Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accurate classification of carotid endarterectomy indication using physician claims and hospital discharge data.
van Gaal, Stephen; Alimohammadi, Arshia; Yu, Amy Y X; Karim, Mohammad Ehsanul; Zhang, Wei; Sutherland, Jason M.
Afiliação
  • van Gaal S; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 8161-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada. stephen.vangaal@vch.ca.
  • Alimohammadi A; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 8161-2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
  • Yu AYX; Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Karim ME; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zhang W; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Sutherland JM; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 379, 2022 Mar 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35317793
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Studies of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) require stratification by symptomatic vs asymptomatic status because of marked differences in benefits and harms. In administrative datasets, this classification has been done using hospital discharge diagnosis codes of uncertain accuracy. This study aims to develop and evaluate algorithms for classifying symptomatic status using hospital discharge and physician claims data.

METHODS:

A single center's administrative database was used to assemble a retrospective cohort of participants with CEA. Symptomatic status was ascertained by chart review prior to linkage with physician claims and hospital discharge data. Accuracy of rule-based classification by discharge diagnosis codes was measured by sensitivity and specificity. Elastic net logistic regression and random forest models combining physician claims and discharge data were generated from the training set and assessed in a test set of final year participants. Models were compared to rule-based classification using sensitivity at fixed specificity.

RESULTS:

We identified 971 participants undergoing CEA at the Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, Canada) between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016. Of these, 729 met inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 615 training, n = 114 test). Classification of symptomatic status using hospital discharge diagnosis codes was 32.8% (95% CI 29-37%) sensitive and 98.6% specific (96-100%). At matched 98.6% specificity, models that incorporated physician claims data were significantly more sensitive elastic net 69.4% (59-82%) and random forest 78.8% (69-88%).

CONCLUSION:

Discharge diagnoses were specific but insensitive for the classification of CEA symptomatic status. Elastic net and random forest machine learning algorithms that included physician claims data were sensitive and specific, and are likely an improvement over current state of classification by discharge diagnosis alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Endarterectomia das Carótidas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Endarterectomia das Carótidas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá