Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost Intraocular Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of 2 models of the travoprost intraocular implant (fast-eluting [FE] and slow-eluting [SE] types) from 1 of 2 phase 3 trials (the GC-010 trial). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, noninferiority trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension having an unmedicated baseline mean diurnal IOP (average of 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm time points) of ≥ 21 mmHg, and IOP of ≤ 36 mmHg at each of the 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm timepoints at baseline. METHODS: Study eyes were randomized to the travoprost intraocular implant (FE implant [n = 200] or SE implant [n = 197] model) or to timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% twice daily (n = 193). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean change from baseline IOP in the study eye at 8 am and 10 am, at each of day 10, week 6, and month 3. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and ophthalmic assessments. RESULTS: Mean IOP reduction from baseline over the 6 time points ranged from 6.6 to 8.4 mmHg for the FE implant group, from 6.6 to 8.5 mmHg for the SE implant group, and from 6.5 to 7.7 mmHg for the timolol group. The primary efficacy end point was met; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference between the implant groups and the timolol group was < 1 mmHg at all 6 time points. Study eye AEs, most of mild or moderate severity, were reported in 21.5%, 27.2%, and 10.8% of patients in the FE implant, SE implant, and timolol groups, respectively. The most common AEs included iritis (FE implant, 0.5%; SE implant, 5.1%), ocular hyperemia (FE implant, 3.0%; SE implant, 2.6%), reduced visual acuity (FE implant, 1.0%; SE implant, 4.1%; timolol, 0.5%), and IOP increased (FE implant, 3.5%; SE implant, 2.6%; timolol, 2.1%). One serious study eye AE occurred (endophthalmitis). CONCLUSIONS: The travoprost intraocular implant demonstrated robust IOP reduction over the 3-month primary efficacy evaluation period after a single administration. The IOP-lowering efficacy in both implant groups was statistically and clinically noninferior to that in the timolol group, with a favorable safety profile. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Progression in Glaucoma Patients with Unchanged Topical Treatment over 3 Years - Retrospective Observational Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is a mainstay of glaucoma therapy. It is, however, still an open question whether a comparable level of long-term IOP lowering achieved by different medications results in comparable protection for the retinal ganglion cells. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze glaucoma damage progression in two cohorts of primary open-angle glaucoma patients with different and unchanged therapy over a period of 3 years, and the main objective of this study was to determine possible differences in terms of structural [retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL)] and functional [visual field (VF)] outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective observational cohort analysis compared two differently treated groups of glaucoma patients with their original, at study entry, topical therapy unchanged over 3 years. The main endpoint was the time course of RNFL thickness and VF mean defect (MD). RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes were included in each group. The first group (21 eyes) was on a fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide twice a day and the second group on one drop of prostaglandin analog, either latanoprost alone (15 eyes) or travoprost alone (6 eyes), in an unchanged regimen over a period of 3 years. IOP in mmHg at baseline and at 36 months was 11.9 ± 2.4 and 13.0 ± 2.1 in the first, and 12.9 ± 3.0 and 14.1 ± 3.2 in the second group, respectively. RNFL thickness values in micrometers were at baseline and at 36 months 77.8 ± 12.3 and 76.6 ± 15.2 in the first, and 77.5 ± 15.2 and 72.8 ± 14.5 in the second group, respectively. VF MD in dB were 1.7 ± 2.5 and 1.2 ± 2.9 in the first, and 0.9 ± 2.3 and 0.7 ± 2.6 in the second group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both groups had comparable baseline, as well as mean overall IOP. However, the course of IOP levels over time was different in the two groups, showing earlier and more pronounced long-term drift in the prostaglandin analog-treated group. RNFL thickness was comparable at baseline, however, RNFL thinning over time was more pronounced in the prostaglandin analog-treated group. There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of VF MD at baseline and over time.

Analysing the change in contrast sensitivity post-travoprost treatment in primary open-angle glaucoma patients using Spaeth Richman contrast sensitivity test.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of the Internet-based Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) in assessing the change in contrast sensitivity (both central and peripheral) post-treatment with travoprost 0.004%. DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Data of 62 eyes (33 patients) undergoing treatment for naïve POAG patients were analysed. Patients were followed up for a period of six months after starting topical travoprost (Travatan 0.004%, Alcon), and the change in central and peripheral CS was studied. RESULTS: Mean total SPARCS score at baseline was 69 ± 10.99, improved to 74.62 ± 9.50 after 6 months of therapy (p: 0.001) in all the glaucoma severity groups. Mean SPARCS score at baseline in mild glaucoma group was 72.05 ± 9.87, in the moderate glaucoma group, it was 62.23 ± 9.2, and in the severe glaucoma group, it was 59.36 ± 11.65. After 6 months of treatment with travoprost, the CS improved to 76.05 ± 8.36 in mild group, 76.69 ± 8.82 in moderate group and 67.18 ± 11.15 in severe group (p value: 0.014). The percentage change in the CS from baseline showed significant improvement in the superotemporal quadrant at 1 month (p value: 0.032), superonasal quadrant (p value: 0.049), inferotemporal quadrant at 3 months (p value: 0.003) and 6 months (p value: 0.039). Inferonasal quadrant was affected most by glaucoma. A statistically significant correlation was seen between total SPARCS score with MD and PSD. Correlation was also seen between the percentage change in CS and average RNFL thickness at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Both central and peripheral CS improve following IOP reduction with travoprost. Change in the CS has a significant correlation with RNFL thickness and the perimetric indices.

Effectiveness of Blepharoptosis Surgery in Patients With Deepening of the Upper Eyelid Sulcus.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of blepharoptosis surgery in patients with deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus (DUES). This case series included 10 consecutive patients (19 eyes) with DUES associated with use of a prostaglandin analog for glaucoma. Patients who had used bimatoprost and developed DUES were changed to an alternative prostaglandin analog and observed for ≥3 months. If there was no improvement, they underwent levator resection for blepharoptosis and were followed up for ≥6 months postoperatively. Improvement in margin reflex distance-1 and surgical complications was evaluated. After discontinuation of bimatoprost in 3 cases (6 eyes), mild subjective and objective improvement in DUES was seen in 2 cases (4 eyes) but without improvement in blepharoptosis. The prostaglandin analog used before surgery was travoprost in 4 eyes (21.0%), tafluprost in 7 eyes (36.9%; including 4 eyes switched from bimatoprost), and latanoprost in 8 eyes (42.1%; including 2 eyes switched from bimatoprost). The mean margin reflex distance-1 value was 1.11 ±â€Š0.96 mm before surgery and 3.72 ±â€Š0.81 mm at the final postoperative follow-up; the difference was significant (P = 3.32 × -10). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Levator resection is a useful and safe procedure for blepharoptosis with DUES.

[Efficacy and safety of travoprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma]. / Éffektivnost' i bezopasnost' preparata 'Travapress' u patsientov s pervichnoi otkrytougol'noi glaukomoi.

PURPOSE: To study the hypotensive efficacy and safety of Travapress (0.004% travoprost) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 50 patients (91 eyes) aged 45 to 74 years. The first group consisted of 23 patients (41 eyes) who received monotherapy with Travaprost. Patients of the second group (27 patients, 50 eyes) Travaprost was added to therapy with timolol 0.5% (17 patients, 32 eyes) or dorzolamide 2% (10 patients, 18 eyes). Travaprost was given for a period of 6 months. IOP was determined in 2 weeks, 1, 3 and 6 months from the beginning of treatment and daily IOP measurement was at 10.00, 12.00, 14.00 and 16.00. Subjective symptoms were evaluated in points by special scales. RESULTS: The study was completed by 42 patients (84%, 79 eyes). Two patients (4.7%) has stopped to use Travapress due to the side effects. Local side effects were observed in 9 patients (21.4%) with mild hyperemia being the most common and seen in 5 patients (11.9%). In the first group, the maximum IOP decrease was recorded for 3 months of the study and amounted to 7.3±1.2 mm Hg (27.5%) compared to baseline. By 6 months, IOP decreased by 6.8±1.5 mm Hg on average (25.6%). In the second group in the subgroup with timolol 0,5% IOP decreased by 4,9±1.7 mm Hg (20%) compared to baseline, in the subgroup with dorzolamid 2% - by 4,3±1,3 mm Hg (16,9%) compared to baseline. Evening use the drug was accompanied by significantly lower levels of daily IOP fluctuations compared with morning intake (3.0±1.2 and 3.8±1.7 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0,002). CONCLUSION: Travapress was established as highly efficient and safe. It can be recommended for wide use in the treatment of patients with POAG.

The Effects of Latanoprost With Benzalkonium Chloride Versus Travoprost With SofZia on the Ocular Surface.

PURPOSE: To assess ocular surface changes in participants using latanoprost with benzalkonium chloride (Xalatan) and travoprost with SofZia (Travatan Z). METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, nonrandomized cohort study, participants were classified into two groups: group 1 (n=28) naive to glaucoma therapy, group 2 (n=27) on previous Xalatan monotherapy in both eyes. Both groups started (or continued) Xalatan in the right eye and Travatan Z in the left eye. Baseline, 1-, and 2-month measurements of tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining score, conjunctival staining score, conjunctival hyperemia score, tear production, and intraocular pressure were obtained. The Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire measured participants' comfort and dryness symptoms. Medication preference was recorded. RESULTS: Data were collected from 55 participants. Tear breakup time at baseline and 1-month follow-up in group 1 was significantly longer than that of group 2 (P=0.005). At 2 months, there was no significant difference in TBUT between the two groups (P=0.779). Tear production in group 1 at all three time points was significantly higher than group 2 (P<0.05). Conjunctival staining score at 2 months in group 1 was significantly higher than group 2 (P=0.031). There was no significant difference in other parameters between the groups at any other time point. No significant difference in any parameter was found between Xalatan and Travatan Z (intragroup comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in ocular surface characteristics were detected between groups, but no significant difference was detected between participants treated with Xalatan and Travatan Z.

Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) in primary angle closure (PAC) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty PAC or PACG subjects who underwent laser iridotomy (LI) and had at least 180° of persistent appositional angle closure and intraocular pressure (IOP) of more than 21 mmHg were enrolled. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive either 360° ALPI (Visulas 532s; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) or medical therapy (Travoprost 0.004%; Alcon-Couvreur, Puurs, Antwerp, Belgium). Repeat ALPI was performed if the IOP reduction was less than 20% from baseline along with inadequate angle widening at the month 1 or month 3 visit. Intraocular pressure was controlled with systematic addition of medications when required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was success rates after ALPI at 1 year. Complete success was defined as an IOP of 21 mmHg or less without medication, and qualified success was defined as an IOP of 21 mmHg or less with medication. Failure was defined as an IOP more than 21 mmHg despite additional medications or requiring glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: Forty subjects (51 eyes) were randomized to ALPI and 40 subjects (55 eyes) were randomized to medical therapy. Complete success (IOP ≤21 mmHg without medication) was achieved in 35.0% eyes of the ALPI group compared with 85.0% of eyes in the prostaglandin analog (PGA) group (P < 0.001), and qualified success (IOP ≤21 mmHg with medication) was achieved in 35.0% and 7.5%, respectively (P = 0.003). The IOP decreased by 4.9 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-6.3 mmHg) in the ALPI group (P < 0.001) and by 6.1 mmHg (95% CI, 5.1-7.1 mmHg) in the medication group (P < 0.001). A failure rate of 30.0% was noted in the ALPI group compared with 7.5% in the medication group (P = 0.01). No treatment-related complications were recorded in either group. CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year, ALPI was associated with higher failure rates and lower IOP reduction compared with PGA therapy in eyes with persistent appositional angle closure and raised IOP after LI.

Effect of benzalkonium chloride-free travoprost on intraocular pressure and ocular surface symptoms in patients with glaucoma previously on latanoprost: an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin analogs reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension; however, these medications may affect the ocular surface and elicit ocular discomfort when preserved with benzalkonium chloride (BAK). METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm study conducted in Latin America from February 2012 to May 2013. Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were intolerant of latanoprost 0.005 % were transitioned to receive once-daily BAK-free travoprost 0.004 % containing polyquaternium-1 (Travatan® preserved with POLYQUAD® [PQ], Alcon Laboratories, Inc; Fort Worth, TX) for 12 weeks. Mean change in IOP from baseline (primary efficacy endpoint) and the percentage of patients who achieved a target IOP of ≤18 mmHg were evaluated at all on-therapy visits. Ocular hyperemia, patient preference, and self-projected adherence were assessed at week 12. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: All enrolled patients were included in the analysis (n = 191); the majority of patients (90.6 %, n = 173/191) completed the study. Mean (SD) patient age was 67.5 (11.3) years, and mean baseline IOP was 14.8 mmHg. Mean IOP was reduced by 0.94 mmHg at week 6 and by 1.09 mmHg at week 12 (P < 0.001 for both). A greater percentage of patients achieved a target IOP of ≤18 mmHg at week 6 (93.1 %; n = 163/175) and week 12 (93.3 %; n = 166/178) compared with baseline (89.5 %; n = 171/191). There was a 10.5 % increase in the percentage of patients with "none/trace" amounts of hyperemia. Most patients preferred the study medication (81.5 %; n = 141/173) and were confident that they would adhere to their preferred medication (90.8 %; n = 157/173). No serious AEs were reported, and eye irritation (3.7 %; n = 7/191) was the most common treatment-related AE. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from BAK-containing latanoprost 0.005 % to BAK-free travoprost 0.004 % preserved with PQ reduced IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were intolerant of latanoprost. BAK-free travoprost 0.004 % is a viable alternative for patients who require switching their IOP-lowering medications because of tolerability issues. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01510145.

Efficacy and Safety of the Travoprost Intraocular Implant in Reducing Topical IOP-Lowering Medication Burden in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

PURPOSE: A randomized, double-masked, multicenter, phase 2 trial to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of travoprost intraocular implant, an extended-release drug delivery system designed to provide uninterrupted sustained intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering therapy, thereby reducing patient treatment burden and improving adherence with IOP-lowering medication. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were administered a fast-eluting implant (FE implant, n = 51) and received twice-daily (BID) placebo eye drops, a slow-eluting (SE implant, n = 54) and received BID placebo eye drops, or underwent a sham surgical procedure and received BID timolol 0.5% (n = 49). IOP was measured at baseline, day 1-2, day 10, week 4, week 6, month 3, and every 3 months thereafter through 36 months. Efficacy was evaluated by mean change from 8:00 AM unmedicated baseline IOP through month 36, and the percentage of patients receiving the same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications as at screening (pre-study). Safety was evaluated by adverse events and ophthalmic parameters. RESULTS: Clinically and statistically relevant IOP-lowering treatment effects were observed through month 36 after a single administration of the travoprost implant compared with BID timolol with mean IOP reductions ranging from 7.6 to 8.8 mmHg for the FE implant group, from 7.3 to 8.0 mmHg for the SE implant group, and from 7.3 to 7.9 for the timolol group at the 8:00 AM timepoint (P < 0.0001 for all treatment groups at all visits). At months 12, 24, and 36, a greater percentage of FE and SE implant patients versus timolol patients were well controlled on the same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications compared with screening with 63 and 69% for the FE and SE implants groups, respectively, versus 45% for the timolol group at month 36. The safety profile of the implant was favorable; there were no dislodgements, no explantations, no adverse events of conjunctival hyperemia or periorbital fat atrophy, no discontinuations due to study eye adverse events, nor any serious adverse events in the study eye. Comparable changes from baseline in corneal endothelial cell counts were observed in the three treatment groups over the 36 months. CONCLUSION: The travoprost intraocular implant demonstrated robust IOP-lowering and substantially reduced topical IOP-lowering medication burden for up to 36 months following a single administration, while maintaining a favorable safety profile. The travoprost intraocular implant promises to be a meaningful addition to the interventional glaucoma armamentarium by addressing the key shortcomings of topical IOP-lowering medications, including low adherence and topical side effects while controlling IOP for up to 36 months. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02754596 registered 28 April 2016.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Travoprost Intracameral Implant Based on Pooled Analyses from Two Phase III Trials.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to conduct and interpret a pooled 12-month analysis of two prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, controlled trials designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the travoprost intracameral implant (slow-eluting [SE] implant in development as a new therapeutic and fast-eluting [FE] implant included for masking purposes) in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: Subjects with OAG or OHT, on 0-3 intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications, baseline unmedicated mean diurnal IOP of ≥ 21 mmHg, and IOP ≤ 36 mmHg at each baseline diurnal timepoint, received either a travoprost implant and twice-daily (BID) placebo eye drops or BID timolol 0.5% eye drops and a sham procedure. Subjects were followed through 12 months and assessed for IOP, reduction in topical IOP-lowering medications, and safety parameters including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). IOP at 8AM was prospectively collected at all study visits through 12 months and diurnal IOP, measured at 8AM, 10AM, and 4PM, was prospectively collected at baseline, day 10, week 6, and months 3 and 12. RESULTS: A total of 1150 subjects were randomized (385 FE implant, 380 SE implant, and 385 sham/timolol) across the two trials. Statistical non-inferiority to timolol and clinically relevant reductions in 8AM IOPs were demonstrated at month 12. In more detail, both implant groups demonstrated statistical non-inferiority to timolol and clinically relevant reductions from baseline in mean diurnal IOP at all visits over the 12-month evaluation period when diurnal IOP was collected. Additionally, both implant groups demonstrated robust treatment effect based on 8AM average IOP from day 10 through the specified visit which ranged from day 10 to month 12 from 6.9 to 8.5 mmHg in the FE implant group; 6.8 to 8.5 mmHg in the SE implant group; and 7.3 to 7.5 mmHg in the sham/timolol group. With regards to reduction in topical pharmacotherapy, at month 12, 77.6% of FE and 81.4% of SE implant eyes were completely free of all topical IOP-lowering medications and a significantly greater proportion of FE and SE implant eyes (89.9% and 93.0%) versus sham/timolol eyes (66.9%) were on the same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications compared with pre-study (p <  0.0001). Furthermore, of subjects on topical IOP medications at screening, a significantly greater proportion of FE implant (80.2%) and SE implant (85.1%) eyes versus sham/timolol (22.8%) eyes were on fewer topical IOP-lowering medications at month 12 compared with pre-study (p <  0.0001). Lastly, of SE implant eyes on same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications at month 12, the average through month 12 decreased by 0.9 medications, and of those SE implant eyes on fewer topical IOP-lowering medications compared with pre-study, the average through month 12 decreased by 1.4 medications. The most common TEAEs related to study treatment were hyperemia (conjunctival or ocular), iritis, and IOP increased. CONCLUSION: The travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated robust IOP-lowering efficacy that was sustained and statistically non-inferior to timolol over the entire 12 months, resulting in a significant reduction in topical IOP-lowering medication use, with the majority of SE implant eyes remaining completely free of all topical IOP-lowering medications. In addition, the implant demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile based on this pooled 12-month analysis of two pivotal trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03519386 (registered May 09, 2018) and NCT03868124 (registered March 08, 2019).

Prostaglandin analogs in ophthalmology.

Glaucoma is a major cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only approach to prevent further optic nerve head damage. Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for glaucoma patients. In recent years, a significant milestone in glaucoma treatment has been a transition to prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) as the first line of drugs. The rapid shift from traditional ß-blockers to PGAs is primarily due to their excellent efficacy, convenient once-a-day usage, better diurnal control of IOP, and systemic safety profiles. This review article aims to provide information regarding the various PGAs in practice and also the newer promising drugs.

Switching to Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Subanalysis of Data from the VISIONARY Study According to Baseline Monotherapy Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The VISIONARY study demonstrated statistically significant intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions with the preservative-free fixed-dose combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, sub-optimally controlled with topical prostaglandin analogue (PGA) or beta-blocker monotherapy. Current subanalyses have examined these data according to the baseline monotherapy. METHODS: A European, prospective, observational study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with OAG or OHT, who were switched to the PF tafluprost/timolol FC from PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were reported according to prior monotherapy subgroup: beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost, and travoprost. Endpoints included the mean change from baseline regarding IOP, conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) at Week 4 and Week 12, and at Month 6. RESULTS: The subanalysis included 577 patients. All prior monotherapy subgroups demonstrated statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline at Week 4, that were maintained through Month 6 (p < 0.001). Mean (SD) IOP change at Month 6 was 6.6 (4.16), 6.3 (4.39), 5.6 (3.67), 4.9 (2.97), 4.6 (4.39), and 4.7  (3.64) mmHg for prior beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, tafluprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost subgroups, respectively. The largest IOP change was observed in the preserved latanoprost subgroup for each of the ≥ 20%, ≥ 25%, ≥ 30%, and ≥ 35% IOP reduction categories at Month 6, demonstrating respective reductions of 8.06, 9.20, 10.64, and 11.55 mmHg. CFS was significantly reduced at Month 6 in the prior bimatoprost subgroup (p = 0.0013). Conjunctival hyperemia severity was significantly reduced at each study visit for prior preserved latanoprost users (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy provided statistically and clinically significant IOP reductions from Week 4 over the total 6-month period, in patients with OAG/OHT, regardless of the type of prior PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy used. Conjunctival hyperemia severity and CFS decreased significantly in prior bimatoprost and preserved latanoprost users, respectively. CLINICAL STUDY NUMBER: European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS) register number: EUPAS22204.

Short-term efficacy of latanoprostene bunod for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the comparative efficacy of latanoprostene bunod (LBN), a novel prostaglandin analogue (PGA), to other medications for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A systematic literature review adapted from the Li et al (Ophthalmology, 2016) study was conducted. Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched for randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 2014 and 19 March 2020. Studies had to report IOP reduction after 3 months for at least two different treatments among placebo, PGAs (bimatoprost 0.01%, bimatoprost 0.03%, latanoprost, LBN, tafluprost, unoprostone) or apraclonidine, betaxolol, brimonidine, brinzolamide, carteolol, dorzolamide, levobunolol, timolol, travoprost. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to provide the relative effect in terms of mean difference (95% credible interval) of IOP reduction and ranking probabilities. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated. RESULTS: A total of 106 trials were included with data for 18 523 participants. LBN was significantly more effective than unoprostone (-3.45 (-4.77 to -2.12)). Although relative effect was not significative, compared with other PGAs, LBN numerically outperformed latanoprost (-0.70 (-1.83 to 0.43)) and tafluoprost (-0.41 (-1.87 to 1.07)), was similar to bimatoprost 0.01% (-0.02(-1.59 to 1.55)) and was slightly disadvantaged by bimatoprost 0.03% (-0.17 (-1.42 to 1.07)). LBN was significantly more efficient than the beta-blockers apraclonidine, betaxolol, brimonidine, brinzolamide, carteolol, dorzolamide and timolol. According to SUCRA, LBN was ranked second after bimatoprost 0.03%, followed by bimatoprost 0.01%. CONCLUSION: LBN was significantly more effective than the PGA unoprostone and most of the beta-blockers. Compared with the most widely used PGAs, LBN numerically outperformed latanoprost and travoprost and was similar to bimatoprost 0.01%.

Changes of the Retina and Intrinsic Survival Signals in a Rat Model of Glaucoma following Brinzolamide and Travoprost Treatments.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the changes of the retina and the intrinsic survival signals of the retina by brinzolamide (Azopt®) and travoprost (Travatan®) in a rat model of chronic ocular hypertension. METHODS: Chronic ocular hypertension was induced by cauterization of three episcleral veins. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed and the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was examined to evaluate changes of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) apoptosis and glial cell activation. Western blot analyses of the bcl-2 family and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) were done to identify changes of the intrinsic survival signaling pathway in the retina. RESULTS: GFAP expression and TUNEL staining revealed significant decreases in RGC apoptosis and glial cell activation after brinzolamide and travoprost administration; bcl-2 and bcl-xL expression were significantly increased after intraocular pressure elevation and it was further increased with brinzolamide and travoprost treatment. This enhancement of survival signaling may have contributed to the decrease in RGC apoptosis. However, the role of ERK signaling was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in retinal damage and increased intrinsic survival signals suggests the neuroprotective potential of brinzolamide and travoprost in an animal model of chronic ocular hypertension, but further studies are required.

Brinzolamide/brimonidine fixed-dose combination bid as an adjunct to a prostaglandin analog for open-angle glaucoma/ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additive intraocular pressure-lowering effect of twice-daily brinzolamide 1%/brimonidine 0.2% fixed-dose combination (BBFC) as an adjunct to a prostaglandin analog (PGA) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension insufficiently controlled with PGA monotherapy. METHODS: In this Phase 4, double-masked trial, patients aged ⩾18 years, with a mean intraocular pressure of ⩾19 and <32 mm Hg in at least one eye were randomized (1:1) to receive BBFC + PGA (n = 96) or vehicle + PGA (n = 92) for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in diurnal intraocular pressure from baseline (averaged over 09:00 and 11:00 h) at Week 6. RESULTS: The mean diurnal intraocular pressure at baseline was similar in the BBFC + PGA (22.8 mm Hg) and vehicle + PGA (22.9 mm Hg) groups. The least squares mean change in diurnal intraocular pressure from baseline at Week 6 was greater with BBFC + PGA (-5.59 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -6.2 to -5.0)) than with vehicle + PGA (-2.15 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -2.7 to -1.6)); the treatment difference was statistically significant in favor of BBFC + PGA (-3.44 mm Hg, (95% confidence interval: -4.2 to -2.7); p < 0.001). Ocular adverse events were reported in 21.1% and 8.7% of patients in the BBFC + PGA and vehicle + PGA groups, respectively. The most frequent ocular adverse event was ocular hyperemia (5.3%) in the BBFC + PGA group and blurred vision (2.2%) in the vehicle + PGA group. CONCLUSION: BBFC + PGA significantly reduced mean diurnal intraocular pressure than PGA alone in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The safety findings with BBFC + PGA were consistent with the known safety profile of the individual medications.

Effect of 6-week washout period on intraocular pressure following chronic prostaglandin analogue treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a 6-week washout period on intraocular pressure (IOP) following long-term monotherapy prostaglandin use. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-centre, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged >18 years diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or open-angle glaucoma suspects based on elevated IOP in one or both eyes, using monotherapy topical latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost once daily. METHODS: Subjects were prospectively randomized to continue prostaglandin analogue (PGA) monotherapy (control group) or discontinue PGA monotherapy (washout group) for 42 days. IOP was measured at day 0 (day of randomization), 7, 21, and 42. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean IOP (mm Hg) ± standard deviation. RESULTS: 154 eyes (87 participants) completed the study, with 69 eyes (39 participants) in the control group and 85 eyes (48 participants) in the washout group. In the control group, day 0 IOP (14.64 ± 2.68 mm Hg) did not significantly differ from IOP at days 7 (14.25 ± 3.01 mm Hg), 21 (14.57 ± 2.61 mm Hg), and 42 (14.78 ± 2.30 mm Hg) (all p > 0.30). In the washout group, mean IOP values at days 7 (16.19 ± 3.80 mm Hg), 21 (17.28 ± 3.55 mm Hg), and 42 (17.84 ± 3.31 mm Hg) were significantly greater than those at day 0 (14.48 ± 1.94 mm Hg) and day-matched control group values (all p < 0.002). In the washout group, 24.7% of eyes had a day 42 IOP ≥21 mm Hg. No eyes in the control group had a day 42 IOP ≥21 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of PGA washout after long-term monotherapy resulted in a small but statistically significant IOP increase. Majority of washout group participants maintained an IOP lower than 21 mm Hg after the 6-week washout duration. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ identifier, NCT03534882).

Correlation of Ocular Surface Disease and Quality of Life in Indian Glaucoma Patients: BAC-preserved versus BAC-free Travoprost.

Objectives: The use of benzalkonium chloride (BAC)-preserved medications is associated with ocular surface disease (OSD) that can negatively affect quality of life (QoL) in glaucoma patients. This study aimed to compare QoL and correlate it with OSD in glaucoma patients receiving BAC-preserved and BAC-free travoprost. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 subjects were divided into 3 groups: 40 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients using BAC-preserved travoprost, 40 POAG patients using BAC-free travoprost, and 30 age-matched controls. All patients were assessed using a single interviewer-administered format of the Ocular Surface Disease index (OSDI) and Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaires. Results: Mean GQL-15 score in the BAC group was significantly higher than in the BAC-free group (24.71±7.42 vs. 17.58±3.06; p<0.05). The mean difference in GQL-15 scores between controls and the BAC-free group (1.24) was insignificant (p>0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between OSDI scores and GQL-15 scores in all the groups (r values: BAC: 0.63, BAC-free: 0.23, controls: 0.29), with higher OSDI scores (severe OSD) associated with higher GQL-15 scores (worse QoL). Cronbach's alpha was 0.84 for GQL-15 and 0.75 for OSDI. Conclusion: BAC-preserved travoprost leads to higher OSDI scores, which correlate strongly with poor QoL scores as compared to BAC-free travoprost. The use of BAC-free formulations should be encouraged to reduce the onset or worsening of OSD and impaired QoL in glaucoma patients.

Changes in Prostaglandin-associated Periorbital Syndrome After Switch from Conventional Prostaglandin F2α Treatment to Omidenepag Isopropyl in 11 Consecutive Patients.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the recovery of patients with PAPS for whom the treatment regimen switched from conventional prostaglandin F2α analogues to a new selective prostaglandin-EP2 agonist: omidenepag isopropyl. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2018 to July 2019, we prospectively evaluated 11 patients who had been using conventional PGF2α drugs. Digital photographs of the patients were taken before the start of omidenepag isopropyl therapy and ~3 and 6 months after. Three independent observers used the photographs to judged recovery according to the 5 signs of PAPS: deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus (DUES), flattening of the lower eyelid bags, upper eyelid ptosis, ciliary hypertrichosis, and periorbital skin hyperpigmentation. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61, and 7 patients were female. The original PGF2α drugs were bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost. The mean duration of PGF2α treatment was 65 months. PAPS signs were evaluated in 10 patients after 3 months and in all 11 patients after 6 months: After 3 and 6 months, DUES improved in 3 and 3 patients, respectively; flattening of the lower eyelid bags improved in 1 and 2 patients, respectively; upper eyelid ptosis did not improve in any patients; ciliary hypertrichosis improved in 0 and 2 patients, respectively; and eyelid pigmentation improved in 2 and 8 patients, respectively. The 3 patients who showed improvement in DUES at 6 months had all previously used bimatoprost. CONCLUSIONS: Some PAPS signs improved after patients started taking omidenepag isopropyl. Our findings will be useful for patients taking antiglaucoma eye drops.

Decreasing intraocular pressure significantly improves retinal vessel density, cytoarchitecture and visual function in rodent oxygen induced retinopathy.

We attempted to explore a noninvasive, easily applicable and economically affordable therapy for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Rat pups were raised in 80% oxygen from postnatal day 7 to P12, and returned to room air. Travoprost eye drops were administered twice a day for 7 days, to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) by about 20%. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to visualize vessel endothelial cells, to analyze retinal neurons and cytoarchitecture. Behavioral experiments were carried out to test visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. At the end of the 7-day treatment, the number of vessels extending to the vitreous body was significantly reduced and retinal vessel density increased. This improvement was maintained to the end of the 12th week. In the central retina of the model group, the horizontal cells were completely wiped out, the outer plexiform layer was undetectable, and the rod bipolar cell dendrites sprouted into the outer nuclear layer. The treatment partially reverted these architectural changes. Most importantly, behavioral experiments revealed significantly improved visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the treated group. Therefore, reducing IOP could potentially serve as a safe and economical measure to treat ROP.

Discovery, characterization and clinical utility of prostaglandin agonists for the treatment of glaucoma.

Topical ophthalmic formulations of analogues of the endogenous arachidonic acid cyclooxygenase metabolite, PGF2α , are the standard of care treatment for the blinding disease glaucoma. These are the most potent and efficacious medical therapies for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), the most important risk factor identified for disease progression. They have few side effects and offer the convenience of once-a-day dosing. It was initially believed that endogenous PGs raised IOP and caused substantial ocular surface adverse effects. However, carefully designed experiments demonstrated that esterification of the carboxylic acid afforded potent and efficacious topical ocular hypotensive activity. The final hurdle to be overcome was improvement of the side effect profile. A hypothesis was advanced that the IOP-lowering effect of PGF2α isopropyl ester was due to activation of its cognate PG-FP receptor, while side effects were largely due to promiscuous interaction with other PG receptors. This hypothesis was validated by modification of the ω chain (carbons 13-20) to a phenyl group. This provided the first marketed FP-class PG agonist analogue (FP-PGA) ocular hypotensive agent, latanoprost. Since the introduction of latanoprost into clinical medicine to lower and control IOP, a number of additional FP-PGAs have been discovered, characterized and marketed, including travoprost, tafluprost, unoprostone isopropyl ester and bimatoprost (an amide). LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Eicosanoids 35 years from the 1982 Nobel: where are we now? To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.8/issuetoc.