Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Editor's Choice - Management of Lower Extremity Venous Outflow Obstruction: Results of an International Delphi Consensus.
Black, Stephen A; Gohel, Manjit; de Graaf, Rick; Gagne, Paul; Silver, Mitchell; Fleck, Bruce; Hofmann, Lawrence V.
Afiliação
  • Black SA; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: Stephen.Black@gstt.nhs.uk.
  • Gohel M; Cambridge University Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
  • de Graaf R; Klinikum Friedrichshafen GmbH, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
  • Gagne P; Vascular Care Connecticut, Darian, CT, USA.
  • Silver M; Ohio Health, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Fleck B; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA.
  • Hofmann LV; Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 67(2): 341-350, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797931
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The endovascular treatment of venous obstruction has expanded significantly in recent years. Best practices for optimal patient outcomes are not well established and the evidence base is poor. The purpose of this study was to obtain consensus on management criteria for patients with lower extremity venous outflow obstruction.

METHODS:

The study was conducted as a two round Delphi consensus. Statements addressed imaging, symptoms and other baseline measures, differential diagnosis, treatment algorithm, indications for stenting, inflow and outflow assessment, successful procedural outcomes, post-procedure therapies and stent surveillance, and clinical success factors. Statements were prepared by six expert physicians (round 1, 40 statements) and an expanded panel of 24 physicians (round 2, 80 statements) and sent to a pre-identified group of venous experts who met qualifying criteria. A 9 point Likert scale was used and consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of respondents rating a statement between 7 and 9 (agreement) or between 1 and 3 (disagreement). Round 1 results were used to guide rewording and splitting compound statements for greater clarity in round 2.

RESULTS:

In round 1, 75 of 110 (68%) experts responded, and 91 of 121 (75%) experts responded in round 2. Round 1 achieved consensus in 32/40 (80%) statements. Consensus was not reached in the treatment algorithm section. Round 2 achieved consensus in 50/80 (62.5%). Statements reaching consensus were imaging (2/3, 66%), symptoms and other baseline measures (12/24, 50%), differential diagnosis (2/8, 25%), treatment algorithm (10/17, 59%), indications for stenting (10/10, 100%), inflow and outflow assessment (2/2, 100%), procedural outcomes (2/2, 100%), post-procedure therapies and stent surveillance, (5/7, 71%), and clinical success factors (5/7, 71%).

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrated that considerable consensus was achieved between venous experts on the optimal management of lower extremity venous outflow obstruction. There were multiple domains where consensus is lacking, highlighting important areas for further investigation and research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article