Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock (TRPSS): A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial.
Moskowitz, Ari; Berg, Katherine M; Grossestreuer, Anne V; Balaji, Lakshman; Liu, Xiaowen; Cocchi, Michael N; Chase, Maureen; Gong, Michelle Ng; Gong, Jonathan; Parikh, Samir M; Ngo, Long; Berlin, Noa; Donnino, Michael W.
Afiliação
  • Moskowitz A; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, New York.
  • Berg KM; Bronx Center for Critical Care Outcomes and Resuscitation Research, The Bronx, New York.
  • Grossestreuer AV; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Balaji L; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Liu X; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine.
  • Cocchi MN; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Chase M; Department of Emergency Medicine, and.
  • Gong MN; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Gong J; Department of Emergency Medicine, and.
  • Parikh SM; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Ngo L; Center for Resuscitation Science.
  • Berlin N; Department of Emergency Medicine, and.
  • Donnino MW; Center for Resuscitation Science.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 208(5): 570-578, 2023 09 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364280
ABSTRACT
Rationale Kidney injury is common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with septic shock. Mitochondrial resuscitation with thiamine (vitamin B1) may attenuate septic kidney injury.

Objectives:

To assess whether thiamine supplementation attenuates kidney injury in septic shock.

Methods:

The TRPSS (Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock) trial was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of thiamine versus placebo in septic shock. The primary outcome was change in serum creatinine between enrollment and 72 hours after enrollment. Measurements and Main

Results:

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled (42 patients received the intervention, and 46 received placebo). There was no significant between-groups difference in creatinine at 72 hours (mean difference, -0.57 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval, -1.18, 0.04; P = 0.07). There was no difference in receipt of kidney replacement therapy (14.3% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.34), acute kidney injury (as defined by stage 3 of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes acute kidney injury scale; 54.7% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.07), or mortality (35.7% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.14) between the thiamine and placebo groups. Patients who received thiamine had more ICU-free days (median [interquartile range] 22.5 [0.0-25.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-23.0], P < 0.01). In the thiamine-deficient cohort (27.4% of patients), there was no difference in rates of kidney failure (57.1% thiamine vs. 81.5% placebo) or in-hospital mortality (28.6% vs. 68.8%) between groups.

Conclusions:

In the TRPSS trial, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of change in creatinine over time. Patients who received thiamine had more ICU-free days, but there was no difference in other secondary outcomes. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03550794).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Injúria Renal Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article