Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis.
Wu, Jincheng; Feng, Qing; Yang, Dongmei; Xu, Hanpeng; Wen, Wangqiang; Xu, Haoxiang; Miao, Jun.
Afiliação
  • Wu J; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
  • Feng Q; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
  • Yang D; Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong, China.
  • Xu H; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
  • Wen W; The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan, China.
  • Xu H; The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  • Miao J; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, China. mj6688@163.com.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 85, 2023 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36726086
OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical characteristics of various tissue structures of different sizes of 3D printed Cage in lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: A finite element model of normal spine was reconstructed and verified. Pedicle screws and Cage of different sizes were implanted in the L4/5 segment to simulate lumbar interbody fusion. The range of motion of the fixed and cephalic adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, the stress at the interface between cage and L5 endplate, and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment of each postoperative model were larger than those of the intact model, but there was not much difference between them. The stress of cage-endplate interface was also larger than that of the intact model. However, the difference is that the stress of the endplate and the screw-rod system has a tendency to decrease with the increase of the axial area of cage. CONCLUSIONS: Cage with larger axial area in lumbar interbody fusion can reduce the stress of internal fixation system and endplate, but will not increase the range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure of adjacent segment. It has a certain effect in preventing the cage subsidence, internal fixation system failure and screw rod fracture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Parafusos Pediculares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Parafusos Pediculares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China