Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How do you feel? Using natural language processing to automatically rate emotion in psychotherapy.
Tanana, Michael J; Soma, Christina S; Kuo, Patty B; Bertagnolli, Nicolas M; Dembe, Aaron; Pace, Brian T; Srikumar, Vivek; Atkins, David C; Imel, Zac E.
Afiliação
  • Tanana MJ; Social Research Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Soma CS; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. tsoma15@gmail.com.
  • Kuo PB; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Bertagnolli NM; https://www.empathy.rocks/, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Dembe A; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Pace BT; Lyssn.io, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Srikumar V; School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Atkins DC; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Imel ZE; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Behav Res Methods ; 53(5): 2069-2082, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33754322
ABSTRACT
Emotional distress is a common reason for seeking psychotherapy, and sharing emotional material is central to the process of psychotherapy. However, systematic research examining patterns of emotional exchange that occur during psychotherapy sessions is often limited in scale. Traditional methods for identifying emotion in psychotherapy rely on labor-intensive observer ratings, client or therapist ratings obtained before or after sessions, or involve manually extracting ratings of emotion from session transcripts using dictionaries of positive and negative words that do not take the context of a sentence into account. However, recent advances in technology in the area of machine learning algorithms, in particular natural language processing, have made it possible for mental health researchers to identify sentiment, or emotion, in therapist-client interactions on a large scale that would be unattainable with more traditional methods. As an attempt to extend prior findings from Tanana et al. (2016), we compared their previous sentiment model with a common dictionary-based psychotherapy model, LIWC, and a new NLP model, BERT. We used the human ratings from a database of 97,497 utterances from psychotherapy to train the BERT model. Our findings revealed that the unigram sentiment model (kappa = 0.31) outperformed LIWC (kappa = 0.25), and ultimately BERT outperformed both models (kappa = 0.48).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Processamento de Linguagem Natural Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Processamento de Linguagem Natural Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos