Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter investigation of the reliability and validity of the live donor assessment tool as an enhancement to the psychosocial evaluation of living donors.
Kook, Yoon Won Amy; Shenoy, Akhil; Hunt, Julia; Desrosiers, Farrah; Gordon-Elliott, Janna S; Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila; Trompeta, Joyce A; Vandrovec, Margo; Weinberg, Sandra; Fan, Weijia; LaPointe Rudow, Dianne.
Afiliação
  • Kook YWA; Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Shenoy A; Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Hunt J; Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
  • Desrosiers F; New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Gordon-Elliott JS; New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Jowsey-Gregoire S; William J. Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Trompeta JA; University of California (UCSF), San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Vandrovec M; William J. Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Weinberg S; University of California (UCSF), San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Fan W; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
  • LaPointe Rudow D; Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Am J Transplant ; 19(4): 1119-1128, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414243
The live donor assessment tool (LDAT) is the first psychosocial assessment tool developed to standardize live donor psychosocial evaluations. A multicenter study was conducted to explore reliability and validity of the LDAT and determine its ability to enhance the psychosocial evaluation beyond its center of origin. Four transplant programs participated, each with their own team of evaluators and unique demographics. Liver and kidney living donors (LDs) undergoing both standard psychosocial evaluation and LDAT from June 2015 to September 2016 were studied. LDAT interrater reliability, associations between LDAT scores and psychosocial evaluation outcome, and psychosocial outcomes postdonation were tested. 386 LD evaluations were compared and had a mean LDAT score of 67.34 ± 7.57. In 140 LDs with two LDATs by different observers, the interrater scores correlated (r = 0.63). LDAT scores at each center and overall stratified to the conventional grouping of psychosocial risk level. LDAT scores of 131 subjects who proceeded with donation were expectedly lower in LDs requiring postdonation counseling (t = -2.78, P = .01). The LDAT had good reliability between raters and predicted outcome of the psychosocial evaluation across centers. It can be used to standardize language among clinicians to communicate psychosocial risk of LD candidates and assist teams when anticipating postdonation psychosocial needs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores Vivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores Vivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article