Quality evaluation of metabolic and bariatric surgical guidelines.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
; 14: 1118564, 2023.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36967766
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To evaluate the quality of surgical guidelines on bariatric/metabolic surgery.Methods:
Four independent reviewers used the AGREE II (The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) tool to assess the methodological quality of the included guidelines and conducted a comparative analysis of the main recommendations for surgical methods of these guidelines.Results:
Nine surgical guidelines were included in this study. Five articles with AGREE II scores over 60% are worthy of clinical recommendation. The field of rigor of development was relatively low, with an average score of 50.82%. Among 15 key recommendations and the corresponding best evidence in the guidelines, only 4 key recommendations were grade A recommendations.Conclusions:
The quality of metabolic and bariatric guidelines is uneven, and there is much room for improvement.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
/
Cirurgia Bariátrica
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
China