Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Hospital Referral Regions in Evaluating End-of-Life Care.
Kaufman, Brystana G; Klemish, David; Olson, Andrew; Kassner, Cordt T; Reiter, Jerome P; Harker, Matthew; Sheble, Laura; Goldstein, Benjamin A; Taylor, Donald H; Bhavsar, Nrupen A.
Afiliação
  • Kaufman BG; Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Klemish D; Department of Statistical Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Olson A; Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Kassner CT; Hospice Analytics, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
  • Reiter JP; Department of Statistical Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Harker M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Sheble L; School of Information Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Goldstein BA; Duke Network Analysis Center, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Taylor DH; Department of Statistical Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Bhavsar NA; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
J Palliat Med ; 23(1): 90-96, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31424316
ABSTRACT

Background:

Hospital referral regions (HRRs) are often used to characterize inpatient referral patterns, but it is unknown how well these geographic regions are aligned with variation in Medicare-financed hospice care, which is largely provided at home.

Objective:

Our objective was to characterize the variability in hospice use rates among elderly Medicare decedents by HRR and county.

Methods:

Using 2014 Master Beneficiary File for decedents 65 and older from North and South Carolina, we applied Bayesian mixed models to quantify variation in hospice use rates explained by HRR fixed effects, county random effects, and residual error among Medicare decedents.

Results:

We found HRRs and county indicators are significant predictors of hospice use in NC and SC; however, the relative variation within HRRs and associated residual variation is substantial. On average, HRR fixed effects explained more variation in hospice use rates than county indicators with a standard deviation (SD) of 10.0 versus 5.1 percentage points. The SD of the residual error is 5.7 percentage points. On average, variation within HRRs is about half the variation between regions (52%).

Conclusions:

The magnitude of unexplained residual variation in hospice use for NC and SC suggests that novel, end-of-life-specific service areas should be developed and tested to better capture geographic differences and inform research, health systems, and policy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article