Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of diagnostic performance of five molecular assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Kanwar, Neena; Banerjee, Dithi; Sasidharan, Anjana; Abdulhamid, Ayah; Larson, Marissa; Lee, Brian; Selvarangan, Rangaraj; Liesman, Rachael M.
Afiliação
  • Kanwar N; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA; School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO, USA.
  • Banerjee D; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA; School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO, USA.
  • Sasidharan A; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA.
  • Abdulhamid A; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA.
  • Larson M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Lee B; School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO, USA; Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA.
  • Selvarangan R; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO, USA; School of Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA. Electronic address: rselvarangan@cmh.e
  • Liesman RM; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA. Electronic address: rliesman@kumc.edu.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(4): 115518, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481324
ABSTRACT
We compared the performance of the Abbott Real Time SARS-CoV-2 assay (Abbott assay), Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2 assay (Aptima assay), BGI Real-Time SARS-CoV-2 assay (BGI assay), Lyra® SARS-CoV-2 assay (Lyra assay), and DiaSorin Simplexa™ COVID assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Residual nasopharyngeal samples (n = 201) submitted for routine SARS-CoV-2 testing by Simplexa assay during June-July 2020 and January 2021 were salvaged. Aliquots were tested on other assays and compared against the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR assay. Viral load in positive samples was determined by droplet digital PCR. Among 201 samples, 99 were positive and 102 were negative by the CDC assay. The Aptima and Abbott assays exhibited the highest positive percent agreement (PPA) at 98.9% while the BGI assay demonstrated the lowest PPA of 89.9% with 10 missed detections. Negative percent agreement for all 5 platforms was comparable, ranging from 96.1% to 100%. The performance of all five assays was comparable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Teste para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Teste para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos