Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(11): 2069-2078, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care systems are increasingly screening for unmet social needs. The association between patient-reported social needs and health care utilization is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between patient-reported social needs, measured by the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE), and inpatient and emergency department (ED) utilization. DESIGN: This cohort study analyzed merged 2017-2019 electronic health record (EHR) data across multiple health systems. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in central North Carolina who completed PRAPARE as part of a primary care visit with behavioral health services. MAIN MEASURES: The count of up to 12 unmet social needs, aggregated as 0, 1, 2, or 3 + . Outcomes include the probability of an ED visit and hospitalization 12 months after PRAPARE assessment, modeled by logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidity burden, being uninsured, and prior utilization in the past 12 months. KEY RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1924 adults (38.7% male, 50.1% Black, 36.3% Hispanic, 55.9% unemployed, 68.2% of patients reported 1 + needs). Those with more needs were younger, more likely to be unemployed, and experienced greater comorbidity burden. 35.3% of patients had ED visit(s) and 36.3% had hospitalization(s) 1 year after PRAPARE assessment. In adjusted analysis, having 3 + needs was associated with a percentage point increase in the predicted probability of hospitalization (average marginal effect 0.06, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) compared with having 0 needs. Similarly, having 2 needs (0.07, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) or 3 + needs (0.06, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) was associated with increased probability of ED visits compared to 0 needs. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported social needs were common and associated with health care utilization patterns. Future research should identify interventions to address unmet social needs to improve health and avoid potentially preventable escalating medical intervention.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos de Coortes , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4251-4259, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862825

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Protectomia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Protectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 69-75, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976929

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a difference in antibiotic administration time and prognosis in afebrile sepsis patients compared to febrile sepsis patients. METHODS: This was retrospective multicenter observational study. Data collected from three referral hospitals. Data were collected from May 2014 through February 2016 under the SEPSIS-2 criteria and from March 2016 to April 2020 under the newly released SEPSIS-3 criteria. Patients were divided into two groups based on body temperature: afebrile (<37.3 °C) and febrile (≥37.3 °C). The relationship between initial body temperature and 28-day mortality were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The subgroup analysis was conducted on patients with complete Hour-1 bundle performance records. RESULTS: We included 4293 patients in this study. Initial body temperatures in 28-day survivors were significantly higher than in 28-day non-survivors (37.5 °C ± 1.2 °C versus 37.1 °C ± 1.2 °C, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in afebrile and febrile sepsis patients. Adjusted odds ratio of afebrile sepsis patients for 28-day mortality was 1.76 (95% Confidence interval 1.46-2.12). As a result of performing the Hour-1 bundle, the number of patients who received antibiotics within 1 h was smaller in the afebrile sepsis patients (323/2076, 15.6%) than in the febrile sepsis patients (395/2156, 18.3%) (p = 0.02). In the subgroup analysis of patients with complete Hour-1 bundle performance records adjusted odds ratio of afebrile sepsis patients for 28-day mortality was 1.68 (95% Confidence interval 1.34-2.11). The febrile sepsis patients received antibiotics faster than the afebrile sepsis patients (175.5 ± 207.9 versus 209.3 ± 277.9, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Afebrile sepsis patients were associated with higher 28-day mortality compared to their febrile counterparts and were delayed in receiving antibiotics. This underscores the need for improved early detection and treatment strategies for the afebrile sepsis patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Febre , Sepse , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Temperatura Corporal , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Modelos Logísticos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2274, 2024 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39169278

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common and severe public health concern, and there are clear biological mechanisms between UTI and hot temperatures, few studies have addressed the association between hot temperatures and UTI. METHODS: We designed a time-stratified case-crossover study using a population-representative sample cohort based on the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) in South Korea. We obtained all NHIS-based hospital admissions through the emergency room (ER) due to UTI (using a primary diagnostic code) from 2006 to 2019. We assigned satellite-based reanalyzed daily summer (June to September) average temperatures as exposures, based on residential districts of beneficiaries (248 districts in South Korea). The conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between summer temperature and UTI outcome. RESULTS: A total of 4,436 ER visits due to UTI were observed during the summer between 2006 and 2019 among 1,131,714 NHIS beneficiaries. For 20% increase in summer temperatures (0-2 lag days), the odd ratio (OR) was 1.06 (95% CI: 1.02-1.10) in the total population, and the association was more prominent in the elderly (people aged 65 y or older; OR:1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.17), females (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19), and people with diabetes history (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23). The effect modification by household income was different in the total and elderly populations. Furthermore, the association between summer temperature and UTI increased during the study period in the total population. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that higher summer temperatures increase the risk of severe UTIs, and the risk might be different by sub-populations.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Estações do Ano , Infecções Urinárias , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Cross-Over , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia
5.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 142, 2024 Aug 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39112973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Utilization by low acuity patients contributes to emergency department (ED) crowding. Both knowledge deficits about adequate care levels and access barriers in primary care are important promoters of such presentations. Concurrently, not having a general practitioner (GP) increases the likelihood of low-acuity ED utilization. This pilot study thus investigated feasibility, acceptance, and potential effects of an ED-delivered intervention for low-acuity patients with no regular primary care provider, consisting of an educational leaflet on acute care options and an optional GP appointment scheduling service. METHODS: Low-acuity ED consulters not attached to a GP were given an information leaflet about alternative care offers for acute health problems and offered optional personal appointment scheduling at a local GP practice. Patients were surveyed on demographics, medical characteristics, health care utilization, valuation of the intervention, and reasons for not being attached to a GP and visiting the ED. A follow-up survey was conducted after twelve months. Trends in health and health care utilization were evaluated. RESULTS: Between December 2020 and April 2022, n = 160 patients were enrolled, n = 114 were followed up. The study population was characterized by young age (mean 30.6 years) and predominantly good general health. Besides good health, personal mobility was a central reason for not being attached to a GP, but general preference for specialists and bad experiences with primary care were also mentioned. Most frequently stated motives for the ED consultation were subjective distress and anxiety, a belief in the superiority of the hospital, and access problems in primary care. The interventional offers were favorably valued, 52.5% (n = 84) accepted the GP appointment scheduling service offer. At follow-up, GP utilization had significantly increased, while there were no significant changes regarding utilization of other providers, including ED. An additional practice survey showed a 63.0% take-up rate for the appointment service. CONCLUSIONS: With this pilot study, we were able to show that a personalized appointment scheduling service seems to be a promising approach to promote GP attachment and increase primary care utilization in patients without a regular GP in a highly urbanized setting. Further larger-scale studies are needed to investigate potential quantitative effects on ED visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023480); date 2020/11/27.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agendamento de Consultas , Berlim , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/organização & administração , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Natl Health Stat Report ; (197): 1-15, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252463

RESUMO

Purpose-This report describes trends in emergency department visits among people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2021, by health insurance status and selected demographic and hospital characteristics. Methods-Estimates in this report are based on data collected in the 2010-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Data were weighted to produce annual national estimates. Patient and hospital characteristics are presented by primary expected source of payment. Results-Private insurance and Medicaid were the most common primary expected sources of payment at emergency department visits by people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2013. Medicaid was the most common primary expected source of payment from 2014 through 2021. Among children younger than age 18 years, the most common primary expected source of payment was Medicaid across the entire period. The percentage of visits by children with no insurance decreased from 7.4% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2021. Among adults, the percentage of visits with Medicaid increased from 25.5% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021, and the percentage of visits by those with no insurance decreased from 24.6% to 11.1% during this period. Among Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people, Medicaid was the most frequent primary expected source of payment during the entire period. Among White non-Hispanic people, private insurance was the most frequent primary expected source of payment through 2015, while private insurance and Medicaid were the most frequent primary expected sources of payment from 2016 through 2021.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Cobertura do Seguro , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Sci Total Environ ; 948: 174753, 2024 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025140

RESUMO

There is growing evidence that high ambient temperatures are associated with a range of adverse health outcomes. Further evidence suggests differences in rural versus non-rural populations' vulnerability to heat-related adverse health outcomes. The current project aims to 1) refine estimated associations between maximum daily heat index (HI) and emergency department (ED) visits in regions of Virginia, and 2) compare associations between maximum daily HI and ED visits in rural versus non-rural areas of Virginia and within those areas, for persons 65 years of age and older versus those younger than 65 years. Our study utilized 16,873,213 healthcare visits from Virginia facilities reporting to the Virginia Department of Health syndromic surveillance system between May and September 2015-2022. Federal Office of Rural Health Policy defined rural areas were assigned to patient home ZIP code. The estimated daily maximum HI at which ED visits begin to rise varies between 25 °C and 33 °C across climate zones and regions of Virginia. Across all regions, estimated ED visits attributable to days with maximum HI above 25.7 °C were higher in rural areas (3.7%, 95% CI: 3.5%, 3.9%) versus in non-rural areas (3.1%, 95% CIs: 3.0%, 3.2%). Patients aged 0-64 years had a higher estimated heat attributable fraction of ED visits (4.2%, 95% CI: 4.0%, 4.3%) than patients 65 years and older (3.1%, 95% CI: 2.9%, 3.4%). Rural patients older than 65 have a higher estimated fraction of heat attributable ED visits (2.7%, 95% CI: 2.2%, 3.1%) compared to non-rural patients 65 years and older (1.5%, 95% CI: 1.3%, 1.8%). State-level syndromic surveillance data can be used to optimize heat warning messaging based on expected changes in healthcare visits given a set of meteorological variables, and can be further refined based on climate, rurality and age.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Temperatura Alta , População Rural , Estações do Ano , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Virginia/epidemiologia
11.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 15(3): 787-795, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679640

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Assessing and comparing German and Dutch nursing home perspectives on residents' hospital transfers. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among German and Dutch nursing homes. Two surveys were conducted in May 2022, each among 600 randomly selected nursing homes in Germany and the Netherlands. The questionnaires were identical for both countries. The responses were compared between the German and Dutch participants. RESULTS: We received 199 German (response: 33.2%) and 102 Dutch questionnaires (response: 17.0%). German nursing homes estimated the proportion of transfers to hospital during 1 year to be higher than in Dutch facilities (emergency department visits: 26.5% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.0001; hospital admissions: 29.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.0001). In German nursing homes, the proportion of transfers to hospital where the decision was made by the referring physician was lower than in the Dutch facilities (58.8% vs. 88.8%, p < 0.0001). More German nursing homes agreed that nursing home residents are transferred to the hospital too frequently (24.5% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.0069). German nursing homes were much more likely than Dutch facilities to believe that there was no alternative to transfer to a hospital when a nursing home resident had a fall (66.3% vs. 12.8%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: German nursing home residents are transferred to hospital more frequently than Dutch residents. This can probably be explained by differences in the care provided in the facilities. Future studies should, therefore, look more closely at these two systems and examine the extent to which more intensive outpatient care can avoid transfers to hospital.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Casas de Saúde , Transferência de Pacientes , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Países Baixos , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
Am J Psychiatry ; 181(8): 741-752, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831705

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study estimated national annual trends and characteristics of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm in the United States from 2011 to 2020. METHODS: Data were from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual cross-sectional national sample survey of emergency departments. Visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm were identified using discharge diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM for 2011-2015; ICD-10-CM for 2016-2020) or reason-for-visit codes. The annual proportion of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm was estimated. RESULTS: The weighted number of emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm increased from 1.43 million, or 0.6% of total emergency department visits, in 2011-2012 to 5.37 million, or 2.1% of total emergency department visits in 2019-2020 (average annual percent change, 19.5%, 95% CI=16.9, 22.2). Visits per capita increased from 261 to 871 visits per 100,000 persons (average annual percent change, 18.8%, 95% CI=17.6, 20.0). The increase in visits was widely distributed across sociodemographic groups. While suicide attempt and intentional self-harm visits were most common among adolescents, adults age 65 or older demonstrated the largest increase (average annual percent change, 30.2%, 95% CI=28.5, 32.0). Drug-related diagnoses were the most common co-occurring diagnosis among suicide attempt and intentional self-harm visits. Despite the rise in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm, less than 16% included an evaluation by a mental health professional. CONCLUSIONS: A significant national increase in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm occurred from 2011 to 2020, as a proportion of total emergency department visits and as visits per capita. These trends underscore an urgent need to improve the continuum of mental health care for individuals with suicidal symptoms.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Comportamento Autodestrutivo , Tentativa de Suicídio , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Transversais , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/psicologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Tentativa de Suicídio/tendências , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 12(Supplement_2): S20-S27, 2023 Dec 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Widespread school closures and health care avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions in access to pediatric mental health care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of emergency and inpatient administrative claims from privately insured children aged 6-20 years in North Carolina between January 2019 and December 2020. We compared rates of emergency department (ED) visits (per 100 000 person-days) and risks of hospitalizations (per 100 000 persons) with diagnosis codes in each category (mental/behavioral health; suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and intentional self-harm [SI/SA/ISH]; and social issues) across 3 time periods (pre-pandemic, lockdown, and reopening). We calculated the proportion and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of total ED visits and total hospitalizations attributable to mental/behavioral health and SI/SA/ISH across the 3 time periods. RESULTS: Rates of all categories of ED visits decreased from pre-pandemic to the lockdown period; from pre-pandemic to the reopening period, mental/behavioral health visits decreased but rates of SI/SA/ISH visits were unchanged. The proportion of ED visits attributable to mental/behavioral health increased from 3.5% (95% CI 3.2%-3.7%) pre-pandemic to 4.0% (95% CI 3.7%-4.3%) during reopening, and the proportion of SI/SA/ISH diagnoses increased from 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%-1.8%) pre-pandemic to 2.4% (95% CI 2.1%-2.7%) during the reopening period. Emergency care use for social issues and hospital admissions for mental/behavioral health and SI/SA/ISH diagnoses were unchanged across the study periods. CONCLUSIONS: In the early pandemic, pediatric mental health care and acute suicidal crises accounted for increased proportions of emergency care. During pandemic recovery, understanding the populations most impacted and increasing access to preventative mental health care is critical.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Saúde Mental , Pandemias , Criança , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Retrospectivos , North Carolina , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(12): e2349305, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150255

RESUMO

Importance: Although substantial research has reported grave population-level psychiatric sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence pertaining to temporal changes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders in the US following the pandemic remains limited. Objective: To examine the monthly patterns of emergency department (ED) visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used time-series analyses to examine whether monthly counts of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders across 5 University of California (UC) campus health systems increased beyond expected levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data included ED visits reported by the 5 UC campuses from 2016 to 2021. Participants included persons who accessed UC Health System EDs had a diagnosis of a psychiatric condition. Data analysis was performed from March to June 2023. Exposures: The exposures were binary indicators of initial (March to May 2020) and extended (March to December 2020) phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was monthly counts of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes, categorized within Clinical Classification Software groups, were used to identify ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and all other psychiatric ED visits, from the University of California Health Data Warehouse database, from January 2016 to December 2021. Time-series analyses controlled for autocorrelation, seasonality, and concurrent trends in ED visits for all other psychiatric conditions. Results: The study data comprised a total of 377 872 psychiatric ED visits, with 37 815 visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The prepandemic monthly mean (SD) number of ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders was 519.9 (38.1), which increased to 558.4 (47.6) following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from time series analyses, controlling for monthly counts of ED visits for all other psychiatric conditions, indicated 70.5 additional ED visits (95% CI, 11.7-129.3 additional visits; P = .02) for schizophrenia spectrum disorders at 1 month and 74.9 additional visits (95% CI, 24.0-126.0 visits; P = .005) at 3 months following the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in California. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found a 15% increase in ED visits for schizophrenia spectrum disorders within 3 months after the initial phase of the pandemic in California across 5 UC campus health systems, underscoring the importance of social policies related to future emergency preparedness and the need to strengthen mental health care systems.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Análise de Dados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pandemias , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Universidades , California , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA