Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disentangling Hippocampal and Amygdala Contribution to Human Anxiety-Like Behavior.
Bach, Dominik R; Hoffmann, Martina; Finke, Carsten; Hurlemann, Rene; Ploner, Christoph J.
Afiliação
  • Bach DR; Computational Psychiatry Research, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland, dominik.bach@uzh.ch.
  • Hoffmann M; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging and Max Planck/UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London WC1N 3BG United Kingdom.
  • Finke C; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  • Hurlemann R; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  • Ploner CJ; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
J Neurosci ; 39(43): 8517-8526, 2019 10 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501296
Anxiety comprises a suite of behaviors to deal with potential threat and is often modeled in approach-avoidance conflict tasks. Collectively, these tests constitute a predominant preclinical model of anxiety disorder. A body of evidence suggests that both ventral hippocampus and amygdala lesions impair anxiety-like behavior, but the relative contribution of these two structures is unclear. A possible reason is that approach-avoidance conflict tasks involve a series of decisions and actions, which may be controlled by distinct neural mechanisms that are difficult to disentangle from behavioral readouts. Here, we capitalize on a human approach-avoidance conflict test, implemented as computer game, that separately measures several action components. We investigate three patients of both sexes with unspecific unilateral medial temporal lobe (MTL) damage, one male with selective bilateral hippocampal (HC), and one female with selective bilateral amygdala lesions, and compare them to matched controls. MTL and selective HC lesions, but not selective amygdala lesions, increased approach decision when possible loss was high. In contrast, MTL and selective amygdala lesions, but not selective HC lesions, increased return latency. Additionally, selective HC and selective amygdala lesions reduced approach latency. In a task targeted at revealing subjective assumptions about the structure of the computer game, MTL and selective HC lesions impacted on reaction time generation but not on the subjective task structure. We conclude that deciding to approach reward under threat relies on hippocampus but not amygdala, whereas vigor of returning to safety depends on amygdala but not on hippocampus.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Approach-avoidance conflict tests are widely investigated in rodents, and increasingly in humans, to understand the neural basis of anxiety-like behavior. However, the contribution of the most relevant brain regions, ventral hippocampus and amygdala, is incompletely understood. We use a human computerized test that separates different action components and find that hippocampus, but not amygdala, lesions impair approach decisions, whereas amygdala, but not hippocampus, lesions impair the vigor of return to safety.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ansiedade / Recompensa / Aprendizagem da Esquiva / Hipocampo / Tonsila do Cerebelo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ansiedade / Recompensa / Aprendizagem da Esquiva / Hipocampo / Tonsila do Cerebelo Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article