Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence, patterns and sociocultural factors associated with use of tobacco-based dentifrices (Gul) in India.
Mehra, Rashmi; Mohanty, Vikrant; Aswini, Y B; Kapoor, Shivam; Gupta, Vaibhav.
Afiliação
  • Mehra R; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus (Govt. of NCT Delhi), B.S. Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
  • Mohanty V; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus (Govt. of NCT Delhi), B.S. Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
  • Aswini YB; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus (Govt. of NCT Delhi), B.S. Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
  • Kapoor S; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus (Govt. of NCT Delhi), B.S. Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
  • Gupta V; Department of Public Health Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus (Govt. of NCT Delhi), B.S. Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Cancer ; 57(3): 311-320, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675444
BACKGROUND: India poses a novel tobacco problem with majority of the tobacco users consuming smokeless form of tobacco (21.4%). Gul is one such Smokeless Tobacco (ST) product that is manufactured commercially as a dentifrice to be applied to the teeth and then to gums many times during the day, making it a cheap and easy tobacco source. Hence, the aim of the present study was to estimate the usage of Gul and its social determinants among adults in the capital city of India, Delhi. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted among 1300 adults across 27 Delhi government dispensaries across 3 districts of Delhi through multistage stratified random sampling. A structured, close-ended, validated questionnaire inquiring about the tobacco practices was used for all the participants and a specially constructed, structured, close-ended, validated proforma was used for Gul users to assess practice and pattern of use. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Gul users was found to be 4.9% with a mean usage duration of 6.28 ± 6.75 years. The usage was found to be more among males (67.7%) and unskilled workers (45.2%). 74.9% started using Gul to treat dental pain with 93.47% of them reporting pain relief. CONCLUSION: Gul usage is an emerging menace in Delhi. Awareness programs and initiatives are the need of the hour to bring this tobacco product under the tobacco control policy radar and at the same time educate people about the actual contents and ill effects of Gul usage.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nicotiana / Tabaco sem Fumaça / Dentifrícios Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nicotiana / Tabaco sem Fumaça / Dentifrícios Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia