Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Technical feasibility of a newly designed bendable forceps for difficult endoscopic tissue samplings (with video).
Lee, Dong Seok; Kim, Ji Won; Lee, Kook Lae; Kim, Byeong Gwan; Kim, Su Hwan; Byeon, Jeong-Sik.
Afiliação
  • Lee DS; Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim JW; Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee KL; Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kjwjor@snu.ac.kr.
  • Kim BG; Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim SH; Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Byeon JS; Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Surg Endosc ; 34(10): 4692-4701, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32661712
BACKGROUND: Biopsies with conventional forceps beyond the operating range are difficult and cumbersome. Thus, we developed a new bendable forceps for improved access to gastrointestinal lesions and evaluated its technical feasibility. METHODS: A bendable forceps was constructed with two channels and a two-stage knob. The bending motion-related structures were designed to improve the range of motion. For the evaluation of the forceps, we used 2 gastrointestinal simulators: an ex vivo porcine model, and an in vivo porcine model with some difficult endoscopic biopsy cases. All evaluations were performed by 5 expert endoscopists and an expert pathologist. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional forceps, the bendable forceps had greater efficacy in the simulator (6.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.96 ± 0.2, p < 0.001), ex vivo porcine model (6.33 ± 0.52 vs. 4.25 ± 0.89, p < 0.001), and in vivo porcine model (6.33 ± 0.52 vs. 4.25 ± 0.89, p < 0.001); greater safety in the simulator (1.92 ± 0.13 s vs. 4.88 ± 0.50 s, p < 0.001), ex vivo porcine model (2.02 ± 0.15 s vs 4.66 ± 0.27 s, p < 0.001), and in vivo porcine model (2.02 ± 0.15 s vs. 4.08 ± 0.70 s, p = 0.002); and larger specimens in the ex vivo porcine model (3.92 ± 0.03 mm vs. 3.85 ± 0.07 mm, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that compared with the conventional forceps, the bendable forceps was effective and safe to use for accessing difficult lesions in the three models. We believe that the bendable forceps serves as a useful supplementary diagnostic tool for accessing difficult lesions. However, further validation of its usefulness in the human body is needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Biópsia / Cirurgia Vídeoassistida / Endoscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Biópsia / Cirurgia Vídeoassistida / Endoscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article