Endothelin receptors: what's new and what do we need to know?

Receptors are at the heart of how a molecule transmits a signal to a cell. Two receptor classes for endothelin (ET) are recognized, the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Intriguing questions have arisen in the field of ET receptor pharmacology, physiology, and function. For example, a host of pharmacological studies support the interaction of the ET(A) and ET(B) receptor in tissues (veins, arteries, bronchus, arterioles, esophagus), but yet few have been able to demonstrate direct ET(A)/ET(B) receptor interaction. Have we modeled this interaction wrong? Do we have a truly selective ET(A) receptor agonist such that we could selectively stimulate this important receptor? What can we learn from the recent phylogenic studies of the ET receptor family? Have we adequately addressed the number of biological molecules with which ET can interact to exert a biological effect? Recent mass spectrometry studies in our laboratory suggest that ET-1 interacts with other hereto unrecognized proteins. Biased ligands (ligands at the same receptor that elicit distinct signaling responses) have been discovered for other receptors. Do these exist for ET receptors and can we take advantage of this possibility in drug design? These and other questions will be posed in this minireview on topics on ET receptors.

ET--phone the pain clinic.

Recent findings by Khodorova et al. demonstrate that the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 plays an important role in certain nociceptive behaviors in an animal model of pain, through activation of sensory neurons. Endothelin-1 might also have the unexpected capacity to release an opioid from surrounding keratinocytes and thereby inhibit the pain response. Such results suggest that, in the periphery, there are important interactions between sensory nerve terminals and surrounding cells, and that glia and keratinocytes could modulate the perception of environmental stimuli to a greater extent than previously considered.

Endothelin receptors in gastrointestinal smooth muscle.

Endothelins (ETs) are a family of peptides with 21-amino-acid residues. ET-1 was identified as a potent vasoconstrictor produced by vascular endothelial cells. Three distinct isoforms of ET, i.e. ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3, have been found to exist in a variety of tissues. ET was later found to cause contraction as well as relaxation of smooth muscle in many physiologic systems. In the gastrointestinal tract, ET causes contraction and/or relaxation of the esophagus, stomach, ileum and colon. In the hepatobiliary system, ET causes contraction of the portal vein, hepatic stellate cells, gallbladder and common bile duct. In mammalian species, two classes of ET receptors, ET(A) and ET(B), have been cloned. ET(A) receptors have higher affinities for ET-1 and ET-2 than ET-3, while ET(B) receptors have the same affinities for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3. In the gastrointestinal system, ET causes smooth muscle contraction through interaction with ET(A) receptors, ET(B) receptors or both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, depending on the tissues and species. In addition to contraction, ET causes smooth muscle relaxation through interaction with ET(A) receptors or ET(B) receptors. At the present time, there are no studies showing that ET causes smooth muscle relaxation through interaction with both ET(A) and ET(B) subtypes. ET induces contraction in most of the non-sphincter muscle except the fundus of the stomach. On the other hand, ET causes relaxation and contraction in the lower esophageal and internal anal sphincters. ET may play an important role in the control of human gastrointestinal motility and portal vein pressure.

The current endothelin receptor classification: time for reconsideration?

The possible involvement of endothelins in a variety of diseases has attracted the attention of many pharmacologists in search of a novel therapeutic approach. The rapid development of endothelin research has resulted in the molecular characterization and pharmacological recognition of ETA and ETB receptors, and in the development of compounds selective for these receptors. However, the characterization of receptors in various assays has shown that a number of effects are mediated by receptors that do not fit the present criteria for ETA or ETB receptors. In this article, Willem Bax and Pramod Saxena address endothelin receptors in general, and atypical receptors in particular.

Endothelin receptors in the detached retina of the pig.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor that causes hypoperfusion of the neurosensory retina. We investigated immunohistochemically the expression of the receptors for ET-1, ET(A) and ET(B), in control and locally detached retinas of the pig. Immunoreactivity for ET(A) was expressed in the innermost retinal layers and in the outer plexiform layer in control retinas, and was additionally strongly expressed by retinal blood vessels at 7 days after detachment of the sensory retina from the pigment epithelium. Immunoreactivity for ET(B) was expressed by the innermost retinal layers, by ganglion cell somata, and by Müller glial cells in the control tissue, and was not altered in its expression after detachment. The vascular expression of ET(A) may suggest a hypoperfusion of the retina after detachment.

Endothelin-1 and its receptors A and B in human aldosterone-producing adenomas.

Endothelin-1 stimulates aldosterone secretion by interacting with specific receptors. Accordingly, we wished to investigate endothelin-1, endothelin-A (ETA) receptor, and endothelin-B (ETB) receptor gene expression, localization, and properties in aldosterone-producing adenomas and in the normal human adrenal cortex. We carried out 125I-endothelin-1 displacement studies with cold endothelin-1, endothelin-3, the specific ETA antagonist BQ-123, and the specific ETB weak agonist sarafotoxin 6 C and coanalyzed data with the nonlinear iterative curve-fitting program LIGAND. We also studied gene expression with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with specific primers for endothelin-1, ETA, and ETB complementary DNA. Normal adrenal cortices from consenting kidney cancer patients (n = 2) and aldosterone-producing adenomas (n = 4) were studied; for the latter, surrounding normal cortex and kidney biopsy tissue served as controls. To further localize the receptor subtypes, tissue sections were studied by autoradiography in the presence and absence of 500 nmol/L BQ-123, 100 nmol/L sarafotoxin 6 C, and 1 mumol/L cold endothelin-1. In all tissues examined, endothelin-1, ETA, and ETB messenger RNAs were easily detected. However, in aldosterone-producing adenomas, both receptors' genes were expressed at a higher level than in the kidney.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Endothelin receptor subtypes in small arteries. Studies with FR139317 and bosentan.

We studied the effects of the selective endothelin A receptor antagonist FR139317 and the combined endothelin A/endothelin B receptor antagonist bosentan in rat mesenteric arteries by using a video dimension analyzer. In endothelium-denuded arteries, increasing concentrations of endothelin-1 evoked a biphasic vasoconstriction. The first phase was observed at low concentrations (10(-16) to 10(-11) mol/L) of endothelin-1 and was relatively weak. However, the contractions characterizing the second phase, which occurred at higher concentrations (10(-10) to 3 x 10(-8) mol/L) of endothelin-1, were much stronger. FR139317 concentration-dependently shifted the second phase of the endothelin-1-induced contraction curve to the right without affecting the first phase. In contrast, bosentan inhibited both the first and the second phase. Even after the blockade of endothelin A receptor, increasing concentrations of the endothelin B receptor agonists endothelin-3 and sarafotoxin S6c still induced small contractions. Maximal contractions induced by single-bolus extraluminal application of endothelin-3 (10(-9) mol/L) or sarafotoxin S6c (3 x 10(-8) mol/L) were markedly more pronounced than responses induced by cumulative concentrations, suggesting endothelin B receptor downregulation upon repeated and sustained activation. The response induced by a single bolus of endothelin-3 (10(-9) mol/L) was antagonized by bosentan but not by FR139317, confirming that endothelin B receptors were involved. In endothelium-intact arteries half-maximally precontracted with norepinephrine, bosentan but not FR139317 inhibited the relaxations induced by intraluminally applied endothelin-3. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential regulation of c-fos gene expression by two types of human endothelin receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

To investigate the nuclear signalling pathway induced by endothelin (ET) isopeptides, we have established permanent Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines, CHO-ETA/fos-lacZ and CHO-ETB/fos-lacZ, that produce both a c-fos-beta-galactosidase fusion protein and either the type A or the type B human ET receptor. These cell lines permitted a colorimetric measurement of c-fos expression, which was induced by the signal transduction system with ET receptors and ET isopeptides. We found that the ET-1-dependent c-fos expression was so efficient that it could respond to low concentrations (even a physiological concentration) of ET-1. For example, CHO-ETA/fos-lacZ and CHO-ETB/fos-lacZ responded to ET concentrations of 5 x 10(-9) M and 5 x 10(-13) M respectively. Using this highly sensitive system, the H-7 sensitive protein kinase was found to be involved in signal transduction mediated by ETA, and also partly in the ETB-mediated pathway. These lines of evidence suggest that c-fos expression occurs through at least two different pathways, depending on the concentration of ET in plasma.

Intracerebroventricular administration of anti-endothelin-1 IgG selectively upregulates endothelin-A and kappa opioid receptors.

Endothelin (ET) type A receptor antagonists enhance morphine-induced antinociception and restore morphine analgesia in morphine tolerant rats [Peptides 23 (2002) 1837; Peptides 24 (2003) 553]. These studies suggest that the central ET and opioid systems functionally interact. To explore this idea further, we determined the effect of i.c.v. administration of anti-ET-1 IgG (rabbit) on brain opioid receptor and ET receptor expression. Three days after implanting cannula into the lateral ventricle, male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered 10 microl (i.c.v.) of either control rabbit IgG (2.5 microg/microl) or anti-ET IgG (2.5 microg/microl) on day 1, day 3, and day 5. On day 6, animals were killed and the caudate and hippocampus collected. Anti-ET IgG had no significant effect on expression, measured by Western blots, of mu, delta or ET-B receptors, but increased kappa opioid (59%) and ET-A (33%) receptor protein expression in the caudate. [35S]-GTP-gamma-S binding assays demonstrated that anti-ET IgG decreased [D-Ala2-MePhe4, Gly-ol5]enkephalin efficacy, but not potency in the caudate. Control experiments showed that there was no detectable rabbit IgG in caudate and hippocampal samples. These results suggest that ET in the CSF negatively regulates kappa opioid and ET-A receptors in certain brain regions. These findings support the hypothesis that CSF neuropeptides have regulatory effects and further demonstrate a link between ET and the opioid receptor system.

Subtypes of endothelin receptors that mediate venous effects of endothelin-1 in anaesthetized rats.

1. The subtypes of endothelin receptors that mediate the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), arterial resistance (RA), cardiac output (CO) and venous resistance (RV) were characterized in 9 groups of pentobarbitone-anaesthetized rats via the injection of ET-1 in the absence and presence of bosentan (Ro 47-0203, ETA- and ETB-receptor antagonist), PD 142893 (ETA- and ETB-receptor antagonist) or FR 139317 (ETA-receptor antagonist), as well as injection of the ETB-receptor agonist, IRL 1620. 2. Cumulative i.v. bolus injections of ET-1 or IRL 1620 (0.5, 1 and 2 nmol kg-1) dose-dependently increased MAP (ET: by 22, 34 and 44; IRL: 8, 17 and 28 mmHg), RA (ET: 62, 108 and 162; IRL: 51, 63 and 86% over baseline), RV (ET: 70, 132 and 179; IRL: 81, 89 and 98% over baseline) and MCFP (ET: 1.1, 1.8 and 1.9; IRL: 0.9, 1.0 and 1.2 mmHg) and reduced CO (ET: -18, -35 and -44; IRL: -24; -26; -25% below baseline). Equimolar doses of ET-1 and IRL 1620 caused similar initial transient depressor responses. Saline did not modify any haemodynamic variables in the time-control group. 3. Bosentan (10 mg kg-1, i.v.) inhibited ET-induced increases in MAP, RV, RA and MCFP and decrease in CO. PD 142893 (22 mg kg-1, i.v.) abolished ET-induced changes on MAP, RV, RA and CO, but did not alter effects on MCFP. Bosentan alone did not cause haemodynamic changes, but PD 142893 alone elevated MCFP (0.9 +/- 0.3 mmHg at 1 h after injection) and did not alter other variables. Both antagonists abolished the initial depressor effects of ET-1. 4. FR 139317 (1 mg kg-1, i.v.) partially inhibited the increases in MAP, RV, RA and MCFP and decreases in CO elicited by ET-1, but did not alter the transient depressor response of ET-1. 5. The results show that both ETA- and ETB-receptors mediate the arterial and venous constrictor effects of ET-1. Bosentan is more efficacious than PD 142893 in inhibiting the venous effects of ET-1.

Characterization of endothelin (ET) receptors in the isolated gall bladder of the guinea-pig: evidence for an additional ET receptor subtype.

1. We have characterized the receptors mediating contractions induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1), ET-2, ET-3 and the ETB-selective receptor agonists, sarafotoxin 6c (SX6c), IRL 1620, BQ-3020, [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1 and ET (16-21) in strips of the isolated gall bladder of the guinea-pig (GPGB). We used as antagonists BQ-123 (ETA receptor selective) and PD 145065 (ETA/ETB receptor non-selective). 2. ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 (10(-10) M to 3 x 10(-7) M) caused similar slowly-developing concentration-dependent contractions of the GPGB. Contractile effects induced by ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3 (at 3 x 10(-7) M) were also similar (230 +/- 25, 241 +/- 7 and 287 +/- 37% of that to histamine at 5 x 10(-6) M, n = 7, 6, 12, respectively). However, the threshold concentration for ET-1 or ET-2 was 10(-10) M whereas it was 3 x 10(-9) M for ET-3. 3. SX6c (10(-10) M to 3 x 10(-7) M) also caused slowly-developing concentration-dependent contractions at a threshold concentration of 10(-10) M (n = 16). However, the contraction caused by SX6c at 3 x 10(-7) M was 116 +/- 9% of that to histamine at 5 x 10(-6) M, which was half of that induced by the same concentration of the ET isopeptides. The contraction induced by IRL 1620 at 3 x 10-7 M (n = 9) was 43 +/- 9% of that to histamine at 5 x 10-6 M, which was one fifth of that produced by the same concentration of ET-1. Contractions induced by BQ-3020 or [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-I at 3 x 10-7 M were even less than those produced by IRL 1620. ET (16-21) was inactive up to 10-5 M. Addition of a concentration of 3 x 10-7 M of ET-1 to tissues with developed contractions induced by the bolus addition of 3 x 10-7 M SX6c caused a further contraction of the GPGB to the level observed with ET-1 alone at 3 x 10-7M (n = 8).4. BQ-123 (10-5 M) did not affect the concentration-response curve to ET-1 and the contraction induced by 3 x 10- M was also not affected (n = 5; 239 +/- 19% of histamine at 5 x 10-6 M). PD 145065(10-5 M) shifted the ET-1 concentration-response curve to the right and the contraction induced by ET-1at 3 x 10-7 M was inhibited by 15% (n = 6; NS). A higher concentration of BQ-123 (10-4 M) caused a significant shift to the right of the ET-1 concentration-response curve similar to that caused by PD 145065 (10-s M) and caused a 24% (n = 6; NS) inhibition of the contractions induced by ET-1 at 3 x 10-7 M. PD 145065 (10-4 M) abolished contractions induced by ET-1 (up to 10- M) and inhibited the response to ET-1 at 3 x 10-7 M by 52% (n = 4; P< 0.05).5. Contractions induced by ET-3 were more sensitive to inhibition by the antagonists. BQ-123 (10-6,10-5 or 10-4 M) inhibited responses to 3 x 10-7 M ET-3 by 66, 71 and 83%, respectively (n = 5, 5, 3;P< 0.05). PD 145065 (10-6, 10-5 or 10-4 M) attenuated more strongly than did BQ-123 the contractions induced by ET-3. For instance, the contractions caused by ET-3 at 3 x 10-7 M were decreased by 73 and 80% (n = 5, 5; P<0.05) in the presence of PD 145065 (10-6 or 10-5 M, respectively). PD 145065(10-4 M) completely abolished contractions to ET-3 (n = 4; up to 3 x 10-7M).6. Contractions induced by SX6c, especially those observed at concentrations lower than 10-8 M, were attenuated by BQ-123 (up to 10-4 M). PD 145065 (10-5M) shifted to the right the concentration response curve to SX6c and inhibited by 38% (P<0.05) the contractions induced by 3 x 10-7M.However, the contractions induced by a bolus addition of a high concentration of SX6c (3 x 10-7 M)and the subsequent addition of an identical concentration of ET-1 on top of SX6c were not affected byBQ-123 (10-6 or 10-5 M).7. These results suggest that ETB receptors are involved in the contractions induced by endothelins in the GPGB. However, SX6c and other selective ETB agonists produced only half or less than half of the contractile response induced by non-selective agonists. In addition, the responses to ET-1 but not to ET-3, were insensitive to the antagonist action of BQ-123 at 10-5 M whereas BQ-123 or PD 145065 at 10-5 M strongly antagonized contractions induced by ET-3. Finally, BQ-123 at 10-4 M inhibited contractions to ET-1 and SX6c. Thus, within the GPGB there may well be additional ET receptor(s) not conforming to the established ETA/ETB receptor subtype classification, as well as ETB receptors.

Localization of endothelin ETB receptors on the myenteric plexus of guinea-pig ileum and the receptor-mediated release of acetylcholine.

1. The type of endothelin (ET) receptor located on the myenteric neurones of guinea-pig ileum was determined by receptor autoradiography and function of the receptor was examined by release experiments of acetylcholine (ACh) from the longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus (LM-MP) preparations. 2. Specific [125I]-ET-1 binding sites were distributed in muscle layers, myenteric and submucous plexuses, and mucosa layers. High-grain densities were detected in both myenteric and submucous plexuses. 3. Binding in the myenteric plexus was abolished by incubation with either IRL 1620 (endothelin ETB receptor agonist) or BQ 788 (endothelin ETB receptor antagonist), but not with BQ 123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist). The [125I]-IRL 1620 binding sites were evident in the myenteric plexus. Thus, the endothelin receptor located on the myenteric neurones is of the ETB type. 4. ET-1 (10(-10)-3 x 10(-8) M) and ET-3 (10(-10)-3 x 10(-8) M) evoked 3H outflow from LM-MP preparations of ileum preloaded with [3H]-choline, in a concentration-dependent manner. There was no significant difference between maximum amounts of ET-1-evoked and ET-3-evoked 3H outflow. 5. ET-1 and ET-3 evoked outflow of 3H was BQ 788-sensitive, but BQ 123-insensitive. Both evoked outflows of 3H were Ca(2+)-dependent and tetrodotoxin-sensitive. 6. These results indicate that the endothelin ETB receptor is located on the enteric cholinergic neurones and that stimulation evokes the release of ACh.

Characterization of the endothelin receptor subtype mediating epithelium-derived relaxant nitric oxide release from guinea-pig trachea.

1. The endothelin (ET) receptor subtype that mediates niric oxide (NO)-dependent airway relaxation in tracheal tube preparations precontracted with carbachol and pretreated with indomethacin was investigated. The release of NO induced by ET from guinea-pig trachea using a recently developed porphyrinic microsensor was also measured. 2. ET-1 (1 pM-100 nM) contracted tracheal tube preparations pretreated with the NO-synthase inhibitor, L-NMMA, and relaxed, in an epithelium-dependent manner, preparations pretreated with the inactive enantiomer D-NMMA. The effect of L-NMMA was reversed by L-Arg, but not by D-Arg. 3. The selective ET(B) receptor agonists, IRL 1620 or sarafotoxin S6c, both (1 pM-100 nM) contracted tracheal tube preparations in a similar manner either after treatment with D-NMMA or with L-NMMA. In the presence of the ET(A) receptor antagonist, FR139317 (10 microM), ET-1 administration resulted in a contraction that was similar after either L-NMMA or D-NMMA. In the presence of the ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ788 (1 microM), ET-1 relaxed and contracted tracheas pretreated with D-NMMA and L-NMMA, respectively. 4. Exposure of tracheal segments to ET-1 (1-1000 nM) caused a concentration-dependent increase in NO release that was reduced by L-NMMA. IRL1620 (1 microM) did not cause any significant NO release. FR139317 (10 microM), but not, BQ788 (1 microM), inhibited the NO release induced by ET-1. 5. These results demonstrate that in the isolated guinea-pig trachea activation of ET(B) receptors results in a contractile response, whereas activation of ET(A) receptors cause both a contraction, and an epithelium-dependent relaxation that is mediated by NO release.

Analysis of two pharmacologically predicted endothelin B receptor subtypes by using the endothelin B receptor gene knockout mouse.

1. This study was performed to clarify whether the endothelin (ET) receptor subtypes mediating two pharmacologically heterogeneous response to ETH receptor agonists in normal mice are the product(s) of a single ETB receptor gene. 2. Vasodilator responses to sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) in the thoracic aorta and contractile responses to ET-1 and IRL1620 in the stomach were examined in tissues from normal and ETB receptor gene knockout mice, in the absence and presence of an ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, or an ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, PD142893. 3. In the normal mouse aorta precontracted with phenylephrine, S6c (0.1-100 nM) caused concentration-dependent relaxations (pD2 = 8.4). BQ-123 had no effect on these responses. However, PD142893 almost abolished the relaxations induced by 0.1-300 nM S6c. 4. In aortae taken from ETB receptor gene knockout mice, S6c up to 1 microM failed to cause relaxations, confirming that ETB receptors are involved in mediating this response. 5. In normal mouse gastric fundus, 0.1 nM-1 microM ET-1, S6c or IRL1620 caused dose-dependent, BQ-123-insensitive contractions, which were much more resistant to PD142893 than S6c-induced relaxations of the aorta. The pD2 values for S6c in the absence and presence of PD142893 (10 microM) were 8.12 +/- 0.11 and 7.70 +/- 0.11, respectively. 6. In the gastric fundus of the ETB receptor gene knockout mouse, S6c and IRL1620 caused no contractions. ET-1 (0.1 nM-1 microM) caused contractions sensitive to both BQ-123 and PD142893, indicating that only ETA receptors mediate ET-1-induced contractions of the knockout mouse gastric fundus. 7. Since both the PD142893-sensitive vasodilator response of the aorta and the PD142893-resistant contractile response of the gastric fundus to S6c were completely absent in the ETB receptor gene knockout mouse, we conclude that the two pharmacologically heterogeneous responses to S6c are mediated by receptors derived from the same ETB receptor gene.

Evidence for heterogeneity of endothelin receptor distribution in human coronary artery.

1. The receptors mediating endothelin-evoked contraction of human coronary artery have been investigated in isolated segments of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). 2. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) was 10 times more potent in distal than in proximal segments but the potency ratio between ET-1 and ET-3 (endothelin-3) was similar and close to 100 in any segment of the artery. 3. BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist, competitively antagonized the response to ET-1 of distal segments (pA2 equal to 7.47). In the proximal segments, part of the contractile response was BQ123 sensitive, but the antagonism was non-competitive. In both groups of segments, the response to ET-3 could be completely blocked by BQ-123. 4. These observations indicate that ETA receptors mediate the contractile response to ET-1 in distal, pre-resistant coronary arteries, but that other ET receptors are also involved in the contractile response of proximal segments.

ETA receptor-mediated constrictor responses to endothelin peptides in human blood vessels in vitro.

1. We have characterized the constrictor endothelin receptors present in human isolated blood vessels using ETA and ETB selective agonists and antagonists. 2. Monophasic dose-response curves were obtained for ET-1 with EC50 values of 6.8 nM in coronary artery, 3.9 nM in internal mammary artery, 17.4 nM in pulmonary artery, 14.5 nM in aorta and 3.2 nM in saphenous vein. In coronary artery, ET-2 was equipotent with ET-1 with an EC50 value of 5.7 nM. The non-selective peptide, sarafotoxin 6b, was 2-3 times less potent than ET-1 but the maximum responses to these two were comparable. 3. In each vessel ET-3 was much less active than ET-1. No response was obtained to ET-3 in aorta and pulmonary artery or in up to 50% of coronary artery, mammary artery and saphenous vein preparations. In those preparations that did respond, dose-response curves were incomplete at 300 nM. Variable contractions were also obtained with the ETB-selective agonist, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c). Where responses were detected, although S6c was more potent than ET-1 (EC50 values of 0.6-1.2 nM), the maximum response produced was always less than 20% of that to ET-1. 4. The synthetic ETB agonists, BQ3020 and [1,3,11,15Ala]-ET-1, were without effect in any of the five blood vessels at concentrations up to 3 microM. 5. ET-1-induced vasoconstriction was blocked by the ETA-selective antagonists, BQ123 and FR139317. Schild-derived pA2 values were 7.0, 7.4 and 6.9 for BQ123 and 7.6, 7.9 and 7.3 for FR139317 in coronary artery, mammary artery and saphenous vein, respectively, consistent with antagonism of ETA receptors. Slopes of the Schild regressions were not significantly different from one. Comparable values of pA2 were estimated for 3ftM BQ123 in aorta (7.4+/-0.5) and pulmonary artery (6.9) from the Gaddum-Schild equation.6. In conclusion we have shown that in human isolated blood vessels, ET-1 is more potent than ET-3 suggesting the presence of vasoconstrictor ETA receptors. This is supported by the lack of effect of the ETB agonists, BQ3020 and [1,3,1,1,15Ala]-ET-l and the ability of the ETA antagonists, BQ123 andFR139317 to block ET-1 responses. Some preparations did contract in response to low concentrations of the ETB-selective sarafotoxin 6c but responses were variable and the maximum was always much less than that to ET-1 in the same preparations. Therefore although constrictor ETB receptors were present on the smooth muscle of human blood vessels, vasoconstriction elicited by the endothelin peptides in vitro is via ETA receptor activation.

Evidence for two endothelin Et(A) receptor subtypes in rabbit arteriolar smooth muscle.

1. Effects of endothelin-1 (Et-1) were studied on membrane currents in choroidal arteriolar smooth muscle by using perforated patch-clamp recordings. 2. Et-1 (10 nM) activated oscillatory Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-)-currents (I(Cl(Ca))) which could not be reversed by washing out. 3. Currents through L-type Ca(2+) channels were resolved in a divalent free medium (I(Ca(L)Na)). Et-1 reduced I(Ca(L)Na) by 75 +/- 7% within 30 s and this effect faded over 5 min, when the depression remained constant. On washing out Et-1, I(Ca(L)Na) almost completely recovered within 10 s. 4. BQ123 (1 microM), a peptide Et(A) receptor blocker, prevented the activation of I(Cl(Ca)), but failed to inhibit I(Cl(Ca)) transients once they had been initiated. In contrast, BQ123 not only prevented but also reversed the inhibition of I(Ca(L)Na) by Et-1. BQ788 (1 microM), an Et(B) receptor antagonist, did not prevent the activation of I(Cl(Ca)) or the inhibition of I(Ca(L)Na) by Et-1. 5. ABT-627 (10 nM), a non-peptide Et(A) receptor antagonist also blocked the activation of I(Cl(Ca)). However, on I(Ca(L)Na), ABT-627 (10 nM) mimicked the action of Et-1 an effect blocked by BQ123 suggesting that ABT-627 acted as an agonist. 6. The data are consistent with choroidal arteriolar smooth muscle cells having two types of Et(A) receptor, one where BQ123 is an antagonist and ABT-627 an agonist, where ligands dissociate freely and this receptor is coupled to inhibition of L-type Ca(2+) channels. In the other, BQ123 and ABT-627 are both antagonists and with Et-1 the receptor converts to a high affinity state producing the classical irreversible activation I(Cl(Ca)).

Pharmacological evidence for the presence of three distinct functional endothelin receptor subtypes in the rabbit lateral saphenous vein.

1. Contraction of the rabbit isolated saphenous vein is mediated by a heterogeneous endothelin (ET) receptor population. This study has characterized these receptor subtypes by use of several pharmacologically distinct ET receptor agonists and antagonists. 2. ET-1, ET-3, sarafotoxin S6c (STXc) and [Ala3,11]ET-1 produced biphasic, concentration-dependent contractions of the saphenous vein, responses which were best fitted by a two-site model comprised of a high (pM) and a low (nM) affinity site. In contrast, IRL 1620 only recognized one of these sites. ET(16-21) was devoid of contractile activity. ET-1, ET-3 and STXc were equipotent at the high affinity site (pD2s of 12.0 +/- 0.2, 12.2 +/- 0.2 and 12.3 +/- 0.3) indicating that this site had the characteristics of an ETB receptor. In contrast, the low affinity site had the functional characteristics of an ETc receptor since the pD2s for ET-3 (10.2 +/- 0.3) and STXc (10.6 +/- 0.3) were significantly greater than that for ET-1 (9.1 +/- 0.1). These contractile responses were insensitive to BQ-123, confirming that ETA receptors were not involved in mediating this effect. 3. SB 209670 differentially antagonized the high affinity phases of the isopeptide concentration-response curves in a fashion dependent on the competing agonist: relative to the KB obtained against STXc (0.15 nM). SB 209670 was 10 fold less potent when ET-1 was used as the competing agonist. This differential effect was not evident at the low affinity site (KB = 38 nM). SB 209670 produced parallel, concentration-dependent rightward shifts in the concentration-response curve to STXc Ro 47-0203 was approximately 1 to 2 orders of magnitude less potent than SB 209670 at inhibiting the high affinity component of the concentration-response curve to STXc, whereas BQ-788 and Ro 46-2005 were approximately 3 orders of magnitude less potent than SB 209670. In addition to RES-701 and BQ-123, the high affinity site was insensitive to PD 142893 suggesting that it may represent an ETB2 receptor. Ro 47-0203 and SB 209670 were equipotent at inhibiting the low affinity component of the STXc concentration-response curve. Although Ro 46-2005, BQ-788, PD 142893 and RES-701 produced significant antagonism at the low affinity site, they were at least ten fold less potent than SB 209670. 4. ET-1, ET-3 and STXc produced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in the precontracted saphenous vein. Antagonist IC50s were approximated as being: SB 209670, 3 nM; BQ-788 and RES 701,300 nM; Ro 46-2005 and PD 142893, 3 microM; BQ-123, > 10 .M, consistent with vasorelaxation being mediated by an ETB1 receptor.5. In summary, three pharmacologically distinct ET receptor subtypes have been identified in the rabbits aphenous vein. Two contractile receptors are present on the vascular smooth muscle, a high affinity site with the characteristics of an ETB2 receptor and a distinct lower affinity site with the characteristics of an ETc receptor. In addition, an ETBI receptor is present on the endothelium which mediates the vasodilator actions of this peptide family.

Pharmacological characterization of endothelin-induced contraction in the guinea-pig oesophageal muscularis mucosae.

1. In the oesophageal muscularis mucosae, we examined the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin-2 (ET-2), endothelin-3 (ET-3) and sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c) as agonists, and FR139317, BQ-123 and RES-701-1 as endothelin receptor antagonists. 2. All of the endothelins produced tonic contractions which were frequently superimposed on rhythmic motility in a concentration-dependent manner. The order of potency (-log EC50) was ET-1 (8.61)=SX6c (8.65)>ET-2 (8.40)>ET-3 (8.18). 3. FR139317 (1-3 microM) and BQ-123 (1 microM) caused parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, but at higher concentrations caused no further shift. RES-701-1 (3 microM) caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, while RES-701-1 (10 microM) had no additional effect. RES-701-1 (0.1-1 microM) concentration-dependently caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to SX6c. The contraction to ET-1 (10 nM) in preparations desensitized to the actions of SX6c was greatly inhibited by pretreatment with FR139317 (10 microM). 4. Modulation of the Ca2+ concentration in the Krebs solution caused the concentration-response curve to ET-1 or SX6c to shift to the right and downward as external Ca2+ concentrations decreased. Verapamil (30 microM) abolished rhythmic motility induced by ET-1 or SX6c. Ni2+ (0.1 mM) weakly inhibited ET-1- or SX6c-induced tonic contraction. SK&F 96365 (60 microM) completely inhibited ET-1-induced contractions. 5. We conclude that there are two types of ET-receptors, excitatory ET(A)- and ET(B)-receptors in the oesophageal muscularis mucosae. These receptors mediate tonic contractions predominantly by opening receptor-operated Ca2+ channels (ROCs) and partly by opening T-type Ca2+ channels, and mediate rhythmic motility by opening L-type Ca2+ channels.

Endothelin receptor subtypes in human and guinea-pig pulmonary tissues.

1. In this study the endothelin (ET) receptor subtypes mediating contractions produced by ET-1 in human and guinea-pig pulmonary tissues were investigated. In addition the receptor responsible for ET-1-induced prostanoid release in human bronchus was determined. 2. In human bronchus and human pulmonary artery ET-1 (0.1 nM-0.3 microM) was a potent and effective contractile agent (pD2 = 7.58 +/- 0.15, n = 6, and 8.48 +/- 0.11, n = 7, respectively). BQ-123 (1-10 microM), a potent and selective ETA receptor antagonist, potently antagonized ET-1-induced contraction in human pulmonary artery (pKB = 6.8 with 1 microM BQ-123, n = 7) but had no effect in human bronchus (n = 6). 3. Sarafotoxin S6c (0.1 nM-0.1 microM), the ETB-selective agonist, did not contract human pulmonary artery (n = 5), but potently and effectively contracted human bronchus: pD2 = 8.41 +/- 0.17, maximum response = 74.4 +/- 3.1% of 10 microM carbachol; n = 5. BQ-123 (1-10 microM) did not antagonize sarafotoxin S6c-induced contraction in human bronchus (n = 5). 4. ET-1 potently contracted guinea-pig trachea, bronchus, pulmonary artery and aorta (pD2 = 8.15 +/- 0.14, 7.72 +/- 0.12, 8.52 +/- 0.12, and 8.18 +/- 0.12, respectively, n = 6-14). BQ-123 (0.1-10 microM)antagonized ET-1-induced contractions in guinea-pig pulmonary artery (pKB = 6.7 with 1 microM BQ-123,n = 6), aorta (pKB = 7.1 with 1 microM BQ-123, n = 6) and trachea (pKB = 6.2 with 1 microM BQ-123, n = 6) butwas without marked effect in bronchus (n = 4). In contrast, sarafotoxin S6c (0.1 nM-0.l microM) did not contract guinea-pig aorta (n = 4) or guinea-pig pulmonary artery (n = 6) but potently and effectively contracted guinea-pig bronchus: pD2= 8.55 +/- 0. 1; maximum contraction = 63.6 +/0 3.1% of 10 microM carbachol,n = 4. Sarafotoxin S6c (0.1 nM-0. 1 microM) was a much less effective agonist in guinea-pig trachea:maximum contraction = 13.9 +/- 2.5% of 10 JM carbachol, n = 4; P< 0.0001, compared to bronchus.Contractions produced by sarafotoxin S6c in guinea-pig bronchus or trachea were unaffected by BQ-123(IO microM, n=4).5. Significant differences were observed in the efficacy, relative to carbachol, but not the potency of sarafotoxin S6c in guinea-pig airways, with a much greater maximum contractile response in bronchus(69.6 +/- 2.4% of 10 microM carbachol, n = 6) or lower region of the trachea (48.5 +/- 5.9% of 10 microM carbachol,n = 6) than in the middle region of the trachea (14.4 +/- 4.0% of 10 microM carbachol, n = 6) or the upper region of the trachea (19.3 +/- 2.7% of 10 microM carbachol, n = 6). There were minimal regional differences in either ET-1-induced contraction or the potency of BQ-123 (3 microM) for inhibition of responses to ET-1 in guinea-pig airways.6. Release of various prostanoids in human bronchus induced by ET-1 (0.3 microM) was essentially abolished with 10 IM BQ-123.7. These data provide evidence that distinct ET receptors mediate ET-1-induced contraction in human pulmonary artery, guinea-pig pulmonary artery and guinea-pig aorta (ETA subtype) compared with human bronchus and guinea-pig bronchus (non-ETA, perhaps ETB subtype). Contractions to ET-1 in guinea-pig trachea appear to involve both ETA and non-ETA (ETB?) receptor subtypes. Furthermore,regional differences appear to exist in the relative distribution of ET receptor subtypes in guinea-pig airways. In human bronchus ET-1-induced prostanoid release, unlike the contractile response, appears to be mediated via ETA receptor activation.