Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing 200,000 Breast Implants and 85,000 Patients over Four National Breast Implant Registries.
Becherer, Babette E; Hopper, Ingrid; Cooter, Rodney D; Couturaud, Benoît; von Fritschen, Uwe; Mullen, Erin; Perks, A Graeme B; Pusic, Andrea L; Stark, Birgit; Mureau, Marc A M; Rakhorst, Hinne A.
Afiliação
  • Becherer BE; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam.
  • Hopper I; Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing.
  • Cooter RD; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.
  • Couturaud B; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University.
  • von Fritschen U; Australian Society for Plastic Surgeons.
  • Mullen E; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Cancer Curie Institute.
  • Perks AGB; Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Helios-Clinic Emil von Behring.
  • Pusic AL; Plastic Surgery Foundation, American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
  • Stark B; Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.
  • Mureau MAM; Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
  • Rakhorst HA; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 152(2): 307-318, 2023 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728275
BACKGROUND: Growing awareness about breast implant-related adverse events has stimulated the demand for large, independent data resources. For this, data from breast implant registries could be combined. However, that has never been achieved yet. METHODS: Real-world data from four currently active national breast implant registries were used. All permanent breast implants from the Australian, Dutch, Swedish, and American registries were included. A subpopulation present across all registries between 2015 and 2018 was subsequently selected, including only permanent breast implants inserted during primary surgery for breast reconstruction or augmentation in patients without previous breast device surgery. Nationwide coverage, patient and implant characteristics, infection control measures, and revision incidences were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 207,189 breast implants were registered. Nationwide coverage varied between 3% and 98%. The subpopulation included 111,590 implants (7% reconstruction, 93% augmentation). Across the registries, mean patient age varied between 41 and 49 years ( P < 0.001) for reconstruction and 31 and 36 years ( P < 0.001) for augmentation. Variation was observed in implant preferences across the countries and over the years. Infection control measures were most frequently registered in Australia. Cumulative revision incidence at 2 years ranged from 6% to 16% after reconstruction and from 1% to 4% after augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, independent, national, registry-based data from four breast implant registries were combined. This is a powerful step forward in optimizing international breast implant monitoring, evidence-based decision-making, and patient safety.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mamoplastia / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article