Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Prognostic Impact of Pericardial Fluid Cytology in Malignant Pericardial Effusion.
Sezenöz, Burak; Uyar Göçün, Feriha Pinar; Kiziltunç, Emrullah; Topal, Salih; Özdemir, Hüseyin Murat.
Afiliação
  • Sezenöz B; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Uyar Göçün FP; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Kiziltunç E; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Topal S; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Özdemir HM; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Anatol J Cardiol ; 27(1): 41-46, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36680446
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Malignant pericardial effusion may affect almost 15 of the patients with underlying malignancies which deteriorates the prognosis. The prognostic significance of pericardial fluid cytology is under-represented in previous studies.

METHODS:

A total of 73 patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion treated with pericardiocentesis were included in this retrospective analysis. Macroscopic appearance, biochemical features, and cytological findings were obtained. Patients were divided into 3 groups (i) without malignancy, (ii) with malignancy and negative cytology, and (iii) with malignancy and positive cytology. Survival data were searched via governmental death notification system.

RESULTS:

Mean age of the study group was 62 ± 15, and 54% (40) of the patients were female. On the cytological evaluation, 17 patients (23.3%) revealed positive cancer cytology, whereas 56 patients (76.7%) revealed negative cancer cytology. The median follow-up period was 840 days, and 34 patients (46.5%) died during follow-up. The survival rate of Group 3 was found to be significantly worse compared to Groups 1 and 2, no statistical difference was found between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of survival (Group 1 vs. Group 2 P =.078; Group 1 vs. Group 3 P <.001; Group 2 vs. Group 3 P =.041).

CONCLUSION:

Cytological evaluation is an important step in patients with malignant pericardial effusion. Positive pericardial fluid cytology indicates a poorer prognosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Neoplasias Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Anatol J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Neoplasias Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Anatol J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article