) of 34% has been reported in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, delayed cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and long-term renal outcomes remain poorly studied. METHODS: Patients with LA-HNSCC who underwent definitive or postoperative cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were included. Acute kidney disease (AKD) was defined as newly developed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 for < 3 months, ≥ 35% decrease in eGFR, or > 50% increase in serum creatinine for <3 months from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients were analyzed. AKD and AKI occurred in 27.9% and 13.4% of patients, respectively. Most patients had primary prophylactic feeding tube (95%) and definitive CRT (83%). More AKD patients had an ECOG status of 0 (p = 0.017), diabetes (p = 0.044), and hypertension (p < 0.001). AKI, but not AKD, was significantly associated with cumulative cisplatin dose, delay, dose reduction, termination, and hospitalization during CRT. GFR percentage in patients with AKD declined significantly during CRT (- 36%), worsened at 3 months (- 39%), and had not recovered to baseline at 12 months after CRT (- 29%). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG status 0 and hypertension as significantly associated with the development of AKD. CONCLUSION: Almost one third of LA-HNSCC patients who underwent CRT with cisplatin developed AKD, and their eGFR did not recover to baseline even after 1 year. ECOG 0 and hypertension were associated with AKD. These findings may have been due to the physician's awareness of AKD and underestimation of its potential complications in fit patients.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/efeitos dos fármacos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Br J Surg ; 107(11): 1500-1509, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Only around one-quarter of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) undergo surgical resection. This population-based study investigated the rates of treatment with curative intent and resection, and their association with survival. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with oesophageal and GOJ cancer between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden were identified from the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV). The NREV was cross-linked with several national registries to obtain information on additional exposures. The annual proportion of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent and surgical resection in each county was calculated, and the counties divided into groups with low, intermediate and high rates. Treatment with curative intent was defined as definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery, with or without neoadjuvant oncological treatment. Overall survival was analysed using a multilevel model based on county of residence at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Some 5959 patients were included, of whom 1503 (25·2 per cent) underwent surgery. Median overall survival after diagnosis was 7·7, 8·8 and 11·1 months respectively in counties with low, intermediate and high rates of treatment with curative intent. Corresponding survival times for the surgical resection groups were 7·4, 9·3 and 11·0 months. In the multivariable analysis, a higher rate of treatment with curative intent (time ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·30; P < 0·001) and a higher resection rate (time ratio 1·24, 1·12 to 1·37; P < 0·001) were associated with improved survival after adjustment for relevant confounders. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed in counties with higher rates of treatment with curative intent and higher rates of surgery had better survival.


ANTECEDENTES: En los pacientes con cáncer en el esófago y de la unión gastroesofágica (gastroesophageal junction, GOJ), solamente en una cuarta parte se practica una resección quirúrgica. Este estudio de base poblacional analizó las tasas de tratamiento con intención curativa y de resección y su asociación con la supervivencia. MÉTODOS: A partir del Registro Nacional Sueco de Cáncer de Esófago y Estómago (National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer, NREV), se identificaron los pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer de esófago y de la GOJ entre 2006-2015. El NREV se cruzó con otros registros nacionales para obtener información adicional. Se calculó la proporción anual de pacientes tratados con intención curativa o mediante resección quirúrgica en cada una de las áreas territoriales de los condados y se categorizaron en baja, intermedia y alta. El tratamiento con intención curativa se definió como la quimiorradioterapia definitiva (definitive chemoradiation therapy, dCRT) o la cirugía, con o sin tratamiento oncológico neoadyuvante. Se analizó la supervivencia global con un modelo multinivel basado en el condado de residencia en el momento del diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 5.959 pacientes, de los que 1.503 (25,2%) fueron tratados quirúrgicamente. La mediana de supervivencia global después del tratamiento con intención curativa fue de 7,7, 8,8 y 11,1 meses para los condados de volumen bajo, intermedio y alto. Para el grupo de cirugía fue de 7,4, 9,3 y 11,0 meses, respectivamente. En el análisis multivariable, una mayor tasa de tratamiento con intención curativa y una mayor tasa de resección se asociaron con una mejor supervivencia (tiempo ganado 1,17; i.c. del 95% 1,05-1,30, P < 0,001 y tiempo ganado 1,24; i.c. del 95% 1,12-1,37, P < 0,001) después del ajuste para los factores principales de confusión. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes diagnosticados en condados con tasas altas de tratamiento con intención curativa y de cirugía tuvieron una mejor supervivencia.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Junção Esofagogástrica , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Suécia/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 778, 2020 Aug 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811474

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcomas (AS) have poor prognosis and often metastasize to distant sites. The potential predictors of metastatic angiosarcomas (MAS) have not been extensively investigated. The main objective of this study was to identify survival predictors of MAS. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) datasets were used to identify patients with MAS from 2010 to 2016. Risk predictors were determined with the aid of Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model analyses. RESULTS: A total of 284 MAS patients met the study entry criteria. Among these, 121 patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with metastasis in bone, 26 in brain (9.2%), 86 in liver (30.3%) and 171 in lung (60.2%). Overall, 96 patients (33.8%) had two or more metastatic sites. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 20.8 and 3.8% while 1- and 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 22.0 and 5.2%, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed chemotherapy, radiation treatment (RT) and tumor size ≤10 cm as independent favorable predictors of OS. In terms of CSS, tumor grade IV, tumor size > 10 cm and absence of chemotherapy were independent adverse predictors. Surgery did not prolong survival outcomes (both OS and CSS) in the current cohort. CONCLUSION: MAS is associated with extremely poor survival. Chemotherapy, RT, and tumor size are independent predictors of OS. Chemotherapy and tumor size are independent prognostic factors of CSS. Chemotherapy is therefore recommended as the preferred treatment option for MAS patients.


Assuntos
Hemangiossarcoma/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hemangiossarcoma/diagnóstico , Hemangiossarcoma/patologia , Hemangiossarcoma/terapia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(3): 663-671, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988623

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Vulvar cancer affects mainly elderly women and with an ageing population the incidence has increased. We explored the primary treatment patterns and relative survival of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) by stage and age-group. METHODS: A population-based nationwide study on women diagnosed with VSCC between 2012 and 2016 and registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC). Main outcome was 5-year relative survival (RS) estimated by the Pohar Perme method. The relative risk of excess mortality (EMRR) between different groups was analyzed by Poisson regression. The age-standardized relative survival (AS-RS) was estimated for the total cohort. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 41 months. The study population included 657 women; 33% were ≥ 80 years old. FIGO stage I was most common (55%). Primary surgery was performed in 96% stage I, 65% stage II, 80% stage III and 28% stage IV. In women ≥80 years, exploration of the groins and chemoradiotherapy was less often performed. They also received lower mean doses of radiation than younger women. The 5-year AS-RS was 74%. 5-year RS was 84% for stage I, 60% for stage II, 54% for stage III and 35% for stage IV. The EMRR for women ≥80 years compared with women <60 years was 4.3 (p < 0.001); 4.9 (p < 0.001) for stages I-II and 3.5(p = 0.007) for stage III. CONCLUSIONS: In general, primary treatment of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in Sweden adhered to guidelines. Areas of improvement include treatment for stage II and for the very old.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Vulvares/terapia , Vulvectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Suécia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Vulvares/mortalidade , Vulvectomia/normas , Adulto Jovem
19.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(1): 136-141, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32798000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in local tumour staging between clinical examination and MRI and differences between FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM in patients with primary cervical cancer undergoing definitive radio-chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients from the prospective observational multi-centre study "EMBRACE" were considered for analysis. All patients had gynaecological examination and pelvic MRI before treatment. Nodal status was assessed by MRI, CT, PET-CT or lymphadenectomy. For this analysis, patients were restaged according to the FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system. The local tumour stage was evaluated for MRI and clinical examination separately. Descriptive statistics were used to compare local tumour stages and different staging systems. RESULTS: Data was available from 1338 patients. For local tumour staging, differences between MRI and clinical examination were found in 364 patients (27.2%). Affected lymph nodes were detected in 52%. The two most frequent stages with FIGO 2009 are IIB (54%) and IIIB (16%), with FIGO 2018 IIIC1 (43%) and IIB (27%) and with TNM T2b N0 M0 (27%) and T2b N1 M0 (23%) in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and clinical examination resulted in a different local tumour staging in approximately one quarter of patients. Comprehensive knowledge of the differential value of clinical examination and MRI is necessary to define one final local stage, especially when a decision about treatment options is to be taken. The use of FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system leads to differences in stage distributions complicating comparability of treatment results. TNM provides the most differentiated stage allocation.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo do Útero/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Biópsia , Braquiterapia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
20.
J Surg Res ; 247: 530-540, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648811

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is the most common histological subtype of anal cancer. Rates have been observed to increase in recent years. Combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently the gold standard of treatment. The aim of this study is to assess ASCC prevalence, treatment trends, and overall survival (OS) in the United States. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-IV ASCC were identified from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. The primary outcome was 5-year OS, which was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: 34,613 cases were included (stage I: 21.45%; II: 41.00%; III: 31.62%; IV: 5.94%), with an increasing trend in prevalence. CCRT was the most used treatment. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with CCRT, offered the best OS rates for stage I, II, and IV cancers (I: 84.87%; II: 75.12%; IV: 33.08%), comparable with survival of stage III patients treated with CCRT (III: 61.14%). Radiation alone had the worse OS rates, and on adjusted analysis, radiation treatment alone had the greatest risk of mortality (I: hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.54; P = 0.016; II: 2.05, 1.44-2.93, P < 0.001; IV: 1.99, 0.99-4.02, P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: ASCC has increased in prevalence, notably in stage III and IV disease. Although CCRT is the most commonly used treatment type for all stages of ASCC, multimodal treatment offers better OS in stages I, II, and IV. Treatment with radiation alone offers the worst OS no matter the stage and should no longer be used as a solitary treatment modality.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Protectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Ânus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/normas , Quimiorradioterapia/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Prevalência , Protectomia/normas , Protectomia/tendências , Radioterapia/normas , Radioterapia/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA