Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Granulocyte and monocyte apheresis as an adjunctive therapy to induce and maintain clinical remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kiss, Szabolcs; Németh, Dávid; Hegyi, Péter; Földi, Mária; Szakács, Zsolt; Eross, Bálint; Tinusz, Benedek; Hegyi, Péter Jeno; Sarlós, Patrícia; Alizadeh, Hussain.
Afiliação
  • Kiss S; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Németh D; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Hegyi P; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Földi M; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Szakács Z; János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Eross B; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Tinusz B; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Hegyi PJ; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Sarlós P; János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Alizadeh H; Division of Haematology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
BMJ Open ; 11(5): e042374, 2021 05 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011580
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The goal of treatment in ulcerative colitis (UC) is to induce and maintain remission. The addition of granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) to conventional therapy may be a promising therapeutic alternative. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of GMA as an adjunctive therapy.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS:

We searched four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for randomised or minimised controlled trials which discussed the impact of additional GMA therapy on clinical remission induction and clinical remission maintenance compared with conventional therapy alone. Primary outcomes were clinical remission induction and maintenance, secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and steroid-sparing effect. ORs with 95% CIs were calculated. Trial Sequential Analyses were performed to adjusts for the risk of random errors in meta-analyses.

RESULTS:

A total of 11 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. GMA was clearly demonstrated to induce and maintain clinical remission more effectively than conventional therapy alone (598 patients OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.91, p=0.002, I2=0.0% for induction; 71 patients OR 8.34, 95% CI 2.64 to 26.32, p<0.001, I2=0.0% for maintenance). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of AEs (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.50, p=0.135, I2=84.2%).

CONCLUSION:

GMA appears to be more effective as an adjunctive treatment in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with UC than conventional therapy alone. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019134050.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos / Colite Ulcerativa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos / Colite Ulcerativa Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria