The Relationship between the Bevel of the Radial Head Epiphysis and the Posterior Synovial Fringe During Rotation of the Elbow: An Ultrasonography Study with Possible Implications Regarding the Pathophysiology of Nursemaid's Elbow.

BACKGROUND: Nursemaid's elbow is the most common upper extremity injury in children under 5 years of age. However, the exact pathomechanism underlying the nursemaid's elbow remains elusive, and approximate one-third of patients present with a nonclassical history. Using a high-frequency ultrasound probe, we attempted to determine the relationship between the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe and the peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis during rotation. It is possible that the primary reason for the nursemaid's elbow is due to the pronator position. METHODS: Twenty-one patients had a history of nursemaid's elbow and had a successful reduction before enrollment in this study. A high-frequency linear array 6 to 24 MHz hockey stick transducer was used to detect small morphologic changes in the peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis and the posterior synovial fringe during rotation of the capitellum-radial joint. RESULTS: In complete pronation, the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe contacts the beveled articular surface of the radial head peripheral rim in all 21 patients. In neutral and complete supination, the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe contacts the convexly nonarticular surface of the radial head peripheral rim and extends deep into the foveal radius. The posterior synovial fringe and the capsule-aponeurotic membrane were tightened in passive pronation in all 21 cases. The posterior synovial fringe and the capsule-aponeurosis membrane were all loose in the neutral and supination positions. CONCLUSION: The anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe touches the beveled peripheral rim of the radial head epiphysis during complete pronation, and the tension of the lateral collateral ligament complex during pronation may further cause unstable conditions of the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe. We hypothesized that the beveled peripheral rim of the radial epiphysis and its relationship with the anterior edge of the posterior synovial fringe could be the reason why nursemaid's elbow only occurs while the elbow is in the pronator position.

Therapeutic approaches of diametaphyseal radius fractures in children.

BACKGROUND: There are clear standards for when to operate on both distal epiphyseal and diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. However, paediatric surgeons are often faced with fractures in the transition zone between metaphysis and diaphysis. This aim of the study is to compare different treatment approaches for diametaphyseal forearm fractures, to classify different types of these fractures, and to define further assessment parameters and treatment recommendations. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients with diametaphyseal radial fractures who were seen at a paediatric surgery clinic between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2013. Patients were treated either non-surgically (C) or surgically using bicortical Kirschner wire (BC-KW), intramedullary K-wire (IM-KW), elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), or combined bicortical and intramedullary K-wire (BCIM-KW). RESULTS: During the study period, 547 patients presented with forearm fractures of which 88 patients (16%) had a fracture in the diametaphyseal region. The majority of diametaphyseal fractures were greenstick fractures (54.4%) followed by transverse fractures (44.3%). Distal fractures were predominantly treated with bicortical K-wiring (BC-KW, 40.5%) or non-surgically (C, 26.2%). Proximal fractures were treated by ESIN osteosynthesis (50%), followed by IM-KW (30%). Intermediate fractures were just as likely to be treated with one out of the 5 above-mentioned techniques. The ulna was involved in 64 of 88 cases. Depending on the type of fracture, it was treated either by ESIN osteosynthesis or non-surgically. No superior operative technique was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The description of diametaphyseal fractures as a separate entity is important, because the therapy of these fractures is heterogeneous and challenging. A classification into proximal, intermediate, and distal may be useful in clinical decision-making. Despite the retrospective nature of this study, our data suggest that the use of a K-wire or combined technique BCIM-KW-technique, whenever technically feasible, achieves better radiological results without secondary dislocation. Further prospective studies are needed to provide better guidance to trauma surgeons.

Subsequent Forearm Fractures Following Initial Surgical Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Forearm fractures are a common pediatric injury. Currently, there is no consensus on treatment for fractures that recur following initial surgical fixation. The objective of this study was to investigate the subsequent fracture rate and patterns and describe the treatment of these forearm fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent surgical treatment for an initial forearm fracture at our institution between 2011 and 2019. Patients were included if they sustained a diaphyseal or metadiaphyseal forearm fracture that was initially treated surgically with a plate and screw construct (plate) or elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), and if they subsequently sustained another fracture that was treated at our institution. RESULTS: A total of 349 forearm fractures were treated surgically with ESIN or a plate fixation. Of these, 24 sustained another fracture, yielding a subsequent fracture rate of 10.9% for the plate cohort and 5.1% for the ESIN cohort ( P =0.056). The majority of plate refractures (90%) occurred at the proximal or distal plate edge, while 79% of the fractures treated previously with ESINs occurred at the initial fracture site ( P <0.001). Ninety percent of plate refractures required revision surgery, with 50% underwent plate removal and conversion to ESIN, and 40% underwent revision plating. Within the ESIN cohort, 64% were treated nonsurgically, 21% underwent revision ESINs, and 14% underwent revision plating. Tourniquet time for revision surgeries were shorter for the ESIN cohort (46 vs. 92 min; P =0.012). In both cohorts, all revision surgeries had no complications and healed with evidence of radiographic union. However, 9 patients (37.5%) underwent implant removal (3 plates and 6 ESINs) after subsequent fracture healing. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize subsequent forearm fractures following both ESIN and plate fixation and to describe and compare treatment options. Consistent with the literature, refractures following surgical fixation of pediatric forearm fractures may occur at a rate ranging from 5% to 11%. ESINs are both less invasive at the time of initial surgery and can often be treated nonoperatively if there is a subsequent fracture, while plate refractures are more likely to be treated with a second surgery and have a longer average surgery time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Risk Factors for Failure of Closed Forearm Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore risk factors for failure of forearm fracture closed reduction in the pediatric emergency department (ED) and to suggest indications for initial surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients aged 0 to 18 years who presented to our pediatric ED with an extraarticular forearm fracture treated with closed reduction between May 2017 and April 2021. We explored risk factors for procedural failure, defined as a need for surgical intervention within 6 weeks of the closed reduction attempt. RESULTS: Of 375 patients (median age 8.1 years, 294 [78.2%] boys), 44 (11.7%) patients sustained a reduction failure, of whom 42 (95.5%) had both radius and ulna fractures. Of the 259 patients with fractures of both bones, the following parameters were independent predictors for reduction failure: refracture (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 17.6, P < 0.001), open fracture (aOR 10.1, P = 0.007), midshaft fracture (aOR 2.6, P = 0.004), radial translation rate 37% and higher in either plane (aOR 5.1, P = 0.004), and age of 10 years and older (aOR 2.9, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric forearm fractures can be successfully managed by closed reduction in the ED. Two-bone fractures had the strongest association with reduction failure. Refracture, open fracture, midshaft location, initial radius bone translation of 37% and higher (and not initial angulation), and patient age of 10 years and older are independent risk factors for reduction failure in two-bone fractures. We propose a risk score for reduction failure that can serve as a decision-making tool.

Proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation in young children: Is this the nursemaid's elbow of the lower extremity?

Anterolateral dislocation of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint (PTFJ) is a rare injury of the knee commonly resulting from violent athletic injuries in adults. Reported here are examples of this injury in a 19 month old and a 4 year old following trivial mechanisms of injury. These cases raise the question of whether this injury may be an unrecognized cause of refusal to bear weight in children in this age group.

Bypass surgery in a mangled forearm using an intramedullary tunnel through the radius.

Critical ischemia in the upper extremity is rare. A surgical bypass is thought to be the superior treatment option. We describe a rare case where regular tunneling options of the bypass were not available and an intramedullary tunnel was used.

Pediatric Floating Elbow Injuries Are Not as Problematic as They Were Once Thought to Be: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric ipsilateral supracondylar humerus and forearm fractures (floating elbow), are historically reported to have a high rate of complications, including pediatric acute compartment syndrome (PACS). As a result, treatment paradigms for these types of injuries differ in the urgency, extent of fixation, and type of immobilization than if each fracture were treated in isolation. We aimed to systematically review the literature on pediatric floating elbow injuries and assess the reported risk of PACS along with risk factors for poor outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in November 2019 in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. An exhaustive search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted for peer-reviewed literature between 1999 and 2019. Two reviewers filtered the results, looking for articles in English that reported >10 pediatric floating elbow cases. Primary outcomes were the rate and risk factors for developing PACS. Secondary outcomes included patient and injury characteristics, treatment strategies, other complications (eg, neurovascular injuries), and final outcomes. RESULTS: The initial search yielded a total of 150 studies. Following review, 11 studies were included, with 433 patients available for review. The mechanism of injury was a fall in 96% of cases. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning was the most common treatment performed for both fractures. Only 8/433 patients (2%) developed PACS. The incidence of a pulseless limb at presentation was 4%, and all patients regained a pulse following reduction. Three cases of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury were reported in the setting of medial pin placement. Good to excellent results were reported in 83% to 100% of patients, based on the modified Flynn criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being limited to heterogenous and retrospective case series, the evidence reviewed in this study contradicts the current belief of a high risk of PACS or other complications in pediatric floating elbows. PACS is much more common with displaced fractures in the setting of delayed treatment. The rate of other complications is comparable to isolated supracondylar humerus fractures. Evidence supports treating these injuries in an urgent fashion in the setting of a displaced fracture, although fixation of both distal and proximal fractures is not supported by evidence. The outcomes of pediatric floating elbows are generally good and do not reflect the poor prognosis that adult floating elbows represent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-systematic review of level IV studies.

Acute Traumatic Compartment Syndrome of the Forearm: Literature Review and Unfavorable Outcomes Risk Analysis of Fasciotomy Treatment.

Forearm compartment syndrome is a relatively underreported event compared with compartment syndrome of the lower extremity or trunk. The aim of this review of the literature was to provide insight into the potential consequences of certain treatment modalities in the control of acute compartment syndrome of the forearm based on data presented over the past 44 years. A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases including EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, capturing studies published from 1973 to 2017 to identify potential articles for inclusion in the review. Outcomes data were evaluated for each of the studies included in this analysis on the basis of treatment utilized (fasciotomy vs. no fasciotomy) and respective outcome (favorable vs. unfavorable). Relative risk (RR) analysis was performed to determine risk factors for unfavorable outcomes from the pooled data. The analysis revealed a statistically significant higher likelihood of unfavorable outcomes resulting from performing fasciotomy in the event of forearm compartment syndrome compared with conservative management (RR = 4.82, p < .01). Fasciotomy treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of patients presenting with forearm compartment syndrome to experience unfavorable outcomes. The results of this study can help guide awareness of potential sequelae of treatment choices in forearm compartment syndrome, and clinical decision-making for wise patient selection for surgical intervention, when necessary.

Who Gets Compartment Syndrome?: A Retrospective Analysis of the National and Local Incidence of Compartment Syndrome in Patients With Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

PURPOSE: Although acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is associated with pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures, there are limited data describing its incidence and risk factors. The purpose of our study was to report the local and national incidence of ACS with SCH and floating elbow (concomitant SCH and forearm) fracture patterns and the associated risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively queried data for SCH fracture patients over a 4-year period from our institution (a level I pediatric trauma center) and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Data on demographics, mechanism of injury, open versus closed fracture, length of stay, presence or absence of forearm fractures, and incidence of traumatic compartment syndrome were analyzed. The student t and χ tests were utilized for group comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for compartment syndrome. Results are summarized as means with SD or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: At our institution, 839 patients with SCH fractures met inclusion criteria. In total, 814 (97.02%) patients (average age, 5.96±2.58 y) sustained isolated SCH fractures during the indicated timeframe. SCH fractures with an associated forearm fracture were identified in 25 (2.98%) patients (average age, 7.00±3.03 y). Three patients (0.36%) with isolated SCH fractures were observed to have compartment syndrome. No compartment syndromes were identified in the patients with floating elbows.Within the same time period, the NTDB identified 31,234 SCH fractures met inclusion criteria. Of those, 31,167 patients had isolated SCH fractures (average age, 5.5±2.7 y). In total, 67 of the SCH patients (0.2%, P<0.0001) had documented ACS (average age, 7.3±3.5 y). The NTDB identified 1565 patients with floating elbows, including 13 (0.8%, P≤0.0001) who developed compartment syndrome (average age, 6.47±2.71 y). The NTDB query also identified 530 patients with neurovascular injury (NVI), with 4.5% (n=24) that developed compartment syndrome. In the regression analysis, older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; P<0.0092), male sex (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P=0.0005), floating elbow fracture pattern (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.1; P=0.0003) and NVI (OR, 25.0; 95% CI, 14.6-42.8; P≤0.0001) were identified as risk factors for developing compartment syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our institution and NTDB reveal that acute traumatic compartment syndrome is rare, occurring in ∼2 to 3 fractures of 1000. However, there is a significantly increased risk with NVI, floating elbow fractures, males, and older patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Characterizing the incidence and associated risk factors of ACS with concomitant SCH and forearm fracture patterns can improve clinical understanding and management of pediatric patients.

[Posttraumatic torsional deformities of the forearm : Methods of measurement and decision guidelines for correction]. / Posttraumatische Torsionsfehler am Unterarm : Messmethoden und Entscheidungsleitfaden für die Korrektur.

Forearm fractures are common in all age groups. Even if the adjacent joints are not directly involved, these fractures have an intra-articular character. One of the most common complications of these injuries is a painful limitation of the range of motion and especially of pronation and supination. This is often due to an underdiagnosed torsional deformity; however, in recent years new methods have been developed to make these torsional differences visible and quantifiable through the use of sectional imaging. The principle of measurement corresponds to that of the torsion measurement of the lower limbs. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are created at defined heights. By searching for certain landmarks, torsional angles are measured in relation to a defined reference line. A new alternative is the use of 3D reformation models. The presence of a torsional deformity, especial of the radius, leads to an impairment of the pronation and supination of the forearm. In the presence of torsional deformities, radiological measurements can help to decide if an operation is needed or not. Unlike the lower limbs, there are still no uniform cut-off values as to when a correction is indicated. Decisions must be made together with the patient by taking the clinical and radiological results into account.

Circumferential Adipofascial Graft for Prevention of Recurrence of Posttraumatic Radioulnar Synostosis.

Radioulnar synostosis can cause substantial loss of function, and surgical treatment can be challenging. Recurrence of the contracture related to scar or reformation of the synostosis is problematic. Several techniques have been described for prevention of recurrence. We present a technique utilizing a free wrap around adipofascial graft for interposition and circumferential coverage of the ulna after resection of the heterotopic bone. We believe this technique has the advantages of technical simplicity, secure interposition, and reliable outcomes.

Ultrasound-Assisted Reduction of Displaced and Shortened Fractures by Pediatric Emergency Physicians.

Pediatric emergency physicians at Kaplan Medical Center regularly reduce forearm fractures under point-of-care ultrasound guidance in the pediatric emergency department. We present 3 children who arrived at our department with shortened, angulated forearm fractures within the span of a single week. We report on the successful reduction of these fractures under point-of-care ultrasound and on the maintenance of anatomic alignment at follow-up 1 week postreduction.

Comparison of 2 available methods with Bland-Altman analysis for measuring intracompartmental pressure.

BACKGROUND: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is the result of increased intracompartmental pressure (ICP), and to avoid a delay in diagnosis requires ICP measurement. This study was designed to compare 2 available methods with Bland-Altman analysis for measuring ICP in experimental animal models, healthy volunteers, and patients with suspected ACS to evaluate their agreement and interchangeability. METHODS: In 20 New Zealand White rabbits, we inflated a tourniquet to stop arterial blood flow to establish ACS rabbit models, of which ICP was measured and recorded by the Whitesides apparatus and the invasive arterial blood pressure monitor system (IABPMS) before and after modeling. The same 2 measurements were applied to the tibialis anterior compartment's ICP of 30 healthy volunteers. The experimental data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. Once it was considered to be a substitute for the Whitesides apparatus based on statistical analysis, we used IABPMS to measure the ICP of the patients suspected of having ACS to estimate its clinical prospect. RESULTS: The rabbit models' ICP estimated by the Whitesides apparatus and IABPMS were 9.60±2.74 and 9.55±2.33 mm Hg, with an increase to 30.20±4.44 and 30.05±4.58 mm Hg after modeling, respectively. The limits of agreement for the ICP were -2.01/2.11 and -2.41/2.71 mm Hg before and after model establishment. The healthy volunteers' ICP were 10.92±6.06 and 10.85±5.87 mm Hg; the limits of agreement for the ICP were -2.53/2.66 mm Hg. With IABPMS to continuously monitor the ICP increasing (40.45±10.42 vs 13.82±4.94 mm Hg) and ΔP (34.54±11.77 mm Hg) to guide the diagnosis of ACS, 5 of 11 patients underwent the emergency fasciotomy for decompression. CONCLUSION: The invasive pressure monitoring via IABPMS can be used as an alternative to the Whitesides method, thanks to the sufficient agreement between the 2 methods in ICP measurement, and also for its advantages recommended as a novel diagnostic approach to ACS in experimental and clinical applications.

Compartment Pressures in Children With Normal and Fractured Forearms: A Preliminary Report.

INTRODUCTION: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) can lead to irreversible damage if fasciotomy is not performed in a timely manner. Needle manometry is a tool to confirm suspected ACS. The threshold for compartment pressures that can be tolerated has been debated. The aim of this study is to assess the normal compartment pressures in noninjured forearms of children. Further, we sought to quantify the maximum tolerable compartment pressures in fractured forearms of children, thus establishing a baseline and providing guidance in evidence-based decision making to evaluate children with suspected ACS. METHODS: This prospective study included children up to the age of 16 years with forearm fractures that needed reduction with or without osteosynthesis. Between June 2009 and March 2013, 41 children were included. Mean age was 9.25 years (range, 4 to 15.4 y). We used needle manometry to measure the pressures in the superficial and deep volar as well as in the dorsal compartments (DCs) on both the forearms. The mean pressures between compartments in healthy versus injured arms were analyzed using a 1-sided, paired t test. RESULTS: On the injured side, the mean compartment pressure was 19.12 mm Hg (range, 3 to 49 mm Hg) in the deep volar compartment, 15.56 mm Hg (range, 5 to 37 mmHg) in the DC, and 14.8 mm Hg (range, 2 to 35 mm Hg) in the superficial volar compartment. On the noninjured side, the mean compartment pressure was 12.9 mm Hg (range, 6 to 31 mm Hg) in the DC, 10.22 mm Hg (range, 3 to 22 mm Hg) in the deep volar compartment, and 9.66 mm Hg (range, 3 to 21 mm Hg) in the superficial volar compartment. We measured an absolute compartment pressure of >30 mm Hg in 15 patients on the fractured side. Three of them had an absolute compartment pressure of >45 mm Hg. Only 1 had ACS. This patient underwent fasciotomy and was excluded for further analysis. On follow-up (mean, 24.84 mo), no patient was found to have any sequelae of ACS. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to report normal compartment pressure measurements in noninjured forearms and in fractured forearms without clinical suspicion of ACS in children.The mean compartment pressure measured in the deep volar compartment (DVC) in healthy children was 10.22 mm Hg (range, 3 to 22 mm Hg) and therefore slightly higher than in adults. Some children with fractures tolerated absolute compartment pressures >30 mm Hg without clinical signs of ACS. Fasciotomy in children under close observation could eventually be delayed despite surpassing the accepted pressure limits for adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-prognostic.

Flexible Intramedullary Nailing of Pediatric Humeral Fractures: Indications, Techniques, and Tips.

Most proximal and diaphyseal pediatric humeral fractures can be treated successfully by closed means; however, certain patient factors or fracture characteristics may make surgical stabilization with flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) a better choice. Common indications for FIN of pediatric humeral fractures include unstable proximal-third fractures in children nearing skeletal maturity, unstable distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures, shaft fractures in polytraumatized patients or patients with ipsilateral both-bone forearm fractures (floating elbow), and prophylactic stabilization of benign diaphyseal bone cysts or surgical stabilization of pathologic fractures. FIN can be safely inserted in an antegrade or retrograde manner depending on the fracture location and configuration. Careful dissection at the location of rod insertion can prevent iatrogenic nerve injuries. Rapid fracture union and return to full function can be expected in most cases. Implant prominence is the most common complication.

Complications of pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures.

Distal radius and forearm fractures represent a large percentage of pediatric fractures. The most common mechanism of injury is a fall onto an outstretched arm, which can lead to substantial rotational displacement. If this rotational displacement is not adequately addressed, there will be resultant loss of forearm motion and subsequent limitations in performing the activities of daily living. Good initial reductions and proper casting techniques are necessary when treating distal radius and forearm fractures nonsurgically; however, maintaining an acceptable reduction is not always possible. Atraumatic reduction of a displaced physeal fracture should occur within 7 days of the injury. If an impending malunion presents at 2 weeks or later after injury, observation is warranted because of concerns about physeal arrest with repeated attempts at manipulation, and it should be followed by a later assessment of functional limitations. Pediatric patients and their parents have higher expectations for recovery, which has contributed to an increase in the surgical management of pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. In addition, surgical interventions, such as intramedullary nailing, have their own associated complications.

The sensory restoration in radial nerve injury using the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve--a cadaveric study for the feasibility of procedure and case demonstration.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the new sensory restoration technique in radial nerve injury using the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve as the donor sensory nerve. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty formalin-preserved cadavers (18 males and 22 females) were used as the subjects of the present study. The localization of the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve was performed. The measurement was done to determine the origin of this nerve in relation to the tip of ulnar styloid. The simulated transfer was done. The length of the superficial radial nerve that had to be cut was determined. The measurement was done by two observers to determine the reliability of measurement. RESULTS: The mean horizontal distance (X) to the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve measured from the tip of ulnar styloid on the right and left side were 5.22 mm and 6.51 mm respectively. The mean vertical distance (Y) to the origin of first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve measured from the tip of ulnar styloid on the right and left side were -7.72 mm and -4.37 mm respectively. The mean length of superficial radial nerve that had to be cut to allow tension free anastomosis, measured from the tip of radial styloid on the right and left side were 68.21 mm and 65.92 mm respectively. The estimated average size of the transferred branch of ulnar cutaneous nerve was about 70% of the size of superficial radial nerve. CONCLUSION: The sensory restoration in radial nerve injury using sensory nerve transfer from the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve was technically feasible regarding to the comparable size between two nerves and anatomic consistency of the first branch of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve.

How common are refractures in childhood?

Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of refractures among children, following fractures of all long bones, and to identify when the risk of refracture decreases. Methods: All patients aged under 16 years with a fracture that had occurred in a bone with ongoing growth (open physis) from 1 May 2015 to 31 December 2020 were retrieved from the Swedish Fracture Register. A new fracture in the same segment within one year of the primary fracture was regarded as a refracture. Fracture localization, sex, lateral distribution, and time from primary fracture to refracture were analyzed for all long bones. Results: Of 40,090 primary fractures, 348 children (0.88%) sustained a refracture in the same long bone segment. The diaphyseal forearm was the long bone segment most commonly affected by refractures (n = 140; 3.4%). The median time to refracture was 147 days (interquartile range 82 to 253) in all segments of the long bones combined. The majority of the refractures occurred in boys (n = 236; 67%), and the left side was the most common side to refracture (n = 220; 62%). The data in this study suggest that the risk of refracture decreases after 180 days in the diaphyseal forearm, after 90 days in the distal forearm, and after 135 days in the diaphyseal tibia. Conclusion: Refractures in children are rare. However, different fractured segments run a different threat of refracture, with the highest risk associated with diaphyseal forearm fractures. The data in this study imply that children who have sustained a distal forearm fracture should avoid hazardous activities for three months, while children with a diaphyseal forearm fracture should avoid these activities for six months, and for four and a half months if they have sustained a diaphyseal tibia fracture.