The role of vitamins and nutrients in rosacea.

Rosacea is a common inflammatory skin condition displaying symptoms like flushing, erythema, papules, and pustules. Oral antibiotics, despite long-term adverse effects, are often used due to topical treatment limitations, underscoring the need for cost-effective choices like dietary modifications. Our review investigates the role of vitamins and minerals in rosacea, and provides evidence-based recommendations for supplementation and topical treatment of these nutrients for rosacea. An online search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1998 to 2023. Included studies were summarized and assessed for quality and relevance in rosacea management. Varied outcomes emerged concerning the impact of essential vitamins and minerals on rosacea treatment. Vitamin A derivatives, specifically oral isotretinoin, demonstrated significant efficacy, with a 90% reduction in lesions, complete remission in 24% of patients, and marked improvement in 57% of patients. Vitamin B3 derivatives, such as topical 1-methylnicotinamide 0.25% and NADH 1%, improved symptoms in 76.4% (26/34) and 80% of patients, respectively. Outcomes for vitamin D, vitamin C, and zinc supplementation varied across studies. However, zinc sulfate solution 5% significantly reduced acne rosacea severity for patients with 40% and 60% exhibiting a moderate or good response, respectively. Omega-3 fatty acids showed significant improvement in alleviating xerophthalmia in 64% of patients with ocular rosacea. Vitamins and minerals hold potential in managing rosacea symptoms, offering a safe and cost-effective alternative or adjunctive treatment option. Currently, there are no established recommendations regarding their supplementation for rosacea. Studies assessing serum levels of vitamins and minerals in relation to rosacea are warranted, as this avenue holds potential for future advancements in the field.

Targeting sebaceous glands: a review of selective photothermolysis for Acne Vulgaris treatment.

Acne vulgaris (AV), characterized by excessive sebum production and Cutibacterium acnes proliferation in the sebaceous glands, significantly impacts physical and psychological health. Recent treatment advancements have focused on selective photothermolysis of sebaceous glands. This review evaluates two innovative therapies: the 1726-nm laser and nanoparticle-assisted laser treatments. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase using the primary terms "acne vulgaris" or "acne" AND "laser," "photothermal therapy," "nanoparticles," "treatment," or "1726 nm laser." Inclusion criteria were articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals that focused on treating AV through targeting the sebaceous glands, yielding 11 studies. Gold nanoparticles, used with 800-nm laser, 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser, or photopneumatic device, and platinum nanoparticles with 1450-nm diode laser, showed notable improvements in severity and number of acne lesions, safety, and patient satisfaction. The 1726-nm laser treatments also showed considerable lesion reduction and tolerability, with minimal side effects such as erythema and edema. Its efficiency is credited to its short, high-power pulses that effectively target sebaceous glands, offering precise treatment with fewer side effects compared to lower-power pulses. Selective photothermolysis using nanoparticle-assisted laser therapy or the 1726-nm laser offers a promising alternative to conventional AV treatments, showcasing efficacy and high patient satisfaction. The 1726-nm laser streamlines treatment but involves new equipment costs, while nanoparticle-assisted therapy integrates well into existing setups but relies on external agents and is unsuitable for certain allergies. Future research should include long-term studies and comparative analyses. The choice of treatment modality should consider patient preferences, cost implications, and availability of specific therapies.

The palliative role of lasers in the treatment of melanoma.

Melanoma, accounting for a significant proportion of skin cancer-related deaths, has variable survival outcomes based on the stage at diagnosis and treatment efficacy. Traditional treatments, while effective, pose risks of scarring and systemic side effects. Laser therapy offers an emerging non-surgical alternative, with CO2 lasers particularly showing promise in palliative care.A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, focusing on laser therapy for melanoma treatment. The search included studies on both stand-alone and adjunct laser therapies, with inclusion criteria requiring peer-reviewed articles detailing treatment outcomes for primary, recurrent, or metastatic melanoma.The literature shows that laser therapy for melanoma falls into four major types when categorized by laser medium: solid-state, diode, pulse-dye, and gas (CO2). Data on solid-state lasers for melanoma are limited and their use remains controversial. However, one study with high-energy pulsed neodymium lasers reported a 5-year survival of 82.9% with minimal adverse effects for primary melanoma. CO2 laser therapy has been effective for palliative treatment, with one study showing 54.8% of patients with recurrent melanoma surviving 5.4 years post-ablation. For metastatic melanoma, numerous studies have shown that CO2 laser therapy can provide symptomatic relief and disease control. Combination therapies using lasers and immune-based therapies have demonstrated enhanced outcomes and immune activation, highlighting the potential of laser therapies in melanoma management.While traditional treatments remain the standard for primary melanoma, laser therapies, particularly CO2 laser ablation, show substantial promise in palliative care for metastatic melanoma. Careful patient selection and assessment are crucial for achieving positive outcomes.

The role of 755-nm alexandrite picosecond laser in melasma management.

Melasma is a skin dyspigmentation condition that disproportionately affects women, particularly those of Latino, Black, and Asian ethnicities, significantly impacting their quality of life. Efforts to identify effective treatment options have led to the exploration of picosecond laser technology which utilizes brief pulse durations to break down pigment while minimizing thermal damage to surrounding tissue. The 755-nm alexandrite picosecond laser, currently FDA approved for benign pigmented lesion removal, including melasma, is a promising solution. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the 755-nm alexandrite picosecond laser both as a stand-alone treatment for melasma and in combination with topical agents. We conducted a PubMed search using "755-nm picosecond" AND "melasma," "755-nm picosecond" AND "hydroquinone," and "755-nm picosecond" AND "tranexamic acid." English-written studies examining this laser as monotherapy or in combination with the topical agents were included. Those not meeting the criteria or lacking data related to melasma improvement were excluded. Monotherapy with the 755-nm picosecond laser led to a 50-75% improvement in melasma appearance in 40% of participants and a significant reduction in the average Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score (p < 0.001) in all patients of one study. Notably, the use of topical tranexamic acid (TTA) in conjunction with the picosecond laser exhibited the most significant degree of improvement in hemi-MASI scores compared to the laser monotherapy group at one- and three-months post-treatment (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was also significantly higher for the combination group (p < 0.05). In contrast, combining hydroquinone (HQ) with the picosecond laser demonstrated no significant difference in outcomes compared to HQ alone, both of which were less effective than TTA with picosecond laser. The combination of the 755-nm picosecond laser with TTA proves promising, outperforming both laser monotherapy and laser with HQ. While monotherapy with the picosecond laser or topical agents is effective, literature favors combination therapy, especially the 755-nm picosecond laser with TTA, for superior benefits and minimal side effects. Ultimately, individualized regimens, considering factors like skin type, should be prioritized, given the heightened risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, especially in skin of color patients.