Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Formula with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets in late-moderate preterm infants: a double-blind RCT.
Kakaroukas, Andreas; Abrahamse-Berkeveld, Marieke; Hayes, Louise; McNally, Richard J Q; Berrington, Janet E; van Elburg, Ruurd M; Embleton, Nicholas D.
Afiliação
  • Kakaroukas A; Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Abrahamse-Berkeveld M; Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hayes L; Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • McNally RJQ; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Berrington JE; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • van Elburg RM; Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Embleton ND; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Pediatr Res ; 2024 Sep 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294239
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Limited evidence exists on the preferred feeding method when breastfeeding is not possible in late and moderate preterm (LMPT) infants. This RCT evaluates growth, safety, and tolerance of a concept infant formula (IF) with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets enriched in dairy lipids in LMPT infants with primary objective to demonstrate non-inferiority of daily weight gain from randomization to 3 months corrected age compared to a standard IF.

METHODS:

LMPT infants were randomized before or around term equivalent age to either the concept (n = 21) or standard IF (n = 20). Forty-one breastfed (BF) infants served as reference.

RESULTS:

Due to unintended low recruitment, non-inferiority in daily weight gain could not be demonstrated for the Concept compared to the Control group, but was compared to the BF group. Other outcomes were similar between the formula groups, except for an apparent larger head circumference gain in the Concept group. No apparent differences in growth and body composition outcomes were observed between the Concept and BF reference groups.

CONCLUSION:

This small-scale study suggests the concept IF is a safe alternative for parents who choose IF to feed their LMPT infant. Larger trials are needed to better determine impacts on head growth or body composition. IMPACT In a small group of late and moderate preterm infants, growth from randomization until 3 months corrected age of infants fed with a concept infant formula with large, milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets was not -significantly different from infants fed a standard infant formula. Infants in the Concept group had non-significant larger gain in head circumference compared to the Control group; larger trials are needed to confirm this finding. Both formulas were well-tolerated, with no differences in adverse events. The concept formula is potentially a safe alternative for parents of moderate to late preterm infants who choose to use formula milk.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article