Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo.
Zuppinger, Claire; Taffé, Patrick; Burger, Gerrit; Badran-Amstutz, Wafa; Niemi, Tapio; Cornuz, Clémence; Belle, Fabiën N; Chatelan, Angeline; Paclet Lafaille, Muriel; Bochud, Murielle; Gonseth Nusslé, Semira.
Afiliação
  • Zuppinger C; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Taffé P; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Burger G; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Badran-Amstutz W; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Niemi T; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Cornuz C; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Belle FN; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Chatelan A; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Paclet Lafaille M; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bochud M; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences (HEdS-GE), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1227 Carouge, Switzerland.
  • Gonseth Nusslé S; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nutrients ; 14(3)2022 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35276994
ABSTRACT
Digital dietary assessment devices could help overcome the limitations of traditional tools to assess dietary intake in clinical and/or epidemiological studies. We evaluated the accuracy of the automated dietary app MyFoodRepo (MFR) against controlled reference values from weighted food diaries (WFD). MFR's capability to identify, classify and analyze the content of 189 different records was assessed using Cohen and uniform kappa coefficients and linear regressions. MFR identified 98.0% ± 1.5 of all edible components and was not affected by increasing numbers of ingredients. Linear regression analysis showed wide limits of agreement between MFR and WFD methods to estimate energy, carbohydrates, fat, proteins, fiber and alcohol contents of all records and a constant overestimation of proteins, likely reflecting the overestimation of portion sizes for meat, fish and seafood. The MFR mean portion size error was 9.2% ± 48.1 with individual errors ranging between -88.5% and +242.5% compared to true values. Beverages were impacted by the app's difficulty in correctly identifying the nature of liquids (41.9% ± 17.7 of composed beverages correctly classified). Fair estimations of portion size by MFR, along with its strong segmentation and classification capabilities, resulted in a generally good agreement between MFR and WFD which would be suited for the identification of dietary patterns, eating habits and regime types.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação Nutricional / Tamanho da Porção Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação Nutricional / Tamanho da Porção Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça