Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resource utilization associated with hospital and office-based insertion of a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the RIO 2 randomized US study.
Rogers, John D; Piorkowski, Christopher; Sohail, M Rizwan; Anand, Rishi; Kowalski, Marcin; Rosemas, Sarah; Stromberg, Kurt; Sanders, Prashanthan.
Afiliação
  • Rogers JD; Department of Cardiology, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Piorkowski C; Department of Electrophysiology, Herzzentrum Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Sohail MR; Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Anand R; Electrophysiology Laboratory, Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
  • Kowalski M; Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Staten Island University Hospital and Northwell Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA.
  • Rosemas S; Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure, Medtronic, Inc, Mounds View, MN, USA.
  • Stromberg K; Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure, Medtronic, Inc, Mounds View, MN, USA.
  • Sanders P; Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
J Med Econ ; 23(7): 706-713, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207636
Background: Previous studies support operational benefits when moving insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) insertions outside the cardiac catheterization/electrophysiology laboratories, but this has not been directly assessed in a randomized trial or when the procedure is specifically moved to the office setting. To gain insight, the RIO 2 US study collected resource utilization and procedure time intervals for ICM insertion in-office and in-hospital and these data were used to calculate costs associated with staff time and supply use in each setting.Methods and results: The Reveal LINQ In-Office 2 US study (randomized [1:1], multicenter, unblinded) included 482 patients to undergo insertion of the ICM in-hospital (in an operating room or CATH/EP laboratory) (n = 251) or in-office (n = 231). Detailed information on resource utilization was collected prospectively by the study and used to compare resource utilization and procedure time intervals during ICM insertion procedures performed in-office vs. in-hospital. In addition, costs associated with staff time and supply use in each setting were calculated retrospectively. Total visit duration (check-in to discharge) was 107 min shorter in-office vs. in-hospital (95% CI = 97-116 min; p < 0.001). Patient preparation and education in-office were more likely to occur in the same room as the procedure, compared with in-hospital (91.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001 and 87.3% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). There was a reduction in registered nurse and cardiovascular/operating room technologist involvement in-office, accompanied by higher physician and medical assistant participation. Overall staff time spent per case was 75% higher in-hospital, leading to 50% higher staffing costs compared to in-office.Conclusions: ICM insertion in a physician's office vs. a hospital setting resulted in reduced patient visit time and reduced overall staff time, with a consequent reduction in staffing costs. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02395536.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Consultórios Médicos / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Recursos em Saúde / Miniaturização Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios / Consultórios Médicos / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Recursos em Saúde / Miniaturização Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos