Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using the FoleyManometer does not increase the risk for urinary tract infection in critically ill patients.
Desie, Nele; Willems, Alexandra; De Laet, Inneke; Dits, Hilde; Van Regenmortel, Niels; Schoonheydt, Karen; Van De Vyvere, Martine; Malbrain, Manu Lng.
Afiliação
  • Desie N; Department of Intensive Care, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, B-2060 Antwerpen, Belgium. manu.malbrain@skynet.be.
Ann Intensive Care ; 2 Suppl 1: S10, 2012 Jul 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22873411
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to determine whether intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring using the FoleyManometer (Holtech Medical, Charlottenlund, Denmark) increases the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI).

DESIGN:

A retrospective database review was conducted.

SETTING:

The study was conducted in the 12-bed medical intensive care unit of ZNA Stuivenberg Hospital (Antwerp, Belgium), a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS There were 5,890 patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of which 1,097 patients underwent intrabladder pressure (IBP) monitoring as estimate for IAP.

INTERVENTIONS:

Crude and adjusted UTI rates were compared among patients undergoing IAP measurements with three different intrabladder

methods:

a modified homemade technique, a FoleyManometer with 35 ml reservoir, and a FoleyManometer low volume (FoleyManometerLV) with less than 10 ml priming volume. MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS:

Four consecutive time periods of 24 months were defined and compared with regard to IAP measurement period 1 (2000-2001), during which IAP monitoring was not used routinely (which serves as a control group), was compared with period 2 (2002-2003), using a modified homemade technique; period 3 (2004-2005), introducing the FoleyManometer; and finally period 4 (2006-2007), in which the FoleyManometerLV was introduced. The incidence of IBP measurements increased from 1.4% in period 1 to 45.4% in period 4 (p < 0.001). At the same time, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (version 2) (SAPS-II) increased significantly from 24.4 ± 21.5 to 34.9 ± 18.7 (p < 0.001) together with the percentage of ventilated patients from 18.6% to 40.7% (p < 0.001). In total, 1,097 patients had IAP measurements via the bladder. The UTI rates were adjusted for disease severity by multiplying each crude rate with the ratio of control versus study patient SAPS-II probability of mortality. Crude and adjusted UTI rates per 1,000 catheter days (CD) were on average 16.1 and 12.8/1,000 CD, respectively, and were not significantly different between the four time periods.

CONCLUSIONS:

Intrabladder pressure monitoring as estimate for IAP either via a closed transducer technique or the closed FoleyManometer technique seems safe and does not alter the risk of UTI in critically ill patients.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Intensive Care Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Intensive Care Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica