Intra-bin correction and inter-bin compensation of respiratory motion in free-running five-dimensional whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Free-running cardiac and respiratory motion-resolved whole-heart five-dimensional (5D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can reduce scan planning and provide a means of evaluating respiratory-driven changes in clinical parameters of interest. However, respiratory-resolved imaging can be limited by user-defined parameters which create trade-offs between residual artifact and motion blur. In this work, we develop and validate strategies for both correction of intra-bin and compensation of inter-bin respiratory motion to improve the quality of 5D CMR. METHODS: Each component of the reconstruction framework was systematically validated and compared to the previously established 5D approach using simulated free-running data (N = 50) and a cohort of 32 patients with congenital heart disease. The impact of intra-bin respiratory motion correction was evaluated in terms of image sharpness while inter-bin respiratory motion compensation was evaluated in terms of reconstruction error, compression of respiratory motion, and image sharpness. The full reconstruction framework (intra-acquisition correction and inter-acquisition compensation of respiratory motion [IIMC] 5D) was evaluated in terms of image sharpness and scoring of image quality by expert reviewers. RESULTS: Intra-bin motion correction provides significantly (p < 0.001) sharper images for both simulated and patient data. Inter-bin motion compensation results in significant (p < 0.001) lower reconstruction error, lower motion compression, and higher sharpness in both simulated (10/11) and patient (9/11) data. The combined framework resulted in significantly (p < 0.001) sharper IIMC 5D reconstructions (End-expiration (End-Exp) 0.45 ± 0.09, End-inspiration (End-Ins) 0.46 ± 0.10) relative to the previously established 5D implementation (End-Exp 0.43 ± 0.08, End-Ins 0.39 ± 0.09). Similarly, image scoring by three expert reviewers was significantly (p < 0.001) higher using IIMC 5D (End-Exp 3.39 ± 0.44, End-Ins 3.32 ± 0.45) relative to 5D images (End-Exp 3.02 ± 0.54, End-Ins 2.45 ± 0.52). CONCLUSION: The proposed IIMC reconstruction significantly improves the quality of 5D whole-heart MRI. This may be exploited for higher resolution or abbreviated scanning. Further investigation of the diagnostic impact of this framework and comparison to gold standards is needed to understand its full clinical utility, including exploration of respiratory-driven changes in physiological measurements of interest.