Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individualized survival prediction and surgery recommendation for patients with glioblastoma.
Zhu, Enzhao; Wang, Jiayi; Jing, Qi; Shi, Weizhong; Xu, Ziqin; Ai, Pu; Chen, Zhihao; Dai, Zhihao; Shan, Dan; Ai, Zisheng.
Afiliação
  • Zhu E; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang J; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Jing Q; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Shi W; Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Xu Z; Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
  • Ai P; School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen Z; School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
  • Dai Z; School of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Shan D; Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
  • Ai Z; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1330907, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784239
ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a lack of individualized evidence on surgical choices for glioblastoma (GBM) patients.

Aim:

This study aimed to make individualized treatment recommendations for patients with GBM and to determine the importance of demographic and tumor characteristic variables in the selection of extent of resection.

Methods:

We proposed Balanced Decision Ensembles (BDE) to make survival predictions and individualized treatment recommendations. We developed several DL models to counterfactually predict the individual treatment effect (ITE) of patients with GBM. We divided the patients into the recommended (Rec.) and anti-recommended groups based on whether their actual treatment was consistent with the model recommendation.

Results:

The BDE achieved the best recommendation effects (difference in restricted mean survival time (dRMST) 5.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.40-7.39; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77), followed by BITES and DeepSurv. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted HR, IPTW-adjusted OR, natural direct effect, and control direct effect demonstrated better survival outcomes of the Rec. group.

Conclusion:

The ITE calculation method is crucial, as it may result in better or worse recommendations. Furthermore, the significant protective effects of machine recommendations on survival time and mortality indicate the superiority of the model for application in patients with GBM. Overall, the model identifies patients with tumors located in the right and left frontal and middle temporal lobes, as well as those with larger tumor sizes, as optimal candidates for SpTR.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China