Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can dedicated emergency team and area for older people reduce the hospital admission rate? - An observational pre- and post-intervention study.
Liu, Jenny; Palmgren, Therese; Ponzer, Sari; Masiello, Italo; Farrokhnia, Nasim.
Afiliação
  • Liu J; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden. jenny.liu@ki.se.
  • Palmgren T; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ponzer S; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Masiello I; Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
  • Farrokhnia N; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 115, 2021 02 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33568087
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) care of older patients is often complex. Geriatric ED guidelines can help to meet this challenge. However, training requirements, the use of time-consuming tools for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a lack of golden standard to identify the frail patients, and the weak evidence of positive outcomes of using CGA in EDs pose barriers to introduce the guidelines. Dedicating an interprofessional team of regular ED medical and nursing staff and an older-friendly ED area can be another approach. Previous studies of geriatrician-led CGA in EDs have reported a reduced hospital admission rate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a dedicated interprofessional emergency team also can reduce the hospital admission rate without the resources required by the formal use of CGA. METHODS: An observational pre-post study at a large adult ED, where all patients 80 years or older arriving on weekdays in the intervention period from 2016.09.26 to 2016.11.28 and the corresponding weekdays in the previous year from 2015.09.28 to 2015.11.30 were included. In the intervention period, older patients either received care in the geriatric module by the dedicated team or in the regular team modules for patients of mixed ages. In 2015, all patients received care in regular team modules. The primary outcome measure was the total hospital admission rate and the ED length of stay was the secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: We included 2377 arrivals in the intervention period, when 26.7% (N = 634) received care in the geriatric module, and 2207 arrivals in the 2015 period. The total hospital admission rate was 61.7% (N = 1466/2377) in the intervention period compared to 64.8% (N = 1431/2207) in 2015 (p = 0.03). The difference was larger for patients treated in the geriatric module, 51.1% compared to 62.1% (95% CI: 56.3 to 68.0%) for patients who would have been eligible in 2015. The ED length of stay was longer in the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: An interprofessional team and area dedicated to older patients was associated to a lower hospital admission rate. Further studies are needed to confirm the results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia