A controlled clinical study on efficacy and safety of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating ocular myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of peribulbar triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), with a comparison of traditional oral drug therapy. METHODS: A total of 22 patients with OMG who received periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection (initially 20 mg weekly, then once per month later if symptoms were improved) from July 2019 to July 2022 were evaluated by a comparison of symptom degree before and after treatment. Adverse reactions were also monitored during the period of treatment. The period of follow-up was more than 6 months. Additionally, a comparison of the treatment efficacy between this periocular injection and traditional oral administration was performed in OMG patients. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, the degree of ptosis in OMG patients decreased to -3.00 ± 0.69, compared to the value (-0.86 ± 1.32) before treatment. The degree of ophthalmoplegia also decreased from 3.12 ± 0.72 to 0.86 ± 0.88 (P < 0.001) after treatment. The achievement rates of minimal manifestations status (MMS)for ptosis and ophthalmoplegia after 4 week-treatment were 86.3% and 75%, respectively, while they were 50% and 30% in patients with traditional oral administration. There was statistically significant difference only in MMS (rather than symptom relief rate and generalization conversion rate) between two groups. No serious complications (except for intraorbital hematoma) were found in OMG patients during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Repeated peribulbar injection of triamcinolone acetonide can effectively alleviate the initial symptoms of OMG patients. However, the evaluation of its long-term efficacy is still needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: This study has been clinically registered by Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), first trial registration date:05/07/2019, registration number: ChiCTR1900024285.

The Combined Application of Bleomycin and Triamcinolone for Treating Refractory Keloids.

BACKGROUND: Triamcinolone acetate injections are considered the first treatment option for keloids, but quite high proportions of keloids either do not respond to triamcinolone or develop recurrence. Beneficial effects of intralesional bleomycin have been recently shown in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. However, the efficacy of combination therapy using intralesional triamcinolone and bleomycin remains undetermined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using bleomycin and triamcinolone mixture to treat refractory keloids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 33 patients with resistant keloids (including 8 men and 25 women) and a mean age of 36.52 years (age range of 18-65 years) were enrolled in this study. A mixture of bleomycin (1 u/cc) with triamcinolone acetonide (13.3 mg/cc) was injected intralesionally into the keloids every 4 to 6 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The clinical improvement was evaluated using the Japan Scar Scale (JSS) and the physician's global assessment of the flattening of the lesions. Side effects were also noted and recorded. RESULTS: In all patients, the total JSS scores decreased significantly after treatment (2.33 ± 1.05), compared with baseline (11.61 ± 2.59), ( p < .001); 26 keloids (78.8%) showed an excellent response (75%-100% flattening), 7 keloids (21.2%) showed a fair response (25%-75% flattening), and 0 keloids (0%) showed a poor response (<25% flattening). Observed side effects were ulceration (33.3%), hyperpigmentation (33.3%), hypopigmentation (15.15%), secondary infection (33.3%), and telangiectasis (15.15%). CONCLUSION: The combined use of bleomycin and triamcinolone offers a promising treatment option for individuals who have not responded well to traditional therapies.

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety and efficacy of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of different doses of IVTA in this setting. METHODS: A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted on Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE from January 2005 to May 2022. Studies that reported on patients with DME or ME secondary to RVO that received treatment with different doses of IVTA were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting on 1,041 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. In eyes with ME secondary to RVO, high-dose (4 mg) IVTA achieved a significantly better change in best-corrected visual acuity (WMD = -4.75 ETDRS letters, 95% CI = [-7.73, -1.78], p = 0.002) and reduction in retinal thickness (WMD = -93.02 µm, 95% CI = [-153.23, -32.82], p = 0.002) at months 4-6 compared to low-dose (1-2 mg) IVTA. However, high-dose IVTA had a higher risk of intraocular pressure-related adverse events (RR = 2.99, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.50], p = 0.04) and cataract surgery (RR = 5.67, 95% CI = [3.09, 10.41], p < 0.00001) than low-dose IVTA in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. These efficacy and safety differences in high-dose and low-dose IVTA were not observed in DME eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The RCT evidence in this setting is limited. High-dose IVTA achieved greater improvements in visual acuity and reductions in retinal thickness than low-dose IVTA at months 4-6. However, high-dose IVTA had a less favorable safety profile than low-dose IVTA. The significance of these outcomes was based on patients with ME secondary to RVO, but not DME.

Whole-genome sequencing unravels novel genetic determinants and regulatory pathways associated with triamcinolone acetonide-induced ocular hypertension.

Glucocorticosteroids commonly used to treat certain ocular inflammatory conditions cause an unwarranted elevation in intraocular pressure (IOP) leading to steroid-induced ocular hypertension (OHT). This study aims to identify novel genetic variants in the Indian population associated with steroid responsiveness, specifically to that of intravitreal Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections, which leads to OHT in 27% of the TA-treated Indian subjects. Genetic determinants and pathways regulating TA-OHT progression were investigated by applying whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on DNA extracted from 53 blood samples that included TA responders and non-responders. Sequencing analysis yielded 45 intronic and 49 exonic variants to be associated with TA-OHT, which are known to play a vital role in eye, heart, brain, and bone deformities. Of these, the most significant genetic variant associated with TA-OHT was further considered for molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies. Variants in the CRPPA, PLOD1, ARHGAP1, TIMELESS and TNFSF4 genes were found to be directly implicating TA-OHT. Furthermore, these genes were enriched in pathways associated with cardiomyopathy, focal adhesion, extracellular matrix, and actin cytoskeleton reorganization. MD simulation studies revealed that the top significant variant (rs141625803) in the CRPPA gene possesses a high pathogenic and structurally destabilizing effect. Thus, novel genetic variants that could be significantly associated with the TA-OHT progression were identified in this study. Validation of these targets in a larger cohort of patients along with their functional analysis would inform on the disease, thereby adding to the existing knowledge on the pathophysiology of TA-OHT.

Incidence and treatment approach of intraocular pressure elevation after various types of local steroids for retinal diseases.

PURPOSE: For the treatment of macular edema, in addition to the use of antivascular endothelial growth factors, steroids are also used intravitreally and sub-Tenon. Side effects include among others cataract formation and elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this retrospective study was to elicit the IOP elevation after administration of various steroidal medication, the time of onset, and the efficacy of the administered IOP-lowering therapies. METHODS: We included 428 eyes with a postoperative (n = 136), diabetic (n = 148), uveitic macular edema (n = 61), and macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (n = 83). These patients were treated with one or more diverse steroidal agents once or multiple times. These drugs included: triamcinolone acetonide (TMC) as intravitreal injection (TMC IVI) or sub-Tenon (TMC ST), as well as dexamethasone (DXM) and fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreally. An increase of IOP of ≥ 25 mmHg was designated as pathological. A steroid response in anamnesis, the time of onset of IOP rise from the first administration, and the therapy administered were documented. RESULTS: Of 428 eyes, 168 eyes (39.3%) had IOP elevation up to a mean of 29.7 (SD ± 5.6) mmHg, which occurred at a median of 5.5 months. Steroids most frequently leading to rise of IOP included DXM (39.1% of all eyes receiving that drug), TMC IVI (47.6%), TMC ST combined with DXM (51.5%), DXM with FA (56.8%), and TMC IVI with DXM (57.4%). A Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Log Rank test showed a significant difference (p < 0.001). IOP rise was treated as follows: 119 conservatively (70.8%), and 21 surgically (12.5%, cyclophotocoagulation 8.3%, filtering surgery 1.8%, in 4 the steroidal drug implant was removed 2.4%), and 28 eyes received no therapy (16.7%). Sufficient IOP regulation was achieved in 82 eyes (68.9%) with topical therapy. In 37 eyes (31.1%) with persistently elevated intraocular pressure, topical therapy had to be continued over the follow-up of 20 ± 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: IOP increases after any type of steroid application are not rare. Results of our study let us suspect that especially therapy with intravitreal dexamethasone, either as a monotherapy or in combination with another steroid, tends to increase IOP more than other steroids. Regular IOP checks are necessary after each steroid administration, with possible initiation of long-term conservative and/or surgical therapy if necessary.

Efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus.

OBJECTIVES: The use of autologous platelet concentrates has shown growing evidence as a promising therapy. We conducted a split-mouth study to evaluate the effectiveness of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) compared with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This split-mouth randomized trial included 12 patients with symptomatic, bilateral OLP lesions. The participants were randomly allocated to receive a 1-ml intralesional PRF injection on one side of the buccal mucosa and a 0.5-ml TA injection on the counterpart side. The application was performed once a week for 4 weeks. The outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale score, REU score, and lesion areas. RESULTS: Both injectable TA and PRF were effective in the management of oral lichen planus. After 4 weeks of treatment, there was an average reduction in the VAS score (68.5% i-PRF, 91% TA) and an average reduction in the REU score (74% i-PRF, 91% TA). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment methods (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional injection with TA showed more effectiveness than i-PRF in the management of OPL lesions. Although, i-PRF cannot be considered a first-line treatment option, it showed promising alternative therapy choice with no side effects.

Iatrogenic cushing's syndrome post intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in oral submucous fibrosis: 2 case reports.

BACKGROUND: Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OFMF) is an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMDs), strongly linked to betel quid chewing. It exhibits a significantly higher rate of malignant transformation compared to other OPMDs. The use of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection has emerged as a highly effective treatment option and has become the cornerstone of managing this condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old female and a 40-year-old male presented with burning sensation and limited mouth opening, leading to diagnosis of OSMF. Both patients were treated with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TAC) Intralesional injections. Following a few months of treatment, a significant improvement in mouth opening was observed. However, both patients began experiencing symptoms such as facial rounding (mooning of the face), a buffalo hump, uneven hair growth, and swelling in the lower extremities. Upon recognizing these symptoms as indicative of Cushing's Syndrome, the administration of TAC injection was discontinued. Both patients were referred to a higher-level medical facility for confirmatory tests, which revealed elevated cortisol levels in both morning (Cortisol A.M) and evening (Cortisol P.M). CONCLUSION: TAC injection has been established as an effective treatment for OSMF. However, it is crucial to closely monitor patients for any adverse effects resulting from the treatment, which may arise from high dosage or increased frequency.

The effect of sage (Salvizan gel) compared to triamcinolone acetonide on the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS) is one of the most common lesions of the oral mucosa. Herbal medicine can be used for the treatment of this disease. The present study aimed to compare the effects of topical application of Sage (Salvizan) and triamcinolone acetonide gels on RAS. METHODS: This double-blind clinical study recruited sixty patients with minor aphthous ulcers. Half of the patients were treated with Salvizan gel, and the other half were treated with oral triamcinolone acetonide gel. The effect of Salvizan topical gel was evaluated and compared with that of oral triamcinolone acetonide gel. Factors such as Pain recovery time, wound healing time, and pain level was evaluated. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 22 using independent t-test, paired t-test, repeated measures ANOVA, and survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS: The mean duration of pain recovery was 1.5 days for Salvizan and 2.5 days for triamcinolone acetonide (p < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of wound healing was 3.3 days for Salvizan and 6 days for triamcinolone acetonide (p < 0.001). Patients' satisfaction from factors such as taste and smell had no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that Salvizan gel is very effective in the treatment of RAS. It was significantly better than triamcinolone acetonide in the pain recovery and wound healing. These promising results favor herbal treatments and show that they can be used more commonly for treating diseases such as RAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUI. RESEARCH: REC.1399.834) on 17/03/2021. It was also registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20100202003251N7).

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis].

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and economic efficiency of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS). The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS was searched against EMbase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, and Wanfang. The efficacy, nasal mucociliary transport time, and safety of the therapy above in the treatment of CRS were analyzed with single-group rate and Meta-analysis, and the economy and sensitivity were evaluated from the perspective of payer. A total of 9 RCTs were included, including 1 145 patients. Meta-analysis showed that compared with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray alone, Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS patients increased the effective rate(RR=1.17, 95%CI[1.11, 1.24], P<0.000 01) and shortened the nasal mucociliary transport time(MD=-3.32, 95%CI[-5.86,-0.78], P=0.01), there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the treatment costs of the control group and the observation group were 44.15 yuan and 1 044.96 yuan, respectively. In the Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray treatment group, 75.48 yuan was spent to improve the effective rate of CRS by 1%. The one-way sensitivity analysis indicated the days of treatment, the RR of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray, the price of unit preparation of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules, and the effective rate of Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray alone had great influence on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In conclusion, Biyuan Tongqiao Granules combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray improves the therapeutic effect on CRS. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that when the willingness to pay was greater than 7 920 yuan(less than 0.1 of GDP per capita 8 098 yuan), the combined therapy was economically superior to the control. Due to the limited number of articles published, it is necessary to carry out a real-world clinical trial of Biyuan Tongqiao Gra-nules and Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray in the treatment of CRS, so as to compare the cost-effectiveness of Biyuan Tongqiao Granules and Triamcinolone Acetonide Nasal Spray.

Intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Bleomycin is a known chemotherapeutic agent whose beneficial effects have been recently shown in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, however, it is unclear how effective it is in comparison with corticosteroids. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Sixty patients were divided into two groups and treated by intralesional injection of triamcinolone (20 mg/ml) or bleomycin (1.5 mg/ml). The treatments were repeated every 3 weeks until the lesions flattened or for a maximum of six sessions. The clinical improvement was evaluated using the Japan scar workshop (JSW) scar scale (JSS) and the physician global assessment of flattening of the lesions. Side effects were also noted and recorded. 55 patients completed the study, 4 patients from the bleomycin group and 1 patient from the triamcinolone group dropped out of the study. In both groups, the total JSS scores decreased significantly after treatment compared to baseline (p < 0.001); however, the difference between groups was not statistically significant after treatment (p = 0.052). Moreover, the degree of flattening of the lesions was comparable between groups (p = 0.933). Side effects in the triamcinolone group were Hypopigmentation(55.2%), atrophy(51.7%), and telangiectasia(41.4%) and in bleomycin group included persistent pain after injection (61.5%), ulceration (69.2%), hyperpigmentation(76.9%), and secondary infection (34.6%). Intralesional bleomycin (1.5 mg/ml) is effective as triamcinolone(20 mg/ml) in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, however, bleomycin should be used carefully, due to adverse events such as pain, ulceration, and hyperpigmentation.

Comparative study between topical application of triamcinolone acetonide after fractional carbon dioxide laser versus microneedling in the treatment of resistant alopecia areata.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease that affects the psychological well-being of the affected individuals. Laser-assisted drug delivery and microneedling (MN) are promising methods for the treatment of different dermatological diseases. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of topical application of triamcinolone acetonide after fractional carbon dioxide laser versus MN in the treatment of resistant AA from a clinical and dermoscopic perspective. Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 15 patients each: the Laser group received fractional CO2 laser treatment followed by topical application of triamcinolone acetonide, and the MN group received dermapen treatment followed by topical application of triamcinolone acetonide. In our study, we found no statistically significant difference between the studied groups before and after treatment, except for black dot, which is higher in the MN group than in the laser group (46.7% vs. 13.3%). There is a statistically significant difference between the studied groups in terms of treatment response at the first follow-up, with 13.3% of the laser group seeing terminal hair regrowth compared to 0 in the MN group after 12 weeks. Regarding the degree of improvement, there was no statistically significant difference between the laser group and the MN group. The use of fractional CO2 laser and MN for transepidermal drug delivery (TED) allowed for more uniform drug distribution. There was no significant difference between the two treatment methods in terms of their high effectiveness in the treatment of resistant AA.

Topical calcipotriol combined with urea 20% versus intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate in the treatment of nail psoriasis: A comparative study.

There is no consistently effective treatment for psoriatic nails. Topical and intralesional modalities have been recently investigated and showed promising efficacy and safety. To compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional injection of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), methotrexate (MTX), triamcinolone acetonide (TA) versus topical calcipotriol plus urea 20% in the treatment of nail psoriasis. This study included 60 patients with nail psoriasis who were randomly assigned to 4 groups, each containing 15 patients. The first 3 groups received intralesional injection of 0.1 ml of 5-FU (group A), MTX (group B), and TA (group C) into the nail matrix and bed monthly for 3 months. Group D received a topical combination of calcipotriol/urea 20% twice daily for 3 months. Therapeutic response was assessed every month for 3 months using the target nail psoriasis severity index (NAPSI). The mean percentage of improvement was significantly higher in topical calcipotriol/urea combination (57.1 ± 26.4) than intralesional TA (44.2 ± 32.7), intralesional MTX (37.7 ± 14.2), and intralesional 5-FU (29.6 ± 14). Adverse effects were mild and insignificant in the studied groups. Topical calcipotriol/urea combination seems to be more effective and safe than intralesional injections of 5-FU, MTX, and TA.

A randomized, prospective pilot study for comparison of a triple combination of 2940 nm Er:YAG Laser and triamcinolone acetonide solution with either 308 nm excimer laser or 0.1% tacrolimus in treatment of stable segmental vitiligo.

This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of a triple combination treatment using 2940 nm Er:YAG laser, triamcinolone acetonide solution combined with either 308 nm excimer laser or 0.1% tacrolimus for the treatment of stable segmental vitiligo. Patients with stable segmental vitiligo were randomly divided into two groups and received a 5-month treatment with 2940 nm Er:YAG laser followed by triamcinolone acetonide and, either 308 nm excimer laser (Group A, N = 8) or 0.1% tacrolimus (Group B, N = 13). General information and imaging data were collected before and at 1 month after treatments. Marked repigmentation and overall repigmentation rates were analyzed and any adverse skin reactions were recorded. Both treatments significantly reduced the percent of skin lesions per total body surface area (p < 0.05) and no significant differences in repigmentation were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). The marked repigmentation rate of Group A was 42.11% and overall repigmentation rate was 94.74%, while for Group B these rates were 51.16% and 100%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the number of fingertip units at each time point (p > 0.05). While there was a significant effect for time on the number of fingertip units without considering other factors (p < 0.05), the time x treatment interaction was not significant (p > 0.05). One Group A patient developed adverse reactions consisting of erythema, burning sensation and blisters and one Group B patient developed mild erythema and burning sensations. Both treatments demonstrated a high level of efficacy and safety in the treatment of stable segmental vitiligo.

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide in the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis.

AIM: The role of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in the prevention of esophageal stricture is not well established. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate its safety and efficacy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase for possible controlled studies. The primary outcomes were stenosis rate and endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions required, and secondary outcome included complications. Random effects were used to calculate the pooled outcome. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were conducted to verify the robustness and reliability of the results. Results: Ten studies containing 499 patients were obtained. In the pooled analysis, statistical significance was found in triamcinolone acetonide injection reduced the incidence of stenosis (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.11, 0.80], P < 0.05) and the number of endoscopic balloon dilation (MD = -3.33, 95% CI [-4.15, -2.50], P < 0.0001) compared with control. Triamcinolone acetonide injection therapy did not increase the risk of complications (OR = -0.77%, CI [-1.62, 0.09], P = 0.08). Subgroup analysis indicated that the single injection of triamcinolone acetonide after endoscopic submucosal dissection significantly reduced the incidence of stenosis compared with without any prophylaxis. Different concentrations and single session volume of triamcinolone acetonide reduced the incidence of stenosis. It also showed that the dose according to the size of the lesion was more effective than the fixed dose in preventing esophageal stricture. Conclusion: Triamcinolone acetonide injection can reduce the incidence of stricture formation as well as the need for EBD sessions without increasing complications.

IS A DECREASED NITRIC OXIDE CONCENTRATION AFTER TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE INTRAVITREAL INJECTION ONE OF THE REASONS FOR INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE RISE?

Diabetic macular edema is the most common cause of vision loss in patients affected by diabetes mellitus. For eyes with persistent retinal thickening despite anti-VEGF therapy, treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone may be considered, especially in pseudophakic eyes. The aim of this study was to examine aqueous humor nitric oxide concentration changes in pseudophakic eyes with persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide, as well as the potential impact of these changes on the intraocular pressure values. In 10 pseudophakic eyes with persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema, paracentesis of anterior chamber with aspiration of aqueous humor and nitric oxide concentration measurements were done on the day of the intravitreal application of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide, and after 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. Also, we were recording intraocular pressure values before the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and during the next 9 months. One month after the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection, we noticed a decrease of nitric oxide concentration (45.37±5.55 µmol/L) by 31.79% compared to the initial values (66.52±7.66 µmol/L). After that, nitric oxide concentrations began to rise slightly, and at the end of the ninth month the mean nitric oxide concentration was similar to that recorded at the beginning of the study. Intraocular pressure values had increasing trend one month after the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection (23.70±4.08 mm Hg) compared to the initial values (16.21±1.55 mm Hg), but after nine months these values returned to normal levels. Decreased concentration of nitric oxide could be one of the reasons for increased intraocular pressure after intravitreal application of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Identification of novel step-up regimen of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in scalp alopecia areata based on a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Although intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is the most commonly prescribed treatment for localized alopecia areata (AA), the literature regarding the optimal concentration for attaining better efficacy with the most acceptable side effects is scarce. To compare hair regrowth and local side effects of various concentrations of intralesional TA in scalp AA using clinical and dermoscopic parameters. A double-blind randomized control trial with four treatment groups (10, 5, 2.5 mg/ml TA and normal saline [NS]) was conducted between March 2018 and August 2019. After recruitment, each AA patch was divided into quadrants and randomized before first injection. Injections were given and outcome parameters were analyzed every 4-weekly till 12-weeks. Statistical analysis was done by the R software employing generalized estimation equation. P-value <.05 was considered significant. Out of 105-patients (168-AA patches), 75-patients (121-patches) completed the study. Hair regrowth scale of all TA concentrations was better than NS group (P < .001). Other parameters such as quadrants with poor clinical response and dermoscopic disease activity signs were also favorable in TA groups in comparison to NS. However the evidence of atrophy and telangiectasia was maximum in 10 mg/mL group. 10 mg/mL TA showed a comparatively better response at the cost of increased adverse effects. Based on the clinical benefit and adverse risk assessment from our study, it may be better to start with 2.5 mg/mL intralesional TA in limited scalp AA patients. It can be implied that the concentration of TA can be increased as a step-up regimen based on the serial clinical and dermoscopic response.

Efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone compared with combined Nd:YAG laser with intralesional steroid or botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone or in combination with intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A or intralesional injection of steroid in treatment of hypertrophic scars. This study included 45 patients with hypertrophic scars who were randomly divided into three equal groups. All participants received 4 sessions of Nd:YAG laser at 4-week intervals. Immediately after the laser treatment, patients in group II were assigned to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, and those in group III were assigned to intralesional botulinum toxin type A. All patients were followed up monthly for 3 months after the last session for any recurrence, or side effects. Clinical evaluation of the cases was done by Vancouver Scar Scale. Hypertrophic scars in the three groups showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) compared with before treatment in all variables (except for pigmentation) and also a significant improvement in pruritus, pain, and patient relief. The highest percentage of improvements was seen in patients treated with Nd:YAG laser combined with intralesional steroid in all variables according to Vancouver Scar Scale. The degree of improvement was negatively correlated with the patients' age. The three treatment modalities were effective, safe with minimal side effects. Nd:YAG laser followed by intralesional injection of Triamcinolone acetonide had the highest percentage of Vancouver Scar Scale reduction. Combination therapy of Nd:YAG laser with intralesional injection of either Triamcinolone acetonide or Botox revealed better results than using Nd:YAG as a single therapeutic modality for HTS.

Triple treatment in ear keloids: Comparison of post-excisional intralesional steroid and platelet-rich plasma treatment.

PURPOSE: Ear keloids lead to psychological problems in the patient by causing complaints, such as itching and swelling. It is highly resistant to treatment, and recurrences are frequent. In the present study, the purpose was to investigate the treatment success of the intralesional steroid and PRP combination in addition to surgical excision in ear keloids. The 5-year recurrence rates and adverse effects of both treatments were also compared in this respect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 60 patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were followed up between 2015 and 2020 due to ear keloids were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 different groups (n = 20) as (A-B-C). There were patients who had only intralesional steroid injections due to ear keloids in Group A, patients who had intraoperative/postoperative steroid injections combined with surgical excision were in Group B, and patients who had intraoperative/postoperative steroid+intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injections combined with surgical excision were in Group C. RESULTS: It was found that the 5-year recurrence rate was the lowest in Group C (Surgical Excision+PRP + TAC). The 5-year recurrence rate of Group C was significantly lower when compared with other groups (p < 0.05). When the 5-year recurrence rate of Group A (TAC) and B (Surgical Excision+TAC) was compared, the recurrence rate of Group B was significantly lower (p < 0.05). When the adverse effects were compared, no significant differences were detected between two Groups (A-B) in terms of Skin Atrophy and Telangiectasia. Significant differences were detected between patients in Group C and other groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were detected between Group B and C (p = 0.832). CONCLUSION: The combination of surgical excision with Intralesional TAC and PRP treatment in patients with ear keloids should be considered as a highly successful multimodal treatment in terms of low recurrence and adverse effects.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Verapamil With Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide in Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Clinical treatment of hypertrophic scars (HSs) and keloids is often unsatisfactory. Intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and verapamil are widely used to treat HSs and keloids, but their efficacy and safety are controversial. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of verapamil and TAC in the treatment of HSs and keloids. METHODS: Embase, Google Scholar, and PubMed were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to February 2020. RCTs that evaluated treatment effects with the Vancouver Scar Scale or reported adverse effects were included. The continuous data and the dichotomous variables were analyzed as mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR), respectively. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (461 patients) were included. Compared with verapamil, TAC rapidly changed the ∆height (MD = 0.07; P < 0.05) and ∆pliability (MD = 0.23; P < 0.05) after the first session, but subsequent treatments resulted in no significant differences in the ∆height, ∆pigmentation, ∆vascularity, and ∆pliability. Although total adverse effects (RR = 0.42; P = 0.1) were not significantly different, in the subgroup analysis the incidence of telangiectasia (RR = 0.04; P < 0.05) and skin atrophy (RR = 0.10; P < 0.05), but not pain (RR = 1.27; P = 0.77), was significantly lower with verapamil than with TAC. CONCLUSIONS: Verapamil may be an effective substitute for TAC. Although total adverse effects did not change, the incidence of telangiectasia and skin atrophy was lower with verapamil than with TAC.

Orbital abscess caused by Exophiala dermatitidis following posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide: a case report and a review of literature related to Exophiala eye infections.

BACKGROUND: Subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) has been widely adopted in the clinical setting of ophthalmology and its infectious complications are rare. However, orbital abscess following STTA has been reported in seven cases. Furthermore, although eye infections due to Exophiala species are uncommon, there have been 19 cases to date. E. jeanselmei, E. phaeomuriformis, E. werneckii, and E. dermatitidis have been reported to cause human eye infections; however, to the best of our knowledge, orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis has not yet been reported. We describe the first documented case of fungal orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis following STTA. We also review the related literature of orbital abscess following STTA, as well as eye infections caused by the four Exophiala species. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 69-year-old Japanese woman with diabetic mellitus. She had a macular oedema in her right eye, which occurred secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. An orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis occurred 4 months after the second STTA for the macular oedema, which was successfully treated by a surgical debridement and systemic administration of voriconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in the patient and from our literature survey caution ophthalmologists to the fact that STTA can cause fungal orbital infections, especially in diabetic patients. Furthermore, surgical treatment is one of the most important risk factors.